The reviews for Goldwater Care Peoria Heights are highly polarized, with a clear split between strong praise from many families and very serious allegations from others. On the positive side, numerous reviewers emphasize a clean, home-like facility with compassionate, friendly staff who treat residents like family. Multiple comments single out the activities program (including organized events such as Valentine's Day) and a dedicated activities team. Several families reported that their loved ones were happier, comfortable, and showed concrete improvement in mobility and quality of life while at the facility. A number of reviews specifically praise the administrator named Karessa and describe the overall environment as warm, small, and supportive.
However, a significant set of reviews describe severe problems that raise major concerns about resident safety and quality of care. Multiple accounts allege neglect (residents left in soiled diapers for days, poor hygiene, inconsistent feeding, and missed physical therapy). There are reports of medication-related issues, including a nurse using a cell phone or playing music during medication rounds and at least one note that medications were refused by a doctor. Nutrition and dining are frequent problem areas in these negative reviews: menus not posted or not provided weekly, abrupt menu changes without nutritional detail, lack of ice for hydration, and specific concerns about inadequate diabetic nutrition.
Management, staffing, and communication emerge as recurring fault lines. Several reviews report poor leadership, conflicting administrators, and breakdowns in communication between administration and families or between departments (dietary, nursing). Understaffing is commonly cited — with allegations that staff were forced to work while COVID-positive, unpaid overtime, and pay disputes. There are also reports of removal of testing supplies, lack of personal protective equipment, and threats against staff during a COVID outbreak period; such accounts include claims that visitors were banned and that conditions became dangerous for residents and employees. These allegations coincided with mention of a health department investigation into complaints, indicating regulatory scrutiny.
Interpersonal behavior issues are another pattern: some reviewers described rude or racist conduct by staff (including a named caregiver), dishonest statements about care, and a rude receptionist or poor message-passing. At the same time, many reviewers used strongly positive language about staff being selfless, outstanding, and the nicest they have encountered. This contrast suggests either inconsistent staffing/management over time or variable experiences depending on unit, shift, or residents' needs.
Taken together, the reviews depict a facility with real strengths — a warm atmosphere, committed caregivers in many cases, cleanliness, and activities that engage residents — but also with critical and recurring operational failures that have led to neglectful conditions for some residents, serious infection-control and staffing problems, and management/communication breakdowns. The pattern suggests inconsistent care quality: prospective residents and families should be aware that experiences appear to vary widely. The presence of both glowing endorsements and grave allegations (including involvement of the health department and COVID-era safety failures) makes it important to verify current conditions directly with the facility, inspect recent inspection reports, and ask specific questions about staffing levels, infection-control policies, dietary management (especially for diabetics), medication administration protocols, and how complaints are handled.
