Overall sentiment in the reviews is predominantly positive about the living environment, amenities, activities, and management, but there are specific and consequential concerns about admissions and the facility's ability to meet certain care needs.
Facilities and apartments: Reviewers consistently describe comfortable one-bedroom apartments with attractive architectural features such as bay windows and patios. Bathrooms are noted as large and equipped with safety features, which indicates attention to resident safety and accessibility. The property also has pleasant outdoor space (a yard) that residents find enjoyable. On-site amenities mentioned include a beauty shop and regular movie screenings, which contribute to a convenient, homelike atmosphere.
Staff and management: The staff and management receive mixed but largely favorable mentions. Multiple summaries call staff kind and informative, and management is described in particularly glowing terms—"fabulous," "caring," and "knowledgeable." Reviewers emphasize that management truly cares about residents, focuses on ongoing care, and is a reason some would highly recommend the community. However, there is at least one report noting no staff interaction with a resident, suggesting variability in staff engagement or differences in individual experiences.
Care quality and admissions: A notable pattern in the reviews is that the community may not accept or be able to meet the needs of residents with certain medical conditions. Specifically, one reviewer reported being rejected due to Huntington's disease and commented that the facility did not meet their care needs and did not consider them for admission. These points indicate the Villas at St. Therese functions primarily as an independent living community and may have explicit clinical or policy-based limits on admitting people with progressive neurological conditions or higher-level care needs. Prospective residents and families should verify clinical capabilities and admission criteria up front.
Dining and activities: Dining appears flexible, with reviewers noting meal options plus the ability to self-serve or cook, which suits residents who want autonomy over meals. Activities highlighted include crafts and puzzles, as well as organized movie screenings—amenities that support socialization and engagement for independent residents.
Culture and fit: The community is identified as a Catholic-based provider. For many residents this may align with expectations and be a positive aspect, but it is an important consideration for those for whom religious affiliation is a factor in choosing a residence. Combined with the admissions and care limitations, the community seems best suited to independent older adults who are fairly self-sufficient, seek a warm and managed living environment, enjoy on-site activities and social life, and do not require specialized medical or memory care.
Bottom line: The Villas at St. Therese appears to offer comfortable apartments, useful safety features, pleasant grounds, a good range of social and personal services, and highly regarded management and much of the staff. However, there are explicit concerns about the facility's willingness or ability to admit and care for people with certain conditions (e.g., Huntington's disease) and at least one report of limited staff interaction. Prospective residents should confirm admission policies, the scope of clinical care available, and typical staff engagement levels to ensure the community is a good match for their medical and social needs.