Overall sentiment in these reviews is broadly positive, with repeated praise for staff, living spaces, amenities, dining presentation, and community atmosphere. Multiple reviewers singled out the staff as friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable, and noted that the community provides upfront information during tours. Physical facilities receive strong marks: apartments are described as nice and roomy with in-apartment laundry, the dining area is attractive and restaurant-like, and there is a swimming pool that visitors are shown on tours. Reviewers also mentioned a range of available services, exercise programs, and other activities that contribute to an inviting, community-oriented environment.
Care quality and staff: Reviewers consistently emphasize the staff as a major strength. Descriptors such as friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable appear repeatedly. The fact that tours include upfront information and pool visits was noted positively, suggesting transparency and an emphasis on showing key amenities. While reviews do not provide clinical care details, the staff-related comments indicate residents and visitors feel well attended to and welcome.
Facilities and apartments: The physical accommodations are a clear selling point. Apartments were described as roomy and looking very good, with the convenience of in-apartment laundry cited as an important feature. Shared spaces were also praised: the dining area was called lovely and restaurant-like, and the overall atmosphere was described as attractive and inviting. The presence of a swimming pool and organized pool tours reinforces the image of a community with leisure amenities and a resort-like environment.
Dining and food: Dining impressions are mixed but lean positive on presentation and service. Multiple reviewers noted restaurant-like dining and good restaurant service, and some explicitly said the food was good. However, there are recurring concerns about food quality: at least one reviewer commented that meals "could probably be better." Operational aspects of dining raised by reviewers include the community serving only two meals a day and an apparent practice of encouraging leftovers. These points may reflect a dining model that does not meet every resident's expectations for variety, portioning, or frequency.
Activities and community life: Reviewers cited organized exercise programs and other activities as part of the community offering, contributing to an inviting atmosphere. Many described the community itself as wonderful, with positive comments about people and the sense of community. The mention that the facility is "closer to their neighborhood" indicates convenience and a desirable location for some prospective residents.
Demographics, cost, and practicality: A few practical concerns appear across reviews. One notable demographic point is a smaller male resident population, which could affect social dynamics for new male residents. Cost is an explicit concern—multiple reviewers described the community as expensive or "not practical," which suggests price or value-for-money issues for some prospective residents. These financial and practical considerations are significant factors that may make the community less suitable for budget-conscious individuals.
Conclusion: In sum, Good Samaritan Society - St Martin Village is portrayed as a warm, well-staffed community with attractive apartments, in-unit conveniences, appealing common areas, and desirable amenities like a swimming pool. Dining presentation and service earn praise, even as food quality and the limited meal schedule raise concerns for some. The strong sense of community and active programming are positives, but potential residents should weigh demographic balance, dining policies, and cost. The community may suit those prioritizing staff engagement, apartment quality, and amenities, while those with higher expectations for meal variety, more frequent dining options, or greater affordability may want to probe these areas further before deciding.
