Overall sentiment in the reviews is predominantly positive, with multiple reviewers emphasizing a high level of satisfaction across care, staff, facilities, and programming. The facility is described repeatedly as very clean and welcoming, with nicely arranged and spacious rooms. Reviewers express confidence in the quality of care provided and explicitly note a lack of concerns in many cases. The small size of the community—reported as about 24 residents—is presented as part of an intimate, family-style atmosphere rather than a drawback.
Staff and care quality emerge as one of the strongest themes. Descriptors used across reviews include helpful, friendly, and cooperative staff. Several reviews indicate that families feel comfortable and confident in the care their loved ones receive. This positive staff portrayal is reinforced by mentions of attentive service and a welcoming attitude that contributes to residents' and families' sense of trust.
Facilities, cleanliness, and resident spaces are consistently praised. Multiple comments cite a very clean environment and nicely arranged spaces. Rooms are described as spacious, and reviewers highlight an overall welcoming atmosphere. On-site amenities such as a salon are noted, supporting a picture of a facility that attends to both personal care needs and resident comfort.
Dining and activities are also frequent positive points. The facility offers family-style dining, which several reviewers mention favorably. There is a robust and varied activities program: daily exercise, social activities, church services, and a full activity calendar are all specifically cited. This variety appears to support social engagement and physical well-being for residents. Transportation logistics are addressed in reviews as well, with van transportation available for doctor appointments, which is an important practical benefit for families.
However, a notable and significant concern appears across some reviews related to ownership and management. Several summaries reference the owners' criminal record and explicitly raise questions about the owner's qualifications. These mentions create explicit safety concerns regarding care for some reviewers. While the majority of comments about daily operations, staff, and resident life are positive, these management-related issues are serious and stand out as the principal negative theme in the review set.
In summary, the reviews paint Field of Dreams Assisted Living as a small, clean, and welcoming facility with good staff, comfortable rooms, a full slate of activities, family-style dining, and useful transportation services. These strengths contribute to a generally favorable impression and apparent confidence in day-to-day caregiving. That said, the reported concerns about ownership history and qualifications introduce a meaningful caveat that prospective residents and their families should not ignore. Because these management-level issues relate to safety and oversight, anyone considering this facility would be prudent to ask direct questions of management, review licensing and background information, and seek clarification about how ownership matters affect staff oversight and resident safety.
