Overall sentiment is predominantly positive about Hillcrest Living Campus, with repeated praise for the direct caregivers, the facility’s cleanliness, and the comfortable, home-like environment. Many reviewers emphasize that CNAs and other frontline staff are compassionate and attentive; several describe the atmosphere as family-like and warm. The building and grounds receive strong marks: the facility is described as very clean and sanitary with a pleasant smell, tiled floors, spacious rooms, an easy-to-navigate layout, and a large outdoor area with a gazebo. The campus model offering a range of living arrangements—from skilled nursing up to independent apartments—is noted as a strength, and multiple reviewers explicitly state they would recommend Hillcrest for care or family referrals.
Care quality and staffing present a mixed but largely positive picture. Numerous comments highlight caring, compassionate care and continuity from staff, and specific staff members (notably a social worker named Dawn) are singled out for exceptional support. CNAs receive consistent, high praise for their hands-on care. However, a number of serious concerns appear in other reviews: reports of understaffing, instances of unprofessional behavior (gossip and harassment), and at least one account of delayed call-light response times exceeding 20 minutes. One reviewer alleges that the Director of Nursing (DON) was a witness to problematic behavior without intervening. These negative reports create a notable contrast to the many positive experiences and suggest variability in staff behavior and response times that could affect resident experience.
Facility and environment impressions are strongly positive, emphasizing cleanliness, pleasant odors, spaciousness, and safety. Reviewers repeatedly describe the campus as quiet, warm, and home-like—with architecture and communal areas that support a family-like atmosphere. The outdoor space and gazebo are highlighted as valuable amenities. Ease of navigation and overall sanitation (tiled floors described as sanitary) are recurring positives that reinforce impressions of good environmental care.
Dining and food receive mixed feedback. Some reviewers say the food is great and contributes to a home-like feeling; others explicitly call the food terrible. This split suggests inconsistency in dining quality or differences in personal expectation. Potential causes could include menu variability, staffing in dining services, or differing dietary needs and tastes among residents.
Management and workplace culture show conflicting signals across reviews. Several reviewers report no complaints about administration or care and recommend the community, while others describe a toxic environment for staff, unprofessional conduct, and concerns about leadership response. The mention of part-time staffing and staff continuity in different reviews indicates staffing patterns that may be working well for some families but raising concerns for others. These mixed management reports point to inconsistencies in culture or supervision across shifts or units.
Notable patterns and recommendations: the most frequently mentioned strengths are the frontline caregivers (CNAs and compassionate staff), cleanliness, and the campus’s comfortable, family-like environment. The most significant concerns are staff-related problems (toxic behavior, gossip), understaffing, and slow call-light responses in at least one report. Prospective residents and families should weigh the strong positive reports about direct care and environment against the sporadic but serious operational and culture issues. If considering Hillcrest, ask for specifics about staffing levels, shift continuity, call-light response protocols, and dining menus, and inquire about how management addresses staff complaints and incidents (including any follow-up practices for concerns involving leadership such as the DON). Additionally, speaking directly with current families or arranging a visit during different times of day may help reveal whether the positive experiences or the negative reports are more representative of day-to-day operations.







