Overall sentiment in the reviews is mixed but leans positive: several reviewers emphasize a clean, well kept and comfortable home-like environment with friendly, attentive staff and good meals. Many specifics recur across reviews: the facility is described as a beautiful house with private rooms equipped with a bed and TV, an outdoor patio and large backyard, and a welcoming atmosphere. Multiple reviewers explicitly state they would recommend the home and express gratitude for the care provided. One staff member (Morris) is singled out by name for being particularly attentive and patient.
Care quality is a major theme with divergent reports. A number of reviews describe top-notch, attentive care and a nurturing environment where residents are comfortable and enjoy the meals. These reviewers highlight staff friendliness, the patient demeanor of caregivers, and overall high-quality care that inspired confidence and recommendations. However, there is a serious negative report describing substandard care for one resident: development of bedsores and an episode where the resident was left in a wet diaper for hours. That review explicitly attributes problems to insufficient caregiver training. Importantly, that reviewer notes the bedsores resolved after the resident moved to a different home, which indicates the adverse outcome was tied to care at this facility rather than the resident's baseline condition. The presence of both strong positive and severe negative accounts points to variability in care quality and reliability.
Staff and management impressions are also mixed but generally positive. Several reviewers praise the staff as friendly, kind, and attentive, and one review calls out the owner as kind. The named positive mention of a staff member (Morris) suggests there are caregivers who deliver consistently good service. At the same time, multiple summaries signal inconsistency: "some caregivers kind" versus "care substandard" and "caregiver training insufficient". This pattern suggests that while management and certain staff members provide excellent care, there may be gaps in training, oversight, or staffing consistency that can produce isolated but serious failures in care.
Facilities, amenities, and atmosphere are consistently praised. Reviewers repeatedly describe the home as beautiful, well maintained, clean, and comfortable. Private rooms with beds and TVs, outdoor spaces like a patio and a large backyard, and a welcoming house-like environment are clear strengths. These elements contribute to resident satisfaction and are cited alongside positive reports about meals and the social atmosphere.
Dining and activities receive generally favorable remarks but with a notable dietary gap. Meals are described as good with variety, and several reviewers mention that residents enjoy the food. There are occasional entertainment offerings and birthday celebrations, which contribute to a sense of community. A specific downside in this area is that vegan dietary accommodation is lacking, indicating limited flexibility for plant-based diets and a potential area for improvement if a prospective resident requires that accommodation.
In summary, Good Nurses Assisted Living appears to offer a warm, clean, and well-appointed home with many caregivers who are caring and attentive, good meals, and pleasant outdoor spaces. The most significant concern raised is variability in care quality, including at least one report of neglectful practices that led to bedsores and inadequate incontinence care; that review also alleges insufficient caregiver training. These contrasting accounts produce an overall picture of a facility with many genuine strengths but with important risks tied to staff training and consistency. Prospective residents and families should weigh the generally positive environment, facilities, and testimonials of excellent care against the documented incident(s) of substandard care, and may want to ask management about staffing consistency, training protocols, and how dietary restrictions (such as veganism) are handled before making a decision.
