Pricing ranges from
    $3,500 – 6,500/month

    Belmont Village Senior Living Cardiff by the Sea

    3535 Manchester Ave, Cardiff, CA, 92007
    4.5 · 92 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    4.0

    Beautiful community, pricey with issues

    I toured the place and overall I'm very impressed - it's a beautiful, modern, immaculately kept community with outstanding amenities (gorgeous pool, huge gym, library, lots of activities and programs) and friendly, attentive staff. The dining is generally excellent and residents seem engaged and well cared for. Major caveats: it's very expensive (large buy-in/deposit), some apartments are small, the neighborhood/location isn't great, and I've noticed occasional short-staffing, turnover and administrative hiccups. If you can afford it, I would recommend it.

    Pricing

    $3,500+/moStudioAssisted Living
    $4,500+/mo1 BedroomAssisted Living
    $6,500+/mo2 BedroomAssisted Living

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Pet friendly
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination
    • Swimming pool

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    4.52 · 92 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.4
    • Staff

      4.5
    • Meals

      4.2
    • Amenities

      4.2
    • Value

      2.6

    Pros

    • Upscale, hotel-like decor and resort-like atmosphere
    • Extremely clean and exceptionally well maintained
    • Compassionate, friendly and attentive staff and nurses
    • Robust, varied and engaging activities program (lectures, music, games, crafts, movies)
    • Chef-prepared dining with changing menus and social dining experience
    • Extensive amenities (swimming pool, gym/exercise room, library, rec rooms, courtyards, gardens)
    • Multiple apartment options and sizes, including spacious two-bedroom units (~1000 sq ft)
    • In-unit conveniences in many units (washer/dryer, kitchenettes with stove/oven/full refrigerator)
    • Integrated independent, assisted and memory-care options; age-in-place and hospice support
    • Transportation, outings and mobile physician services provided
    • Pet-friendly policy
    • 24/7 nursing presence in some areas and knowledgeable clinical staff
    • Responsive management to resident suggestions (in many reviews)
    • Safe, bright, social environment with easy visitor access and a small-community feel
    • Strong demand and waitlist, indicating popularity

    Cons

    • High cost, large buy-in/deposit and ongoing expense (price often deemed unaffordable)
    • Short-staffing and high staff turnover causing service gaps
    • Long wait times for calls, canceled activities, and reduced housekeeping when shorthanded
    • Inconsistent food quality and menu/staff changes affecting dining experience
    • Extra charges for many services and occasional billing/vendor administrative problems
    • Limited or restricted access to some amenities for memory-care residents
    • Visitor parking, sign-in procedures and single-direction exits create logistical hassles
    • Some units are smaller than expected or larger than desired depending on preference
    • Occasional lapses in laundry/linen and room-cleaning services
    • Quarantine policies or communication about them seen as unclear by some families
    • Remodeling or institutional feel at times; some find the surrounding location unattractive
    • Some residents report boredom or few people around in certain areas
    • Third floor lacks outdoor access in at least one report
    • Elevator layout/confusing navigation reported by some visitors

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment across the reviews of Belmont Village Cardiff by the Sea is strongly positive, with frequent praise for the facility's upscale, hotel-like environment, high standards of cleanliness, and extensive amenities. Many reviewers describe a resort-like, bright and airy atmosphere with tasteful decor, wide hallways, and well-maintained grounds. The physical plant regularly cited as a major strength includes a swimming pool, gym/exercise room, game and rec rooms, library, courtyards and outdoor gardens, plus multiple social spaces. Apartment offerings are varied, spanning studios through spacious two-bedroom units (reported around 1,000 sq ft), and many units feature in-unit washer/dryer and well-equipped kitchenettes. A consistent theme is that the building and apartments feel modern, comfortable and thoughtfully laid out for independent and assisted living residents alike.

    Care quality and staff performance elicit mixed-but-overall-positive comments. A large number of reviewers emphasize compassionate, respectful, and attentive staff and nursing teams, noting that staff often know residents' names, provide emotional support, and help residents make friends and remain engaged. Several reviews specifically highlight strong nursing support (including RNs noted for diabetes management and clinical responsiveness), hospice support, and an age-in-place model that gives families confidence. At the same time, staffing challenges appear repeatedly: reports of high turnover, short-staffing, and overworked caregivers lead to longer wait times for calls, canceled activities or church runs, occasional lapses in housekeeping and laundry, and frustration during holidays or busy periods. Many reviewers still say the staff 'go above and beyond' despite these pressures, while others report experiences of unresponsiveness in specific instances.

    Dining and activities are major draws. Multiple reviews praise chef-prepared meals, social dining, and a changing menu with alternatives and fixed-menu options for residents who prefer them. Some families say the food is excellent and variety is strong; others report inconsistencies after staff or cook changes and occasional bland lunches. The activities program is frequently lauded as robust and creative: daily exercise classes, lectures by retired professionals, live entertainment, movie nights, music programs, puzzles and games (Circle of Friends), crafts, cultural programming, and resident-run groups. Transportation and curated outings, as well as on-site services like mobile physician visits and computer classes, are highlighted as valuable. A few comments note that some activity leaders (for example, yoga led by staff) may not be professionally trained, and that some residents still feel bored or that certain areas have fewer participants.

    Management, communication and administrative issues show a split pattern. Many reviewers praise responsive management who address concerns and implement suggestions, and describe a smooth move-in process and supportive tours. Conversely, recurring criticisms include poor communication around billing or vendor relations, unpaid invoice/payment processing problems, lack of clear information at booking, and the perception that some services draw extra fees. Some families reported a drop in compassion or quality tied to staffing churn and the feeling that the place is increasingly 'expensive for what you get.' Sign-in procedures for visitors and parking constraints are repeatedly mentioned as inconvenient, and the single-direction exit/visitor parking bottlenecks are noted as practical drawbacks.

    Memory care and specialized services receive overall favorable notes but with caveats. The memory-care units are described as beautiful and dignified, with engaging activities and sensitive staff. There is mention of memory-care day programming up to seven hours per day and creative, therapeutic activities. However, several reviews indicate that memory-care residents may have limited access to some general amenities and outdoor spaces; families should clarify specific access policies. Also, demand is high and a waitlist exists, which both speaks to the program's appeal and creates availability hurdles.

    Cost and value considerations are prominent. Many reviewers explicitly state that Belmont Village is pricey, with a significant buy-in or deposit and higher monthly fees versus alternatives. Several reviewers nonetheless conclude the cost is justified by the quality of the facility, range of services, and staff, while others found it unaffordable despite liking the place. Renovations and remodeling are mentioned in a few reviews and can temporarily limit amenity access. Small logistical complaints—elevator confusing at first, some bathroom layouts that require bedroom access, third-floor outdoor limitations—are minor but repeatedly cited.

    In summary, Belmont Village Cardiff by the Sea is consistently described as a high-end, well-maintained senior living community with strong dining, a lively activities calendar, comprehensive amenities, and many compassionate caregivers. Its integrated care model, social programming, and resort-like environment attract high demand. Potential residents and families should weigh these strengths against the community's premium cost and be mindful to ask specific questions about staffing levels, housekeeping/linen policies, billing practices, memory-care access to amenities, visitor logistics, and how temporary staffing/renovation challenges are managed. For families prioritizing cleanliness, robust programming, and an upscale environment, reviewers frequently recommend Belmont Village—while advising prospective residents to budget for the higher price and to verify operational details during peak seasons or staffing transitions.

    Location

    Map showing location of Belmont Village Senior Living Cardiff by the Sea

    About Belmont Village Senior Living Cardiff by the Sea

    Belmont Village Senior Living Cardiff by the Sea sits on coastal bluffs with views of the Pacific and rolling sand, and you'll find the building's got a Craftsman-inspired style, lush grounds, and extras like solar panels and water-saving landscaping, while inside there are welcoming gathering spaces, a technology center, arts and crafts room, full-service salon, on-site fitness center with a physical therapist, and even a heated outdoor pool. The community is licensed for the highest level of care, so couples with different needs can live together, whether they need independent living, assisted living, memory care, or short-term respite stays, and you'll find 24/7 licensed nurses and staff trained for memory impairment, diabetic care, and medication management. Studio and one-bedroom apartments are available, and every home includes Wi-Fi, housekeeping, and access to services like bathing, dressing, grooming, laundry, transportation, parking, and a 24-hour concierge. Meals are chef-prepared with many daily choices and restaurant-style service at Josephine's Kitchen, plus there's a bistro, outdoor dining terrace, and a focus on health and nutrition.

    Belmont Village puts a strong focus on helping residents stay active and engaged as needs change, with the Circle of Friends memory support and a dedicated Memory Care Neighborhood, making sure those living with Alzheimer's or other forms of dementia have the support they need. There are physical, speech, and occupational therapy services available on-site, and the Whole Brain Fitness Lifestyle program, based on research and university partnerships, helps residents work on mind and body wellness through scheduled events, exercise classes, and social programs. Residents have many options for outings, as there's free scheduled transportation, and the community sits near shops, beaches, supermarkets, birdwatching trails, and local restaurants. Activities like movie screenings in the screening room, community events, and pet-friendly apartments aim to support both social and personal interests. Belmont Village opened in 1997, operates in both the US and Mexico City, and keeps its state licensing current. The staff, from caregivers and nurses to food servers, chefs, executive leadership, and marketing support, all follow high professional standards so residents get the right support, whether that means help with meals, memory care, full skilled nursing, or simply enjoying daily life in a safe and stable community.

    About Belmont Village Senior Living

    Belmont Village Senior Living Cardiff by the Sea is managed by Belmont Village Senior Living.

    Belmont Village Senior Living (Est. 1997, Houston, TX) operates 34+ luxury communities nationwide offering assisted living, memory care, and independent living. Founded by Patricia Will, the company emphasizes quality over quantity with 24/7 licensed nursing, evidence-based programs through academic partnerships with USC/UCLA.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    42

    Inspections

    1

    Type A Citations

    4

    Type B Citations

    6

    Years of reports

    18 Jun 2024
    Found no deficiencies identified during the annual inspection; observed clean, sanitary, and well-maintained spaces, safe equipment, adequate food supplies, functioning alarms, and secured confidential records.
    17 Jun 2024
    Conducted an unannounced annual review, reviewed the file, toured the site with the building engineer, and reviewed staff and resident records; found no deficiencies and noted a follow-up visit is needed to complete the annual process.
    18 Jun 2024
    Confirmed no deficiencies during the annual inspection visit; facility found to be in compliance with all licensing regulations.
    17 Jun 2024
    Conducted unannounced annual inspection. No deficiencies cited during visit. Additional visit needed to complete inspection.
    25 Apr 2024
    Amended a prior evaluation, discussed changes with the executive director, who agreed to remove copies of the old version; no deficiencies were found.
    06 Feb 2024
    Identified two medication administration errors by staff that led to one resident receiving an extra dose of a blood thinner and another resident receiving a medication not prescribed to them; no adverse health effects occurred. Flagged one deficiency and issued one technical violation.
    25 Apr 2024
    Amended a prior evaluation report with no deficiencies observed or cited during the visit.
    06 Feb 2024
    Confirmed two medication errors occurred due to staff errors, resulting in incorrect medication administration to residents without adverse health consequences.
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    30 Jan 2024
    Found no evidence to support the claim that infection-control practices for scabies outbreaks were ignored, with records showing a 2023 outbreak was treated, a 2024 suspected case treated, staff trained, and outside sources confirming adherence to public health guidance. Found no evidence of bed bug activity, as room inspections showed none, pest-control records indicated none, and residents did not corroborate pests. Overall, the information gathered did not support the allegations.
    30 Jan 2024
    Investigated allegations of improper infection control for scabies and lack of pest treatment; determined no substantial evidence to support claims.
    17 Oct 2023
    Found that staff meet residents' hygiene needs and respond to call buttons; delays occurred when staff were out, and some residents pressed the call button for less important needs, which can slow responses.
    17 Oct 2023
    Staff were found to be meeting residents' hygiene needs and responding to call buttons, with allegations of neglect unsubstantiated.
    29 Aug 2023
    Found that despite reports of multiple falls and injuries, interviews and records did not demonstrate neglect or lack of supervision; the evidence did not support the allegation.
    29 Aug 2023
    Determined that the allegation of neglect and lack of supervision leading to a resident's injuries was not supported by sufficient evidence; concluded that the resident often did not use available assistance, contributing to falls.
    21 Apr 2023
    Found that the allegation that staff restrained a resident in a wheelchair was unfounded; interviews and records showed the caregiver was hired by the resident’s family from a private agency, not by the setting, and appropriate agencies were notified.
    21 Apr 2023
    Found that the allegation of facility staff restraining a resident in a wheelchair was unfounded, as the caregiver responsible was privately hired by the resident's family.
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    19 Jan 2023
    Found no deficiencies after a brief tour and a resident interview during an unannounced collateral visit, and an exit interview was conducted.
    19 Jan 2023
    Confirmed no deficiencies during visit and interviewed resident.
    12 Aug 2022
    Found that COVID-19 infection control measures were in place, including centralized entry screening, routine symptom checks for staff and visitors, visitor sign-in, posted hygiene and physical distancing reminders, PPE availability, and a designated visitation area; no deficiencies observed.
    12 Aug 2022
    Confirmed no deficiencies observed during inspection, facility in compliance with infection control practices.
    13 Jan 2022
    Determined that a resident's personal belongings were mishandled when moving to a higher level of care, with an eyewitness report indicating the furniture was moved outside and discarded during the transition despite conflicting staff accounts. Noted that there was no evidence to support the allegations of a pressure injury or financial abuse.
    • § 87468.1(a)(12)
    13 Jan 2022
    Confirmed mishandling of resident's belongings during move to new living arrangement, substantiated pressure injury allegation, unsubstantiated financial abuse claim.
    17 Dec 2021
    Found no deficiencies after on-site review of mitigation measures, including disinfection, testing, vaccination, screening, and PPE. A debriefing with leadership concluded the visit.
    17 Dec 2021
    Reviewed visit found no deficiencies.
    19 Aug 2021
    Found the December 2019 allegations that residents' needs were not met, rooms were not sanitary, and incontinence care was not adequately provided unsubstantiated; records showed an average nine-minute call-response time, clean rooms, and no concerns with incontinence care.
    19 Aug 2021
    Confirmed allegations of not meeting resident needs, maintaining room sanitation, and assisting with incontinence care in December 2019 were unsubstantiated based on evidence from interviews and records.
    13 Aug 2021
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not administer medications as prescribed. Identified information leading to a technical advisory about how medications should be administered.
    13 Aug 2021
    Found that on January 29, 2020, a resident with agitation and aggression was not offered the prescribed PRN (as-needed) medication, despite the dosing chart allowing up to four doses in 24 hours. Records and interviews showed the resident was present at the residence during the incident and that 911 was called after the situation escalated, with a similar December 2019 episode where PRN was given.
    13 Aug 2021
    Confirmed concerns of medication administration not being done according to prescribed instructions.
    12 Aug 2021
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced required 1-year visit; records were reviewed and all staff had current criminal background clearances, while residents were observed and infection-control measures—including disinfection, testing surveillance, screening protocols, and PPE—were in place. An exit interview was conducted.
    12 Aug 2021
    Conducted unannounced visit, observed residents and staff, no deficiencies noted.
    06 Jul 2021
    Identified an allegation from a prior complaint dated December 20, 2019 during an unannounced site visit; access was gained and information exchanged.
    20 Dec 2019
    Found that cleaning supplies were accessible to dementia residents due to an unlocked storage area, confirming the stated allegation.
    • § 87705(f)(1)
    06 Jul 2021
    Confirmed allegations from a previous visit were addressed during an unannounced visit by licensing officials.
    21 Apr 2021
    Investigated an allegation that a resident sustained an injury on February 22, 2021 and reported it to a family member; found no deficiencies.
    21 Apr 2021
    Confirmed self-reported incident, conducted virtual visit, interviewed staff, no deficiencies cited.
    • § 87465(d)
    30 Dec 2020
    Conducted an on-site visit to provide technical assistance and assess mitigation measures, including disinfection, testing surveillance, screening protocols, and PPE. Interviewed staff and conducted a walk-through of Memory Care areas; no deficiencies were issued.
    30 Dec 2020
    No deficiencies were identified during the visit and the facility received technical assistance on infection control protocols.
    12 Aug 2020
    Confirmed that a staff member was present at the facility without an approved criminal record exemption, leading to their immediate removal.
    28 Jan 2020
    Confirmed allegations of staff neglecting to seek timely medical attention for a resident with serious injuries and failing to address care needs after an observed change of condition. The Department is considering issuing an Enhanced Civil Penalty.
    20 Dec 2019
    Identified unlocked supply storage with accessible cleaning supplies in memory care areas.
    11 Oct 2019
    Identified inconsistencies in statements and documentation, with findings ultimately deemed unsubstantiated.

    Nearby Communities

    • Entrance sign for La Vida Del Mar with a Mediterranean-style building, palm trees, driveway and blue sky.
      $4,500 – $6,300+4.7 (42)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living

      La Vida Del Mar

      850 Del Mar Downs Rd, Solana Beach, CA, 92075
    • An elderly woman in a red sweater walking arm-in-arm with a man in a suit along a pathway leading to the entrance of a building with the number 1440 above the doorway. The building has a tiled roof, white columns, and is surrounded by palm trees and landscaped gardens with flowers.
      $3,900 – $5,850+4.4 (63)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom
      assisted living, memory care

      Aegis Living Shadowridge

      1440 S Melrose Dr, Oceanside, CA, 92056
    • Brick-paved entrance to a senior living building with double doors set in a stone facade, a balcony above, and potted plants flanking the entry.
      $2,850+4.5 (244)
      suite
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Alta Vista Senior Living

      2041 W Vista Way, Vista, CA, 92083
    • Photo of Las Villas Del Norte
      $3,500+4.0 (223)
      suite
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Las Villas Del Norte

      1325 Las Villas Way, Escondido, CA, 92026
    • Exterior view of Oakmont of Pacific Beach, a beige multi-story assisted living and memory care facility with palm trees lining the sidewalk and a large sign displaying the facility name and address number 955.
      $5,095 – $6,895+4.4 (53)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Pacific Beach

      955 Grand Ave, San Diego, CA, 92109
    • Exterior view of a modern multi-story residential building with balconies and large windows, surrounded by palm trees and parked cars along the street during dusk.
      $5,500 – $7,800+4.6 (80)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      continuing care retirement community

      Merrill Gardens at Bankers Hill

      2567 Second Ave, San Diego, CA, 92103

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 56 facilities$5,698/mo
    2. 77 facilities$5,684/mo
    3. 70 facilities$5,674/mo
    4. 31 facilities$5,545/mo
    5. 69 facilities$5,617/mo
    6. 157 facilities$5,339/mo
    7. 159 facilities$5,452/mo
    8. 163 facilities$5,320/mo
    9. 189 facilities$5,209/mo
    10. 161 facilities$5,239/mo
    11. 206 facilities$5,312/mo
    12. 201 facilities$5,628/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living