The reviews present a clearly divided picture of Solange at Golf Course Assisted Living, with strong positives reported by some and serious concerns raised by others. On one side, multiple comments highlight a well-maintained, pleasant facility with staff who are described as attentive and caring. At least one reviewer gave a 5/5 overall rating and stated they were happy with the service. Physical aspects of the building are repeatedly praised: reviewers describe it as nice, modern, homey, and clean, with a pleasant aroma. The community’s women-only character is explicitly noted and could be a positive attribute for prospective residents seeking that environment.
Despite these favorable notes, several reviews raise substantive and recurring concerns about quality of life and day-to-day care. Activities are described as extremely limited — one review explicitly says activities are essentially limited to coloring — which many would interpret as insufficient stimulation or social engagement for residents. Dining quality is another frequent complaint: food is characterized as frozen or unappetizing, suggesting problems with meal preparation, menu variety, or food service standards.
Staffing and care delivery show a mixed but concerning pattern. While staff are called attentive and nice in some accounts, other reviewers report being understaffed at night, with a single caregiver responsible for the entire house overnight. That staffing detail raises safety and responsiveness concerns for families and residents, particularly for those who require frequent nighttime assistance. There is a notable tension between individual caregiver behavior (often described positively) and structural staffing/coverage issues that could affect overall care consistency.
Management and organizational priorities are another recurring theme. Several reviewers perceive management as primarily money-focused, and some state that resident well-being is neglected as a result. The language used includes residents feeling “stuck,” which implies limited options for residents or families who are unhappy with care or conditions. These comments point to potential problems with leadership responsiveness, transparency, or willingness to address complaints.
Taken together, the pattern in the reviews is polarized: the facility’s physical attributes and pockets of strong, attentive staff performance earn praise, but systemic issues — limited activities, poor meal quality, nighttime understaffing, and perceptions of profit-driven management — produce significant dissatisfaction for other reviewers. Prospective residents and families should weigh the pleasant facility environment and reported cases of good care against the reported limitations in programming, dining, and overnight staffing. If considering Solange, important due diligence steps would include asking specific questions about activity programming and frequency, meal preparation and menu options, exact staffing ratios (especially at night), and how management responds to resident or family concerns.
