Overall sentiment across the reviews is predominantly positive, with frequent and consistent praise for the staff, dining, living spaces, and social programming. Many reviewers describe a warm, family-like community where staff are helpful, cheerful, and willing to go the extra mile. Specific staff members receive individual recognition—Director Allyson is mentioned repeatedly for organized crisis response and strong leadership, and a social worker named Cory is also praised—underscoring a pattern of personal, responsive care from employees. Several accounts describe staff actions that went beyond routine duties, such as coordinating between facilities, supporting residents through health crises, and creating a welcoming environment.
The facility's apartments and physical amenities earn high marks. Multiple reviews highlight spacious units (including a roughly 1,000-square-foot two-bedroom model with a den, sun deck, and covered garage), in-unit washer/dryer hookups, full kitchens, ample storage, walk-in closets, and multiple bathrooms in larger units. Common areas are described as clean, bright, and well-maintained, and the overall upkeep and maintenance are called "superb" by more than one reviewer. Recreational amenities are robust: a recreation center, exercise classes, crafts and card rooms, billiards, a library, and a workout room are all mentioned, along with organized outings and a community bus that help keep residents engaged and socially active.
Dining is a prominent strength in many reviews. The kitchen staff receives strong, repeated praise for delicious meals—some reviewers call it the best in the area—and there are mentions of free continental breakfast and meals provided (typically breakfast and lunch in some reports). At the same time, there is variability in how meals are handled: a few reviews note that some units or plans do not include meals and instead use flexible, pay-per-meal pricing. A small number of reviewers also reported only one meal offered or that meals are not included in their plan, so prospective residents should clarify meal arrangements and pricing up front. A minor operational shortcoming reported by multiple reviewers is that the gathering room is not equipped with ovens, which affected some group cooking or event expectations.
Activities and the social environment are consistent highlights. Reviewers frequently note the breadth and quality of on-site activities—exercise classes, games, Bible discussion groups, church services, and organized outings—contributing to a strong sense of community and routine. Many residents report active social lives, friends at meal times, and high levels of satisfaction with programming. Several reviews specifically emphasize that the independent living portion of the campus is lively and well-suited for seniors who are looking for social engagement rather than full assisted care.
Concerns and negative patterns are less frequent but important to note. A subset of reviews raises issues with management or administration—examples include reports of condescending management behavior and broader administration issues that reviewers say affected care continuity. There are also reports that the quality of care declined in the assisted living section, with staff being seen as fine but administrative oversight lacking. Some reviewers express worries about the adequacy of supportive services and resident safety, suggesting that the facility may be stronger on independent living and social programming than on higher-acuity care. Cost is another pain point: a few reviewers described rents as high or exorbitant. Finally, a handful of comments point to modest unit finishes in older apartments (such as old carpet) despite otherwise strong unit features in many newer or larger apartments.
In summary, Good Samaritan Society - Fox Run Senior Living is generally presented as a bright, well-maintained community with excellent staff, strong dining in many cases, plentiful activities, and spacious, well-equipped apartments for those in independent living. The dominant themes are compassionate and proactive staff, a family-like atmosphere, robust programming, and very positive impressions of the kitchen and social life. Prospective residents and families should, however, verify specifics around meal plans and costs, ask detailed questions about supportive services and assisted-living care if that level of support is needed, and consider touring multiple unit types to assess finishes and layout. The reviews suggest an overall solid choice for independent seniors seeking an active community, with the caveat to clarify administrative practices and care levels if you anticipate needing higher-acuity services.
