Chandler Place

    3701 Chandler Drive, Saint Anthony, MN, 55421
    4.1 · 44 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousCurrent/former resident
    4.0

    Caring staff, social life, caveats

    I had a very positive experience overall. The staff were warm, caring, and responsive, activities are plentiful, and the community felt welcoming - nursing coordinated outside medical care and respite helped with recovery. Apartments and grounds are well-maintained with indoor parking and a village-like feel, but units can be small, one-bedrooms are limited, some are far from elevators/dining and lack in-unit laundry. Dining is generally good with varied choices, though some meals were salty/overcooked and there are extra charges that push the price up. Availability and communication were sometimes poor, so I'd recommend it for the caring staff and social life but confirm costs, apartment location, and meal quality before moving in.

    Pricing

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    4.14 · 44 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.0
    • Staff

      4.2
    • Meals

      3.6
    • Amenities

      3.8
    • Value

      2.9

    Pros

    • Caring, friendly and attentive staff
    • Good coordination with outside medical services (OT/PT, doctor referrals)
    • Clean, well-maintained common areas and apartments
    • Strong social community with many activities and clubs
    • Excellent or very good dining for many residents
    • Independent-living apartments with access to higher levels of care
    • Spacious apartment options and some full kitchens
    • Housekeeping and laundry services provided regularly
    • Free or convenient on-floor laundry in some units
    • Amenities like fountain, walking path, garden plots and exercise room
    • Welcoming, village-like lobby and communal spaces
    • Transportation services and easy parking/drop-off
    • Respite and short-term trial stays available and effective
    • Low staff turnover reported by some reviewers
    • Staff engage residents personally (greeting by name, reducing loneliness)
    • Active volunteer opportunities and resident-led programs
    • Community dining plus cafeteria/à la carte options
    • Reasonable pricing on some units; some apartments described as inexpensive
    • Separate memory-care dining area
    • Continuous care community (availability of assisted care if needed)
    • Many residents recommend or would refer family/friends
    • Relief and good recovery reported after short-term stays
    • On-site receptionist and nursing support available
    • Community offers religious services (e.g., Catholic priest visits)
    • New improvements and renovations planned in some apartments

    Cons

    • Extra fees charged for numerous services and add-ons
    • Occasional short-staffing and slow response to resident needs
    • Communication lapses and poor coordination with hospitals reported
    • Limited availability; waiting lists and perceived bait-and-switch practices
    • Variable dining issues (overcooked meals, salty food, inconsistent service)
    • Incidents of food mishandling/cleaning lapses in dining/storage areas
    • Some aides initially idle or unfriendly in specific cases
    • Facility can feel too large, institutional, or not ‘homey’ to some
    • Older building in places with dark decor and smaller rooms
    • Some apartments are smaller or farther from elevators/dining rooms
    • No in-unit laundry in many units
    • Higher costs for higher levels of care; overall expense can be high
    • Renovation disruptions (equipment/air conditioners left around)
    • Unclear meal schedules and occasional inconsistency in service
    • Parking/location not ideal for all; some find it too far from city
    • Insufficient personalized attention for very high-need residents
    • Charges for small extras (e.g., dining escorts, cat care) frustrate residents
    • Occasional housekeeping/dining cleanliness problems (mold, leftovers)
    • Mixed impressions about certain amenities (horrible coffee noted)
    • Some reviewers felt management transparency and communication lacking

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment across the reviews is largely positive, with strong recurring praise for the people and community at Chandler Place. Most reviewers highlight caring, friendly, and attentive staff — from receptionists and nursing to dining and activities teams — and many cite staff who greet residents by name, engage them socially, and help reduce loneliness. Several specific accounts describe staff coordinating medical care effectively (arranging OT/PT and physician communication) and providing helpful assistance with day-to-day needs such as mail, medication management during short-term stays, and respite care. Respite and trial assisted-living stays are particularly valued, with families noting relief and good recovery outcomes.

    Facility and apartment quality receive mixed-but-favorably-tilted feedback. Many reviewers describe clean, well-maintained common areas, a welcoming village-like lobby, and apartments that are roomy with ample storage and full kitchens in some units. Amenities such as walking paths, an outdoor fountain, garden plots tended by residents, exercise rooms, and religious services add to the community feel. The property is an older building in places, but upkeep is usually good and some apartments are being renovated (new carpet/tile plans mentioned). The community offers a continuum of care: independent living with à la carte assisted services and a separate memory-care dining area, which appeals to families wanting autonomy plus future-care assurance.

    Dining and activities are central strengths cited across reviews. Multiple respondents praise the food — calling it very good, healthy, exceptional in some cases — and note varied choices, cafeteria options, and an à la carte menu. Conversely, there are consistent but less frequent complaints about specific meals (e.g., overcooked fish, salty dishes that caused swelling) and about service inconsistencies (leftovers left out, puddles not cleaned promptly). Activities are robust and a highlight for many residents: bingo, dominoes, movies, happy hour, outings, volunteer opportunities, and resident-led programs create a lively social environment. Staff are frequently acknowledged for soliciting resident input on meals and programming.

    Cost, billing practices, and management transparency emerge as important concerns. Several reviewers complain about extra charges for many small services (meals, escorts, pet care), and some perceive a lack of transparency around fees and availability (reports of bait-and-switch or limited spots). While some units and residents are satisfied with pricing — even describing certain apartments as inexpensive or reasonably priced dining — others note that costs can be high, particularly for heavier levels of care. Short-staffing and slow responsiveness are recurring operational issues in some accounts; these tie into worries about late-night medication administration and insufficient personalized attention for residents with higher needs.

    Operational and maintenance issues are mentioned with varying frequency. A few reviews describe isolated cleanliness or food-handling lapses (mold in storage areas, leftovers left on tables), and some note that renovation activity can be disruptive (air conditioners and equipment left around). Others report location or layout drawbacks: rooms that are far from elevators or dining rooms, dark decor in some units, and some apartments that are small. There are also comments that the facility can feel too large or industrial to people seeking a more intimate, homey setting.

    Taken together, the reviews paint Chandler Place as a community with strong interpersonal strengths — compassionate staff, active social programming, and a welcoming communal culture — supported by generally clean and well-maintained facilities and a useful continuum of care. The most important trade-offs for prospective residents and families are cost and transparency, occasional staffing and service inconsistencies, and some variability in unit size and location within the building. For independent seniors seeking active social life and reliable on-site care with the option to age in place, Chandler Place is frequently recommended; for those highly sensitive to extra fees, who need very high-touch personalized care, or who prefer a smaller, more home-like environment, the concerns raised in reviews suggest visiting, asking detailed questions about fees/availability, and observing staffing patterns during different shifts before deciding.

    Location

    Map showing location of Chandler Place

    About The Goodman Group

    Chandler Place is managed by The Goodman Group.

    Founded in 1965 by Sidney Goodman, The Goodman Group is headquartered in Chaska, Minnesota, and operates 37 senior living communities across seven states. They provide independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, and rehabilitation services. Their mission is "to enrich the quality of life by inspiring greater well-being in every individual."

    People often ask...

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of a large, multi-story residential building with balconies and a tower-like structure at one corner, surrounded by landscaped greenery and walkways with people walking and sitting nearby during dusk.
      $7,071 – $9,192+3.6 (26)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Marvella

      825 Mount Curve Blvd, St. Paul, MN, 55116
    • Front exterior view of Harmony Gardens Senior Living facility showing a large, multi-section building with multiple windows, a covered entrance with an American flag in front, and a parking lot with several cars parked.
      Pricing on request4.4 (30)
      suite
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Harmony Gardens Senior Living

      1438 County Rd C E, Maplewood, MN, 55109
    • Exterior view of a large, modern three-story senior living facility building with a covered entrance driveway, surrounded by green lawns and trees under a partly cloudy blue sky.
      $5,633 – $7,322+3.9 (69)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      assisted living, memory care

      Alto Grayslake

      1865 E Belvidere Rd, Grayslake, IL, 60030
    • Exterior view of Belmont Village Senior Living Glenview building at dusk, showing a large covered entrance with white columns, well-maintained landscaping with bushes and trees, and a multi-story brick and siding facade with lit windows.
      $3,965+4.6 (121)
      Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Belmont Village Senior Living Glenview

      2200 Golf Rd, Glenview, IL, 60025
    • Evening view of the entrance area of Belmont Village Senior Living Lincoln Park, featuring brick walls, decorative lighting fixtures, a circular chandelier on the ceiling, and a sign with the facility's name visible near the street.
      $5,506 – $7,157+4.5 (131)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Belmont Village Senior Living Lincoln Park

      700 W Fullerton Ave, Chicago, IL, 60614
    • Front exterior view of the American House Town and Country senior living facility with a circular driveway, landscaped greenery, and an American flag on a flagpole under a wooden entrance canopy.
      $5,000+3.9 (61)
      suite
      assisted living, memory care

      American House Town and Country

      1020 Woods Mill Rd, Town and Country, MO, 63017

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    674 facilities$6,156/mo
    635 facilities$6,124/mo
    639 facilities$6,132/mo
    506 facilities$6,172/mo
    707 facilities$6,100/mo
    710 facilities$6,109/mo
    599 facilities$6,172/mo
    347 facilities$6,312/mo
    325 facilities$6,261/mo
    597 facilities$6,144/mo
    471 facilities$6,169/mo
    693 facilities$6,064/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living