Overall sentiment in the reviews is strongly positive, with many reviewers highlighting the facility’s cleanliness, attractive home-like setting, and compassionate individualized care. Multiple comments describe Project Caring as a beautiful, quiet house in a nice neighborhood that is well maintained. Reviewers repeatedly note that staff are professional, kind, and welcoming, and several specifically praise the caregiving team as compassionate and well managed. The small size of the facility is presented as a strength: reviewers emphasize one-on-one care, personalized attention, and private rooms for residents, and several recommend the home highly and describe it as an excellent value.
Facilities and environment are frequent positives. Reviewers call the property "very clean," "beautiful," and "lovely," and they consistently remark on the quiet, desirable location. The homelike atmosphere is a recurring theme — reviewers describe a smaller, residential setting rather than an institutional environment, with pleasant resident interactions and a calm, welcoming home. Maintenance and management receive praise, reinforcing the perception of a well-run small residential assisted living option.
Staff and care quality are strong themes. Across reviews the staff are described as caring, professional, compassionate, and attentive. Multiple reviewers use words like "wonderful team of caregivers," "personalized care," and "one-on-one care." One staff member, Paye, is explicitly named and praised for excellent care, which suggests that individual caregivers make a meaningful positive impression on families. Reviewers’ recommendations and statements of high value indicate a high level of trust in the caregiving team and management.
However, several concrete concerns appear and are important for prospective residents and families to consider. The most serious safety-related issue mentioned is a door lock that reviewers identified as a potential security concern for a resident who wanders (dementia-related wandering). That single safety note suggests the facility may not have secure wandering-prevention measures appropriate for some people with mid-to-late-stage dementia. Related to resident needs and expectations, reviews also note a lack of structure: specifically, reviewers report no monthly meal plan and no published activity list. These points indicate that the facility may operate on a more flexible, home-style model without the formalized schedules, bundled meal billing, or organized activity programming typical of larger assisted living communities.
Taken together, the pattern is clear: Project Caring appears to excel at providing a small, clean, homelike setting with dedicated, compassionate staff and individualized attention — a good match for residents who value privacy, quiet, and personalized care. At the same time, it may be less well suited for residents who require secure wandering prevention, a regimented daily schedule, formalized group activities, or a bundled monthly meal plan. Prospective families should weigh those trade-offs and verify specifics with management.
Practical next steps for interested families, based on the review themes: ask about door and exit security procedures for residents with dementia or wandering tendencies; request a sample daily/weekly schedule and an activity calendar to understand available programming; clarify how meals are billed and whether any meal plans or dining options exist; and meet key staff members (like Paye) to assess fit. In summary, reviews portray Project Caring as a warm, well-kept, and well-staffed home-style assisted living option that offers strong personalized care but may require confirmation of safety and programming features for residents with higher behavioral or scheduling needs.
