The reviews for New Mexico Behavioral Health present a sharply mixed portrait: several reviewers strongly praise the staff, care, and overall therapeutic environment, while others allege serious safety, competence, and facility problems. Positive commentary centers on the interpersonal quality of care — many reviewers describe staff as compassionate, kind, professional, and responsive, with repeated references to 24-hour medical attention and personnel who "go above and beyond." Families report feeling supported and comfortable entrusting loved ones to the facility; some explicitly state they were impressed during tours and grateful for the care delivered. Multiple reviewers say the center provides effective support for patients with disability or PTSD, and some describe an atmosphere of camaraderie and warmth that made them eager to return. A few reviews also praise the clinical intake process (detailed history takers), and some note the facility's standing as the largest psychiatric center in New Mexico, implying experience and capacity to accept referrals.
However, these positives are counterbalanced by serious allegations from other reviewers. Several reports accuse nursing staff of being abusive or incompetent and say patients were mistreated. One unit (Sierra) is specifically described pejoratively as a "Motel 6," implying poor facility condition and inadequate accommodations. There are alarming claims of illicit activity on-site (a "drug pusher") and statements that some patients were discharged in worse condition than on admission. Reviewers also raised concerns about administrative or systemic failings — accusations that codes and protocols were not followed, calls for investigations, and even mentions of potential lawsuits. Some reviewers framed the experience as a waste of Medicaid money, which points to concerns about resource use and oversight.
Across reviews there is a theme of inconsistent care quality: while some stays are described as "phenomenal" and staffed by people who make families feel supported and residents feel safe, other accounts describe the opposite — unsafe, neglectful, or harmful experiences. This polarization suggests variable performance across units or shifts rather than uniformly excellent or uniformly poor care. Facility-related comments range from positive (good meals, camaraderie) to negative (Sierra unit description, implied cleanliness/appearance issues), indicating that infrastructure and environment may not be consistent across the campus.
Dining and daily life receive mixed mentions: a number of reviewers enjoyed the food (one specifically praised soy chicken nuggets) and noted camaraderie among residents, which can be important for therapeutic milieu. Conversely, the unflattering description of a unit as "Motel 6" and other appearance-related comments suggest that at least some units could benefit from physical upgrades or more attentive upkeep. Activities and peer support are implied to be positive in some accounts (camaraderie, exclusive club-like bonds), though there is limited detailed information about programming or recreational offerings.
Management, oversight, and safety emerge as the most consequential concern. Multiple reviewers explicitly call for investigation into mistreatment and noncompliance with codes, and one even suggests potential legal action. These allegations are serious and, if accurate, indicate the need for strong administrative review, staff re-training, and possibly third-party oversight to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance. At the same time, many reviews highlight staff who are exemplary — compassionate, professional, and loving — which suggests that management interventions focusing on supervision, standardization of practices, and targeted support could help align the facility's overall performance with the highest-quality examples described.
In summary, New Mexico Behavioral Health appears to offer high-quality, compassionate care in many instances, with a capable multidisciplinary staff and strong positive experiences reported by families and patients. However, there are also significant, recurring negative reports that raise red flags about inconsistent care, potential safety incidents, unit-level facility issues, and possible policy noncompliance. Prospective patients and families should weigh both the positive testimonials about staff dedication and the serious allegations of mistreatment. For current administrators, the review pattern indicates an urgent need to investigate the negative claims, standardize training and protocols, ensure consistent facility upkeep across units (e.g., Sierra), and increase transparency and oversight to address both the real strengths and the troubling deficiencies reflected in these reviews.