Overall sentiment across the reviews for Maple Manor Board and Care is strongly positive. Multiple reviewers emphasize that this is a family-owned, small, two-story home with 24 rooms, which contributes to an intimate, community feeling. The facility is repeatedly described as clean and well maintained — reviewers mention spotless rooms and clean common areas — and the building’s layout includes a central area for meals and socializing as well as a large backyard and playground that support outdoor activities and casual social interaction.
Care quality and staff performance are recurring strengths in the reviews. The staff are consistently characterized as friendly, caring, professional, and communicative. Families report being kept in the loop and appreciate the aides’ genuine concern for residents. Several reviewers explicitly state that care needs are met and describe the experience as excellent; one reviewer noted an explicit staff-to-resident ratio of 7:1, and others described staffing as adequate and flexible. Reviewers also used words like accommodating and honest to describe management and staff demeanor, suggesting transparent practices and responsiveness to family concerns.
Dining and daily life are also highlighted positively. Homemade meals are mentioned multiple times and appear to be well received — reviewers note residents have a healthy appetite, indicating the food quality and menu meet resident preferences. Activity programming is present and varied: staff organize outside walks, bingo, arts and crafts, and other activities that contribute to an engaged community. The facility’s small size and the described social spaces (central dining/social area, backyard) support these day-to-day interactions.
Value and recommendations are another strong theme. Multiple reviewers call Maple Manor a good value or reasonably priced, even comparing it favorably to more expensive alternatives. Many reviewers say they would recommend or would consider the facility as an option, and several characterize their experience as very good or great overall.
Notwithstanding the largely positive tone, there are limited but important concerns to note. One reviewer simply stated that it was "not the best place" without elaborating, which is an isolated, unspecified negative comment. A more concrete concern raised by another reviewer involves clinical suitability: they questioned the placement of a resident with schizophrenia who did not have a definite dementia diagnosis. That comment suggests potential limitations or questions about the facility’s appropriateness for residents whose primary needs are psychiatric rather than dementia-related. This is a single, specific worry in an otherwise positive set of reviews, but it is meaningful because it touches on clinical admission criteria and the fit between resident needs and available services.
In summary, Maple Manor Board and Care is frequently praised for its clean, home-like environment; attentive, caring staff; homemade meals; active social programming; and perceived value. The facility’s small, family-owned character and reportedly favorable staff-to-resident ratio contribute to an intimate, well-supervised atmosphere that many families find reassuring. The main pattern of concern is limited and focused on clinical appropriateness for residents with primary psychiatric diagnoses; prospective families should verify the facility’s admission criteria, staff training, and experience with specific clinical needs. Given the generally strong positive feedback, an in-person visit and direct conversation with management about clinical policies, staffing, and behavioral-health accommodations would be a reasonable next step for families with residents who have complex psychiatric or non-dementia needs.
