Pricing ranges from
    $5,225 – 9,730/month

    Belmont Village Senior Living Albany

    1100 San Pablo Ave, Albany, CA, 94706
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    3.0

    Beautiful facility but inconsistent care

    I love the beautiful, bright facility, excellent dining and nonstop activities - the staff are often warm, attentive and memory care can be excellent, so my loved one is engaged and comfortable. However, I've also seen troubling staffing and management turnover, inconsistent care (missed meds, showers, laundry), poor communication and occasional safety/cleanliness lapses. It's very expensive and can be hit-or-miss: wonderful when well-staffed, risky when not. Overall grateful for the amenities and engagement, but families should monitor care quality closely.

    Pricing

    $7,020+/mo1 BedroomIndependent Living
    $9,620+/mo2 BedroomIndependent Living
    $5,225+/moSemi-privateAssisted Living
    $7,450+/moStudioAssisted Living
    $9,730+/mo1 BedroomAssisted Living
    $7,020+/moSuiteMemory Care

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Pet friendly
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    4.27 · 115 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      3.6
    • Staff

      4.0
    • Meals

      4.3
    • Amenities

      4.1
    • Value

      2.4

    Pros

    • Beautiful, modern, hotel-like facility and design
    • Clean, well-maintained common areas and rooms (reported often)
    • High-quality, chef-driven dining with varied menu options
    • Specific praise for meals (farm-raised salmon, Josephine's Kitchen)
    • Multiple dining areas and attentive dining service
    • Robust, diverse activities and engagement programs
    • Notable programs: Brain Games, drumming circle, opera broadcasts, live concerts
    • Frequent cultural/educational programming (lectures, UC partnership)
    • Resident-driven programming and many excursions/outings
    • Full-size movie theater, gym/fitness center, library, bistro
    • Well-equipped memory care programming and dedicated dementia activities
    • 24/7 nursing/wellness center and on-site medication management
    • Compassionate end-of-life care reported
    • Many individual staff members praised as caring, attentive, and professional
    • Responsive and supportive management cited in many reviews
    • Strong initial move-in and tour experience; informative staff
    • Safe, secure entry and parking structure
    • Opportunities for social connection; residents report improved quality of life
    • Programs and amenities that appeal to intellectually curious residents
    • PALS/assistance program available

    Cons

    • Inconsistent quality of direct care staff (wide variance between excellent and poor)
    • Understaffing leading to long wait times for assistance
    • Missed or wrong medications and medication management errors reported
    • Missed meals and inconsistent meal reminders
    • Housekeeping lapses: rooms not cleaned for weeks in some accounts
    • Poor follow-through and communication from staff/management at times
    • High cost and frequent price increases
    • Management turnover and organizational instability reported
    • Episodes of neglectful care and safety concerns (toilet overflow, delayed response)
    • Perceived patronizing or intrusive staff behavior (including staff with apartment keys)
    • Insufficient or stressed wellness/medication staff
    • Limited or uninviting outdoor space / small concrete patios / little garden access
    • Some apartments reported as small with poor views (contrasts with reports of large rooms)
    • Memory care capacity concerns and rapid escalation to higher care levels
    • Refusal or denial of outside caregiver help in some situations
    • Inconsistent laundry services and shower assistance delays
    • Security concerns and delayed family notification in incidents
    • Poor internet and limited water facilities reported by some
    • Restrictive environment and many rules mentioned by a few reviewers
    • Instances of theft or rude front-desk staff reported
    • Perception of deceptive appearances / services promoted but not always delivered
    • Some activity organizers viewed as weak or understaffed
    • Occasional hygiene and sanitation failures during COVID recounted
    • Threats of discharge in payment/care disputes
    • Variable apartment sizes and amenity availability depending on unit

    Summary review

    Overall impression Belmont Village Senior Living Albany receives strongly mixed but generally positive feedback with important caveats. Across the reviews the community is repeatedly praised for its upscale, modern design, cleanliness, and hotel-like ambiance. Many residents and families report that the facility adds richness to daily life through excellent dining, abundant activities, cultural programming and thoughtful amenities (movie theater, gym, library, bistro). At the same time, a significant and recurring theme is variability: while many staff and services are described as outstanding, there are repeated reports of inconsistent care delivery, communication breakdowns, and operational problems that materially affect resident safety and satisfaction.

    Facilities, dining, and activities Physical plant and amenities are one of Belmont Albany’s strongest selling points. Multiple reviews describe the building as beautiful, bright, and immaculately maintained with high-end furnishings and thoughtful public spaces. Reviewers cite a long list of amenities: multiple dining rooms, chef-driven menus (specific praise for Josephine's Kitchen and items such as farm-raised salmon), a bistro, a full-size movie theater, gym/fitness center, library, and secure outdoor spaces or patios. Programming is a clear strength: reviewers consistently praise the breadth and quality of activities — from Brain Games, drumming circles, opera and live concerts to lectures (including UC affiliation), excursions, and resident-driven events. Many families credit these offerings with improving social engagement, mental stimulation, and overall quality of life for residents.

    Staff, caregiving, and clinical services Reviews present a polarized view of the caregiving staff. Numerous accounts describe caregivers, nurses, and managers as compassionate, attentive, and highly competent — including examples of exemplary end-of-life care, proactive nursing, close attention to residents’ changing conditions, and flexible collaboration during COVID. The on-site wellness center and medication management receive positive mentions in many reviews. However, there is a substantial counterpoint: a sizeable number of reviews describe inconsistent staff performance, with some direct care staff labeled as inexperienced, poorly trained, or inattentive. Specific and serious failures are reported, including wrong medications, missed medications, missed meals, missed showers, delays in cleaning up hazards (e.g., toilet overflow noticed after 48 hours), and even allegations of neglect. These incidents often correlate with understaffing, high staff turnover, and stretched wellness staff. The result is a mixed safety profile: many families feel safe and well-cared-for, while others report events that raise real concerns about clinical oversight and reliability.

    Operational and management themes Management receives both praise and criticism. Several reviews highlight responsive, engaged leadership and helpful move-in support; others point to management turnover, poor communication, and failure to follow through on promised services. Housekeeping and maintenance are specifically cited as inconsistent over time, with some reviewers reporting immaculate rooms and others recounting significant cleaning lapses. Financial concerns recur: Belmont Albany is frequently described as expensive (examples of $6,000–$7,000/month were mentioned), with reports of price increases and at least one family noting threats of discharge related to payment or care disputes. A few reviewers raised allegations about front-desk rudeness, theft, or sketchy finances — not dominant themes but concerning when they appear. Security and notification also surfaced: there are instances of delayed family notification after safety events and at least one reported security breach. Overall, operationally the community appears to perform well much of the time but shows vulnerabilities when staffing or leadership consistency falter.

    Consistency and variability A central pattern across these reviews is variability. Many reviewers emphasize that outcomes depend heavily on which staff are on duty and on apartment/unit assignment. Some residents have large roomy units and overlook pleasant outdoor areas; others report small apartments with poor views and uninviting concrete patios. Similarly, some families describe attentive PALS (assistants) and quick responses; others describe PALS as poorly trained, unreliable, or slow to respond. Memory care is described positively in multiple reviews (specialized programming, secured patios, roll-in showers), yet there are also concerns about insufficient memory care capacity, too-rapid escalation of care needs, and limited follow-through in high-acuity situations. This inconsistency suggests the need for prospective residents and families to evaluate unit-specific conditions, staffing ratios, and real-time performance rather than relying solely on the community’s overall reputation.

    Who this community suits — and cautions Belmont Village Albany appears to be an excellent fit for seniors who prioritize amenities, engagement, social and cultural programming, and high-quality dining in an upscale environment. Reviewers who value intellectual stimulation, frequent activities, chef-prepared meals, and a hotel-like residence report strong satisfaction. However, families of residents with higher or unpredictable medical needs should proceed with caution: the community has reported medication errors, missed care events, and understaffing-related delays. The variability in care quality and housekeeping also argues for careful, ongoing monitoring: check staffing levels for the specific apartment, inquire about nurse/wellness coverage overnight, understand policies on outside caregivers, verify housekeeping schedules, and get clear written answers about price increases and discharge policies.

    Bottom line recommendations Belmont Village Albany offers considerable strengths — outstanding amenities, an active and creative activities program, and many deeply caring staff members — and can provide a richly engaging lifestyle for many residents. But it is not uniformly excellent across all operational dimensions. Prospective residents and families should do thorough, targeted due diligence: tour the exact apartment(s) available, meet frontline caregivers and the wellness head, ask for recent staffing metrics and turnover data, request examples of medication-safety protocols and incident reporting, check references from current residents/families, and examine the contract carefully for pricing, housekeeping, and discharge terms. If a prospective resident has significant medical, memory, or mobility needs, insist on written assurances about staffing ratios, response times, and escalation procedures. When the facility is well-staffed and management is engaged, reviewers report a warm, vibrant, and high-quality experience; when staffing and management fray, the consequences for resident care and safety can be significant.

    Location

    Map showing location of Belmont Village Senior Living Albany

    About Belmont Village Senior Living Albany

    Belmont Village Senior Living Albany sits in Albany, right in the greater Bay Area, and you find it offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing all on one campus, so if health needs change, people don't have to move away. The place has strong ties with UC Berkeley, with programs where university professors come in to lead educational and interactive activities, so residents can keep learning new things, join projects, and connect with the community. You see a technology center that helps everyone stay in touch, and a curriculum full of social and enrichment opportunities, along with outings to UC Berkeley and trips around town thanks to scheduled shuttles. The community's about five years old, with wide halls, roomy bathrooms with roll-in showers, and an outdoor secured patio and garden terrace used for activities or just relaxing outside when the weather's nice. There's a steady activities staff mixing exercise with quieter groups, so there's always something to do.

    The dining area, Josephine's Kitchen, looks like a restaurant, offering twenty-four daily meal choices, an outdoor dining patio, and chef-prepared meals, so you can sit with friends or enjoy a quiet meal, and residents get housekeeping and salon services, plus a screening room and a fitness center with supervised programs. Belmont Village has on-site licensed nurses available day and night and staff who help with daily activities like bathing, getting around, and managing medicine, and they're trained to care for folks with Alzheimer's and dementia in a secure neighborhood, with evidence-based programs like Circle of Friends® for memory support. They partner with neurologic research groups and run Whole Brain Fitness Lifestyle programs, joining clinical support, exercise, nutrition, and social events, so people who want a richer routine can have one.

    You find the campus laid out for hospitality and comfort, designed by experts for safety and ease of movement, and it's LEED Gold certified, which means it meets high environmental standards. Couples needing different care levels can still live together here. The place is pet-friendly, welcoming cats or dogs, and offers short-term recovery stays for folks who just need a little help after an illness or surgery. There's Wi-Fi everywhere, so you can bring a laptop or keep up with family. The on-site staff help manage medication, provide therapy services like physical and occupational therapy, and offer transportation for errands and appointments. Belmont Village Albany holds a high community score of 9.9 from Seniorly and a 4.2-star rating from 68 reviews, and it's won several awards for design and service, so people say a lot of good things about it. The management approach means Belmont Village owns and operates all its communities, aiming for consistency and warm hospitality. The facility pays attention to dining, activities, health, and learning, and works with university partners to keep everyone's mind active and engaged as the years pass.

    About Belmont Village Senior Living

    Belmont Village Senior Living Albany is managed by Belmont Village Senior Living.

    Belmont Village Senior Living (Est. 1997, Houston, TX) operates 34+ luxury communities nationwide offering assisted living, memory care, and independent living. Founded by Patricia Will, the company emphasizes quality over quantity with 24/7 licensed nursing, evidence-based programs through academic partnerships with USC/UCLA.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    44

    Inspections

    6

    Type A Citations

    9

    Type B Citations

    6

    Years of reports

    01 Jul 2025
    Identified an allegation of unsafe storage when enoxaparin injections and hydrogen peroxide were found unlocked under a resident’s bathroom sink, and cleaners and acetaminophen tablets were left accessible in a resident’s room. Observed additional safety concerns from unsecured items in living areas, impacting resident safety.
    • § 87309(a)
    • § 9058
    06 Jun 2025
    Identified a potential abuse incident reported by staff involving a worker and a resident on 05/15/25, with notification to authorities. Identified a memory-care altercation between two residents, resulting in one-on-one supervision for one resident and families notified; no further issues reported by families.
    • § 9058
    10 Feb 2025
    Investigated the allegation that staff failed to provide appropriate supervision, resulting in resident falls; reviewed relevant resident records and incident reports, noting falls were documented but there was not enough evidence to prove the violation occurred.
    15 Jan 2025
    Found two reported elopements: on 11/19/24, a resident exited an alarmed back door around 4:30 PM and was intercepted by staff, with medical staff and the responsible party notified; on 01/04/25, a resident exited through the main entrance around 2:00 PM and was intercepted at the bus stop two minutes later, with medical staff and the responsible party notified.
    17 Dec 2024
    Found that the allegation that staff do not respond to phone calls was not supported by evidence, with staff and a family member confirming calls were answered. Found that the allegation that staff do not effectively communicate with residents and their families about COVID-19 outbreaks was not supported by evidence, as staff reported proper reporting and notifications were sent.
    17 Dec 2024
    Investigated findings showed that the allegations about a resident’s weight loss, failure to contact the resident’s representative, not following the care plan, and delays in medical care did not meet the preponderance of evidence standard. Evidence from interviews and records indicated weight monitoring occurred, changes were communicated to the primary care physician and family, and hospice involvement was present.
    12 Dec 2024
    Identified illegal eviction. A hospice resident who had treatment for a stage 3–4 pressure wound was not allowed to return and was moved to another care setting.
    12 Dec 2024
    Investigated allegations that a resident developed a stage 3–4 pressure wound and that hospice plan deviations and use of private caregivers without proper notice were not reported. Found that requested records, including hospice notification and incident reports, were not provided by the stated deadline.
    08 Oct 2024
    Identified a deficiency for not submitting required proof by the due date and for repeat violations within 12 months.
    26 Sept 2024
    Found that four specific allegations—overnight neglect, staff not meeting residents' needs, yelling or mistreating residents, and placing residents in an unsafe environment—were unsubstantiated after review.
    20 Aug 2024
    Identified a UIR involving a resident's bowel movements and noted it involved an independent living unit. Planned follow-up discussions with the resident and spouse to aid the resident's condition, with awareness that both independent living and assisted living supports were involved, and no deficiencies cited.
    20 Aug 2024
    Identified that a resident with a severe hip fracture elected not to pursue surgery and is bed-bound, currently in a short-term SNF and requiring 24-7 care; found that waiving the 30-day termination notice would require a health-condition relocation order, which is not initiated by the resident or staff, and discussed removing the resident’s belongings if they do not return to allow renovations and admit a new resident.
    20 Aug 2024
    Found no deficiencies during a visit to address a reported incident.
    06 Aug 2024
    Found the complaint about the private caregiver hired by the family unfounded.
    06 Aug 2024
    Investigated allegations that were determined to be unfounded, indicating they were false or lacked reasonable basis. Conducted an exit interview with the executive director to discuss these findings.
    • § 87224(i)
    03 Jul 2024
    Found residents lounging in common areas and meals served during the visit, with a central medication room kept locked and first aid kits available. Observed safety measures including detectors integrated with the sprinkler system, a recently serviced fire extinguisher, monthly drills, an annual evacuation with local police, and unobstructed indoor and outdoor passages.
    03 Jul 2024
    Confirmed that the facility met fire safety and resident care standards during the inspection.
    27 Feb 2024
    Identified that a resident who cannot leave unassisted re-entered through the front door; cameras did not capture an exit, and staff believed the resident left through a rear door that did not require a PIN.
    27 Feb 2024
    Verified incident involved resident leaving unassisted, in violation of regulations. Deficiency documented; follow-up required.
    30 Nov 2023
    Found that on 7/22/2022, five residents in wheelchairs sat at one round dining table without the required distancing, indicating a lapse in COVID-19 mitigation. Found that an email notification about a COVID-positive case was sent to residents’ representatives in July 2022, indicating the allegation of failing to provide notifications did not occur.
    30 Nov 2023
    Confirmed inadequate COVID mitigation procedures and lack of COVID-positive notifications. Unsubstantiated allegations of inadequate staffing levels, unqualified staff, neglect of residents, and cleanliness concerns.
    • § 87211(a)(2)
    20 Jul 2023
    Found residents were cared for in a clean, safe environment with functioning safety equipment and updated disaster plans. Confirmed that all staff had clear criminal background checks and residents' records were complete; no deficiencies found.
    20 Jul 2023
    Confirmed that the facility met all safety and operational standards during the inspection.
    24 Mar 2023
    Found that an incident between two residents in December 2021 was not reported, resulting in a deficiency.
    24 Mar 2023
    Found a December 2021 incident where a resident’s door struck another resident; staff did not witness aggressive behavior. The resident was reevaluated and families were informed, and there wasn’t enough evidence to prove the alleged violation occurred.
    24 Mar 2023
    Found that an incident between two residents in December 2021 was not reported to the authorities, resulting in a regulatory deficiency.
    27 Jan 2023
    Determined that the allegations that a resident sustained multiple falls and that staff did not meet the resident's basic needs were not proven.
    27 Jan 2023
    Investigated allegations of a resident sustaining multiple falls and staff not meeting basic needs; found insufficient evidence to confirm these claims.
    • § 87705(c)(4)
    19 Jan 2023
    Found multiple care-related concerns, including skin injuries, bruising, infection, delays in medical treatment, and issues with medical record maintenance. Concluded that some allegations could not be proven due to insufficient evidence, while others indicated ongoing care concerns.
    19 Jan 2023
    Found multiple substantiated allegations related to resident care, including skin tears, unexplained bruises, infection treatment delays, medical record maintenance issues, and rash development. Staffing levels were determined to be sufficient.
    11 Apr 2022
    Found no deficiencies and no imminent health or safety concerns. Observed detectors in place, safe water temperature, adequate food, a complete first aid kit, and residents in common areas who were well groomed and comfortable during a gastrointestinal outbreak.
    11 Apr 2022
    Confirmed no health or safety concerns found during inspection. Residents observed to be well cared for.
    • § 87405(d)(2)
    28 Dec 2021
    Investigated an incident where a resident went AWOL and was located unharmed after staff searched the area and notified family and police; no deficiencies cited.
    28 Dec 2021
    Visited facility in response to AWOL incident, no deficiencies cited.
    21 Jul 2021
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced infection control check on 7/21/2021. Observed a central screening point for staff, residents, and visitors with a sign-in policy, thermometer, and hand sanitizer; posted cough/sneeze etiquette and handwashing reminders; a 30-day PPE supply maintained at a central location; and ongoing screening records for residents and staff.
    21 Jul 2021
    Toured facility, staff wearing proper PPE, no deficiencies cited.
    • § 87705(c)(5)
    • § 87465(g)
    • § 87466
    • § 87468.1(a)(2)
    16 Jul 2021
    Found that a resident sustained severe bruising from improper handling during transfers, despite prior discussions about safer handling practices. Staff grabbed the resident's arms and legs to help move or reposition her, contributing to the injuries.
    16 Jul 2021
    Investigated four specific allegations involving a resident—weight loss, inadequate incontinence care, not following the care plan, and not providing the care plan to the responsible party—and found insufficient evidence to prove these claims.
    16 Jul 2021
    Identified weight loss and lack of following care plan. Incontinence care and showers not provided as required.
    • §
    04 Aug 2020
    Determined financial abuse allegation unfounded; no evidence supported the claim after interviews with the involved parties.
    01 May 2020
    No deficiencies were found during the inspection.
    18 Feb 2020
    Reviewed allegation regarding improper care provided and reimbursement issued for a resident. Insufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegation.
    09 Jan 2020
    Reviewed unannounced inspection found incidents of stolen items reported by residents, including jewelry and money, resulting in police involvement. Personal property forms were incomplete.
    • § 87468.1(a)(12)
    • § 87468.1(a)(2)
    01 Nov 2019
    Reviewed unannounced inspection. No citation issued. Information gathered on resident's death.
    • § 87465(c)(2)

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of a modern multi-story senior living facility building with large windows and a parking area in front. The building has a beige brick facade with red and gray accents under a clear blue sky.
      $2,995 – $8,250+4.5 (38)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      continuing care retirement community

      Merrill Gardens at Rockridge

      5238 Coronado Ave, Oakland, CA, 94618
    • Exterior view of Cardinal Point senior living facility showing the entrance with white columns and a covered driveway. The building has multiple balconies and large windows. There are landscaped plants and flowers in the foreground, along with a sign that reads 'Cardinal Point Oakmont Senior Living 2851 Mariner Square Drive'. A clear blue sky is visible above.
      $3,200 – $5,995+4.8 (60)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      continuing care retirement community

      Cardinal Point

      2431 Mariner Square Dr, Alameda, CA, 94501
    • Exterior view of Truewood by Merrill, Pinole senior living facility showing a two-story building with white walls and a covered entrance. There are trees with red leaves, green bushes, and a flagpole with the American and California state flags. The sky is clear and blue.
      $3,050 – $4,890+4.3 (105)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living

      Truewood by Merrill, Pinole

      2621 Appian Way, Pinole, CA, 94564
    • Exterior view of a modern multi-story residential building with large windows, balconies, and a landscaped entrance featuring trees and shrubs. A silver car is parked near the entrance on a paved street.
      $7,900 – $17,000+4.9 (138)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Coterie Cathedral Hill

      1001 Van Ness Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94109
    • Exterior view of a multi-story residential building with large windows and a green awning entrance, surrounded by small trees and parked cars under a clear blue sky.
      $6,780 – $10,500+4.2 (47)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Ivy Park at Cathedral Hill

      1550 Sutter St, San Francisco, CA, 94109
    • Front exterior view of Merrill Gardens senior living facility showing a modern three-story building with brick and beige paneling, large windows, and a covered entrance with the facility name displayed above.
      $7,900+4.7 (47)
      2 Bedroom
      continuing care retirement community

      Merrill Gardens at Lafayette

      1010 Second St, Lafayette, CA, 94549

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 151 facilities$6,775/mo
    2. 128 facilities$6,741/mo
    3. 116 facilities$6,951/mo
    4. 159 facilities$6,724/mo
    5. 107 facilities$6,893/mo
    6. 92 facilities$6,357/mo
    7. 186 facilities$6,732/mo
    8. 98 facilities$6,037/mo
    9. 96 facilities$6,045/mo
    10. 132 facilities$6,742/mo
    11. 78 facilities$5,497/mo
    12. 89 facilities$5,541/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living