Pricing ranges from
    $3,995 – 6,595/month

    Oakmont of Fair Oaks

    8484 Madison Ave, Fair Oaks, CA, 95628
    4.4 · 87 reviews
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    4.0

    Gorgeous campus, compassionate care, pricey

    I toured and ultimately placed my loved one here - the campus is gorgeous, fairly new, spotless, and not at all like a nursing home. Staff are warm, attentive, remember residents' names, and the amenities (salon, craft room, movie theater, gym, patio) and food/live music are real positives. It is expensive, with many add-ons and some communication/management and staffing hiccups, but most issues were addressed and care feels compassionate. Overall I'm very satisfied and would recommend if it fits your budget.

    Pricing

    $5,795+/moStudioAssisted Living
    $6,595+/mo1 BedroomAssisted Living
    $3,995+/moSemi-privateMemory Care

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Spa
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    4.37 · 87 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.2
    • Staff

      4.3
    • Meals

      4.0
    • Amenities

      4.4
    • Value

      2.2

    Pros

    • Compassionate, professional, and attentive staff
    • Clean, well-maintained, and aesthetically pleasing facility
    • Newer building with elegant, hotel-like ambiance
    • Spacious apartments with private bathrooms, kitchenettes, and balconies
    • Wide range of on-site amenities (salon, craft room, movie theater, library, gym)
    • Attractive outdoor areas (fountain, garden, gazebo, courtyard, nature habitat)
    • Gourmet dining program with customizable meals and kitchen garden produce
    • Robust activities program (painting, music, wine tasting, poetry, games, exercise)
    • Memory care offerings and staff with dementia experience (reported in multiple reviews)
    • Staff who know residents by name and foster a welcoming community
    • Smooth and supportive move-in and intake experiences reported by many families
    • Effective health monitoring and some regular communication from staff
    • Resident-organized successful programs and high-quality organized events
    • Thoughtful design and good location; well laid out common spaces
    • Many reviewers highly recommend the community

    Cons

    • High staff turnover and reports of understaffing
    • Inconsistent management follow-through and unresponsive administration
    • Safety concerns in memory care (resident-to-resident aggression reported)
    • Inconsistent quality of care across shifts and staff members
    • Dining inconsistencies: some praise gourmet food while others report bland or poor meals
    • Meals sometimes served quickly and residents rushed into TV or out of dining area
    • Activities participation uneven; some activities are limited or not performed as shown
    • Add-on fees, pricing opacity, and perception of being overpriced
    • Housekeeping and maintenance issues reported in some units (mold, floors not cleaned)
    • Grounds/landscaping inconsistency despite generally attractive grounds
    • Instances of rude or gossipy staff and a few reports of condescending behavior
    • Operational issues (broken bus, unfinished construction, promises not kept)
    • Mixed feedback about admissions and sales responsiveness (some unreturned calls)
    • Allegations of poor communication between shifts and with families
    • Reports of management turnover, evictions, and distrust of administration in a few cases

    Summary review

    Overall impression Reviews of Oakmont of Fair Oaks paint a predominantly positive picture of a newer, upscale senior living community with many signature amenities and a largely compassionate workforce, but they also reveal recurring operational and management concerns that temper that praise. Most reviewers emphasize the facility’s aesthetics and hospitality: the building is repeatedly described as beautiful, hotel-like, spotless, and well laid-out. Common areas (movie theater, library, salon, craft room, gym, courtyards) and outdoor features (fountain, garden, gazebo, native-plant nature area with monarchs) are frequently highlighted as strengths that contribute to a pleasant daily life for residents.

    Staff and care quality Staff performance is the single most frequently noted positive area. Many reviewers describe staff as caring, professional, and attentive — often remembering residents’ names, preferences, and providing individualized attention during meals or activities. Several reviews single out specific employees and departments (marketing/tour staff, med techs, caregivers, housekeeping, activities) as particularly helpful, and multiple families describe smooth, supportive move-ins and confident transitions. Memory care receives mixed but substantial praise in many reviews: some family members say the staff “understand dementia,” provide safe, comprehensive memory programming, and create trusting relationships that bring peace of mind.

    However, there is a contrasting set of reviews describing inconsistent care. A significant theme is staffing instability — reports of high turnover and understaffing leading to insufficient supervision, missed promises, and variable performance between staff members and shifts. A number of reviews flag management as unhelpful or unresponsive, citing poor communication, no follow-through on care plans or facility promises, and at times a perceived lack of accountability. These operational gaps lead to real family anxieties (for example, medication or daily routine issues that had to be repeatedly raised to get fixed).

    Facilities and maintenance Physically, Oakmont scores high. Residents and visitors frequently praise the tasteful design, spacious apartments (including large single rooms in memory care), private bathrooms, kitchenettes, and balconies. The grounds and new construction receive commendation for upkeep and layout, and unique touches — such as a kitchen garden tended by the executive chef and wildlife habitat certification — are noted as differentiators. That said, some reviewers report maintenance or cleanliness lapses in isolated instances: mold in a toilet, floors reportedly not cleaned in rooms, and uneven landscaping maintenance. These negative observations are relatively fewer than the positive ones but are significant because they contrast with the generally pristine image and raise concerns about consistency.

    Dining and culinary program Dining reviews are polarized. Many reviewers praise the culinary program as gourmet, customizable, and high-quality — with fresh produce from an on-site kitchen garden and attentive dining staff in an attractive dining room. Several describe memorable meals, live piano entertainment, and positive dining experiences (e.g., brunch on the patio, themed events). Conversely, a portion of reviewers report bland or disappointing meals, food portions or selections they didn’t expect, and dining service that feels rushed (meals served quickly with residents ushered to watch TV immediately afterward). These mixed reports suggest the food program is strong when staffed and executed as intended, but can be uneven depending on staffing, timing, or management of expectations.

    Activities and social life Oakmont offers a broad and generally well-regarded activities calendar: painting classes, music, wine tastings, poetry nights, crafts, games, exercise classes, and resident-organized programs appear repeatedly and elicit positive feedback where participation is good. Some residents and families report high engagement and successful programs. Yet others describe limited activities, low participation, or advertised events that do not occur. A few reviews specifically criticize the activity director’s approach (treating residents like children) or note that despite many offerings, the community can feel less vibrant or have less socialization than expected. Participation levels and the energy of activities appear to vary across the community.

    Management, communication, and cost transparency Management and administrative effectiveness emerge as a mixed but important area of concern. Positive comments describe attentive leadership and an “open-door” management style; negative comments focus on unresponsive admissions staff, salespeople who don’t follow up, lack of clear itemized billing, and perceived deception over what’s included in base pricing. Several reviewers mention add-ons and extra charges, difficulty obtaining an itemized monthly breakdown, and general pricing opacity — leading to the perception that Oakmont is expensive or “pricey” and sometimes out of budget. Operational hiccups — broken community bus, unfinished construction, poor coordination between shifts, and in a few reports even serious issues like evictions — contribute to distrust in management continuity for a minority of families.

    Notable patterns and final assessment The dominant pattern is of a largely excellent physical environment staffed by many compassionate caregivers producing high satisfaction for many families — but with enough recurring operational, communication, and staffing concerns to warrant careful scrutiny before committing. Memory care is repeatedly praised by some families for expertise and safety, yet a smaller but consequential set of reviews describes safety incidents and resident-to-resident aggression in memory care; this contradiction suggests variability in experience that prospective families should investigate in person.

    Recommendations for prospective families - Tour multiple times and observe multiple shifts (meal time, evening, weekend) to evaluate staffing consistency and activity vibrancy. - Ask for specific, recent examples of memory-care staffing ratios, incident protocols, and how resident-aggression is handled. - Request an itemized list of base fees and all potential add-on charges, plus a sample monthly statement to assess pricing transparency. - Speak with current residents and families about housekeeping, maintenance response times, and communication with management. - Verify specific amenities and programs you care about (transportation, favorite activities, dietary accommodations) and get promises in writing.

    In summary, Oakmont of Fair Oaks offers an attractive, amenity-rich environment with many genuinely caring staff members and a strong lifestyle program, but prospective residents and families should perform targeted due diligence around staffing stability, management responsiveness, dining consistency, and fee transparency to ensure the community meets their expectations consistently.

    Location

    Map showing location of Oakmont of Fair Oaks

    About Oakmont of Fair Oaks

    Oakmont of Fair Oaks stands as a senior living community in Fair Oaks, CA with an RCFE license number 345002797, showing it follows state rules for safety and care. The two-story building sits in a green area, so there are nice views and landscaped gardens to enjoy. The community welcomes pets and has English-speaking staff, including a part-time nurse and full-time wellness nurses available seven days a week, so residents can get help with daily needs like bathing, dressing, medications, and special care such as diabetes management, memory care for dementia or Alzheimer's, and hospice support.

    The apartment homes are large for senior housing, with sizes from 400 square foot studios to 1300 square foot two-bedrooms, all with high ceilings, crown molding, walk-in closets, big windows for lots of natural light, and in some units, washer/dryer hookups or balconies. Some covered parking spaces and garages are available for an extra fee. Residents get weekly housekeeping, basic cable, all utilities except phone, and scheduled rides for shopping or medical appointments, plus there's a personal chauffeur service and valet parking.

    A lot goes on here with group games like Scrabble, book clubs, art and poetry classes, yoga, strength classes, walking clubs, gardening in raised beds, offsite outings, happy hours, musical events, movie nights in the private theater, themed parties, knitting clubs, and volunteer work. Folks can relax in the comfortable indoor and outdoor areas sitting under the pergola or strolling on walking paths, and pets have their own fenced park.

    Care is central, with 24/7 staff managing medicine, special diets, incontinence, oxygen, and even escorted services to activities or meals, which are served restaurant-style from 7am to 7pm, or at any time in the 24-hour Bistro. The dining room has real white linens, chandeliers, and fresh flowers for a nice atmosphere. Meals come from a trained executive chef and team experienced in fine dining.

    Physical therapy and rehabilitation, salon and spa services, a fitness center, and a well-stocked library are all on-site, and devotional services support spiritual wellbeing. Apartment homes have kitchen appliances, and there's storage and laundry space. The community also has a dedicated memory care unit, where the Oakmont Diabetes Wellness program and other personal health plans help residents stay safe and involved. Common areas bring people together, and the design feels open and bright because of the big windows and natural light. The campus is close to shops, dining, and the arts, and staff encourage people to live their way, connect, and make lasting friendships. Oakmont of Fair Oaks is part of Oakmont Senior Living, offering a full range of care so residents don't have to move if their needs change.

    About Oakmont Senior Living

    Oakmont of Fair Oaks is managed by Oakmont Senior Living.

    Founded in 2001 by Bill Gallaher, Oakmont Senior Living has emerged as a nationally recognized leader in luxury senior living, headquartered in Windsor, California. The family-owned and operated company has grown to serve over 8,000 seniors across 80 luxury communities throughout California, Nevada, and Hawaii, generating annual revenue of $750 million. Oakmont Management Group, established in 2012 as the sole operator of these luxury communities, works in partnership with the Gallaher Family development company, which has been building seniors housing since the 1990s. The company has achieved remarkable growth, adding 1,811 units to its portfolio between 2024 and 2025, ranking No. 12 on the ASHA 50 list of largest senior living operators.

    Oakmont provides comprehensive care services including assisted living, memory care, and retirement living, with a company-wide focus on individualized attention and luxury amenities. Their premier communities feature wellness centers, assistance with personal care, medication management, award-winning culinary programs, movie theaters, and pet therapy. The company has pioneered innovative programs such as virtual reality therapy using the Rendever platform, allowing seniors with Alzheimer's and dementia to relive past experiences and participate in new adventures. Their signature Traditions memory care neighborhoods provide individualized 24-hour care by providers trained in dementia education, offering daily reminiscence activities designed to help older adults recall positive memories.

    Oakmont's mission centers on delivering meaningful lifestyles and relationships with residents, families, and team members by developing a winning culture anchored in five core values: authenticity, teamwork, compassion, commitment, and resilience. The company maintains an unwavering commitment to excellence, integrity, and high standards of service, with a philosophy of creating communities where residents can continue living even as their needs change. Their approach emphasizes creating safe, nurturing environments where both residents and team members can be the most authentic versions of themselves, fostering a culture that treats residents like family while maintaining luxury standards.

    Oakmont's industry leadership has been recognized through numerous achievements, including ranking among the nation's largest operators and maintaining a 97 percent occupancy rate across their portfolio. The company was a 2022 Yass Prize finalist for innovation in education, and their SVP of Human Resources was inducted into McKnight's 2023 Hall of Honor for excellence in talent development. Recent strategic partnerships include an expanded relationship with Welltower and the launch of the Ivy Living brand, alongside major real estate transactions involving Healthpeak's $1.3 billion acquisition of 24 Oakmont communities. These partnerships and recognitions underscore Oakmont's position as an industry innovator committed to setting new standards in luxury senior living while maintaining their foundational values of personalized care and exceptional service.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    64

    Inspections

    16

    Type A Citations

    16

    Type B Citations

    6

    Years of reports

    19 Jun 2025
    Identified the allegation of repeated medication errors in medication management. Discussed issues from August 29, 2023 related to non-compliance during the conference.
    • § 9058
    22 May 2025
    Found that staff were not adequately trained on emergency evacuation protocols. Interviews and records showed training gaps and a February 1, 2025 fire in which evacuations were inconsistent and some residents were not evacuated as planned.
    • § 87208(a)
    21 May 2025
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced visit; the care home was clean and well furnished, with a safe hot water temperature, locked cleaning supplies, functioning detectors, and adequate food supplies.
    • § 9058
    20 May 2025
    Found no deficiencies after reviewing five resident files, four staff files, and two residents' medications, which were locked away and inaccessible; also noted a current liability insurance on file.
    • § 9058
    03 Jan 2025
    Investigated the allegation that staff were not assisting the resident with oxygen. Found the available evidence did not prove the allegation.
    21 May 2024
    Identified that the executive director did not hold an active administrator certificate. Conducted an exit interview with the executive director.
    21 May 2024
    Identified deficiency in administrative certification.
    • § 87405(a)
    10 May 2024
    Found that the allegation that residents were not receiving lift assistance and that lifting was unsafe was unfounded; staff and residents reported adequate lift care and safe lifting practices.
    10 May 2024
    Found four apartments and interviewed five residents; no deficiencies were identified.
    10 May 2024
    Confirmed that allegations regarding hoyer lift and sit-to-stand lift protocols were unfounded after interviews, observations, and record reviews.
    09 May 2024
    Found no deficiencies after review of living spaces, bathrooms, kitchen, safety systems, medication storage, and records; furnishings, cleanliness, food supplies, and documentation all met requirements.
    09 May 2024
    Inspection conducted found no deficiencies in the care home, with all areas observed to be in compliance with regulations.
    31 Jan 2024
    Found that a resident did not consistently wear oxygen when ambulating outside the apartment, as the oxygen was found in the apartment during observation while the resident was away. Found that the call button was operable and staff responded promptly during testing, with interviews indicating no ongoing issues with calls.
    31 Jan 2024
    Confirmed insufficient use of oxygen by the resident, but found no evidence of inadequate response to call buttons or lack of participation in activities.
    • § 87611(e)
    20 Oct 2023
    Confirmed signature obtained for amended documentation tied to an inspection on 10/18/2023; exit interview conducted with site leadership.
    20 Oct 2023
    Identified an allegation and investigated during the inspection.
    18 Oct 2023
    Identified medication-handling issues, including an off-count for one resident, undocumented administration dates, and delayed entry of newly delivered meds; found evidence of bubble-pack tampering and an undestroyed bottle of the same med. Observed PPE gaps for isolation care, with a cart missing N95 respirators and no posted PPE instructions, while health guidance advised continuing use of full PPE for isolation cases.
    18 Oct 2023
    Confirmed that there were discrepancies in medication management and insufficient PPE protocols for residents in isolation due to COVID-19 at the facility.
    • § 87468.1(a)(2)
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    20 Sept 2023
    Identified that new medications for a resident were not delivered to the site until the evening of 9/9/2023, with inconsistent staff reports, and a medication count showing two medications off from the records. A civil penalty was assessed.
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    20 Sept 2023
    Obtained signature for amended document after meeting with the executive director; exit interview conducted with the executive director.
    20 Sept 2023
    Confirmed an allegation regarding a specific issue during the inspection.
    31 Aug 2023
    Identified signatures on amended documents and noted a $250 civil penalty for 8/31/2023 due to a repeat violation within 12 months of a prior violation dated 5/12/2023. Conducted an exit interview with the Executive Director, who acknowledged receipt of related documents.
    31 Aug 2023
    Confirmed repeat violation and assessed civil penalty for the facility.
    29 Aug 2023
    Found substantiated that residents did not receive adequate incontinence care and bathing assistance, experienced delayed responses to call buttons, and faced medication mismanagement, with a civil penalty of $250 assessed. Found unsubstantiated concerns about cleanliness or disrepair.
    • § 1569.625(b)
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    • § 87618(b)(3)
    29 Aug 2023
    Found medication mismanagement, including a medication marked as given that was not in the medication bin, and listed as injected despite no injectable medications being available. Found neglect in incontinence care and bathing, with a resident reporting weeks without a shower and inconsistent documentation of care.
    • § 87464(f)(1)
    • § 87468.1(a)(2)
    29 Aug 2023
    Identified medication mismanagement, including a record listing a medication as injected though no injectable medication was available and meds marked as given that were off count. Found that a resident needing hands-on bathing assistance went weeks without a shower, with delays and documentation gaps in bathing care.
    29 Aug 2023
    Investigated allegations about a resident's wound care, medication management, and incontinence assistance. Found that a heel wound was present on admission with inconsistent care documentation, medication counts did not match records, and incontinence support was delayed, while cleanliness and upkeep concerns were not supported.
    29 Aug 2023
    Confirmed complaint allegations regarding multiple incidents of neglect and medication mismanagement. Unsubstantiated allegations regarding cleanliness and disrepair.
    • § 87466
    • § 87465(a)(1)
    21 Jul 2023
    Found the perimeter free of clutter and debris, and delayed egress in memory care was operational. Reviewed three resident files and three staff files, obtained a current copy of liability insurance, and no deficiencies identified.
    21 Jul 2023
    Conducted annual inspection, found no deficiencies.
    06 Jul 2023
    Found no deficiencies cited; care home showed properly furnished apartments, sanitary bathrooms, hot water at 115°F, adequate food supplies, locked toxins and medications, clean outdoor areas, and functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detectors. Administrator was unavailable to provide documents, and LPAs planned to return to review files and complete the annual check.
    06 Jul 2023
    Conducted inspection did not identify any deficiencies in the care home.
    12 May 2023
    Found insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. Interviews and call-button records showed frequent delays in responses, with times over 15 minutes and up to 42 minutes on multiple occasions.
    12 May 2023
    Confirmed inadequate staffing levels at the facility based on interviews and call button response time records, resulting in a substantiated allegation.
    • § 87411(a)
    06 Oct 2022
    Identified a deficiency for not reporting COVID-19 cases to the licensing division since September 12, 2022; observations showed proper PPE use and general infection prevention in place, with no follow-up concerns raised.
    06 Oct 2022
    Conducted an in-person health and safety check visit and found deficiencies regarding reporting COVID-19 cases.
    • § 87211
    14 Sept 2022
    Investigated allegations that staff did not respond promptly to a resident's call button and left the resident unattended for hours after a fall. Identified training gaps, with several staff not meeting required initial and annual training standards.
    14 Sept 2022
    Confirmed: Staff failed to respond to resident’s call button and left resident unattended after a fall for an extended period of time. Untrained staff were also identified.
    • § 87411(a)
    • § 1569.625(b)
    30 Aug 2022
    Determined that staff did not follow the physician’s order to change a resident’s contact lenses. A civil penalty of five hundred dollars was issued.
    • § 1569.49
    30 Aug 2022
    Found a $500 penalty issued for a violation that caused injury or illness to a resident during February 2020 through August 2020; no deficiencies were issued under the current license.
    30 Aug 2022
    Identified a violation that resulted in the injury or illness of a resident from February to August 2020. No deficiencies found during the inspection. Penalty issued to the facility.
    30 Aug 2022
    Confirmed deficiency related to not changing resident's contact lenses as ordered by physician, resulting in resident's vision worsening beyond acceptable limits. Civil penalty of $500 issued.
    • § 1569.49
    02 Aug 2022
    Investigated two allegations: staff did not follow the monthly order to change the resident’s contact lenses, and the resident’s personal property, including coins and an FBI jacket, was not safeguarded and went missing. Found that documentation and communication gaps existed regarding eye-care orders and safeguarding valuables, and staffing concerns could not be confirmed.
    02 Aug 2022
    Confirmed insufficient care for a resident by failing to follow orders for contact lenses and missing valuable personal property. Staffing levels were not found to be insufficient.
    • § 87465(a)(3)
    • § 87218(a)(2)
    29 Jul 2022
    Found no deficiencies during the visit. PPE use, sanitation, food storage, fire safety equipment, and vaccination/visitation protocols were in place, with required posters and signs observed.
    29 Jul 2022
    Confirmed no deficiencies observed during the inspection.
    04 Nov 2021
    Found unfounded the allegation that there were COVID-19 positive cases at the site.
    04 Nov 2021
    Investigated complaint that was entered incorrectly and found allegations of COVID-19 mismanagement to be unfounded, indicating they were false or lacked a reasonable basis. Conducted exit interview.
    06 Aug 2021
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced visit on 8/6/2021 focused on infection control, with PPE used and daily COVID-19 screening completed. No health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed in the areas toured, and an exit interview was conducted.
    06 Aug 2021
    Found no deficiencies during the annual post-licensing visit conducted with the health services director at the care home.
    06 Aug 2021
    No deficiencies cited during the annual post-licensing visit.
    21 Jul 2021
    Identified readiness for licensure after a pre-licensing review for a change of ownership, noting a memory care unit, two floors, adequate food and safety supplies, and organized resident and staff records. Awaiting final approval from CAU, with potential additional requirements still needed.
    21 Jul 2021
    Confirmed that the facility passed inspection and is ready for licensing pending final approval.
    14 Apr 2021
    Determined there was insufficient evidence to prove a staff member took the missing wedding rings; two searches were conducted, the rings were not found, and there was no on-file inventory of the resident’s personal property to support ownership.
    14 Apr 2021
    Investigated the alleged violation of personal rights regarding missing wedding rings, determined that there was insufficient evidence to confirm the claim, after interviews and review of facility records.
    • § 87218(a)(2)
    • § 87465(a)(3)
    26 Jun 2020
    Two incidents involving missing personal belongings were reported by the Department and followed up on during a telephone visit with the Executive Director.
    30 Dec 2019
    Investigated the allegation that a resident's personal belongings were not safeguarded; found no substantial evidence to confirm or deny the theft occurred.
    27 Dec 2019
    Confirmed that staff did not provide timely assistance with toileting for residents, leading to substantiated allegations of neglect.
    • § 87705(c)(4)
    20 Dec 2019
    Confirmed mismanagement of medications and theft by staff members at a care home.
    11 Dec 2019
    Confirmed allegations of medication errors and inadequate staffing, as well as issues with incontinence care and room cleanliness at the facility.
    • § 87625(b)(3)
    • § 87465(a)(5)
    • § 87411(a)
    • § 87625(b)(1)
    26 Nov 2019
    Inspection found the assisted living facility in compliance with regulations, with clean and well-maintained common areas and resident rooms, proper food preparation and storage, and adequate safety measures in place.
    15 Nov 2019
    Confirmed successful completion of COMP II, demonstrating understanding of Title 22 regulations and various aspects of facility operation during a telephone call.
    28 Oct 2019
    Visited by Licensing Program Analysts for a case management visit regarding evacuees from a wildfire, no deficiencies found during the visit.
    08 Oct 2019
    Found multiple instances of a resident leaving the premises unsupervised and being brought back by staff, posing a risk to their safety.
    • § 87208

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of a senior living facility named Oakmont of Carmichael with a beige stucco building, tiled roof, landscaped garden with colorful flowers, trees, and a curved walkway. Two people are walking on the path near the entrance.
      $3,795 – $5,495+4.6 (121)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Carmichael

      4717 Engle Rd, Carmichael, CA, 95608
    • Exterior view of Ivy Park at Roseville, a multi-story senior living facility with beige and brown stucco walls and red tile roofing. The entrance features a covered drop-off area with benches and potted plants. There is a landscaped roundabout with flowers and shrubs, and an American flag flying on a flagpole. The sky is clear and blue.
      $3,000 – $3,900+4.2 (62)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      independent living, assisted living, board and care

      Ivy Park at Roseville

      5161 Foothills Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Exterior view of a three-story senior living facility building with beige walls and multiple balconies. The building is surrounded by green grass, trees, and shrubs under a clear blue sky.
      $2,865 – $4,785+4.6 (69)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent living

      Truewood by Merrill, Roseville

      1275 Pleasant Grove Boulevard, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Stone sign for The Pavilion at El Dorado Hills Memory Care located at 2288 Francisco Drive, surrounded by green grass and trees in the background.
      $4,075 – $5,297+4.0 (11)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      assisted living, memory care

      The Pavilion at El Dorado Hills

      2288 Francisco Dr, El Dorado Hills, CA, 95762
    • Exterior view of Oakmont of Westpark senior living facility at dusk, showing a two-story building with illuminated windows, stone and stucco facade, landscaped greenery, and a covered entrance with a clearance sign.
      $3,595 – $4,995+4.3 (86)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Westpark

      2400 Pleasant Grove Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Front exterior view of a senior living facility named 'the Chateau' with a covered entrance, surrounded by lush green trees and landscaped flower beds. There are chairs and an American flag near the entrance.
      $4,400 – $9,155+4.2 (90)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      River's Edge

      601 Feature Dr, Sacramento, CA, 95825

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 449 facilities$5,159/mo
    2. 423 facilities$5,114/mo
    3. 557 facilities$5,140/mo
    4. 458 facilities$5,050/mo
    5. 203 facilities$5,161/mo
    6. 488 facilities$5,079/mo
    7. 187 facilities$5,051/mo
    8. 389 facilities$5,046/mo
    9. 401 facilities$5,073/mo
    10. 244 facilities$5,170/mo
    11. 130 facilities$5,124/mo
    12. 356 facilities$5,254/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living