Overall sentiment in the reviews for Astoria Retirement is predominantly positive, with multiple reviewers emphasizing a warm, family-like atmosphere, attentive caregiving, and well-maintained, homey accommodations. The most frequent themes are the compassionate nature of the caregivers and aides, a small facility size that enables close attention to residents, and an administrator who is described as supportive. Several reviewers explicitly state they would recommend the community and note long-term resident satisfaction, including one who had lived there nearly three years.
Care quality and staff: Reviews consistently praise the caregivers and aides as kind, loving, and attentive, creating a family-like environment. Words used across summaries include warm, caring, respectful, and attentive. This suggests staff-resident interactions are a strong point and that personalized, hands-on care is a defining characteristic of the community. One review also cites sufficient staffing levels and close attention given the smaller size, reinforcing the perception of reliable day-to-day support. However, there is a notable outlier that reports problems with staff temper and dishonesty, which indicates that while staff behavior is generally a strength, prospective residents and families should be aware that negative interpersonal incidents have occurred.
Facilities and management: The facility is described as small, homey, and immaculate, which aligns with multiple reviewers noting a welcoming atmosphere and comfortable accommodations. Several reviewers explicitly call the community well-managed and state that residents are well cared for. The small scale appears to be an organizational strength, allowing staff to deliver individualized attention. That said, management concerns surface in one review describing mismanaged pharmacy accounts and dishonesty, a serious administrative issue. This single but significant complaint contrasts with the otherwise strong managerial praise and suggests variability in administrative reliability or at least an isolated but impactful failure in administrative processes.
Dining and activities: Dining receives uniformly positive remarks — meals are described as home-cooked, tasty, and appealing, with a good variety that includes fruits and vegetables. Multiple reviewers mention appealing and well-prepared meals as a highlight. Activity programming is also positively noted, with references to daily and varied activities that contribute to a pleasant atmosphere and resident engagement. These consistent comments indicate that both nutrition and programming are strengths likely to support resident wellbeing and satisfaction.
Patterns and recommendations: The aggregate picture is of a small, well-kept retirement home with warm staff, strong personal care, quality meals, and active engagement for residents. Most reviewers highly recommend Astoria Retirement. Nevertheless, the review citing pharmacy/account mismanagement, temper issues, and dishonesty is an important counterpoint; it raises concerns about medication management and staff conduct that could have serious consequences. Because that complaint is significantly more severe than the other, generally positive remarks, prospective residents and families should verify medication handling procedures, ask about pharmacy/account oversight, and inquire about staff training and incident reporting policies during tours.
Bottom line: Astoria Retirement appears to offer compassionate, attentive care in a small, clean, and homey setting with good meals and activities, and many satisfied residents and families. To be thorough, visitors should pay particular attention to administrative safeguards — especially around medications and billing — and observe staff interactions directly to ensure the positive patterns reported in most reviews are present in their specific experience.
