Regency Palms Oxnard

    1020 Bismark Way, Oxnard, CA, 93033
    4.6 · 58 reviews
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousCurrent/former resident
    4.0

    Clean, caring home; verify staffing

    I moved in smoothly and found the brand-new, spotless facility warm and home-like with spacious rooms and kitchenettes. The staff are friendly, professional and genuinely caring, meals are restaurant-style and usually delicious, and activities are plentiful and engaging. Management is helpful and responsive most of the time, but I have seen understaffing and turnover cause long waits for assistance and occasional communication hiccups. Security and personalized care give me confidence, but families should verify staffing stability and memory-care safeguards before deciding.

    Pricing

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    4.55 · 58 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.4
    • Staff

      4.5
    • Meals

      4.3
    • Amenities

      4.6
    • Value

      4.5

    Pros

    • brand-new, very clean, and well-maintained facility
    • spacious, well-appointed rooms with kitchenettes (microwave, refrigerator, sink)
    • safety-focused bathrooms and accessible one-floor layout
    • spotless common areas, bright seasonal decorations, and pleasant landscaping
    • friendly, caring, and compassionate caregiving staff
    • visible and responsive management and directors (multiple reviewers named directors)
    • quick housekeeping and proactive maintenance response
    • excellent dining program with praised head chef and diverse menu options
    • restaurant-style dining room and family-meal atmosphere
    • robust activities program (live music, bingo, putting green, movies, outings)
    • specialization in memory care and many positive dementia-care reports
    • around-the-clock competent care reported by many reviewers
    • personalized attention and a small resident population enabling familiar staff-resident relationships
    • wide range of amenities (gym, movie theater, chapel, library, gardens, courtyards)
    • peace of mind and high level of care reported by numerous families
    • good value / fair pricing and affordable respite care options
    • helpful front desk and welcoming move-in process
    • positive rehabilitation and therapy support (physical therapists mentioned)
    • ample social events (brunches, themed parties, live performances)
    • convenient location (near park/beach) and pleasant community feel

    Cons

    • documented high staff turnover and nursing (RN) departures in some periods
    • understaffing leading to delays in assistance and long waits for care
    • reported medication errors and communication breakdowns between departments
    • multiple reports of falls and at least one hospital visit tied to incidents
    • inconsistent quality of care—some shifts described as excellent, others as minimal or careless
    • occasional poor management behavior or unprofessional communication
    • activity program inconsistency—reports of months with little or no activities
    • transportation issues (inoperable shuttle/bus reported)
    • food quality inconsistency—some reports of cold, uncovered, or poor-quality meals
    • dirty patios, occasional unpleasant smells, and outside areas described as shady or neglected
    • shared rooms in memory care and limited privacy noted by some reviewers
    • extra fees for services (additional laundry, landline) that some families highlighted
    • departmental communication problems and opening/startup hiccups
    • some reviewers explicitly advised others to avoid due to safety concerns
    • long hallways that can cause walker fatigue for some residents
    • limited nearby options for exploration cited by reviewers
    • access or visitation restrictions and security/staffing questions raised by some families
    • variability in activities director engagement (some praised, some criticized)

    Summary review

    Overall impression: Reviews for Regency Palms Oxnard show a strongly mixed but predominantly positive profile with consistent praise for the facility’s physical plant, dining program, compassionate staff, and memory-care programming — balanced by recurrent, serious concerns about staffing stability, inconsistent care, and occasional safety incidents. Many reviewers describe a brand-new, bright, and spotless community with spacious rooms (often with kitchenettes), attractive common spaces, and a warm, restaurant-style dining environment. Numerous families and residents highlight specific staff members and directors by name and report smooth move-ins, personalized attention, responsive maintenance/housekeeping, and a calendar full of social and wellness activities.

    Care and staff: A substantial portion of reviews emphasize caring, professional, and attentive caregivers. Reviewers often use language such as “compassionate,” “kind,” and “goes above and beyond.” Several comments specifically praise memory-care competency and dementia-informed care, noting staff understanding of dementia behaviors and consistent, respectful approaches. Management visibility and helpfulness are reported frequently; multiple reviewers named directors and staff who made positive impressions. Quick response after incidents, proactive follow-up, and around-the-clock competent care were noted by many families. At the same time, there are repeated and serious reports about high staff turnover, RN and nursing departures, and understaffing. These staffing problems manifest in long waits for assistance, inconsistent caregiver quality (“few good caregivers” vs. many excellent ones), and concerns about continuity of care. That variability is the single largest driver of negative sentiment and creates a risk for residents who need consistent, skilled attention.

    Safety and clinical issues: While several reviewers explicitly state the facility feels secure and safe, others raised grave safety-related concerns. Multiple accounts mention medication errors, falls (including incidents not discovered for hours) and at least one hospital visit. Those reports are concentrated around reviewers who also describe poor staffing or high turnover, suggesting that clinical and supervision risks were correlated with staffing shortages on particular shifts or time periods. These incidents were severe enough that some families moved their loved ones out and warned others. Conversely, other reviewers praised immediate responsive care after falls and felt confident in clinical oversight. This split indicates inconsistent implementation of safety protocols across different times or teams.

    Facilities and amenities: The community’s physical attributes are a consistently strong point. Reviewers praised clean, modern rooms with crown molding and track lighting, roomy bathrooms, and helpful in-room features like refrigerators, microwaves, and kitchenettes. Common spaces (dining room, movie theater, library, gardens, fountains, chapel, gym) were described as attractive and well-maintained; seasonal decorations and bright, colorful environments were mentioned many times. Some outdoor areas were called shady or not as well-kept by a few reviewers, and patios were sometimes reported as dirty or smelling unpleasant. Long hallways were noted as potentially fatiguing for residents using walkers. Overall, the facility’s newness and upkeep are strong selling points.

    Dining and housekeeping: Dining receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from many reviewers: excellent chefs, diverse menus, customization, themed brunches, and family-style meals were frequently highlighted. At the same time, there are isolated but strong complaints about meal quality — reports of food being cold, left uncovered for hours, or “awful” — which appeared in a subset of negative reviews. Housekeeping and maintenance are generally described as quick and thorough, enhancing resident satisfaction in most accounts.

    Activities and social life: The activities program is another commonly cited strength: live music, movie showings (often twice daily), bingo, putting green contests, brunches, parties, shuttle outings, and varied exercise classes were frequently praised. Several reviewers stressed that staff learn residents’ names and create a family atmosphere. However, some reviewers described long stretches without activities or criticized the activities director as disengaged (e.g., spending time on administrative tasks rather than programming). These conflicting reports point to variability in programming consistency, possibly tied to staffing or management attention.

    Management, communication, and operations: Many families report visible, helpful administrators who facilitated smooth move-ins and provided good communication. Conversely, some complaints centered on poor management decisions, unprofessional communication (staff speaking in front of residents), difficulty reaching administrators during certain times, and departmental communication breakdowns. Specific operational issues were mentioned: the resident shuttle/bus being inoperable in some instances and extra fees for services such as additional laundry or landline usage. Several reviews referenced opening/startup hiccups and improvements over time, including administration efforts to increase staffing ratios in response to concerns.

    Patterns and recommendations for prospective families: The dominant pattern is one of strong facilities, excellent dining, and many caring staff — with intermittent but significant lapses tied to turnover and understaffing. Positive reviews often emphasize names and concrete examples of staff excellence; negative reviews frequently describe systemic issues (turnover, medication errors, falls) that materially affected resident safety. Prospective families should treat these reviews as evidence of variability: Regency Palms Oxnard can provide a very positive, restaurant-style, socially active environment with high-quality dementia care, but there are periods and shifts where staffing and operational problems have led to serious incidents.

    Bottom line: Regency Palms Oxnard offers compelling physical amenities, a strong dining program, varied activities, and many compassionate caregivers and leaders — making it an attractive option for many seniors, especially those seeking a modern memory-care–capable community. However, because multiple reviewers reported staffing instability, safety incidents, and inconsistent activities or management responsiveness, prospective residents and families should probe current staffing levels, fall/medication protocols, nurse turnover history, activity schedules, food-handling practices, and transport availability during tours. Meeting directors, viewing care schedules, speaking with current families, and observing a meal and an activity in person will help confirm whether the community is currently delivering the consistently high level of care described by many reviewers or if the concerns raised in other accounts remain active issues.

    Location

    Map showing location of Regency Palms Oxnard

    About Regency Palms Oxnard

    Regency Palms Oxnard sits in the heart of College Estates in Oxnard, offering a wide range of senior care including assisted living, independent living, skilled nursing, and memory care services. The community has skilled nursing care, rehabilitation therapies, and personalized care plans for each resident. People with Alzheimer's or dementia get care through the Reminiscence at Regency Palms® Memory Care program, which features a secure, self-contained neighborhood. Assisted living comes with the Rejuvenate at Regency Palms® program, letting residents live with help when needed and freedom when wanted. The building is new with beautiful landscaping, two stories, and various housing choices, with shared rooms, studios, and one-bedroom accommodations sized at 308 and 337 square feet. Shared neighborhoods are available for those who need live-in care, and the staff helps with daily activities like bathing, dressing, and managing medicines.

    Inside, the facilities are modern with comfortable, spacious layouts, a bistro café serving chef-prepared meals, a beauty salon, a barber shop, a library, and a movie theater. Outdoor courtyards give residents a place to relax, and amenities like fitness centers, game rooms, and event areas keep seniors active. The community allows pets and supports socialization and hobbies with events and outings. Transportation services help residents attend appointments, run errands, or take trips, and Wi-Fi and high-speed internet help people stay in touch with family. On-site home health and hospice care is available, with CarePredict® monitoring technology enhancing safety and monitoring health. Safety features such as a residents' call button system, fall detection, wander management, and keyless door entry are planned for the near future.

    The community has a team of passionate staff, and they provide 24/7 support, showing warmth and kindness like family. Nutritious chef-planned meals are served daily. Regency Palms Oxnard aims for seamless transitions, so moving in is designed to be stress-free. Tours are available to show daily life, dining, and activities. The center welcomes veterans and surviving spouses, helping them access VA benefits. The facility is licensed and in compliance with all standards. Regency Palms Oxnard has won the Best of Senior Living and the All-Star Award, and it holds a high review score of 8.9 from residents and families, who mention exceptional care and support. Meridian Senior Living, which operates over 20 communities across the country, manages Regency Palms Oxnard. This community focuses on helping seniors stay independent and safe, often providing special programs that inspire purpose, connection, and happiness every day.

    About Meridian Senior Living

    Regency Palms Oxnard is managed by Meridian Senior Living.

    Founded in 2010, Meridian Senior Living has established itself as a prominent operator in the senior housing industry, headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland. The privately-owned company has rapidly grown to become one of the nation's top 20 senior housing operators, currently managing 45 communities across 21 states throughout the United States. With approximately 4,100 employees serving over 7,000 residents, Meridian has built a substantial presence in the senior living sector, demonstrating consistent growth and expansion since its inception just over a decade ago.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    26

    Inspections

    5

    Type A Citations

    10

    Type B Citations

    4

    Years of reports

    12 Sept 2024
    Found insufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff sexually abused residents. Found insufficient evidence to support the allegations that staff makes fun of residents and coerces residents to use the toilet against their will.
    12 Sept 2024
    Investigated the allegation that staff sexually abused residents, found no evidence to support the claim, and residents and staff reported that residents are treated well and feel safe. Also examined the claim that staff made fun of residents and tried to force them to use the toilet against their will, and found no evidence supporting those allegations.
    15 Jun 2024
    Identified deficiencies related to staff training and medication safety. Found that two staff lacked prohibited health condition training and three staff were not current on required medication training; the medication cabinet was left unlocked with residents present, and medications were pre-poured more than 24 hours in advance.
    15 Jun 2024
    Reviewed the facility’s safety, sanitation, and record-keeping procedures during a routine annual visit, noting that medications were stored unsecured at one point, and several staff members lacked required training.
    • § 1569.625(b)(2)
    • § 87465(h)(5)
    • § 87307(a)(2)
    • § 87705(f)(2)
    05 Apr 2024
    Investigated the allegations that lack of care and supervision caused a resident to fall, and that residents’ personal rights were being violated; found no evidence to support either allegation.
    22 Feb 2024
    Investigated the allegation that staff were smoking marijuana while on duty; interviews and observations indicated no evidence supporting the claim.
    22 Jan 2024
    Reviewed operational procedures and resident records, identified medication documentation inconsistencies, and noted staff training deficiencies during an unannounced annual inspection.
    • § 1569.69(b)
    • § 87465(h)(6)
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    • § 1569.696(a)
    • § 87411(c)(1)
    04 Jan 2024
    Found that the facility generally met safety and health standards, including proper emergency equipment, food preparation, and resident accommodations, but identified some record-keeping deficiencies and unsecured laundry rooms during the visit.
    • § 87705(f)(2)
    • § 87309(a)
    06 Dec 2023
    Investigated concerns that staff did not ensure a door was locked leading to a resident with dementia leaving unsupervised, and found evidence that R1 left during a power outage but insufficient evidence to confirm they were locked in or mistreated; also reviewed feeding and other safety concerns with no findings of neglect or improper care.
    • § 87464(f)(1)
    14 Sept 2023
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not properly assist a resident with falls and fees; found the resident’s fees were refunded after their short stay, and the allegation was deemed unsubstantiated.
    21 Jul 2023
    Found that a resident’s living space was extremely cluttered with obstacles that created a safety hazard. A citation was issued for the unsafe living condition.
    • § 87303(a)
    13 Jul 2023
    Found that residents were being changed incontinence supplies every two hours or as needed, and scheduled to be bathed at least twice a week, with residents confirming they received their showers and no issues regarding toileting or bathing were reported.
    12 Jul 2023
    Reviewed multiple allegations including that staff did not respond promptly to a resident’s fall, provided incorrect medication dose, spoke inappropriately, and did not safeguard personal belongings; found evidence supported staff delays during a fall but insufficient evidence for the other claims.
    • § 87468.2(a)(4)
    20 Jun 2023
    Investigated four specific allegations, including medication procedures, timely administration, respectful treatment, and bill assistance, and found no evidence to support any of them.
    16 May 2023
    Found no deficiencies; safety devices tested and working, medications securely stored and reviewed, records complete, and living areas clean and well maintained.
    16 May 2023
    Confirmed that the facility maintained compliance with safety, sanitation, and record-keeping standards during the inspection, with no deficiencies identified.
    14 Mar 2023
    Determined that residents were being provided with activities, as staff and residents participated in decorating and engaging in scheduled events, and records confirmed ongoing activity programs.
    29 Nov 2022
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not safeguard resident’s personal belongings and found no evidence supporting that claim; also examined the claim of inappropriate staff interaction with a resident and found no evidence to support it.
    29 Sept 2022
    Identified that the administrator did not promptly provide a former resident with their medical records upon request, as regulations require immediate access without the need for completion of a release form.
    • § 87468.2(a)(19)
    07 Jun 2022
    Found pre-licensing complete with no deficiencies. The home met safety and operation requirements, including fire clearance for five non-ambulatory and one bedridden resident, secure storage for medications and cleaning supplies, functioning smoke and carbon monoxide detectors, and posted emergency plans.
    07 Jun 2022
    Found that the facility met all licensing requirements, with appropriate safety features, accommodations for residents, and proper storage of supplies, allowing for safe and comfortable living conditions.
    23 May 2022
    Confirmed the identity of applicant and administrator through photo ID and interview questions. Confirmed understanding of regulations and readiness across areas including facility operation, admission policies, staffing and training, health condition restrictions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness.
    23 May 2022
    Confirmed that the applicant/administrator participated in a compliance review, demonstrating understanding of relevant regulations and policies related to facility operations, staffing, emergency preparedness, and licensing requirements.
    19 Apr 2022
    Investigated the allegation that the signal system was in disrepair; testing showed that pendants and pull cords functioned properly, and staff reported no issues.
    31 Jan 2022
    Reviewed compliance with infection control practices and safety standards, found the facility maintained appropriate safety measures, functional alarms, proper sanitation, secured outdoor areas, and adequate PPE, with no deficiencies noted.
    15 Jan 2021
    Reviewed a pre-licensing inspection confirming the facility met safety, sanitation, and operational requirements, including proper accommodations for residents, safety systems, and appropriate postings, with approval pending final license issuance.

    Nearby Communities

    • Covered entrance area of a facility with four blue cushioned chairs arranged around small tables, two potted plants near wooden double doors, and a sign indicating pick-up and drop-off only with no parking.
      $2,895 – $3,763+4.1 (53)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      assisted living, memory care, board and care

      Aegis Living Ventura

      4964 Telegraph Rd, Ventura, CA, 93003
    • Front exterior of a two-story senior living building with a covered entryway, illuminated windows, and a paved driveway at dusk.
      $5,095 – $5,495+4.3 (60)
      Studio • Semi-private
      assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Simi Valley

      3110 Royal Ave, Simi Valley, CA, 93065
    • Entrance of a building with large columns and a covered porch, surrounded by well-maintained landscaping including green shrubs and red flowering plants under a clear blue sky.
      $4,275+4.5 (62)
      Studio
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Ivy Park at Simi Valley

      5300 E Los Angeles Ave, Simi Valley, CA, 93063
    • Exterior view of Belmont Village Senior Living Calabasas showing a beige stucco building with a red tile roof, arched entryway, and several windows with green shutters under a clear blue sky.
      $5,160 – $14,800+4.5 (28)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      assisted living, memory care

      Belmont Village Senior Living Calabasas

      24141 Ventura Blvd, Calabasas, CA, 91302
    • Front exterior of a modern multi-story senior living building at dusk, showing the illuminated entrance, windows, and landscaping with trees.
      $6,500+4.2 (25)
      1 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living

      The Village at NorthRidge

      9222 Corbin Avenue, Northridge, CA, 91324
    • Exterior view of Aegis Living Granada Hills facility with a beige stucco building featuring red tile roofing, surrounded by palm trees and other greenery under a clear blue sky. A sign in front displays the facility name and address.
      $5,460 – $6,450+4.7 (9)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom
      assisted living, memory care

      Aegis Living Granada Hills

      10801 Lindley Avenue, Granada Hills, CA, 91344

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 57 facilities$6,181/mo
    2. 57 facilities$6,181/mo
    3. 130 facilities$5,654/mo
    4. 99 facilities$5,605/mo
    5. 90 facilities$5,622/mo
    6. 93 facilities$5,634/mo
    7. 83 facilities$5,968/mo
    8. 73 facilities$5,974/mo
    9. 139 facilities$6,061/mo
    10. 153 facilities$6,039/mo
    11. 1 facilities$5,167/mo
    12. 143 facilities$5,917/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living