Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Request a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Healthcare staffing
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Restaurant-style dining
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Air-conditioning
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wifi
Memory care community services
Mild cognitive impairment
Specialized memory care programming
Transportation
Community operated transportation
Transportation arrangement
Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
Common areas
Beauty salon
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Gaming room
Garden
Outdoor space
Small library
Wellness center
Community services
Concierge services
Fitness programs
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Planned day trips
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
2.83·(18)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
1.7
Staff
2.0
Meals
1.0
Amenities
2.5
Value
2.8
Pros
Dementia-aware care programs
Calm, resident-centered atmosphere
Engaging activities program
Multiple care neighborhoods by cognitive level
Compassionate, teamwork-oriented caregiving staff
Staff accommodations for complex schedules and pandemic needs
Well-maintained interior areas
Safe outdoor wandering areas
State survey compliance
Cons
Inconsistent staffing and time-management practices
Gaps in staff training for clinical and personal-care tasks
Staff conduct and communication tone
Delays in personal-hygiene and bathing schedules
Odor concerns in entry and some common areas
Inconsistent food quality and meal appeal
Weak leadership responsiveness and accountability
Deficient resident-safety and fall-prevention practices
Crowded common areas and space-management issues
Security and access-control weaknesses
Summary of reviews
The reviews present a mixed picture of care at this facility. Positive remarks highlight a core of committed caregivers and organized clinical programs for residents with cognitive impairment: reviewers note dementia-aware approaches, distinct care neighborhoods by cognitive level, an engaging activities program, and safe outdoor areas for residents who wander. Several comments emphasize teamwork among staff, accommodations during the pandemic, and compliance with state survey requirements. These elements suggest an operational foundation capable of supporting resident engagement and memory-care needs.
At the same time, there are repeated operational concerns that prospective families should weigh. Care delivery appears uneven: while some staff are described as compassionate and attentive, other accounts point to inadequate staffing levels, time-management problems, and gaps in staff training for routine clinical and personal-care tasks. These weaknesses are tied to delays in bathing and hygiene assistance and broader concerns about responsiveness to basic care needs.
Dining and activities present a similar contrast. The activities program and the facility’s division into multiple communities are positives for social engagement and cognitive-appropriate programming. However, food quality and meal appeal are characterized as inconsistent and unappetizing by several observers, which can affect residents’ mealtime satisfaction and nutrition if not addressed.
Facility condition and management raise additional issues. Some reviewers describe the interior as well maintained and note a calm environment, yet others report odor concerns at the entry and in common areas, crowded communal spaces, and an overall need for building and policy upgrades. Safety and security are also highlighted as areas for improvement: concerns include access-control weaknesses and gaps in fall-prevention and monitoring practices, with at least one described incident that resulted in hospitalization and that underscores the importance of robust safety protocols.
Management and leadership receive mixed assessments. Positive comments cite helpful scheduling flexibility and supportive pandemic-era responses, but a number of comments indicate weak leadership responsiveness, limited follow-through on family concerns, and workplace-culture issues that affect staff conduct and communication tone. Taken together, the pattern in the reviews points to a facility with clear strengths in memory-care programming and a dedicated caregiving core, alongside persistent operational and management shortcomings that would benefit from targeted improvements in staffing, training, environmental maintenance, dining services, and safety oversight.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Curry Manor.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Curry Manor is located at 1458 Quail Ln, Roseburg, OR, 97471.
About Curry Manor
Curry Manor sits out in the country part of the Garden Valley in Roseburg, Oregon, where folks can look out on orchards and farm fields, and it feels pretty homelike and relaxed, which seems to suit most people who want some peace and quiet in their days. The place has 62 beds total, and 47 of those are set up for memory care, so it's well known for helping people with Alzheimer's or other memory conditions, and there's staff around 24 hours who help folks in all kinds of ways-moving from bed to wheelchair, with bathing or dressing, checking insulin for diabetes, or helping with medication so nobody forgets anything too important. Meals are made ready for everybody, so residents don't need to worry about cooking or shopping, and there's always gentle reminders when it's time to eat, which some people really need. For those who might feel unsteady, staff can walk folks back and forth from meals or activities, and they help with personal things like grooming, too. The building has both private and shared rooms, with choices that include studios, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, and semi-private setups. Folks get to enjoy indoor gathering spaces where it's easy to socialize or join group activities, and the secure walking path means even those having memory troubles can get some fresh air outdoors in the orchard area, without getting lost or into trouble. The care is arranged around each person's needs, so there are personal care plans that keep things pretty tailored, and the whole idea is to let everyone keep as much independence and dignity as possible. Curry Manor takes Medicaid, social security, veteran's benefits, private pay, and insurance, which makes it possible for different kinds of people to live there. The staff has experience with memory care and residential care, and many families have counted on their expertise, especially for loved ones whose Alzheimer's is getting worse. So, it's a straightforward, country place, with 24-hour staff, secure areas to walk, and a focus on supporting people so their days can be just a bit easier and less stressful.
People often ask...
Curry Manor offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $6,399 per month.
Curry Manor offers assisted living, memory care, and skilled nursing.
There are 5 photos of Curry Manor on Mirador.
The full address for this community is 1458 Quail Ln, Roseburg, OR 97471.
No, Curry Manor does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Investigated the allegation that records were not accessible and concluded records were not provided upon request.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
18 Apr 2026Inspection
18 Apr 2026Inspection
Investigated and found that records were not provided upon request.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
18 Apr 2026Inspection
18 Apr 2026Inspection
Investigated and found that staff did not follow the resident's care plan, resulting in choking risk and ER transfer, and the provider failed to ensure the plan was followed.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
10 Mar 2026Inspection
10 Mar 2026Inspection
Investigated found the records were not provided upon request, resulting in a licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
29 Jan 2026Abuse: Neglect
29 Jan 2026Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the complaint and found abuse by neglect due to failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in multiple alterations.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Jan 2026License Condition
26 Jan 2026License Condition
Found a deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Nov 2025Inspection
21 Nov 2025Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system that created a risk of harm to a resident. Distraction led to a medication shake being left near the resident, violating Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
28 Oct 2025Inspection
28 Oct 2025Inspection
Investigated a medication administration case and found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system that could have harmed a resident, constituting neglect and abuse.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
17 Oct 2025Abuse: Neglect
17 Oct 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found abuse by neglect due to failure to properly plan care, which led to a resident being physically assaulted.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
17 Oct 2025Abuse: Neglect
17 Oct 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found abuse by neglect due to poor care planning that allowed a resident to be physically assaulted; a $500 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
17 Oct 2025Inspection
17 Oct 2025Inspection
Found that records were not provided to the department upon request, violating administrative rules.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
28 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
28 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safety risk occurred when a resident was placed in a roommate situation with a known aggressor, risking harm to another resident. A $250 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
28 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
28 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated abuse by neglect related to unsafe roommate assignment that risked harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
16 Jan 2025Complaint
16 Jan 2025Complaint
Found deficiencies in updating and documenting the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool; resident data were not updated quarterly, with some residents unchanged for over a year.
Deficiency—Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Plan
31 Dec 2024Abuse: Neglect
31 Dec 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint of neglect and abuse due to inadequate care planning that failed to prevent resident-on-resident violence; findings showed repeated physical altercations occurred.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
20 Dec 2024Inspection
20 Dec 2024Inspection
Found ABST was not fully implemented or updated.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
19 Dec 2024Inspection
19 Dec 2024Inspection
Identified failure to fully implement and update the Acuity Based Staffing Tool (ABST).
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
17 Dec 2024Inspection
17 Dec 2024Inspection
Investigated and found ABST not fully implemented or updated.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
17 Dec 2024Inspection
17 Dec 2024Inspection
Found that ABST was not fully implemented or updated.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
16 Dec 2024Inspection
16 Dec 2024Inspection
Identified inconsistencies between the resident roster, care plans, and ABST data and found the ABST outdated.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
16 Dec 2024Inspection
16 Dec 2024Inspection
Determined an updated ABST reflecting resident needs was not maintained, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
15 Dec 2024Inspection
15 Dec 2024Inspection
Found failure to fully implement and update the Acuity Based Staffing Tool. This represented a Level 2 licensing violation with minor harm or potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
02 Dec 2024Inspection
02 Dec 2024Inspection
Investigated found an outdated ABST not reflecting residents' needs, causing inconsistencies among the roster, care plans, and ABST.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
26 Nov 2024Inspection
26 Nov 2024Inspection
Investigated a licensing allegation and found that the Acuity Based Staffing Tool was not fully implemented or updated.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 Nov 2024Inspection
23 Nov 2024Inspection
Concluded that a deficiency existed due to an outdated ABST that did not accurately reflect the resident population and their care needs, with inconsistencies among the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 Nov 2024Inspection
23 Nov 2024Inspection
Found deficiencies related to an outdated ABST and inconsistencies between resident data and care planning.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 Nov 2024Inspection
23 Nov 2024Inspection
Determined that an outdated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool failed to reflect resident care needs, causing inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
21 Nov 2024Licensure
21 Nov 2024Licensure
Identified extensive deficiencies across governance, resident care planning, safety, health services, and resident rights with multiple failures to implement required programs, monitor conditions, and ensure proper staff training and documentation.
Deficiency—Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
Deficiency—Resident Health Services
Deficiency—RN Delegation and Teaching
Deficiency—Systems: Tracking Control Substances
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
Deficiency—Systems: Resident Right to Refuse
Deficiency—Systems: Medication Administration
Deficiency—Systems: Self-Administration of Meds
Deficiency—Acuity Based Staffing Tool - ABST Time
Deficiency—Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Staffing Plan
Deficiency—Training Within 30 Days of Hire ? Direct Care Staff
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—General Building Exterior
Deficiency—Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors
Deficiency—Housekeeping and Laundry
Deficiency—Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, TV, or Cable
Deficiency—Individual Rights Settings: Privacy, Dignity
Deficiency—Individual Door Locks: Key Access
Deficiency—Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Administration Responsibilities
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance with Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Activities
Deficiency—Outside Area
Deficiency—Secure Outdoor Recreation Area
19 Nov 2024Inspection
19 Nov 2024Inspection
Found deficiencies related to an outdated Acuity-Based Staffing Tool that did not reflect resident needs, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
13 Nov 2024Inspection
13 Nov 2024Inspection
Investigated an allegation about the accuracy of the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool and identified inconsistencies between the resident roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
08 Nov 2024Inspection
08 Nov 2024Inspection
Identified an outdated ABST with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
08 Nov 2024Inspection
08 Nov 2024Inspection
Investigated an allegation and found the ABST was not updated and did not reflect resident needs, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
05 Nov 2024Inspection
05 Nov 2024Inspection
Identified a deficiency where the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool was not updated to reflect resident needs, causing inconsistencies between rosters, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
05 Nov 2024Abuse: Neglect
05 Nov 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a failure to provide a safe medication administration system for a newly admitted resident, leading to serious neglect and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
31 Oct 2024Inspection
31 Oct 2024Inspection
Investigated and found that the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool was not updated to reflect resident care needs, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
21 Oct 2024Abuse: Neglect
21 Oct 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found that the care plan was not followed to ensure same-gender bathing assistance, which caused emotional distress and constitutes abuse and neglect; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
21 Oct 2024Inspection
21 Oct 2024Inspection
Identified a licensing violation for failing to maintain an updated ABST reflecting resident needs, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
04 Oct 2024Abuse: Neglect
04 Oct 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found failures in care planning to prevent physical altercations between residents.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
04 Oct 2024Inspection
04 Oct 2024Inspection
Identified a deficiency due to an outdated ABST that did not reflect resident needs, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
09 Sept 2024Inspection
09 Sept 2024Inspection
Investigated and identified a violation for failing to maintain an updated ABST that reflects residents' care needs, with inconsistencies among the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
08 Sept 2024Inspection
08 Sept 2024Inspection
Found that care plan was not followed, leaving a resident unattended during toileting and resulting in neglect and abuse.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
08 Sept 2024Inspection
08 Sept 2024Inspection
Determined that a violation occurred due to an outdated ABST that did not reflect resident population and care needs.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
01 Sept 2024Inspection
01 Sept 2024Inspection
Investigated ABST data practices and found inconsistencies among the roster, care plans, and ABST entries, violating administrative rules.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
27 Aug 2024Inspection
27 Aug 2024Inspection
Found inconsistencies between the resident roster, care plans, and ABST data, indicating the ABST was not updated to reflect resident needs. This violated Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
10 Jun 2024Licensure
10 Jun 2024Licensure
Identified sanitation deficiencies in kitchen areas and administration compliance concerns; a follow-up visit found substantial compliance.
Investigated an allegation found that an updated ABST reflecting resident care needs was not maintained, causing inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
02 Apr 2024Inspection
02 Apr 2024Inspection
Investigated and found interiors had unpleasant odors due to housekeeping issues.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services
02 Apr 2024Inspection
02 Apr 2024Inspection
Found failure to implement services per the service plan.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
02 Apr 2024Complaint
02 Apr 2024Complaint
Investigated a staffing-related complaint; scope indicated potential for harm related to staffing requirements.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
02 Apr 2024Inspection
02 Apr 2024Inspection
Verified no licensing violation or abuse occurred after investigating an allegation of not administering medication as ordered. Found that services were not implemented for one resident during a site visit.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
02 Apr 2024Complaint
02 Apr 2024Complaint
Investigated and found failures to implement an acuity-based staffing tool with resulting staffing below tool guidance; and noted a cited deficiency related to doors, walls, elevators, or odors.
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
Deficiency—Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors
02 Apr 2024Inspection
02 Apr 2024Inspection
Identified insufficient qualified awake direct care staff to meet 24-hour needs, causing long call light wait times.
Licensing—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
20 Mar 2024Inspection
20 Mar 2024Inspection
Found that a staff member physically and verbally abused a resident and that the environment was not safe.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Apr 2023Inspection
20 Apr 2023Inspection
Concluded that weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents, and staff to the proper authority was not submitted timely for about 30 days.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
11 Apr 2023Inspection
11 Apr 2023Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment when a resident left a locked memory care unit without assistance, and the resident has a history of exit seeking.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
06 Apr 2023Licensure
06 Apr 2023Licensure
Found deficiencies in food sanitation and administration compliance, with a follow-up showing substantial compliance.
Investigated and identified a deficiency in timely weekly reporting of vaccination status for residents and staff.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
06 Jan 2023Inspection
06 Jan 2023Inspection
Investigated a records issue and found the acuity-based staffing tool was not up to date, causing inconsistencies with resident rosters and care plans. Found violations of Oregon Administrative Rules due to inaccurate ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
03 Oct 2022Complaint
03 Oct 2022Complaint
Investigated complaint; identified deficiencies in service planning, infection prevention, staffing, and acuity-based staffing tools.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
26 Sept 2022Inspection
26 Sept 2022Inspection
Identified insufficient direct care staffing to meet residents' needs. Observed 6 care partners and 2 med-techs on day/evening shifts, short of the planned 7 care partners and 2 med-techs for memory care and assisted living.
Licensing—Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents
26 Sept 2022Inspection
26 Sept 2022Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found that an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool did not accurately reflect residents' needs, with inconsistencies between the roster, care plans, and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
26 Sept 2022Inspection
26 Sept 2022Inspection
Investigated an allegation of failing to maintain infection prevention and control and masking requirements, and found a substantiated licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
26 Sept 2022Inspection
26 Sept 2022Inspection
Found that resident service plans were not updated quarterly to reflect residents' care needs.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
01 Sept 2022Inspection
01 Sept 2022Inspection
Found failure to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation and to report weekly vaccination status for residents, staff, and vaccinated individuals to the proper authority during August 2022.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
20 Aug 2022Abuse: Neglect
20 Aug 2022Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found failures to implement interventions and care planning for a resident's fall history, leading to an unwitnessed fall with a fracture. A $450 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Jul 2022Complaint
21 Jul 2022Complaint
Identified deficiencies in infection control practices, including improper mask usage by staff and missing front-entrance signage.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Reasonable Precautions
13 Jul 2022Inspection
13 Jul 2022Inspection
Found a deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment for residents.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
12 May 2022Inspection
12 May 2022Inspection
Investigated alleged neglect and found that a staff member failed to provide basic care per the care plan, leaving the resident soaked in bodily fluids and in an unsafe environment, while another staff member was not found to have wrongdoing.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
06 Mar 2022Inspection
06 Mar 2022Inspection
Found that an alleged perpetrator financially exploited the alleged victim by taking medications and causing financial loss. The environment did not provide a safe setting for the alleged victim.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Feb 2022Inspection
11 Feb 2022Inspection
Determined that medication orders were not carried out as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
12 Dec 2021Inspection
12 Dec 2021Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found a staff member stuffed gloves into a resident's mouth, constituting physical abuse, and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Oct 2021License Condition
26 Oct 2021License Condition
Found that needed services were not provided.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide service
11 Oct 2021Validation
11 Oct 2021Validation
Identified widespread deficiencies in administration, resident care, safety, staffing, and facility conditions with risks to residents.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Facility Administration: Operation
Deficiency—Facility Administration: Records
Deficiency—Reasonable Precautions
Deficiency—Resident Rights and Protection - General
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents
Deficiency—General Building Exterior
Deficiency—Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors
Deficiency—Housekeeping and Laundry
Deficiency—Administration Responsibilities
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Administrator Training
Deficiency—Staffing
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance With Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Nutrition and Hydration
Deficiency—Activities
Deficiency—Secure Outdoor Recreation Area
Deficiency—Resident Rooms
30 Jun 2020Abuse: Neglect
30 Jun 2020Abuse: Neglect
Identified a violation of safe medication administration practices that led to hospitalization, and assessed a fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
18 Jan 2020Inspection
18 Jan 2020Inspection
Found that the care plan was not followed during a shower, leading to combative behavior and physical actions, with findings substantiated.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
28 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
28 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect by failing to provide basic care or services, risking serious harm.
Abuse—Failed to administer medication as ordered
28 Aug 2019Abuse: Neglect
28 Aug 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect due to failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in discomfort and risk of serious harm; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
08 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the complaint and found neglect in care that failed to maintain health and safety, resulting in harm and unreasonable discomfort.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
19 Jan 2018Abuse: Neglect
19 Jan 2018Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an abuse/neglect allegation and found failure to provide a safe environment and to assess and intervene in a timely manner. A fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
19 Dec 2017Inspection
19 Dec 2017Inspection
Found a violation for unsafe disposal of unused medication due to failure to provide a safe medication administration system.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
12 Dec 2017Abuse: Neglect
12 Dec 2017Abuse: Neglect
Fined after a substantiated neglect finding for failing to assess and intervene when a resident's condition changed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
05 Jan 2017Abuse: Neglect
05 Jan 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and concluded care planning was not adequate.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
17 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
17 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to protect a resident from harm, with violations identified. A $200 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
06 Jan 2016Abuse: Neglect
06 Jan 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an abuse/neglect allegation and found that the care plan was not followed, resulting in inappropriate sexual contact and rough treatment.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
29 Jul 2015Abuse: Neglect
29 Jul 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment for residents, with neglect that could result in harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Jul 2015Abuse: Neglect
23 Jul 2015Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation of neglect and found a failure to assess and intervene.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Jul 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
23 Jul 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a deficiency in preventing diversion of resident medications.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
22 May 2015Inspection
22 May 2015Inspection
Found deficiencies related to care planning and safeguarding people from harm.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
01 Mar 2015Abuse: Neglect
01 Mar 2015Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
29 Aug 2014Inspection
29 Aug 2014Inspection
Identified a care plan violation with potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
25 Jun 2013Inspection
25 Jun 2013Inspection
Identified a safety deficiency and a failure to follow the care plan.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
04 Jun 2013Abuse: Neglect
04 Jun 2013Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to assess and intervene after a resident's condition changed, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
21 May 2013Inspection
21 May 2013Inspection
Investigated and identified the allegation as substantiated, noting residents were not protected from harm.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
31 Mar 2013Abuse: Neglect
31 Mar 2013Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a neglect allegation and identified failure to follow the care plan, leading to a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
06 Feb 2013Inspection
06 Feb 2013Inspection
Investigated and found a deficiency in protecting a resident from physical assault.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
03 Jan 2013Abuse: Neglect
03 Jan 2013Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint alleging failure to assure resident rights; identified violations and a civil penalty was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to assure resident rights
18 Dec 2012Inspection
18 Dec 2012Inspection
Determined that a resident's rights were violated due to harassment.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
13 Nov 2012Inspection
13 Nov 2012Inspection
Investigated a failure to protect a resident from harm; a violation was found.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
09 Oct 2012Abuse: Neglect
09 Oct 2012Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to assure resident rights. A civil penalty of $600 was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to assure resident rights
27 Sept 2012Inspection
27 Sept 2012Inspection
Found that the care plan was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
04 Aug 2012Abuse: Neglect
04 Aug 2012Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a failure to provide a safe environment, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Mar 2012Inspection
05 Mar 2012Inspection
Identified an inadequate medication system and failure to keep medication records current or accurate.
Licensing—Failed to keep medication record current or accurate
13 Aug 2011Inspection
13 Aug 2011Inspection
Investigated a complaint and concluded residents were not protected from inappropriate sexual contact.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
19 Oct 2010Abuse: Neglect
19 Oct 2010Abuse: Neglect
Identified neglect due to inadequate incontinent care.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
12 Aug 2010Inspection
12 Aug 2010Inspection
Substantiated a licensing violation alleging failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Feb 2010Inspection
14 Feb 2010Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
25 Jan 2010Abuse: Neglect
25 Jan 2010Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found the care plan was not followed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Curry Manor. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Curry Manor directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of Curry Manor?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
