My mother has lived here for years and I've been very pleased with the compassionate, knowledgeable staff and the clean, homey atmosphere. The small, well-maintained community offers great meals, varied activities, dementia-aware care, meticulous medication management, and prompt family communication - I'd definitely recommend it.
Loved one of resident
Jul 2026
Pricing
Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Schedule a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Coordination with health care providers
Hospice waiver
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Healthcare staffing
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Restaurant-style dining
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Air-conditioning
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wifi
Memory care community services
Dementia waiver
Mild cognitive impairment
Specialized memory care programming
Transportation
Community operated transportation
Transportation arrangement
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Common areas
Beauty salon
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Gaming room
Garden
Outdoor space
Pet friendly
Small library
Wellness center
Community services
Concierge services
Fitness programs
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Planned day trips
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
4.38·(100)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
4.4
Staff
4.5
Meals
4.2
Amenities
4.4
Value
3.2
Pros
Compassionate, individualized care
Dementia-capable memory care on-site
24/7 supervision and safety focus
Engaging daily activities program
On-site live music and entertainment
Varied, nutritionally balanced meal service
Celebratory events and social programming
Transportation and offsite trip services
Small, home-like intimate environment
Friendly, long-tenured staff
Strong family communication and care planning
Well-maintained, attractive grounds and campus
Clean, well-maintained facilities
Excellent housekeeping and laundry services
Three-level campus layout supporting care transitions
Responsive maintenance and support services
Personalized room and common-area design
Cons
Inconsistent staffing levels and workforce strain
Variable staff conduct and responsiveness
Inconsistent cleanliness and sanitation practices
Medication-management variability and med-tech workload concerns
Management transparency and follow-through gaps
Inconsistent meal quality and limited menu choices
Limited capacity and availability due to small size
Allegations of mishandled personal property and financial conduct
Short clinical-tenure and turnover among RNs
Reliance on multi-role staff creating scheduling pressures
Summary of reviews
Overall impression
Jurgens Park Senior Living is frequently described as a small, home-like assisted living community with an active social program and an on-site memory care option. Many families highlight compassionate, individualized attention, long-tenured caregivers, and an environment that emphasizes social engagement and safety. The property and grounds draw repeated praise for being attractive, well maintained, and conducive to outdoor dining and strolling.
Care and staff
Care quality is a prominent strength for many families: reviewers commonly cite staff who know residents by name, 24/7 supervision, dementia-capable care, and active care planning and family communication. There are numerous anecdotes of staff going above and beyond, strong med-tech skill in many instances, and useful supports during transitions and admissions. At the same time, recurring operational themes raise concerns: staffing levels and workforce strain are described as uneven, which appears to affect responsiveness at times. Reviewers also note variability in staff conduct—while many caregivers are praised as attentive and kind, others are described as less engaged. Clinical staff turnover, particularly among RNs, and med-tech workload pressures are noted and could affect continuity of care.
Dining and nutrition
Dining is a mixed area. Numerous reviews praise varied menus, nutritious and tasty meals, celebratory dining events (birthdays, al fresco options) and attentive service. Conversely, some families report inconsistent meal quality, limited menu choices or missed meal-service expectations. Prospective families should directly observe a meal service, review menu cycles, and ask about accommodations for preferences and clinical diets.
Activities and engagement
The activities program is a clear strength: daily offerings such as bingo, arts and crafts, puzzles, exercise classes, live music (piano, accordion), outings, and animal visits are frequently mentioned. The small scale of the community supports frequent social interaction, family-style dining, and individualized activity planning. For residents seeking an active, social environment, the programming and transportation options are likely to be appealing.
Facilities and operations
Physically, the campus is described as attractive, clean, and thoughtfully laid out with studios and common areas opening onto activity hubs and outdoor spaces. Housekeeping and groundskeeping are regularly praised. However, the small size that contributes to a home-like atmosphere also limits capacity and room availability. Several operational issues appear repeatedly: inconsistent sanitation/cleanliness practices in some reports, scheduling pressures from multi-role staff assignments, and occasional gaps in follow-through on administrative commitments.
Management and notable patterns
Management and administrative responsiveness receive mixed assessments. Many families describe strong engagement from leadership and improvement under new management, while others cite gaps in transparency, follow-through, and trustworthiness. There are serious individual claims, including allegations concerning mishandled personal property and financial conduct; these merit direct inquiry during any evaluation. Overall patterns suggest a facility with strong person-centered strengths but uneven operational consistency in areas tied to staffing, clinical continuity, and administrative accountability.
What prospective families should do next
Given the blend of consistently praised strengths and the operational inconsistencies noted, a recommended next step is an in-person visit focused on verification: observe a mealtime, sit in on an activity, ask for staffing ratios and turnover statistics, review medication and incident protocols, confirm housekeeping and sanitation procedures, and request written policies regarding belongings and financial practices. Speaking directly with current families and reviewing inspection records (if available) can also help clarify whether the strengths or the cited operational weaknesses are most applicable to the household or unit you are considering.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Jurgens Park Senior Living.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Jurgens Park Senior Living is located at 17950 SW 115th Ave, Tualatin, OR, 97062.
About Jurgens Park Senior Living
Jurgens Park Senior Living sits in Tualatin, Oregon, close to shopping, restaurants, and medical centers, and you'll find it's a single-story place with Colonial-style architecture and a landscaped garden, which some folks find makes it feel more like a home than a facility. The community's got 64 beds, with 46 set aside for memory care, and you can pick from several floor plans, including studio, private studio, and one-bedroom options. Residents can have their pets with them if they follow the indoor no smoking policy, and meals roll out three times a day with a registered dietician ready to help with any dietary needs. The place covers a wide range of care, including independent living for folks who don't need much help, assisted living where staff lend a hand with bathing, dressing, medication, and so on, and memory care for those dealing with Alzheimer's or dementia, where they aim to cut down confusion and wandering with special designs and features and where the "Transitions" program helps when needs change over time.
Jurgens Park provides skilled nursing for higher care needs and ambulatory care to help with daily tasks, meals, and outings. There's a full team including nurses on staff, a doctor on call, a dentist, and podiatrists available; they're supported by specially trained team members who can assist day or night. When folks need physical, occupational, or speech therapy, those services are on tap, too. The respite care is there for people who need short-term stays, maybe after surgery, with flexible options for daily, weekly, or monthly visits, and hospice support is available. They tailor care plans for each person, meeting often to talk through what's best and always focusing on safety, comfort, and letting residents keep as much independence and dignity as possible.
There's a strong sense of community with beautiful living rooms where people gather, lots of indoor common areas, a beauty and barber shop, and arrangements to get folks to appointments or out and about, thanks to complimentary transportation services. Activities run every day, covering everything from social events to devotional services to programs for lifelong learning and fitness, which keeps people active and helps with mental engagement. Residents, staff say, often feel comfortable and welcomed, because the environment's supportive and familiar, and the care teams really do try to advocate for each resident, taking time to line up services and help families understand costs and options.
Memory care services range from individualized support, special programming for cognitive stimulation, to features meant to prevent agitation or getting confused. Assisted living covers help with housekeeping, daily living, and transportation, while folks who want to live more independently still get access to community perks and a vibrant social atmosphere. The staff focus hard on making sure everyone finds something meaningful to do and gets support designed just for them, and the whole setup aims for residents to feel cared for, respected, and able to live with as much joy and fulfillment as they can.
Sinceri Senior Living is a premier senior living management company founded in 1986 by Jerry Erwin and headquartered in Vancouver, Washington. Originally operating under the name JEA Senior Living, the company has grown substantially over its nearly four decades of operation to become a major player in the senior care industry. Today, Sinceri operates 83 communities across 21 states, serving approximately 5,330 seniors nationwide with a comprehensive range of living options designed to meet diverse care needs and lifestyle preferences.
The company offers three distinct levels of senior care: independent living, assisted living, and specialized memory care through their signature "Meaningful Moments" program. Their assisted living services include 24-hour licensed supervision, medication management, nutritious dining programs, and their exclusive "Elevate" Life Enrichment Program, which addresses four key wellness dimensions - physical, emotional, social, and intellectual aspects. The Meaningful Moments memory care program takes a unique person-centered approach, focusing on each resident's individual history, passions, and interests to create meaningful connections and engagement opportunities for those affected by Alzheimer's and related dementia conditions.
Sinceri's philosophy centers on treating residents like family and fostering genuine bonds between those who live and serve in their communities. Their mission emphasizes honoring the aging process while providing exceptional, person-centered care that empowers residents to maintain their independence and live their best lives regardless of care needs. The company believes that everyone deserves dignity, respect, and opportunities for joy and meaningful experiences, which drives their holistic approach to senior care that goes beyond basic safety and comfort to create truly enriching living environments.
The company has earned significant industry recognition, including certification as a Great Place to Work for seven consecutive years and multiple Forbes honors, including ranking as #78 among America's Best Midsize Employers in 2021 and recognition as one of America's Best Employers by State for Washington. In recent years, Sinceri has experienced substantial growth through strategic partnerships with major healthcare REITs including National Health Investors and Ventas, adding multiple properties in 2024 while maintaining strong operational performance with seven consecutive quarters of NOI growth and achieving pre-pandemic occupancy levels across their stabilized portfolio.
People often ask...
Jurgens Park Senior Living offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $5,500 per month.
Jurgens Park Senior Living offers assisted living and memory care.
There are 27 photos of Jurgens Park Senior Living on Mirador.
The full address for this community is 17950 SW 115th Ave, Tualatin, OR 97062.
No, Jurgens Park Senior Living does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Found deficiencies in kitchen sanitation practices and administration compliance, with multiple areas needing cleaning, repair, and adherence to licensing rules.
Found that the facility failed to provide a safe environment, placing residents in immediate jeopardy.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide safe environment
17 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
17 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found that a resident was exposed to emotional abuse due to repeated visits by a terminated staff member and failure to restrict access.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
09 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
09 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a report of neglect and abuse; found a resident exposed to heat and sun in the courtyard due to a lack of a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 May 2025Abuse: Neglect
13 May 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that staff did not follow the service plan, resulting in a fall with injury. This constitutes neglect related to safety and resident rights.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
28 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
28 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation that care planning failed to monitor after a fall, leading to neglect.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
26 Apr 2025Inspection
26 Apr 2025Inspection
Investigated found neglect and abuse due to failure to follow a resident's care plan during a transfer, resulting in a fall with injury.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
04 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
04 Apr 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a report of abuse and neglect and found a failure to provide a safe environment, constituting abuse and neglect.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
27 Mar 2025Abuse: Neglect
27 Mar 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a violation for failing to follow a care plan, which led to a choking incident; a $188 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
21 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
21 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation of neglect and found failures in care planning and 1:1 supervision that led to a resident's fall and left arm fracture.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
20 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
20 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found neglect of care related to inadequate care planning and interventions that risked injury, with a fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
21 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
21 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found neglect related to hygiene, resulting in a $250 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
15 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
15 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a failure to provide a safe environment, indicating abuse and neglect. A staff member kissed a resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
19 Dec 2024Change of Owner
19 Dec 2024Change of Owner
Investigated found multiple deficiencies across governance, resident rights, care planning, and health/safety practices, with failures to protect residents and ensure consistent, person-centered care.
Deficiency—Facility Administration: Operation
Deficiency—Reasonable Precautions
Deficiency—Resident Rights and Protection - General
Investigated the allegation of failing to provide social services and found a deficiency in implementing services.
Licensing—Failed to provide social services
13 Feb 2024Inspection
13 Feb 2024Inspection
Found a deficiency in service planning where the service plan was not developed with a Service Planning Team that consists of the resident and the resident's legal representative.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
07 Feb 2024Complaint
07 Feb 2024Complaint
Investigated found that abuse incidents were not immediately reported to authorities, and identified multiple deficiencies in service planning, staffing, call systems, and staff training.
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training – Pre-Serv
Deficiency—Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, Tv, Or Cable
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
23 Dec 2023Inspection
23 Dec 2023Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found that a caregiver verbally/emotionally abused a resident and failed to protect them from abuse. The findings indicate violations of resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from mental or emotional abuse
23 Dec 2023Inspection
23 Dec 2023Inspection
Determined that involuntary seclusion occurred, violating resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from involuntary seclusion
26 Aug 2023Inspection
26 Aug 2023Inspection
Investigated an allegation of abuse reporting and found a failure to immediately notify authorities.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
30 May 2023Licensure
30 May 2023Licensure
Found no deficiencies. It determined substantial compliance with meal service and food sanitation rules.
Deficiency—Comment
23 Apr 2023Inspection
23 Apr 2023Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to report potential or suspected abuse and found a violation of reporting requirements.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
19 Mar 2023Inspection
19 Mar 2023Inspection
Found deficiencies in staff competency training and in maintaining staff competency documentation.
Licensing—Failed to assure a qualified caregiver was present
19 Mar 2023Inspection
19 Mar 2023Inspection
Identified a deficiency where the call system failed to connect resident units to the care staff center or staff pagers.
Licensing—Failed to maintain functional door alarm or call system
19 Mar 2023Inspection
19 Mar 2023Inspection
Investigated the allegation and identified a deficiency in updating the ABST to reflect resident needs, with data inconsistencies among roster, care plans, and ABST.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
14 Feb 2023Abuse: Neglect
14 Feb 2023Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found failures to plan care for the known fall risk, with multiple falls causing injuries.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
27 Dec 2022Abuse: Neglect
27 Dec 2022Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that the resident's care plan was not followed, leading to neglect and abuse; a $225 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
18 Oct 2022Complaint
18 Oct 2022Complaint
Found staffing deficiencies due to not providing designated awake caregivers in each building and not consistently meeting acuity-based staffing levels, risking inadequate resident assistance during night shifts.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
16 Sept 2022Inspection
16 Sept 2022Inspection
Found that staffing levels, intensity and qualifications were not consistently aligned with acuity-based staffing expectations.
Licensing—Failed to update staffing plan based on ABST
16 Sept 2022Inspection
16 Sept 2022Inspection
Investigated a staffing allegation and found that a designated awake caregiver was not provided in every building, with the night shift closing one of three buildings and sleeping during the shift.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate staffing
11 Aug 2022Abuse: Neglect
11 Aug 2022Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a violation of safe medication administration that caused a resident to be transported to the hospital.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
28 Feb 2022Validation
28 Feb 2022Validation
Concluded substantial compliance after follow-up visits, despite earlier findings of multiple deficiencies across meals sanitation, move-in evaluations, service plans, medication management, staff training, fire safety, and exterior safety.
Deficiency—Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Service Plan: Service Planning Team
Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
Deficiency—Systems: Medication Administration
Deficiency—Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—General Building Exterior
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance With Rules Health Care
11 Oct 2020Inspection
11 Oct 2020Inspection
Found violations related to failure to administer prescribed medication and to maintain a safe medication administration system.
Licensing—Failed to administer ordered medication
11 Oct 2020Inspection
11 Oct 2020Inspection
Investigated and found that ordered medications were not administered, violating resident rights and constituting neglect and abuse. The resident reported missing two pills and not receiving the additional medication.
Licensing—Failed to administer ordered medication
01 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
01 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect and abuse due to failure to provide adequate skin care, resulting in a wound and hospital treatment; a $500 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide appropriate skin care
08 Sept 2020Inspection
08 Sept 2020Inspection
Investigated the medication administration allegation and verified the failure to administer medication as ordered.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
01 Jun 2020Abuse: Neglect
01 Jun 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that care planning failed to mitigate fall risk, leading to injuries and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
07 Mar 2020Abuse: Neglect
07 Mar 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint and found neglect for failing to provide a safe environment, resulting in injuries; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
17 Feb 2020Abuse: Neglect
17 Feb 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found violations for failing to plan care according to the resident's observable needs and assessed a $250 fine.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
11 Apr 2019Abuse: Neglect
11 Apr 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care resulting in an unsafe environment and inadequate care, with a fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
14 Mar 2019Abuse: Neglect
14 Mar 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated neglect and found a failure to provide a safe environment, risking serious harm to a resident; a fine was assessed of $1,125.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
06 Feb 2019Condition
06 Feb 2019Condition
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The issue was documented as a licensing violation.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide safe environment
04 Feb 2019Abuse: Neglect
04 Feb 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated neglect of care due to failure to maintain a safe environment; a $15,000 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to assure resident was safe
04 Feb 2019Abuse: Neglect
04 Feb 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care for a resident due to failure to maintain a safe environment, with a $15,000 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to assure resident was safe
04 Feb 2019Inspection
04 Feb 2019Inspection
Found that staff failed to report suspected abuse; a $1,000 fine was assessed.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
04 Feb 2019Inspection
04 Feb 2019Inspection
Substantiated the failure to report suspected abuse and assessed a $1,000 fine.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
07 Jun 2018Abuse: Neglect
07 Jun 2018Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint and found failure to adequately plan care related to falls, with a $1,500 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
24 May 2018Abuse: Neglect
24 May 2018Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to assure resident safety and assessed a $375 fine.
Abuse—Failed to assure resident was safe
24 May 2018Inspection
24 May 2018Inspection
Investigated an allegation of failing to report potential or suspected abuse and substantiated the finding, resulting in a civil penalty.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
01 Dec 2017Abuse: Neglect
01 Dec 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a resident was not protected from harm; neglect was substantiated.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 Oct 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
13 Oct 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
Found deficiencies related to preventing theft or misuse of medications and ensuring a safe environment.
Abuse—Failure to provide a system that prevents theft or misuse of medication
10 Jul 2017Abuse: Neglect
10 Jul 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a neglect allegation and found that the care plan was not followed, resulting in inappropriate care.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
05 May 2017Inspection
05 May 2017Inspection
Found a safety deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
03 May 2017Abuse: Neglect
03 May 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment; a $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
29 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
29 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
17 Aug 2015Abuse: Neglect
17 Aug 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided and the care plan was not followed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
25 Jun 2015Abuse: Neglect
25 Jun 2015Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
20 May 2015Abuse: Neglect
20 May 2015Abuse: Neglect
Identified failure to provide a safe environment. The issue was categorized as neglect with minor harm potential.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
25 Feb 2015Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
25 Feb 2015Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Found a failure to provide a safe environment following an allegation of verbal/mental abuse.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
21 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Oct 2013Abuse: Neglect
08 Oct 2013Abuse: Neglect
Found deficiencies in the medication administration system and assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
24 Sept 2012Abuse: Physical Abuse
24 Sept 2012Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated a physical abuse allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
07 Aug 2012Abuse: Physical Abuse
07 Aug 2012Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated the allegation of failing to protect a resident from rough treatment and found a safety deficiency.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
18 Jan 2011Inspection
18 Jan 2011Inspection
Found a violation of providing a safe environment and assessed a $300 fine.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
16 Sept 2010Inspection
16 Sept 2010Inspection
Found that a qualified caregiver was not present and the plan of care was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to assure that a qualified caregiver was present
07 Apr 2010Inspection
07 Apr 2010Inspection
Determined that the plan of care was not followed, with potential for minor to moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Jurgens Park Senior Living. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Jurgens Park Senior Living directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of this community?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
