Overall sentiment across these reviews is mixed, with clear strengths in individual caregiver engagement and weaknesses in facility infrastructure, consistency of staff behavior, and significant safety and privacy concerns reported by some reviewers. Many reviewers appreciate the personal touches from certain caregivers — named as attendants, nurses, or administrative staff — who go out of their way to make residents feel at home. The community is small, which can foster friendliness and personal attention; private rooms with TVs are frequently noted as comfortable, and some residents receive administrative help that families value. Several reviewers also mentioned social activities such as crafts, bingo, exercise, and dance happening in the common living room, and friends often visit specifically to watch TV with residents. Food is generally described as acceptable, with multiple mentions of the meals being “okay” or “fine.” Outdoor spaces are described positively in at least one review, suggesting outdoor areas may be adequate even if interior spaces are less impressive.
Care quality and staff behavior are prominent, mixed themes. On the positive side reviewers highlight attentive staff and caring nurses who interact warmly with residents. However, these positive impressions are tempered by multiple reports of inconsistent staff quality — some staff are described as unfriendly or unhelpful — leading to variable experiences depending on shift or personnel. There are also serious allegations from some reviewers including claims of staff misconduct, privacy (HIPAA) violations, and even reports of residents being kicked out. These allegations prompted calls for investigation from reviewers; while the reviews do not provide documented outcomes, the presence of such serious claims is a notable negative signal that families and oversight bodies would likely want to verify and address.
Facility and cleanliness issues appear in several reviews. The common areas and dining room are repeatedly described as small and crowded, which can limit social comfort and accessibility. The interior is characterized as only “decent” by some reviewers and as not upgraded or lacking modern features by others. More concerningly, at least one review reports a serious cleanliness lapse in a restroom with feces on the floor — a specific instance that raises red flags about sanitation practices and supervision. Limited phone access was also mentioned, which can affect residents’ ability to communicate with family and emergency services; this is an operational concern that impacts daily life and family reassurance.
Dining and activities show conflicting impressions. Several reviews list organized activities (crafts, bingo, exercise, dance) and friendly TV viewing opportunities that residents and visitors enjoy. These activities contribute positively to quality of life for some residents. Conversely, other reviews state there are no activities, indicating inconsistency in programming or in how well activities are communicated or staffed. The dining experience itself is affected by space constraints: food is generally considered acceptable, but the dining area being small and crowded reduces dining comfort and could present logistical challenges for meal service and social interaction.
Management, safety, and policy concerns are a consistent pattern among the more negative comments. Allegations of privacy violations and staff misconduct, along with reports of residents being removed from the facility, suggest potential lapses in resident rights protections and facility oversight. These are serious issues that warrant further inquiry by families or regulators to determine whether they are isolated incidents or symptoms of systemic problems. At the same time, the presence of caring nurses and helpful administrative staff in other reviews suggests that while parts of the operation are functioning well, there is inconsistent performance and potential gaps in training, supervision, or policy enforcement.
In summary, Six Mile Assisted Living presents a combination of strengths and risks according to reviewers. Positive aspects include individualized caregiver attention, a small-community feel, comfortable private rooms with TVs, some organized activities, and generally acceptable food. The main areas of concern are inconsistent staff behavior, serious allegations regarding misconduct and privacy, sanitation lapses, cramped interior common spaces, limited phone access, and uneven activity programming. These mixed reports suggest the facility may provide very good care for some residents depending on staff assignment and timing, but there are significant red flags that families should investigate further — especially the allegations about privacy violations, evictions, and cleanliness — before making placement decisions.
