Overall sentiment across the review summaries for Cedar View Adult Family Home is more positive than negative, with several consistent strengths identified alongside a few notable concerns. Multiple reviewers emphasize a warm, welcoming, small-home environment that supports individualized care. The facility’s single-story layout, open great-room concept, spacious bedrooms (where residents may bring their own furniture), and attractive yards contribute to a homelike, comfortable feel. Several comments say the home was "best for dad," reflecting that reviewers felt it met specific resident needs well.
Care quality and staff performance are frequent positive themes. Reviewers repeatedly note good communication between caregivers and medical professionals, routine doctor visits, and attentive caregivers who are professional, courteous, kind, and compassionate. The management and hiring practices are framed positively in multiple summaries—reviews describe high standards and caregivers who genuinely care for residents. Many reviewers would recommend Cedar View to other families based on the level of personal attention and the facility’s ability to provide needed care.
Daily life features are also highlighted as strengths. The community is said to offer lots of activities and a predictable daily routine, which reviewers appreciated. Dining earns consistent praise: "very good food" and "great meal options" are specifically mentioned. Visiting access is described as outstanding, which is important to families who want frequent, flexible contact with residents.
However, there are several important and concrete concerns that temper the positive feedback. A recurring negative theme is under-staffing; at least one review explicitly connects staffing shortages with worries about the home’s ability to meet a resident’s needs. Cleanliness appears inconsistent across properties—while some reviews call the home clean, another report specifically states "not so clean" and notes a shared bath, which may be a drawback for some families. There is also at least one serious complaint involving a threatened eviction and associated value/cost concerns, indicating potential issues with management communication or contractual/financial expectations in at least one case.
Another pattern is variability between properties: reviewers describe a "second property" as nicer or newer, suggesting differences in condition and amenities depending on which house a resident occupies. That variability, combined with the staffing and cleanliness concerns, suggests the experience can differ by location and over time.
In summary, Cedar View Adult Family Home appears to offer a warm, home-like environment with attentive, compassionate staff, good medical communication, predictable routines, engaging activities, and well-regarded meals. These strengths make it a recommended option by several reviewers for families seeking a smaller, individualized care setting with excellent visiting access. At the same time, prospective families should be aware of reported weaknesses: intermittent understaffing, at least one serious management dispute involving threatened eviction and cost/value concerns, and inconsistent cleanliness (including shared-bath configurations at one property). Those considering Cedar View should verify current staffing levels, cleanliness practices, bathroom arrangements, and contract/eviction policies, and ideally visit the specific house they are considering (noting there appears to be variation between properties).
