Pricing ranges from
    $3,169 – 4,440/month

    Pathway Homes

    2714 Gosford Road#D, Bakersfield, CA 93309
    • Assisted Living

    Adequate facility but uncaring staff

    I found the facility adequate in appearance and amenities, but the staff often seemed uncaring and provided only bare-minimum care; I observed gossip, apparent HIPAA lapses, chronic understaffing, and corners being cut. Meals were unhealthy, extra charges piled up, and I wouldn't recommend it for a family member.

    Loved one of resident
    Jul 2026

    Pricing

    Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.

    Schedule a Tour

    Date of Tour
    Time Window
    Tour Type

    You selected in-person tour on in the

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Medication management

    Healthcare staffing

    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Transportation

    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Community services

    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    Reviews

    1.00·(3)

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      1.0
    • Staff

      1.0
    • Meals

      1.0
    • Amenities

      1.0
    • Value

      1.0

    Cons

    • Uncaring staff
    • Bare-minimum care
    • Staff gossiping about residents
    • HIPAA/privacy violations
    • Community safety concerns
    • Unhealthy meals
    • High price and extra charges
    • Not recommended for family members
    • Poor staffing levels
    • Cost-cutting/cutting corners
    • Poor resident care

    Summary of reviews

    Overall sentiment across the provided reviews is strongly negative. Reviewers consistently describe the level of care as minimal and inadequate, using terms such as "bare-minimum care" and "poor resident care." Multiple summaries emphasize that residents do not receive the attention or clinical support expected, and that shortcuts are taken that affect the quality and safety of care. Several reviewers explicitly state they would not recommend the facility for a family member, which underscores a pervasive lack of confidence in the provider.

    Staff-related issues are a dominant theme. Reviews repeatedly call out uncaring or indifferent staff behavior and poor staffing levels, which appear to contribute directly to diminished care quality. There are specific allegations of staff gossiping about clients and violating privacy rules (HIPAA violations), indicating both unprofessional conduct and potential regulatory noncompliance. These items point to problems with staff training, supervision, and workplace culture. The combination of gossip, privacy breaches, and perceived indifference suggests management may not be enforcing standards or protecting resident dignity.

    Dining and basic services are also criticized: reviewers report "unhealthy meals," implying that nutrition and mealtime quality fall short. Coupled with claims of cost-cutting and "cutting corners," these comments suggest that operational decisions may prioritize expense reduction over resident wellbeing. The presence of "high price and extra charges" in the reviews exacerbates the negative picture: families perceive they are paying a premium yet receiving substandard care and services, which fuels dissatisfaction and mistrust.

    Management and financial transparency are additional points of concern. Several summaries note extra charges and high prices without corresponding quality, indicating billing or communication issues. The pattern of cutting corners and poor oversight inferred from staffing and privacy complaints suggests systemic management weaknesses rather than isolated incidents. Reviewers also describe the home as "concerning for the community," which can reflect a broader reputational impact beyond individual families.

    Notably absent from the reviews are positive mentions of activities, well-maintained facilities, or any staff/manager commendations; the reviews do not provide counterbalancing strengths. In sum, the aggregated reviews paint a consistent picture of a facility struggling with staffing and culture problems, substandard daily care and meals, privacy and professionalism lapses, and perceived poor value for cost. These patterns indicate risks to resident wellbeing and suggest that families should exercise caution and seek additional verification before choosing this provider.

    Reviews written on Mirador

    We have no reviews to show about Pathway Homes.

    Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.

    Location

    Map showing location of Pathway Homes

    Pathway Homes is located at 2714 Gosford Road#D, Bakersfield, CA, 93309.

    About Pathway Homes

    Pathway Homes is a small, licensed care facility in Bakersfield, California, with a capacity for six residents, and you'll find it about 3.8 miles outside Greenacres, set up so people can live as independently as possible while getting the help they need, and they use unique terms like "Pathway Homes," "supportive living," and "Pathway Support" for what they do, meaning their programs focus on helping residents work toward recovery and community life, offering support for mental health and developmental challenges and using individualized care plans for every person so folks can follow their own routines and feel dignified, and there's assisted living, memory care, and home care services, where the staff helps with medication, bathing, dressing, transfers, meals, and daily tasks, and there's always someone around since supervision and healthcare staffing are available at all hours, and the environment's made for comfort, with things like emergency alert systems, wheelchairs access, a dining room with scheduled meals including special diets, and furnished studio rooms, plus cable, telephone, WiFi, housekeeping, laundry services, and transportation, so everything feels a bit more manageable. Residents have a tight-knit place to call home, with activities scheduled every day, a common lounge, movie nights, peer support groups, walking paths, gardens, and a focus on engaging people in the community through things like skill-building, work help, and community events, and families are welcome to be involved in care planning to help keep things steady and familiar, and whenever someone needs a break, respite care is offered for short periods. The staff includes multilingual caregivers who speak English and are trained to support both physical and emotional health, and there's a clear effort to keep residents safe, comfortable, and included, with help from advocates like the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and the California Department of Social Services keeps an eye on things with regular inspections and visits-including a handful of complaint visits just to make sure all's in order, and Pathway Homes fits people who value independence but could use a hand with daily living and who want opportunities to connect and grow within the wider community.

    People often ask...

    Pathway Homes offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $3,169 per month.

    Pathway Homes offers assisted living.

    The full address for this community is 2714 Gosford Road#D, Bakersfield, CA 93309.

    No, Pathway Homes does not offer respite care. Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.

    Safety & Compliance

    In California, the Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing Division licenses residential care facilities for the elderly, conducting inspections and investigating complaints.

    License number157209157
    StatusLicensed
    Facility typeResidential Care Elderly
    Capacity6 residents
    LicenseeMARKELL & MARQUELL ENTERPRISES,L.L.C
    EffectiveNovember 23rd, 2021
    View the official license record

    Inspection Reports

    39

    Reports

    9

    Type A Citations

    14

    Type B Citations

    8

    Complaints

    5

    Years

    09 Dec 2025Inspection
    Concluded a follow-up office visit with the licensee at the Fresno Regional Office to discuss fire clearance, alterations, restricted health care plans, medication records, administrator authority/qualifications, and staff associations. No deficiencies were cited.
    21 Nov 2025Inspection
    Identified safety and documentation deficiencies, including an exit obstruction in bedroom area, improper medication logging, an expired restricted home health care plan, no oxygen-use signage, and an incomplete emergency/disaster plan.
    18 Nov 2025Inspection
    Identified an exit to bedroom #3 obstructed by a resident’s bed, a staff member not associated with the facility, and a resident with a restricted health condition lacking a care plan; also noted that a transfer of a criminal record clearance had not been completed.
    • Type ACCR87307(d)(6)
    • Type ACCR87355(e)(3)
    • Type BHSC1569.39(b)
    18 Nov 2025Inspection
    Identified a second bed obstructing an exit in a resident's bedroom and noted several safety and operation observations during the unannounced visit.
    27 Aug 2025Inspection
    Observed a bed obstructing an exit in bedroom three, creating an immediate safety risk.
    • Type A87405(d)(2)
    18 Mar 2025Complaint
    Found insufficient evidence that staff interfered with residents' right to select their own health care agency.
    18 Mar 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff interfered with residents' right to select their own health care agency; found insufficient evidence to prove interference.
    15 Oct 2024Inspection
    Observed a clean, well-maintained environment and no deficiencies cited.
    15 Oct 2024Inspection
    Observed a clean, well-maintained residence with adequate lighting, safe features, and proper medication storage; no deficiencies were cited.
    15 Oct 2024Inspection
    Observed no deficiencies and found the environment clean and in good repair.
    12 Sept 2024Complaint
    Investigated an allegation of unlawful eviction. Interviews indicated the resident was not evicted and required a higher level of care.
    13 Aug 2024Inspection
    Observed hot water temperatures in two bathrooms exceeded the allowed maximum, creating a potential safety risk.
    • Type B87303(e)(2)
    05 Dec 2023Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not observe changes in resident's condition. There wasn't enough evidence to prove or disprove the allegation.
    16 Nov 2023Inspection
    Observed no deficiencies. Living spaces, bedrooms, bathrooms, and safety equipment appeared clean and in good repair.
    16 Nov 2023Inspection
    Observed a clean, well-maintained setting with secure medications, functioning safety devices, and adequate living space; no deficiencies were cited.
    16 Nov 2023Inspection
    Observed clean, well-maintained spaces with safe storage and accessible areas; no deficiencies cited.
    27 Sept 2023Inspection
    Identified a deficiency where staff lacked required training for residents with restricted health conditions.
    • Type B87613(a)(2)
    06 Mar 2023Inspection
    Confirmed no deficiencies cited during an unannounced case-management review. The visit followed up on a prior report.
    28 Dec 2022Complaint
    Investigated two concerns: staff failed to provide assistance resulting in falls, and staff yelled at a resident with isolation. Based on records and interviews, there was not enough evidence to prove these occurred.
    • Type B87468.2(a)(4)
    17 Nov 2022Inspection
    Observed adherence to infection control and safety protocols, with staff wearing masks and medications kept behind a locked door. Emergency contact information for all residents was up to date.
    17 Nov 2022Inspection
    Observed infection-control measures at the site, including staff wearing masks, a front-entry disinfection station, and a secured area for cleaning supplies and medications, with adequate food stock and up-to-date emergency contacts for all residents.
    17 Nov 2022Inspection
    Observed masks worn by staff, a front entrance with a disinfection station, and a locked area for medications and cleaning supplies. Noted two days of perishable food and seven days of non-perishable food, and that all residents' emergency contact information had been updated.
    19 Oct 2022Complaint
    Investigated the allegation of disrepair and found it unfounded.
    29 Aug 2022Inspection
    Identified several health and safety deficiencies, including a staff member lacking fingerprint transfer clearance, unlocked cleaning storage, missing health assessment, no non-skid in the master shower, and unsupervised residents.
    • Type A87355(e)(2)
    • Type A87705(f)(2)
    • Type B87412(a)(11)
    • Type B87303(e)(5)
    • Type B87411(d)(3)
    29 Aug 2022Inspection
    Identified that only one staff member was on duty for four residents, creating a potential health and safety risk.
    • Type B87411(d)(3)
    14 Jul 2022Inspection
    Identified a deficiency related to incidental medical and dental care after a missing narcotic medication bottle raised concerns about self-administered medications.
    • Type A87465(a)(4)
    29 Nov 2021Inspection
    Identified deficiencies related to health care policy and food safety after a case management follow-up. Specifically, there was no written exception for a restrictive health condition, inadequate food supplies (less than one week of nonperishable and less than two days of perishable foods), and missing TB health screening results for staff.
    • Type A87616(a)
    • Type B87555(b)(26)
    • Type B87411(f)
    29 Nov 2021Inspection
    Identified violations related to food storage, admissions paperwork, postural supports orders, and staff health screenings.
    • Type A87608(3)
    • Type A80065(g)(2)
    • Type B87555(b)(26)
    • Type B87507(c)
    29 Nov 2021Inspection
    Observed infection-control measures and safety practices during a routine annual review, including staff wearing masks, entry temperature checks, and available hand sanitizer. Cleaning supplies were stored behind a locked cabinet, and staff training on infection control was documented.
    29 Nov 2021Inspection
    Observed infection-control practices and PPE availability; staff wore masks and sanitizing supplies were available, and resident emergency contact information was updated.
    21 Oct 2021Complaint
    Investigated a complaint about supervision and bed bugs. Found staff were scheduled at both sites and sometimes worked at the nearby facility, creating potential safety risks; pest control addressed bed bug reports, and no evidence of an active infestation was found.
    • Type B87411(a)
    21 Oct 2021Complaint
    Investigated lack of supervision and found staff listed on schedules at both locations, with licensee admitting staff would go to the neighboring location to help while on duty.
    • Type B87411(a)
    21 Oct 2021Inspection
    Observed pre-licensing requirements were met, with safety detectors installed and cleaning and maintenance tasks completed.
    23 Aug 2021Inspection
    Observed hot water at 107.4°F and an adequate bedroom setup for two ambulatory residents; all pre-licensing requirements were met.
    23 Aug 2021Inspection
    Identified several items needing attention to meet licensing standards, including bathroom repairs, detector installation, door alignment, outdoor debris removal, and thorough cleaning.
    29 Jul 2021Inspection
    Observed that common and resident areas had adequate furnishings and safety measures, but Bedroom #2 blocked an exit and hot water in bathrooms was under 100 degrees Fahrenheit.
    12 Jul 2021Inspection
    Identified issues related to operation were discussed during a non-compliance conference on 07/12/2021.
    12 Jul 2021Inspection
    Held a non-compliance conference to discuss identified issues related to operation. Participants included the licensee/administrator and licensing staff.
    08 Jun 2021Inspection
    Identified a licensing evaluation for a care home seeking initial licensure. It reviewed operation details, staff qualifications, and required documentation.

    Disclaimer

    Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Pathway Homes. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Pathway Homes directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.

    Are you an owner or operator of this community?

    Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.

    Nearby Communities

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 167 facilities$3,941/mo
    2. 155 facilities$3,852/mo
    3. 148 facilities$3,825/mo
    4. 138 facilities$3,948/mo
    5. 71 facilities$3,923/mo
    6. 106 facilities$3,955/mo
    7. 72 facilities$3,891/mo
    8. 93 facilities$3,911/mo
    9. 81 facilities$3,888/mo
    10. 86 facilities$3,891/mo
    11. 81 facilities$3,899/mo
    12. 54 facilities$4,013/mo
    © 2026 Mirador Living