Mirador estimate
    $6,000/month

    WellQuest of Elk Grove

    Sheldon Pacific, 8871 E Stockton Blvd, Elk Grove, CA, 95624
    4.6 · 68 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    4.0

    Gorgeous resort-like care, pricey drawbacks

    I moved my mom in and, overall, I'm impressed - the brand-new, resort-like campus is gorgeous and spotless, the staff are genuinely caring and professional, activities/amenities (pool, salon, gym, movie room, cottages) and restaurant-style food are excellent, and they throw memorable events. It feels safe and homey for many residents, but it is very expensive and some units lack kitchen/storage. Be aware of occasional housekeeping gaps, understaffing/high turnover, a few care/communication lapses and troubling marketing/privacy concerns we encountered. If you can afford it and ask tough questions about staffing and policies, I'd recommend it.

    Pricing

    $6,000+/moSuiteAssisted Living

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    4.62 · 68 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.2
    • Staff

      4.4
    • Meals

      4.1
    • Amenities

      4.5
    • Value

      2.9

    Pros

    • New, bright, resort-like and beautifully designed facility
    • Variety of living options (independent cottages, assisted living, memory care)
    • Caring, attentive and personable staff widely praised
    • On-site rehab/therapy team (EmpowerMe) and medical services (PT/OT, doctors)
    • Chef-prepared, varied and customizable dining including diabetic-friendly options
    • Extensive amenities (pool, heated pool, movie theater, gym, salon, library)
    • Accessible features (pool chair lift, GPS rapid-response bracelet)
    • Active social and event programming (water aerobics, happy hour, classes, parties)
    • Private cottages with in-room kitchens and apartment-style options
    • Modern in-unit appliances (fridge, washer, dryer) in many units
    • Weekly housekeeping and laundry assistance offered
    • Pet-friendly community
    • Clean, well-maintained public spaces and ‘five-star’ vibe reported frequently
    • Supportive move-in experience and helpful sales/staff members
    • Community engagement and well-run social events (birthday parties, anniversary, car show)

    Cons

    • High cost; many reviewers describe pricing as expensive or not affordable
    • Inconsistent staffing levels, reports of being understaffed and high staff turnover
    • Reports of neglect or inattentive care for some residents
    • Privacy invasion and data misuse by a marketing company (unsolicited outreach to relatives)
    • Inside/apartment units can be small, expensive, and some lack full kitchens
    • Housekeeping inconsistent or insufficient (weekly service not always thorough)
    • Maintenance and staff follow-through issues; unfulfilled promises noted
    • Mixed reports on meal quality with some reports of declining food, small portions, unattractive presentation
    • Security concerns noted in some reviews (not always secure)
    • Limited storage in some units
    • Exterior/front of building or landscaping described as unappealing or sparse
    • Policy constraints (e.g., third-floor rule for non-ambulatory residents) that may limit fit
    • Some reviews describe the community as impersonal or not 'homey' for certain residents
    • Occasional administrative errors in Memory Care (wrong photos/misidentification) and slow management response
    • Dust or cleanliness issues in specific rooms despite generally high cleanliness ratings

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment across the reviews is predominantly positive about WellQuest of Elk Grove’s facility, amenities, dining, and many staff members, but there are consistent caveats about cost, staffing consistency, and isolated care and privacy problems. The site is repeatedly described as new, bright, and beautifully designed with a resort-like or five-star feel. Reviewers frequently praise the range of living options—independent cottages, assisted living apartments, and memory care—and the visible quality of the grounds and interior spaces. Many reviewers highlight a strong social environment and community spirit, pointing to well-executed events (birthday parties, anniversary celebration, car show), frequent activities (water aerobics, classes, happy hour), and an active calendar that supports resident engagement.

    Care quality and staff performance are among the most discussed themes and show a mixed but generally favorable pattern. Numerous comments emphasize caring, warm, and professional staff who are attentive and go above and beyond—several staff and administrators are singled out positively by name. On-site clinical supports are also viewed as a strength: an on-site rehab team (EmpowerMe), physical and occupational therapy, and the presence of medical services are noted as valuable for keeping residents mobile and cared for. That said, a significant minority of reviewers report troubling experiences: understaffing, high turnover, delayed responses, and instances of perceived neglect where residents were reportedly unattended. These negative reports contrast with many glowing testimonials and suggest uneven execution of care across shifts or over time.

    The facility’s amenities and daily living offerings receive consistent praise. The dining program is often described as a standout feature: chef-prepared, varied menus with diabetic-friendly customization and generous portions in many reports. Amenities such as a heated pool with chair lift, movie theater, gym, salon, library, and multiple lounges create a full-service environment that reviewers liken to a fine hotel. Cottages and some apartment units with in-room kitchens are highlighted by families who appreciate independent-living features. Practical conveniences—modern appliances, laundry assistance, weekly housekeeping, and on-site events—are called out as strengths. Conversely, several reviews point to inconsistency in housekeeping thoroughness, limited storage in some floorplans, and that some inside apartments are small, lack full kitchens, and feel pricey for their size.

    Management, administration, and operational consistency emerge as mixed. Many reviewers commend specific directors and staff for excellent communication, follow-through during move-ins, and helpfulness during transitions. Positive anecdotes include thoughtful event planning and staff who advocate for residents. However, there are recurring concerns around management follow-through: unmet promises, maintenance slowdowns, and at least one specific memory care administrative error (wrong resident photo posted), with a reviewer noting management inaction in response to that issue. A particularly serious and separate theme is a privacy/data issue: several reviewers objected to unsolicited marketing outreach to relatives, alleged use of addresses without consent, and potential data misuse by a marketing firm. That privacy concern stands out as a major non-clinical risk raised by families and appears to have triggered intentions to report the marketing company.

    Price and perceived value are a prominent dividing factor. Many reviewers find the community worth the cost, praising amenities, food, and the attentive staff and recommending the community highly. Others are concerned the pricing is too high for the level of care or size of certain units; a few families felt care was overpriced or that at-home care would have been cheaper than the monthly cost quoted. Relatedly, some reviewers felt the environment could be impersonal or too large for residents who prefer a smaller, homey facility.

    Notable patterns and practical considerations that emerge for prospective residents and families: the community excels visually and socially, offers a broad menu of amenities and therapy services, and has staff members who frequently receive high marks for compassion and engagement. At the same time, verify unit specifics (kitchen inclusion, storage, floor location rules), ask for current staffing levels and turnover data, confirm housekeeping scope/frequency, review meal trends in person, and raise any privacy/data handling questions before committing. Be aware of the reported incidents—care neglect for some residents, administrative errors in Memory Care, and the marketing/data-privacy complaints—so you can probe how management has addressed those issues.

    In summary, WellQuest of Elk Grove is widely regarded as an attractive, amenity-rich community with many passionate and caring staff and strong offerings in dining, rehab, and social programming. However, inconsistent operational execution on staffing, housekeeping, maintenance, and a documented privacy/marketing concern create meaningful caveats. The community appears to be an excellent fit for residents who prioritize new facilities, robust activities, on-site therapy, and high-quality dining and who can afford the pricing; families should perform targeted due diligence around staffing consistency, unit features, memory care safeguards, and data/privacy policies before moving forward.

    Location

    Map showing location of WellQuest of Elk Grove

    About WellQuest of Elk Grove

    WellQuest of Elk Grove serves seniors 55 and older and offers a wide range of housing and care options, so you'll see independent living, assisted living, memory care, and even skilled nursing plus respite and adult day services, and it sticks to a person-centered approach with individualized plans to fit each resident's needs. The place is state-licensed, houses up to 121 people, and you'll find apartments-including one-bedroom units between 450 and 600 square feet-that are pet-friendly, have emergency response systems, and allow for different floor plans, with staff on-call 24 hours and nurses on duty 12 to 16 hours most days. Residents get help with things like bathing, dressing, mobility, and managing medications, and the staff assists with mild cognitive impairment and behavioral needs if those crop up. For meals, there's all-day dining, plus weekly housekeeping, laundry, and on-site maintenance, so chores don't get in the way. Transportation is planned for appointments or outings, and you can bring a pet along which is important to many people. Amenities include walking paths, jogging trails, raised garden beds, a fitness room, a spa, a wellness area, and even a full-service salon and café, with Wi-Fi and accessible features throughout the campus. Folks have access to a library, game room, and plenty of social and recreational events, with memory care having its own activity program and therapy areas for specialized needs. The facility provides safety features like smoke alarms, sprinklers, safety rails, and wheelchair accessibility. Healthcare services run the range from diabetes care and physical therapy to home health aids and physician concierge visits. There's a focus on keeping residents active and engaged, both in mind and body, with staff and advisors available to help residents and families weigh options and find care that fits different lifestyles and budgets. The place scores well on ratings, averaging 4.6 out of 5 stars across thousands of community reviews, with other affiliated communities close by, so families checking out options across the area get a pretty broad view, and the doors are open most days from morning until evening for visitors or tours.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    51

    Inspections

    7

    Type A Citations

    8

    Type B Citations

    6

    Years of reports

    09 Jul 2021
    Found no safety hazards or deficiencies after the visit and file review. All COVID-19 related questions were negative, temperatures and hot water were within required ranges, medications were securely stored, and annual documents were noted for updates.
    11 Mar 2022
    Found no health or safety concerns or deficiencies after reviewing a December 2021 medication-related incident and a December 2021 incident involving two residents, and noting that two staff were terminated following an internal investigation.
    03 Aug 2023
    Identified no health or safety issues with a chicken coop in the memory care unit garden, where residents participate in activities and relax, with the area kept inaccessible when staff are not around.
    25 Aug 2022
    Found no evidence to prove the overcharging allegation; records showed charges matched the admission agreement, residents reported no overcharges, and audits and daily operations were described as satisfactory.
    04 Sept 2024
    Found two residents had become bedridden and were living in units not fire-cleared for bedridden residents. Noted compliance in several areas, including proper medication storage, cleanliness, a working elevator, and quarterly evacuation drills, with one deficiency observed.
    • § 87202(a)(2)
    28 Jul 2025
    Investigated the allegation that a resident was injured by a motorized cart; the resident denied injury and stated they often drove fast but were never hurt. Found insufficient evidence to prove the injury occurred while in care.
    31 Aug 2022
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced visit; safety measures, equipment, medication storage, and records were compliant.
    04 Sept 2024
    Identified a medication error in which eye drops not prescribed for a resident were administered. Hospice assessment and ongoing monitoring showed no adverse effects, and a deficiency was cited.
    • § 87465(a)(1)
    23 Sept 2020
    Found no deficiencies after a pre-licensing visit conducted via video, noting three floors with 133 rooms: 85 assisted living rooms with private bathrooms and 48 memory care rooms (6 with private bathrooms). Two dining areas, activity spaces, two locked medication rooms, and 43 fire extinguishers were in place, and kitchen supplies plus all required components were in order.
    28 Jul 2025
    Found no evidence that staff failed to assist residents promptly to prevent falls; found no evidence that the resident bathroom door was in disrepair.
    21 Dec 2023
    Identified eight resident falls from 9/29/23 to 11/24/23, seven unwitnessed, and found that all reporting requirements for those incidents were met. Found that a death report submitted on 11/13/23 correctly documented a death on 10/30/23, as confirmed by interviews.
    • § 87211(a)(1)
    05 Aug 2025
    Identified that a resident did not receive prescribed medication on 02/04/2025 due to an ordering lapse and lack of follow-up. Found no evidence to support that call-bell responses were delayed; residents reported no issues and logs showed an average response time of 9–11 minutes.
    • § 87465(a)(4)
    28 Jul 2025
    Found that the allegation that staff failed to properly safeguard outdoor patio areas for residents had no supporting evidence. Furniture was sturdy and residents and family members reported the patio areas were adequately safeguarded.
    18 Jun 2025
    Found that the allegation that staff do not keep things clean and sanitary could not be proven based on video footage and on-site observations.
    30 Jan 2025
    Found the allegation that residents missed medications unfounded; no deficiencies were observed and the complaint was dismissed.
    18 Jun 2025
    Found three specific allegations—elevator not properly operating, fire safety requirements not met, and failure to timely respond to the residents council—unsubstantiated.
    07 Nov 2023
    Investigated allegations that a resident was left outside in 2022 and suffered sunburn; medical records show a sun-exposure visit, sunscreen orders, and a later diagnosis of actinic keratosis. Interviews and record reviews found inconsistent documentation and noted that some staff interviews could not be completed, though training and sunscreen procedures were described.
    • § 87465(c)(2)
    02 Jul 2025
    Found that the toenail care allegation for the resident was not proven by the available evidence. Records showed the resident was independent in self-care prior to hospice, opted out of podiatry, and staff arranged grooming after hospice enrollment when the resident could no longer leave.
    16 Jan 2025
    Found that during a COVID outbreak, delayed resident checks and lack of shift handoffs allowed a resident to remain in direct sun, resulting in heat stroke and death. Investigations identified staffing shortages and procedural gaps contributing to the outcome.
    • § 1569.312(e)
    28 Jul 2025
    Investigated the allegation that staff failed to report an incident; found no evidence of a fall or injury requiring notification and determined the allegation to be unsubstantiated.
    28 Jul 2025
    Found the allegation that staff did not safeguard residents' personal property to be unsubstantiated. Found no evidence in interviews or records that any resident's property was taken.
    03 Aug 2023
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced visit; areas were clean, well maintained, and safe, with residents engaged and staff providing activities and care, and safety systems functioning.
    26 Feb 2025
    Investigated allegation that overnight staff were not awake or available to assist residents; interviews and records showed regular random night checks, phone checks, and call-light responses averaging about 8 minutes, with adequate night staffing and outside agency coverage when needed. Found no evidence of ongoing unavailability during overnight hours and noted measures to keep staff attentive.
    13 Mar 2025
    Found that three meals per day were not provided as part of the resident’s core services; a third meal was billed separately under the Independent Living rate, while the resident was receiving Assisted Living services. Found overcharging for meals beyond core service, with invoices showing extra meal charges that should have been included in the rate.
    • § 87464(f)(3)
    • § 87555(b)(1)
    07 Feb 2023
    Investigated an incident in which a staff member accidentally let a resident with dementia leave the building, resulting in a 50-minute disappearance before the resident was returned with help from the fire department, followed by in-service staff training. Reviewed another incident where a resident exhibited a change of condition and was hospitalized, later returning in good condition.
    • § 87705
    03 Dec 2024
    Identified that on 11/22/2024 memory care residents did not receive their scheduled morning medications due to staffing shortages and lack of qualified staff; residents were monitored for 48 hours with no adverse effects observed.
    03 Oct 2024
    Verified identification of the applicant and administrator and confirmed their understanding of licensing laws and regulations, including facility operation, admission policies, staffing and training, health conditions, general provisions, emergency preparedness, complaints and reporting, and pre-licensing readiness. LIC 809 with a copy of photo ID was signed.
    21 Oct 2024
    Identified outdated physician exam records for two residents with dementia, with no newer documentation available during the visit. Cited for failure to maintain current medical exams.
    • § 87705(c)(5)
    18 Oct 2024
    Found no objections to licensure at this time; licensure is pending for a capacity of six residents, including four non-ambulatory. Observed safety and compliance measures were in place, such as locked sharps and medications, functioning detectors, appropriate hot water and room temperatures, adequate food supplies, a stocked first aid kit, and clean, well-maintained spaces.
    04 Sept 2024
    Identified deficiency in fire clearance for bedridden residents during inspection.
    • § 87202(a)(2)
    21 Dec 2023
    Reviewed fall incident reports and resident files, identifying deficiencies that need to be addressed. Additionally, a death report was submitted with an accurate date of death.
    • § 87211(a)(1)
    07 Nov 2023
    Confirmed insufficient sunscreen application and neglect in supervising residents sitting outside, but found lack of evidence to prove some allegations and insufficient training for staff.
    • § 87465(c)(2)
    25 Oct 2023
    Identified plans to change ownership by leasing to a prospective licensee and potentially appointing them as administrator. Notified that residents must be informed prior to the change, and that the administrator-related documents and notice should be provided to the assigned licensing analyst.
    25 Oct 2023
    Confirmed no deficiencies cited during the meeting regarding a change of ownership and addition of a new licensee.
    03 Aug 2023
    Reviewed visit to garden area revealed no health or safety issues. Residents enjoy presence of chickens in designated area.
    02 Aug 2023
    Found no new issues after an unannounced follow-up on a prior matter; the administrator said the prior matter had been sent to another LPA, and an exit interview was conducted.
    02 Aug 2023
    Cleared deficiency, no new citations.
    29 Jun 2023
    Identified a water temperature of 125 degrees, above the required 105-120 range. Noted adequate safety and supply measures, including first aid supplies, a charged fire extinguisher, working carbon monoxide/smoke detectors, and locked storage for medications, cleaning solutions, and knives, plus a minimum two-day perishable and seven-day nonperishable food supply.
    29 Jun 2023
    Reviewed files and conducted inspections of various areas within the facility, identifying areas of compliance and non-compliance with regulations.
    • § 87303(e)(2)
    07 Feb 2023
    Confirmed incident involving a resident leaving the memory care unit unassisted. Subsequent incident resulted in resident being sent to hospital but later returning in good condition.
    • § 87705
    31 Aug 2022
    Inspection on 8/31/2022 found no safety hazards, with all required items in place and temperatures within guidelines. No deficiencies were observed, and the report was provided to the facility.
    25 Aug 2022
    Identified allegations of overcharging residents were not proven. Meal service and accommodation of special dietary needs were found to be satisfactory. Maintenance of front door and gate access were not found to be concerning. Staffing shortages were addressed effectively.
    21 Jul 2022
    Found no deficiencies during the annual visit; areas inspected—living and common spaces, bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, medications, and records—were in good order. Noted a hospice waiver allowing up to two residents at a time; current census was three.
    21 Jul 2022
    Conducted unannounced annual inspection visit. No deficiencies observed.
    11 Mar 2022
    Confirmed no deficiencies and compliance with regulations during the visit.
    13 Aug 2021
    Found no deficiencies; safety devices, medication logs, first aid supplies, and food storage were in order. Noted two window screens needing replacement with an order placed, and hot water temperature and thermostat were within acceptable ranges.
    13 Aug 2021
    Visited the facility and everything was in compliance with regulations, including staff clearances, physical plant conditions, medication logs, safety features, and first aid supplies.
    09 Jul 2021
    Inspected physical plant, safety measures, and medication storage; no deficiencies observed. Residents engaged in activities and required supplies were available.
    23 Sept 2020
    Confirmed no deficiencies observed during pre-licensing visit.
    04 Aug 2020
    Confirmed understanding of Title 22 regulations during COMP II call with CAB analyst.
    25 Nov 2019
    Confirmed no deficiencies found during annual visit.

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of Oakmont of East Sacramento, a multi-story assisted living and memory care facility with stone and stucco walls, red tile roofing, and landscaped greenery in front. The building number 5301 is visible on the stone tower section.
      $5,000+4.4 (71)
      suite
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of East Sacramento

      5301 F St, Sacramento, CA, 95819
    • Front exterior view of a senior living facility named 'the Chateau' with a covered entrance, surrounded by lush green trees and landscaped flower beds. There are chairs and an American flag near the entrance.
      $4,400 – $9,155+4.2 (90)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      River's Edge

      601 Feature Dr, Sacramento, CA, 95825
    • Exterior view of a senior living facility named Oakmont of Carmichael with a beige stucco building, tiled roof, landscaped garden with colorful flowers, trees, and a curved walkway. Two people are walking on the path near the entrance.
      $3,795 – $5,495+4.6 (121)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Carmichael

      4717 Engle Rd, Carmichael, CA, 95608
    • Exterior front of Oakmont of Fair Oaks building with a landscaped driveway, entrance canopy, and people walking on the path.
      $3,995 – $6,595+4.4 (87)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • Semi-private
      assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Fair Oaks

      8484 Madison Ave, Fair Oaks, CA, 95628
    • Exterior view of Ivy Park at Roseville, a multi-story senior living facility with beige and brown stucco walls and red tile roofing. The entrance features a covered drop-off area with benches and potted plants. There is a landscaped roundabout with flowers and shrubs, and an American flag flying on a flagpole. The sky is clear and blue.
      $3,000 – $3,900+4.2 (62)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      independent living, assisted living, board and care

      Ivy Park at Roseville

      5161 Foothills Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Exterior view of Oakmont of Westpark senior living facility at dusk, showing a two-story building with illuminated windows, stone and stucco facade, landscaped greenery, and a covered entrance with a clearance sign.
      $3,595 – $4,995+4.3 (86)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Westpark

      2400 Pleasant Grove Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 203 facilities$5,052/mo
    2. 258 facilities$5,022/mo
    3. 167 facilities$4,996/mo
    4. 263 facilities$4,935/mo
    5. 260 facilities$4,783/mo
    6. 193 facilities$4,643/mo
    7. 251 facilities$4,822/mo
    8. 253 facilities$4,756/mo
    9. 45 facilities$4,933/mo
    10. 85 facilities$4,792/mo
    11. 263 facilities$4,981/mo
    12. 299 facilities$4,889/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living