Pricing ranges from
    $1,200 – 1,800/month

    Fullerton Villa

    2441 W Orangethorpe Ave, Fullerton, CA, 92833
    3.9 · 39 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    4.0

    Warm bilingual staff; clean, comfortable

    I've had a mostly positive experience - staff are warm, bilingual (Korean/English), meals are Korean and tasty, the place is clean, gated and comfortable, and my grandma enjoys the activities and caring atmosphere. That said, the interior can feel gray and there have been times with thin staffing and spotty communication; I'd strongly recommend confirming nursing/medical coverage and asking directly about any reported issues before deciding.

    Pricing

    $1,200+/moSemi-privateAssisted Living
    $1,800+/moSuiteAssisted Living

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    3.87 · 39 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.2
    • Staff

      3.9
    • Meals

      4.1
    • Amenities

      4.6
    • Value

      2.0

    Pros

    • Welcoming, attentive and compassionate staff
    • Bilingual Korean-English service and culturally familiar staff
    • Daily Korean/Asian meal options and dietary accommodations
    • Clean, well-maintained and often newly remodeled facility
    • Spacious rooms and some garden-view rooms
    • Landscaped gardens and gated/monitored property
    • Engaging and varied activities program (arts & crafts, movie nights, diverse daily activities)
    • Personalized care and assistance with daily activities
    • Supportive, family-like community atmosphere
    • Frequent nurse visits and health-tailored meals (reported by multiple reviewers)
    • Emergency call system, in-room TV, bath and beauty aides available
    • Improvements in resident mental and physical well-being reported
    • Reasonable monthly fee reported by some reviewers
    • Effective HVAC/cooling and heating system

    Cons

    • Inconsistent staff communication between shifts or departments
    • Reports of poor food quality from some reviewers
    • Allegations of neglect, abuse, or unsafe conditions in a few reviews (under investigation)
    • Claims of understaffing or few staff on duty at times
    • No nurse on-site consistently reported by some reviewers; reliance on med techs with limited knowledge
    • Reported bed bug infestation and other cleanliness issues in isolated reports
    • Strongly mixed experiences — high variability in care and service quality
    • Perceived management focus on money, repeated rent increases and high bed costs
    • Occasional mishandling of resident events or belongings (e.g., birthday cake incident)
    • Unpleasant odor or “gray” atmosphere reported by some reviewers
    • Some reviewers reported Korean staff were unhelpful or problematic (contradictory to many positive reports)
    • Concerns about ability to care for post-hospital or medically complex residents

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment: Reviews of Fullerton Villa are strongly mixed but lean positive in quantity and tone. Many reviewers consistently praise the staff, cultural fit, cleanliness, activities, and the sense of community. However, there are a number of serious, recurring negative comments—ranging from poor communication and inconsistent care to allegations of neglect and pest problems—that create a pattern of uneven quality. The facility appears to deliver an excellent experience for a substantial portion of residents and families, while a minority of accounts raise significant concerns that potential families should investigate further.

    Staff and caregiving: The most frequent positive theme is staff quality. Numerous reviewers describe the staff as welcoming, attentive, compassionate, and family-like. Several accounts emphasize bilingual Korean–English service and staff who provide culturally familiar care and daily Korean meals, which many families see as a major benefit. Positive reports highlight personalized care, frequent nurse visits (noted by some), bath and beauty aides, emergency call systems, and staff who help residents through difficult transitions. Staff dedication is often credited with improved resident mood, physical health, and a general feeling of being at home.

    Facilities and environment: Many reviewers praise the facility’s cleanliness, recent remodels, new furniture/mattresses, landscaped gardens, gated property, and security monitoring. Rooms are described as spacious and some have garden views. The facility’s HVAC is singled out positively by at least one reviewer. Conversely, isolated negative remarks mention a persistent unpleasant smell, a “gray” atmosphere, and at least one report of a bed bug infestation—issues that conflict with the prevailing cleanliness narrative and should be checked during a tour.

    Dining and activities: Dining reviews are mixed but lean positive for cultural offerings: multiple reviewers appreciate daily Korean meals, dietary accommodations, and health-tailored menus. That said, several reviewers criticized the food quality or the dining staff, and one or two described the food as “terrible.” Activities are a consistent strength: reviewers commonly report a varied, stimulating program including arts and crafts, weekly movie nights, and other daily social events that contribute to a lively, home-like atmosphere and improved resident engagement.

    Management, operations, and costs: Several reviews praise helpful management and staff who make transitions smoother. Other reviews, however, allege frequent rent increases, high bed costs, and a money-focused management approach. There are also multiple comments about inconsistent communication between staff shifts or departments—an operational weakness that can affect medication, event coordination, and family notifications. Some reviewers mention new ownership and renovations positively, which may indicate recent operational changes; prospective families should ask about ownership timelines, fee history, and policies on rent increases.

    Medical care and safety concerns: While many families describe peace of mind due to monitored security and attentive caregiving, there are recurring medical and safety concerns in several reviews. Some reviewers note no nurse on staff and reliance on med techs with limited medical knowledge, and a few say the facility may not be well-equipped to manage post-hospital orders or complex medical situations. More seriously, a small number of reviews allege neglect or abusive behavior and even note investigations—claims that must be probed directly with the facility and local licensing agencies. Instances of mishandled resident events (e.g., a birthday cake episode) and reports of understaffing also contribute to safety concerns for some families.

    Patterns and recommendations: The dominant pattern is high variability: many families express gratitude and a high level of satisfaction—especially those seeking Korean-language services, culturally familiar meals, and a home-like community—while others report serious operational and care lapses. When considering Fullerton Villa, prospective families should (1) schedule an in-person tour to assess current cleanliness, smell, and staffing levels; (2) ask directly about on-site medical staffing (nurses vs. med techs), emergency procedures, and experience managing post-hospital care and Alzheimer’s needs; (3) request a written history of fees and recent rent changes; (4) inquire about pest control records and any past complaints/investigations; and (5) speak to current families about consistency of care across shifts.

    Bottom line: Fullerton Villa offers many clear strengths—especially compassionate bilingual staff, culturally appropriate dining, engaging activities, and a clean, secure campus—that make it an excellent fit for many Korean-speaking seniors and families seeking a warm, community-oriented residential setting. However, the presence of several serious negative reports means due diligence is essential. Prospective residents and families should visit, ask detailed operational and clinical questions, and verify recent licensing or inspection records to ensure the facility’s strengths are consistent and current.

    Location

    Map showing location of Fullerton Villa

    About Fullerton Villa

    Fullerton Villa, also called Fullerton Residential Manor, has been in operation since 2013 and is licensed by the state of California to support up to 197 residents with license number #306004839. The facility offers assisted living, independent living, and memory care in a clean and comfortable environment. Residents find support from a team led by Ms. Darlene Lindley, Administrator, and trained staff who are there around the clock, providing nursing care, medication management, incontinence care, diabetes care, and caregiver services for help with daily activities. Fullerton Villa focuses on helping seniors stay independent, offering private and comfortable rooms with high-quality wooden floors, regular health checks, a 24-hour call system, and room and housekeeping services.

    For those needing extra support, Fullerton Villa does offer specialized areas for memory care and support for residents living with Alzheimer's and other dementias. There are also hospice care, home health care, and non-medical home care services available, along with support and referral services to help residents connect with the right care options. The facility runs under the Assisted Living Waiver Program (ALWP).

    Meal and dining services provide nutritious food prepared with quality ingredients, and activities like arts and crafts, movie nights, music programs, cultural events, and exercise sessions keep residents engaged. Off-site activities, easy access to public transit, complimentary transportation, and resident parking make getting around simple, while pet-friendly rules let residents keep their dogs or cats. Fullerton Villa also has indoor common areas, satellite TV in private and common spaces, a fitness room, a library, and landscaped walking paths. The facility supports social and spiritual needs with community gatherings and Christian devotional activities. Residents can expect regular assistance, supervision, and a variety of programs designed to support both their health and their emotional well-being in a friendly, social setting.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    35

    Inspections

    5

    Type A Citations

    2

    Type B Citations

    6

    Years of reports

    20 Sept 2024
    Identified a deficiency during the visit; residents were observed to be clean, content, and well cared for, with safety features, meals, activities, and centralized medication storage in place.
    20 Sept 2024
    Inspection found facility operating within capacity limits with clean and well-maintained living spaces, proper food storage, medication handling, and resident activities. Staff and resident files were reviewed, and deficiencies were cited per Title 22 regulations.
    • § 87465(h)(5)
    21 Aug 2024
    Found residents safe and well cared for, with no health or safety hazards observed, rooms clean, a comfortable temperature, and an adequate food supply. Issued an advisory note.
    21 Aug 2024
    Observed residents were safe, well-cared for, and the facility was clean with adequate food supply.
    15 Feb 2024
    Found an open ceiling with a trash bin in the first-floor activity room due to a leak; fire consultants opened the ceiling to inspect and ruled out a sprinkler issue, noting a plumbing problem. Provided consultation on reporting requirements; the administrator indicated understanding and planned to follow up, and an exit interview was conducted.
    15 Feb 2024
    Confirmed open ceiling with leaking issue identified during inspection visit.
    12 Feb 2024
    Found that staff did not adequately supervise a resident with dementia, resulting in the resident eloping from the premises.
    12 Feb 2024
    Found deficient supervision resulting in a resident leaving the facility.
    • § 1569.2(c)
    13 Dec 2023
    Determined allegation that admission agreement was not followed unfounded after confirming the parking fee was waived and interviewing a resident and staff.
    13 Dec 2023
    Confirmed the allegation of not following the resident's admission agreement was unfounded.
    • § 87465(h)(5)
    12 Dec 2023
    Identified a scabies outbreak in 2020 that was not reported to the Department as required. Interviews with four staff and one resident confirmed the outbreak lasted about two to three weeks, with those affected treated with a cream, isolated, rooms sanitized, and clothing washed separately.
    12 Dec 2023
    Found that some residents had scabies and were treated. Determined that the evidence did not clearly prove the allegation that the spread of scabies was not prevented, so the allegation was unsubstantiated.
    12 Dec 2023
    Confirmed scabies outbreak at the facility, but unable to determine if the spread was prevented.
    11 Dec 2023
    Investigated the allegation that a resident sustained injuries from a fall; found insufficient evidence to prove or refute the incident. Determined the allegation that staff threatened eviction UNSUBSTANTIATED; found no documented eviction notices or warnings.
    11 Dec 2023
    Found that the resident did not receive PRN hydrocodone on 9/22/2020 when requested, while orders to hold the medication were issued on 9/22 and 9/24/2020 and the resident was informed; the resident is no longer reachable for interview, and the allegation was unfounded.
    11 Dec 2023
    Investigated allegations of a resident sustaining injuries from a fall and staff threatening eviction; determined insufficient evidence to confirm these allegations occurred as reported.
    • § 1569.2(c)
    18 Oct 2023
    Found that staff did not notify the resident’s authorized representative about the fracture in a timely manner and did not seek medical attention promptly for the resident. Determined there was insufficient evidence to prove or refute the remaining allegations regarding laundry needs, safeguarding clothing, feeding, and dressing.
    18 Oct 2023
    Confirmed staff delayed notifying resident's family of a fracture and staff failed to seek timely medical attention for resident as alleged, but other allegations were unsubstantiated.
    28 Oct 2022
    Found that all staff were background cleared, with two not correctly associated in Guardian. The census and roster were obtained, an exit interview was conducted, and a technical advisory about keeping Guardian associations updated was issued.
    14 Nov 2022
    Delivered an amended version of the complaint investigation to clarify allegation 1 and remove unrelated items for separate case management, and identified that two staff members were not yet associated on 10/28 but are now correctly associated. Updated hospice admission agreements for residents, with one previously missing now complete and the other signed during this visit, and conducted an exit interview with the administrator.
    28 Oct 2022
    Found that the allegation that residents were charged in excess was unfounded. Found that the allegation that staff accepted residents for hospice who do not meet eligibility was unfounded; noted that one hospice plan of care was missing.
    14 Nov 2022
    Confirmed amendment of initial report and corrected missing documentation related to staff association and resident admission agreement.
    28 Oct 2022
    Reviewed allegations of excessive charges and improper hospice care eligibility, but found them to be unfounded.
    • § 87211(a)(2)
    30 Sept 2022
    Found no deficiencies during the visit, with advisory notes issued; infection control measures were in place, temperatures checked, and medications secured, with adequate food supplies. Stains were observed in some sinks and toilets in bathrooms, and paper towels were not stocked.
    30 Sept 2022
    Confirmed no deficiencies found during inspection, residents well-cared for.
    • § 87446
    • § 87705(b)(1)
    07 Jul 2021
    Found no evidence that the resident was malnourished or dehydrated upon hospital admission, despite concerns raised by the POA.
    07 Jul 2021
    Investigated allegation regarding unmet needs of a resident, found no evidence supporting claims of malnourishment or dehydration, and deemed the allegation unfounded.
    02 Jun 2021
    Found that the allegation of lack of supervision resulting in a resident threatening another was unfounded. No further incidents occurred afterward.
    02 Jun 2021
    Determined that the allegation of lack of supervision resulting in a resident threatening another resident was unfounded, as staff responded promptly to the incident, and residents had previously coexisted without serious issues.
    28 Apr 2021
    Determined the allegation of unlawful eviction unfounded. Supported by interviews and documents, no eviction notice was issued.
    28 Apr 2021
    Determined that the allegation of "Unlawful Eviction" was unfounded after reviewing documentation and conducting interviews; no eviction notice was issued.
    08 Apr 2020
    Determined that the allegation of rent being increased beyond the basic Social Security Income rate was unfounded. Verified that the appropriate 60-day notice of rent increase was given to the resident’s power of attorney.
    27 Feb 2020
    Confirmed allegations of inadequate care, medication mismanagement, and unsanitary conditions were found to be unsubstantiated after interviews and document reviews.
    06 Feb 2020
    Confirmed lack of supervision did not result in resident falling, as resident reported dizziness and fell on their own while watching tv. Minor skin tear treated by staff, but resident later taken to hospital for unrelated infection.
    29 Oct 2019
    Inspection found no deficiencies.

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of a senior living facility building with stone and beige walls, multiple windows, and a covered entrance. There is a paved driveway in front and some landscaping with plants and trees. An American flag is visible near the entrance under a clear blue sky.
      $3,995 – $5,295+4.0 (72)
      Studio • Semi-private
      assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Fullerton

      433 W Bastanchury Rd, Fullerton, CA, 92835
    • Exterior view of Ivy Park at Cerritos senior living facility entrance with a covered drop-off area, American flag, and surrounding landscaping under a clear blue sky.
      $5,355 – $6,520+4.4 (34)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living

      Ivy Park at Cerritos

      11000 New Falcon Way, Cerritos, CA, 90703
    • Exterior view of a large, multi-story senior living facility with stone and stucco facade, arched windows, and a covered entrance. Palm trees and potted plants decorate the front area under a clear blue sky.
      $3,495+4.3 (87)
      Semi-private
      continuing care retirement community

      Villagio at Capriana Memory Care Community

      454 La Floresta Dr, Brea, CA, 92823
    • Front facade of the Merrill Gardens senior living building with balconies, an American flag on a pole in the foreground, and benches flanking the entrance.
      $4,795 – $6,233+4.2 (57)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      continuing care retirement community

      Merrill Gardens At Huntington Beach

      17200 Goldenwest Street, Huntington Beach, CA, 92647
    • Front exterior view of Oakmont of Huntington Beach, a three-story building with a beige facade, red tile roof, and multiple windows. The entrance features arches, palm trees, and a landscaped area with shrubs and rocks. A car is parked on the street in front, and the sky is clear and blue.
      $4,595 – $5,595+4.5 (56)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Huntington Beach

      18922 Delaware St, Huntington Beach, CA, 92648
    • Entrance sign for Ivy Park at Tustin assisted living and memory care facility with landscaped greenery and trees, set against a colorful sunset sky.
      $4,890 – $5,550+4.3 (71)
      1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      assisted living, memory care

      Ivy Park at Tustin

      12291 Newport Ave, Santa Ana, CA, 92705

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 444 facilities$5,621/mo
    2. 362 facilities$5,318/mo
    3. 412 facilities$5,414/mo
    4. 446 facilities$5,355/mo
    5. 263 facilities$4,962/mo
    6. 429 facilities$5,403/mo
    7. 255 facilities$5,431/mo
    8. 477 facilities$5,515/mo
    9. 348 facilities$5,397/mo
    10. 234 facilities$4,974/mo
    11. 353 facilities$5,544/mo
    12. 343 facilities$5,522/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living