Mercy McMahon Terrace

    3865 J St, Sacramento, CA, 95816
    4.5 · 18 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    5.0

    Highly recommend compassionate Christian care

    I placed my mom here and I'm very glad I did - the staff are warm, highly competent and genuinely caring (Cecelia, Melinda and Odessa stood out). It's a loving Christian, family-like environment with beautiful grounds, updated rooms, private rooms available, and a pleasant dining/common area that accommodates dietary needs. Activities were excellent before COVID and are limited now, but outings and programming resume when possible. My mom initially struggled but flourished and received exceptional end-of-life and ongoing care - great value and I highly recommend.

    Pricing

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    4.50 · 18 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.8
    • Staff

      4.9
    • Meals

      4.5
    • Amenities

      4.3
    • Value

      4.0

    Pros

    • Highly trained staff
    • Affable, caring caregivers
    • Friendly and supportive administration
    • Excellent and accommodating care
    • Named staff praised (Odessa, Cecelia, Melinda)
    • High-quality meals and accommodates dietary restrictions
    • Private and spacious rooms
    • Common dining room
    • Beautiful grounds and updated interior
    • Central downtown location near Mercy General Hospital
    • Strong activity program with outings and chaperoned transportation five days a week
    • Family involvement and community events
    • Well run and supportive facility
    • Good value and reasonable price
    • Loving Christian environment
    • Supportive end-of-life care and family coping support
    • Residents generally happy and flourishing

    Cons

    • Not ideal for confused residents due to size and stimulation
    • Activities and social programming limited during COVID
    • COVID-related isolation negatively impacted at least one resident
    • Older facility despite updates
    • Inconsistent or unclear comments about food quality
    • Some residents required move to memory care for dementia needs
    • Initial adjustment can be difficult or scary for new residents

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment in the reviews is strongly positive, with repeated emphasis on the quality of care and the warmth of the staff and administration. Reviewers frequently describe the team as highly trained, cheerful, accommodating and deeply caring; several family members called out specific staff by name (Odessa, Cecelia, Melinda) and gave glowing recommendations. Multiple comments note that residents thrive and are happy after an initial adjustment period, and that the facility is well run with a supportive, family-involving culture.

    Care quality and staff: The dominant theme across reviews is excellent caregiving. Staff are characterized as competent, compassionate and responsive to resident needs. There are multiple mentions of accommodating, cheerful caregivers and administrators who support families through transitions and even end-of-life care. The facility receives praise for individualized attention and for staff who help residents flourish after settling in. Several reviewers explicitly said they would highly recommend the facility based on the care provided.

    Facilities and location: Reviewers describe the property as attractive, with beautiful grounds and an updated interior despite being an older building. Rooms are noted as spacious and private rooms are available; there is a common dining room. The central downtown location close to Mercy General Hospital is repeatedly mentioned as a convenience and asset. These physical and locational attributes contribute to the perception of a comfortable, safe setting for residents.

    Dining: Most comments about dining are favorable — some reviews state high-quality meals and note that dietary restrictions are accommodated. One summary mentioned uncertainty about food quality, so while food is generally viewed positively, there may be some variability in perception or experience. The presence of a common dining area is noted as part of the social fabric of the community.

    Activities and community life: The facility historically has offered a robust activity program, including live entertainment, movies and regular outings with chaperoned transportation five days a week. Family involvement and community events are highlighted as strengths that foster a lively atmosphere. However, COVID-related restrictions have curtailed programming in some periods; reviewers explicitly note that activity offerings were limited during the pandemic, which impacted residents’ social engagement.

    Management, values and cost: Administration is described as friendly and supportive, contributing to a warm, often Christian-oriented community environment. Reviewers consistently mention fair value and reasonable pricing for the level of care and amenities provided. Families appreciated management’s role in facilitating resident transitions and providing emotional support to relatives.

    Concerns and notable patterns: The main concerns raised are specific and consistent. Several reviewers point out that the facility’s size and general activity level can be overstimulating or not ideal for residents with confusion or advanced memory impairment; in fact, at least one resident needed to move to a dedicated memory care setting. COVID isolation was called out as having a negative impact on one resident’s wellbeing, reflecting pandemic-era limitations on programming and visitation. A few comments also note that the building is older (albeit updated) and that initial adjustment to the community can be frightening for some new residents. There is a small note of ambiguity regarding food quality from one reviewer, suggesting room for clearer or more consistent dining feedback.

    Conclusion: In sum, Mercy McMahon Terrace is consistently praised for its high-quality, compassionate care, strong and personable staff, attractive grounds and convenient location. It offers good value and a supportive community with meaningful family involvement and a history of active programming. Prospective residents and families should weigh these strengths against specific needs: those with significant memory impairment or high sensitivity to busy environments may find the size and stimulation less suitable, and temporary reductions in activities (for example, during COVID) can affect social engagement. For many families seeking competent, warm care in a central location with solid programming and community life, the reviews portray Mercy McMahon Terrace as a highly recommendable option.

    Location

    Map showing location of Mercy McMahon Terrace

    About Mercy McMahon Terrace

    Mercy McMahon Terrace sits in a quiet Sacramento neighborhood, right across from Mercy General Hospital and close to shops, restaurants, and other medical offices, so it's pretty convenient for people who still like to get out or have appointments. This community has a capacity for 189 residents and offers several types of care, including independent living, assisted living, nursing care, memory care-like the program called June's Place-and even hospice care for those who need it. Folks can choose from studio, studio deluxe, or one-bedroom apartments, and some rooms come with private bedrooms or kitchenettes for those who still want to do a little cooking. Basic comforts, like wheelchair-accessible showers, cable or satellite TV, and free Wi-Fi, are included, and there's an emergency call system in every unit.

    The staff includes personal care assistants and a part-time nurse, and they're around twenty-four hours a day to help with things like dressing, bathing, medication, diabetes management, incontinence care, non-ambulatory and bedbound care, as well as memory support for residents with conditions like dementia. Supervision of medication, help with oxygen, and catheter or colostomy care are available too. If someone's looking for housekeeping, laundry, or companionship, staff can help there as well. There's also financial aid and help with selling a home, which can be a relief when moving in.

    Meals are chef-prepared and served restaurant-style in the main dining room, and there are many options, including dishes for folks who want low-sodium, gluten-free, vegetarian, vegan, international, or sugar-free meals; plus, there's an anytime dining option if you don't want to eat at set hours. Residents can have guest meals, and there's a bistro on-site for snacks, fruit, or baked goods throughout the day. Amenities also include a café, a private dining space for family visits, and free transportation for shopping and errands Monday through Friday, or you can use nearby public transit. There's a chapel with an on-staff chaplain, weekly Mass, and other religious services, along with VA Aid Assistance for veterans.

    The community has a beauty salon, a barbershop, fitness centers, a library, lounge areas, a game and craft room, and offers regular social and wellness activities. People can join word games, storytelling, dramatic readings, faith sharing, music events, crafts, cribbage, and organized outings. Outdoor gardens give a quiet spot to relax. There are also fitness classes like yoga and stretching, and scheduled events that help folks stay active, connected, and entertained. Monthly programs promote wellness and encourage everyone to stay involved if they want.

    Mercy McMahon Terrace allows visits during the week from 7:30 am to 6:30 pm and on weekends from 8:30 am to 5:00 pm, with staff at the front desk to help with visitors during those hours. The facility accepts checks, credit card payments, insurance, and charges a one-time community fee. The place is licensed under state license number 340312763 and holds a 4.4 rating from 11 reviews, which lets you know folks seem to appreciate the place overall. The whole setup tries to support independence but offers enough help for people who need a hand with daily life as they get older, and you can always find someone around if you need something, which brings peace of mind for many.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    32

    Inspections

    3

    Type A Citations

    3

    Type B Citations

    5

    Years of reports

    26 Dec 2024
    Identified safety and medication-management concerns at the home, including an unlocked medication cart and medications found in a resident’s room, and an unlocked cabinet containing spray paint. Observed functioning safety equipment and adequate food supplies, reviewed seven resident files and seven staff files, and interviewed two staff and two residents; a technical advisory was issued.
    • § 87465(h)(2)
    26 Dec 2024
    Investigated an incident alleging neglect where a staff member did not promptly change a resident after a bowel movement for more than two hours, despite reminders from other staff. The staff member was terminated, and internal investigation notes were requested.
    03 Oct 2024
    Investigated the allegation that residents were not provided safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment; found insufficient evidence to support this claim. Investigated the allegation that there were not enough staff to meet residents’ needs; found insufficient evidence to support this claim, as most residents reported needs were met and most staff indicated timely responses to calls.
    19 Dec 2023
    Found no deficiencies and determined compliance with applicable regulations after reviewing resident and staff files and inspecting the building. Noted 97 residents living at a 189-capacity site, with a hospice waiver for 18, an adequate date-stamped food supply, water temperature of 115 degrees, and current fire safety records (drill on 10/23/2023 and inspection on 6/30/2023).
    29 Dec 2023
    Determined that the allegation of a personal rights violation stemmed from miscommunication about belongings during move-out; the former resident moved out with notice, the final 30 days were prorated, and a refund was issued after she retracted the allegation. Found no evidence that a violation occurred; the complaint may be amended if new information arises.
    29 Dec 2023
    Determined that the allegation regarding resident belongings being improperly discarded was due to a miscommunication, and the resident was satisfied with the resolution; no violations were cited.
    19 Dec 2023
    Found that an independent resident using a walker fell while exiting an elevator and trying to enter their apartment after losing balance. No care staff witnessed the fall, but a housekeeper alerted staff; the resident was taken to the emergency department and returned with no pain reported and continued normal activities.
    19 Dec 2023
    Found all five allegations unsubstantiated after reviewing tours, interviews, and records, with no deficiencies cited.
    19 Dec 2023
    Confirmed compliance with health and safety regulations, with no deficiencies identified during the inspection.
    05 Dec 2023
    Reviewed an incident from 11/21/2023 describing an unexplained laceration on the left leg, later identified as a skin tear. Obtained current chart notes documenting the resident's status; staff reported recovery and no deficiencies were observed.
    05 Dec 2023
    Reviewed current documentation indicating that a resident's recent skin tear had healed, with no violations observed during the visit.
    25 Jan 2023
    Found compliance with California Title 22 and Health and Safety Code; no deficiencies cited. Noted 110 residents residing at the location, with a hospice waiver allowing 18 residents.
    25 Jan 2023
    Confirmed that the facility met regulatory requirements, maintained safety protocols, and had no deficiencies during the inspection.
    27 Dec 2022
    Found that the allegation that R1 was physically abused by care staff could not be proven, and that R1's change in condition was reported promptly. Found that bruising on R1 was caused by rough handling by care staff, and that a civil penalty was assessed.
    27 Dec 2022
    Investigated that a resident sustained bruising after being roughly handled by staff, with evidence showing staff caused harm due to insufficient training, and confirmed the allegation of physical abuse.
    12 Oct 2022
    Investigated a mask-wearing issue involving a staff member during a shift. Found not enough evidence to prove or disprove the Covid-19 data reporting claim; information about Covid-19 is provided to responsible parties, but there is no requirement to share Covid-19 statistics with residents' responsible parties.
    12 Oct 2022
    Investigated whether staff wore masks during shifts and reported COVID-19 data to responsible parties; found that staff generally wore masks after training, and COVID-19 reporting procedures were appropriate, though the staff mask incident was valid.
    • § 87468.1(a)(1)
    26 May 2022
    Investigated the allegation about residents leaving and re-entering; found no issues, since residents could inform caregivers, meet at the front lobby, and be escorted back in. Noted a temporary Sunday entry process that was later discontinued, a one-minute average response to memory care doorbells, and updated Covid-19 screening and door-code policies.
    26 May 2022
    Investigated whether residents could leave and reenter the facility freely and noted that residents and staff confirmed no issues with reentry; found policies for visitor entry times had changed, with no current Sunday call-in requirement, and that response times to doorbells in the memory care unit averaged one minute.
    04 Mar 2022
    Found full compliance with applicable regulations; no deficiencies cited.
    04 Mar 2022
    Verified compliance with licensing regulations, including facility safety, resident care, and COVID-19 protocols, with no deficiencies noted during the visit.
    • § 1569.58(a)(2)
    06 Jan 2022
    Identified deficiencies in the Plan Of Operation, which lacked descriptions of standard tasks for all care levels, how care levels were determined, and how point values were assigned, despite ongoing technical guidance.
    29 Dec 2021
    Confirmed a follow-up case management visit, reviewed a revised plan of operation and related service plan documents, and found no deficiencies.
    06 Jan 2022
    Identified deficiencies in the facility's Plan of Operation related to unclear care level descriptions and inadequate documentation, leading to unresolved regulatory concerns.
    29 Dec 2021
    Reviewed the facility's revised plan of operation and discussed service plan documentation with staff, finding no deficiencies.
    13 Dec 2021
    Found no deficiencies and observed compliance during an unannounced visit on 12/13/2021, with 10 residents residing, 5 receiving hospice under a waiver for up to 18, a central screening area with visitors screened, sanitation and social distancing in place, construction underway with measures in place, and meals served from a mobile kitchen.
    13 Dec 2021
    Reviewed the plan of operation and discussed issues; requested a revised plan by 12/20/2021 and advised it would require department review and approval; found no deficiencies.
    13 Dec 2021
    Reviewed a plan of operation and discussed necessary revisions; no violations were identified during the visit.
    • § 87208
    • § 1569.657(a)
    12 Feb 2021
    Identified three allegations: staff not properly trained (mask usage during family tele-visits); no one in charge when the administrator is away; and the home not following the resident care plan (hearing aids access during tele-visits). Found evidence of improper mask wear during a zoom call, gaps in leadership coverage when the administrator isn’t present, and hearing aid access issues for a resident during tele-visits.
    12 Feb 2021
    Investigated allegations regarding staff not properly training, lack of leadership when the administrator is absent, and failure to follow resident care plans, with findings showing improper mask use by staff during family visits and inadequate coverage when the administrator is away.
    11 Aug 2020
    Reviewed COVID-19 precautions, PPE practices, and resident interaction policies, confirming that safety measures such as screenings, mask-wearing, and outdoor visitations were in place, with residents no longer social distancing or masking indoors.
    23 Jan 2020
    Reviewed staffing files and identified a staff member without current first aid certification, and confirmed that the facility met safety, food storage, and medication accessibility standards.
    • § 1569.50(a)(3)

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of Oakmont of East Sacramento, a multi-story assisted living and memory care facility with stone and stucco walls, red tile roofing, and landscaped greenery in front. The building number 5301 is visible on the stone tower section.
      $5,000+4.4 (71)
      suite
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of East Sacramento

      5301 F St, Sacramento, CA, 95819
    • Front exterior view of a senior living facility named 'the Chateau' with a covered entrance, surrounded by lush green trees and landscaped flower beds. There are chairs and an American flag near the entrance.
      $4,400 – $9,155+4.2 (90)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      River's Edge

      601 Feature Dr, Sacramento, CA, 95825
    • Exterior view of a senior living facility named Oakmont of Carmichael with a beige stucco building, tiled roof, landscaped garden with colorful flowers, trees, and a curved walkway. Two people are walking on the path near the entrance.
      $3,795 – $5,495+4.6 (121)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Carmichael

      4717 Engle Rd, Carmichael, CA, 95608
    • Exterior front of Oakmont of Fair Oaks building with a landscaped driveway, entrance canopy, and people walking on the path.
      $3,995 – $6,595+4.4 (87)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • Semi-private
      assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Fair Oaks

      8484 Madison Ave, Fair Oaks, CA, 95628
    • Exterior view of Oakmont of Westpark senior living facility at dusk, showing a two-story building with illuminated windows, stone and stucco facade, landscaped greenery, and a covered entrance with a clearance sign.
      $3,595 – $4,995+4.3 (86)
      Studio • Semi-private
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Oakmont of Westpark

      2400 Pleasant Grove Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747
    • Exterior view of Ivy Park at Roseville, a multi-story senior living facility with beige and brown stucco walls and red tile roofing. The entrance features a covered drop-off area with benches and potted plants. There is a landscaped roundabout with flowers and shrubs, and an American flag flying on a flagpole. The sky is clear and blue.
      $3,000 – $3,900+4.2 (62)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      independent living, assisted living, board and care

      Ivy Park at Roseville

      5161 Foothills Blvd, Roseville, CA, 95747

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 253 facilities$4,756/mo
    2. 251 facilities$4,822/mo
    3. 335 facilities$4,896/mo
    4. 263 facilities$4,935/mo
    5. 260 facilities$4,783/mo
    6. 128 facilities$4,326/mo
    7. 299 facilities$4,889/mo
    8. 263 facilities$4,981/mo
    9. 258 facilities$5,022/mo
    10. 350 facilities$4,835/mo
    11. 193 facilities$4,643/mo
    12. 161 facilities$4,849/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living