Pricing ranges from
    $5,795 – 7,533/month

    Abbey Road Villa

    14132 Hubbard St, Sylmar, CA, 91342
    3.4 · 20 reviews
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    3.0

    Clean welcoming but inconsistent care

    I toured this facility and left with mixed impressions. It's very clean with spacious, airy common areas, large dining and activity spaces, pleasant patios and grounds, and generally tasty food and engaging activities. Many staff were friendly, caring and competent - helpful and attentive at times - but service was inconsistent: I saw attentive nurses and managers yet also instances of admin inattentiveness, slow responses, and night staffing shortages. Some areas felt outdated or basic (old beds, dim long hallways, occasional odors), shared rooms were possible, and pricing/financial details were unclear; it's also far from my home. If cleanliness, activities and warm staff matter most, it's worth serious consideration, but it wasn't the right fit for me.

    Pricing

    $5,795+/moSemi-privateAssisted Living
    $6,954+/mo1 BedroomAssisted Living
    $7,533+/moStudioAssisted Living

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    3.40 · 20 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      3.6
    • Staff

      4.1
    • Meals

      3.8
    • Amenities

      3.1
    • Value

      2.5

    Pros

    • friendly staff
    • competent and knowledgeable staff
    • caring and empathetic caregivers
    • attentive and proactive medication management
    • helpful and welcoming tour/management staff
    • clean and very clean facility and rooms
    • spacious, airy facility and rooms
    • large indoor recreational area
    • large dining area
    • pleasant outdoor spaces and patios with grass and trees
    • colourful, non‑hospital décor in some areas
    • delicious food and liked menu
    • organized operations in many shifts
    • ample parking (reported by some reviewers)
    • good community information provided
    • residents engaged in activities
    • affordable option mentioned by some reviewers
    • many reviewers would recommend the community

    Cons

    • outdated or old facilities in parts
    • shared rooms required
    • some rooms basic or empty during tours
    • old hospital‑style beds that sag
    • nursing staff described as not welcoming by some
    • administration inattentive or unhelpful in some cases
    • limited staffing or night staffing shortages
    • long delays for assistance reported
    • price perceived as high and missing financial information
    • mixed smells reported (mostly clean but occasional unpleasant smell)
    • depressing atmosphere in some areas (long dim hallways)
    • insufficient safety markings and outdated event info
    • reopened after closing caused traumatic experiences for at least one reviewer
    • distance/long travel time for some families

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment across the reviews is mixed but leans positive around cleanliness, staff warmth, and communal spaces. Numerous reviewers emphasize that the facility is very clean, airy and well organized; many specifically praise the dining area, indoor recreational area, and outdoor patios and grassy spaces with trees. A recurring strength is the staff: multiple comments describe staff as friendly, competent, caring, empathetic, and knowledgeable. Several reviewers highlighted attentive management and tour staff who were gracious and informative, and multiple families said they would recommend the community or felt their loved ones were well cared for.

    Care quality and staffing are areas with both strong praise and notable concerns. Positive comments point to proactive medication handling, prompt responses in many instances, and staff who are on the ball and empathetic. At the same time, some reviewers reported serious issues: nursing staff described as not welcoming, administrative inattentiveness, long delays when residents need assistance, and night‑shift staffing shortages. These contrasts suggest variability in service depending on shift, team, or time; prospective families should verify current staffing levels, response times, and nurse/resident ratios during a visit.

    Facility condition and physical environment also show a split picture. Many reviewers like the facility’s spacious, airy layout, colourful décor in parts, and lack of a ‘‘hospital’’ feel in some areas. The dining and activity spaces receive repeated praise. Conversely, several reviews call out old or outdated infrastructure: plastic hospital beds that sag, long dim hallways, and areas that appear basic or depressing. A few reviewers noted a room shown during a tour had no furniture (potentially misleading), and one or two reported an unpleasant smell. These mixed comments indicate that while common areas are often well maintained, some resident rooms or wings may need updating.

    Dining and activities are generally well regarded. Numerous reviewers mention delicious food, a liked menu, and active programming; several families noted their relatives participate in and enjoy activities. A small number of comments, however, indicate few activities in certain circumstances or that event information was outdated. One reviewer observed residents in the dining room appearing unhappy during a tour, which could be an isolated observation or a sign to look more closely at meal‑time atmosphere during a visit.

    Management, transparency, and safety practices show both positives and red flags. Positive narratives emphasize flexible, attentive managers and helpful community information. On the other hand, some reviewers call out administrative unhelpfulness, missing financial information during decision‑making, and insufficient safety markings during a floor replacement. One reviewer described a traumatic experience tied to the community reopening after a closure, which is a serious concern though it appears to be an outlier in the dataset. Prospective families should ask management directly about financials, recent renovations, safety protocols, and any history of closures or major incidents.

    In summary, Abbey Road Villa presents as a largely clean, spacious community with many caring and competent staff members and strong dining and activity programs. However, there are consistent signals of unevenness: some wings or rooms feel dated, staffing levels (especially at night) may be thin, and administrative responsiveness varies. If you are considering this community, prioritize an in‑person visit that checks current room conditions (including actual furnished rooms), confirms staffing patterns and response times, reviews financial terms, and observes mealtime and activity engagement. Many families report positive experiences and strong care, but the variability in reviews suggests due diligence will be important to determine if this community is the right fit for your specific needs.

    Location

    Map showing location of Abbey Road Villa

    About Abbey Road Villa

    Abbey Road Villa sits right in California, a senior living community licensed for 78 residents, and folks there find a warm, cozy atmosphere with staff who try hard to pay attention to each person. Meals come served daily, with kosher and vegetarian options if needed, and residents can eat together in the dining room, which sort of helps cut down on cooking chores, and the kitchen uses fresh ingredients with snacks and a rotating menu. The building's newer, used to be called Caroline's Chateau, and now has both independent living and assisted living options, plus a separate secured memory care wing for residents with Alzheimer's or those who have trouble with wandering or big behaviors, and anyone at least 60 years old can call it home.

    People live in shared or private rooms, some with wheelchair accessible showers or on the ground floor, and the whole property has indoor and outdoor common spaces, which folks use for group activities, relaxing, or just sitting with others. Life here has a regular stream of activities, like arts and crafts, walks, bingo, music nights, movie nights, and more serious group things like educational programs or book clubs, along with trips out thanks to regular and complimentary transportation, since the place isn't far from a bus line and has parking for those with cars. People who like something more spiritual can join devotional and religious services, both onsite and offsite.

    For those who need help, Abbey Road Villa has round-the-clock awake staff plus nurses, a doctor on call, and visiting therapists-speech, occupational, physical-as well as visiting dentists and podiatrists. There's help with daily things, like bathing, grooming, dressing, medication management, reminders, or even help transferring from bed to chair, whether a person needs only standby help, one- or two-person transfers, or the full mechanical lift. The staff can also assist residents who aren't able to walk on their own, and they take care with blood sugar checks and diabetic needs, including insulin if ordered by a doctor. Staff can handle incontinence, reminding people to use the restroom and help with care, and for people at high risk of wandering or acting out, bracelets and safety measures help keep them from getting lost.

    Abbey Road Villa supports aging in place, meaning as a person's needs change, the level of care can increase, so most folks don't have to move when they need more help. There's hospice care, respite care for short stays, home care services with trained aides, and nursing home support if needed. The villa also has an on-site beautician and barber, a pharmacy, housekeeping ready for emergencies, and a wellness room and fitness area for exercises like chair yoga and balance classes. Outdoor smoking's allowed in set areas. The community is licensed by the State of California (License #197608349) with experienced staff onsite at all times and technology in the memory care wing that helps keep residents safe. For payment and floor plans, options change, so it's good to check what's available. Abbey Road Villa works to create a flexible, social community where people find structure, safety, and the help they need as they grow older, all with support for both independence and care.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    54

    Inspections

    2

    Type A Citations

    2

    Type B Citations

    5

    Years of reports

    13 May 2025
    Investigated and reviewed records; found that the resident was admitted and hospitalized multiple times, with some refusals of on-site medical visits, and care coordinated with the hospital and primary care physician. Interviews with staff indicated no observed pressure injuries or signs of neglect related to staff care.
    06 Apr 2025
    Determined that the allegation that a resident sustained multiple fractures while in care due to staff neglect is unsubstantiated.
    11 Oct 2024
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not dispense medications as prescribed; findings showed the resident did not receive morning meds on the day of hospitalization in August, and interviews indicated this was due to hospitalization rather than ongoing practice.
    18 Mar 2025
    Found staff were present and intervened during the incident, and the claim that staff failed to prevent a resident from slapping another or to assist the other resident wasn't supported.
    28 Jan 2025
    Found no evidence that staff financially exploited a resident by continuing to receive that resident's Social Security payments after departure; direct deposits were stopped, all payments were returned to SSA (most recently on 11/06/2024), and the allegation deemed unsubstantiated.
    16 Jan 2025
    Found UNSUBSTANTIATED for the allegations that staff failed to assist with medications, neglected daily care, did not arrange incidental medical care, or failed to meet dietary needs. Interviews and records showed staff generally provided appropriate medication assistance, ADL support, help with medical appointments, and diet accommodations, with most residents confirming this.
    15 Nov 2024
    Investigated a complaint that a resident was sexually assaulted by a male staff member. Interviews showed the resident declined to discuss the matter further, the staff member was reassigned to assist others, and the matter was not pursued further at this time.
    13 Aug 2024
    Found no immediate health or safety hazards at the site; safety systems were functioning, PPE stock was adequate, kitchens and bathrooms were clean and properly equipped, medications were secured, and resident and staff records were up to date.
    13 Aug 2024
    Confirmed that the facility met health and safety requirements, including proper signage, PPE availability, cleanliness, functional equipment, and updated resident and staff records.
    28 May 2024
    Found that five specific concerns—medication administration, eyeglasses, wheelchair, oxygen, and dignity—were unsubstantiated.
    28 May 2024
    Confirmed allegations regarding medication and provision of eyeglasses were unsubstantiated, as documented administration and resident interviews did not support the claims.
    16 Apr 2024
    Found that the allegation that staff failed to provide a resident's records to the resident's authorized representative on 03/12/24 was not supported by information gathered, since the administrator denied receiving the fax and the representative arrived to obtain copies only on 04/12/24.
    16 Apr 2024
    Investigated an allegation regarding delayed document provision to a resident's authorized representative, which was ultimately deemed unsubstantiated.
    • § 87468.2(a)(19)
    04 Jan 2024
    Found that the resident’s stay is funded through a county program that provides a $168 monthly personal allowance, with cash disbursements made by the administrator. Found that the allegation that the resident should be receiving $300 per month and would have about $600 at month end but only $180 remained was not supported by the records, and that the resident makes multiple cash withdrawals from the personal allowance.
    04 Jan 2024
    Investigated the allegation that a resident should have a higher account balance but found it unsubstantiated, confirming the resident made periodic cash withdrawals that explained the remaining balance.
    02 Nov 2023
    Found seven residents did not see hair on fresh towels and towels were changed daily. Found seven residents reported no discrimination by staff and that call bells were answered promptly, with incontinent residents changed regularly and on time.
    02 Nov 2023
    Investigated allegations of unsanitary towels, racial discrimination, and leaving a resident in a soiled diaper; determined claims were unsubstantiated based on resident and staff interviews, and record reviews.
    27 Sept 2023
    Found no evidence that diapers were left on the floor; dirty diapers were brought to the outside garbage bin after changes. Found that eight of eleven residents said staff responded to call bells within a reasonable time (not more than 15 minutes), while three residents did not call for help.
    27 Sept 2023
    Investigated staff conduct and call response times, no evidence found to support allegations. Residents and staff stated diapers disposed of properly and calls answered promptly.
    05 Sept 2023
    Found no immediate health and safety hazards at the site; PPE stocked, COVID-19 safety signage and hand hygiene stations were present, alarms and sprinklers were tested, and resident and staff records were complete.
    05 Sept 2023
    Confirmed compliance with health and safety regulations during the visit.
    03 Aug 2023
    Found that staff coordinated with the resident’s social worker to arrange timely non-emergency medical care, with a recent regular doctor visit and a scheduled specialist appointment. Observed that the resident slept during the day, ate breakfast in the dining room, and had allergy-based dietary restrictions clearly posted to ensure safe meals.
    03 Aug 2023
    Reviewed allegations of staff not seeking timely medical attention for a resident and not meeting a resident's needs, both were deemed unsubstantiated.
    15 Jun 2023
    Found no evidence to support the allegation that the administrator allows residents to smoke by the front door; observation showed the designated smoking area is about 14 feet 10 inches from the front door and posted with reminders to keep the doors closed, and staff and residents reported warnings to stay away from the door.
    15 Jun 2023
    Investigated complaint of smoking near front door, found allegation unsubstantiated.
    01 Jun 2023
    Found no evidence of a cockroach infestation; seven residents interviewed reported no cockroaches in their rooms or elsewhere. Found that residents described meals as nutritious and liked the food, with lunch observed matching the monthly menu.
    01 Jun 2023
    Investigated allegations of pests and food at the facility were found to be unsubstantiated.
    23 May 2023
    Found no evidence to support the allegation that staff switched the resident's Social Security income without permission; the resident had no SSI or share-of-cost at the facility, and payments were from a county housing program. Found that the resident received regular medical care, including visits to a primary care physician and specialists, with a gastrointestinal referral currently being processed.
    23 May 2023
    Reviewed allegations of staff mishandling a resident's personal funds and medical needs; found no evidence of mishandling as payments were made by a county agency and medical appointments were maintained regularly.
    12 Jan 2023
    Found comprehensive infection-control measures in place, including vaccination requirements for new hires and admissions, ongoing weekly COVID testing, and designated rooms for positive cases; observed ample PPE, hand-sanitizing stations, masks, clean common areas and kitchen, secure medication storage, properly furnished bedrooms with accessible bathrooms, and up-to-date resident and staff records and training.
    12 Jan 2023
    Inspection found facility to be in compliance with infection control protocols, with proper COVID prevention measures in place and sufficient supplies stocked.
    05 Oct 2022
    Found that staff did not follow the site's fall protocol during an unwitnessed fall on 09/30/20. Issued a citation and discussed appeal rights.
    05 Oct 2022
    Confirmed deficiency in fall protocol following unwitnessed fall incident.
    • §
    26 Aug 2022
    Found that a resident sustained a fracture from a fall at the residence and staff promptly assessed and transported the resident to the hospital; records showed only one fall during the stay and that fall-prevention protocols were followed. Found that pre-admission appraisal information and functional assessments were documented, and an ANS was prepared for readmission, though one ANS form and some family signatures were not obtained.
    26 Aug 2022
    Investigated allegations of falls and fractures at a facility were deemed unsubstantiated.
    12 Aug 2022
    Found that the air conditioning failed on 08/10/2022 and was repaired by 08/12/2022 after parts delay; residents were offered relocation. Interior temperatures remained within regulatory limits, and no citations were issued.
    12 Aug 2022
    Confirmed no health and safety concerns after addressing air conditioning issues. Residents reported satisfactory room temperatures during the visit.
    06 Jun 2022
    Investigated the allegation that one resident forced another to take nude photos on 4/23/22; both residents denied any forcing and left together, with law enforcement and adult protective services notified. Found the information gathered does not support the allegation at this time.
    06 Jun 2022
    Investigated allegation of resident forcing another resident to take nude photos, but both residents denied the incident occurred. No health or safety issues found during the visit.
    12 May 2022
    Determined the allegation that a resident was mistreated while in care to be unsubstantiated. Interviews indicated the resident denied mistreatment and other residents reported they were comfortable.
    12 May 2022
    Allegation of resident mistreatment was investigated and found to be unsubstantiated based on interviews with residents and the individual involved.
    05 Apr 2022
    Investigated a claim that residents used the back emergency exit to leave and smoke without signing in or out. Found that the exit alarm did not deter this, creating an unsafe condition.
    02 Jul 2021
    Found that the emergency auditory alarm was functioning and not disabled; it includes a motion sensor and is part of a redundant security system monitored by CCTV. Explained that batteries frequently ran out due to constant use by residents who smoke in the back alley.
    05 Apr 2022
    Confirmed the allegation regarding residents exiting the facility through an unauthorized door meant for emergency use, potentially compromising safety.
    • § 87705(k)(6)
    22 Dec 2021
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not wear masks; observed staff wearing masks while on duty, and six residents confirmed this.
    22 Dec 2021
    Investigated complaint about staff not wearing masks and found it unsubstantiated based on staff and resident interviews and observations. Conducted exit interview.
    06 Dec 2021
    Found that on 11/28/2021, an incident occurred between two residents and a special incident report was not submitted to Licensing. The administrator could not explain why the special incident report was sent to Licensing, raising concerns about reporting and a potential health and safety risk to residents.
    • §
    06 Dec 2021
    Investigated the allegation that a resident attacked another resident while in care. Interviews and records indicated prior verbal tensions and an incident where one resident chased another, causing a head injury, the other resident declined to be interviewed, and no evidence of an attack was found.
    06 Dec 2021
    Investigated the allegation that one resident attacked another and found it unsubstantiated, as the alleged victim reported no attack occurred and the other resident declined to be interviewed.
    06 Aug 2021
    Found entry controlled by a gated main entrance with screening, and PPE and hand sanitizer available. Found no immediate health or safety hazards on the premises; life-safety systems (exit alarms, smoke/CO detectors) were functioning, fire extinguishers charged, and bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, and common areas were clean and properly equipped.
    06 Aug 2021
    Confirmed no immediate health and safety hazards during the visit.
    02 Jul 2021
    Confirmed that the emergency alarm system is functional and part of a redundant security system with CCTV monitoring.
    16 Oct 2020
    Found that the diaper-change delay was due to staff being busy, with one resident requiring two-person assist and changes performed on a schedule. Found that meals were nutritious and varied; there was no eviction threat—staff explained a potential transfer to a higher level of care if needed—and there was no smoking or odor observed inside the premises.
    16 Oct 2020
    Investigated allegations of neglect, poor food quality, eviction threats, and smoking, and found all claims unsubstantiated after interviews and record reviews.

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of Aegis Living Granada Hills facility with a beige stucco building featuring red tile roofing, surrounded by palm trees and other greenery under a clear blue sky. A sign in front displays the facility name and address.
      $5,460 – $6,450+4.7 (9)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom
      assisted living, memory care

      Aegis Living Granada Hills

      10801 Lindley Avenue, Granada Hills, CA, 91344
    • Entrance of The Gardens at Park Balboa facility with double glass doors, potted plants on either side, outdoor wall lanterns, and surrounding greenery including palm trees and bushes.
      $3,400 – $4,100+4.5 (200)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      The Gardens at Park Balboa

      7046 Kester Ave, Van Nuys, CA, 91405
    • Front exterior of a modern multi-story senior living building at dusk, showing the illuminated entrance, windows, and landscaping with trees.
      $6,500+4.2 (25)
      1 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living

      The Village at NorthRidge

      9222 Corbin Avenue, Northridge, CA, 91324
    • Exterior view of The Village at Sherman Oaks building entrance at dusk with illuminated covered driveway, palm trees, and landscaped plants.
      $5,230 – $8,155+4.4 (104)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      The Village at Sherman Oaks

      5450 Vesper Ave, Sherman Oaks, CA, 91411
    • Exterior front view of Encino Terrace Senior Living building with beige walls, multiple windows with brown awnings, a driveway entrance, and a pharmacy on the right side under a green sign.
      $2,750 – $4,680+4.5 (87)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living, board and care

      Encino Terrace Senior Living

      16025 Ventura Blvd, Encino, CA, 91436
    • Photo of Ivy Park At Burbank
      $4,375 – $9,895+4.1 (37)
      Semi-private • Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Ivy Park At Burbank

      2721 Willow Street, Burbank, CA, 91505

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 300 facilities$5,128/mo
    2. 222 facilities$4,933/mo
    3. 529 facilities$5,336/mo
    4. 200 facilities$4,704/mo
    5. 560 facilities$5,306/mo
    6. 537 facilities$5,291/mo
    7. 493 facilities$5,317/mo
    8. 446 facilities$5,296/mo
    9. 498 facilities$5,492/mo
    10. 622 facilities$5,719/mo
    11. 183 facilities$4,857/mo
    12. 485 facilities$5,382/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living