Pricing ranges from
    $6,850 – 8,905/month

    Vacaville Memory Care

    431 Nut Tree Rd, Vacaville, CA 95687
    • Assisted Living
    • Memory Care

    Pricing

    Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.

    Request a Tour

    Date of Tour
    Time Window
    Tour Type

    You selected in-person tour on in the

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    Reviews

    4.77·(125)

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.7
    • Staff

      4.8
    • Meals

      4.1
    • Amenities

      4.5
    • Value

      3.1

    Pros

    • Compassionate, attentive caregivers who treat residents with dignity
    • Responsive family communication and support during transitions
    • Homelike cottage layout with smaller resident groups
    • Secure, enclosed courtyard with accessible gardens and walking paths
    • Memory-care specialization and support as residents’ needs change
    • Frequent activities, music, social events, and family gatherings
    • Clean, welcoming common areas and well-maintained cottages
    • On-site meal preparation, snacks, and generally positive dining feedback
    • Resident independence and freedom to move within secure outdoor areas
    • Smooth move-in process and helpful admissions guidance

    Cons

    • Caregiver and executive-leadership turnover
    • Inconsistent management communication, policy clarity, and follow-through
    • Variable respite availability and unclear arrangements for recurring short stays
    • Variable meal palatability
    • Limited accommodation of some residents’ preferred seated-exercise activities
    • Compact rooms and shared-bathroom capacity in some cottages
    • Affordability concerns for some families

    Summary of reviews

    Families generally describe Vacaville Memory Care, also referred to in reviews as Pacifica Senior Living Vacaville, as a supportive, home-like community for people living with dementia or other memory challenges. Many describe caregivers as warm, patient, and attentive, and value the respectful way staff interact with residents. Families also appreciate help with transitions and individualized routines; one family described improvements in a resident’s appetite and willingness to accept bathing assistance after settling in. Several accounts say residents can remain at the community as their care needs change, which can reduce the likelihood of a later move.

    The physical setting is a recurring strength. The community is arranged as separate cottages around a secure courtyard, with gardens and walking paths that residents can access within the enclosed grounds. Reviewers say this layout feels less institutional than a large building and allows residents to socialize across cottages while maintaining a smaller-group atmosphere. Cleanliness and welcoming common areas receive positive feedback. Some visitors found rooms smaller than expected, and one tour review raised questions about the number of bathrooms relative to cottage occupancy; other families found shared rooms adequate for residents’ needs.

    Staff communication and care coordination are often praised, including updates to families, responsiveness to questions, and assistance during move-in. Dining feedback is mixed: many families say meals are appealing, varied, or enjoyed by residents, and note that food is prepared on site with snacks available. Other accounts describe meals as bland or poorly received. Activities are frequently described as varied and engaging, with music, outdoor events, social gatherings, and family participation. One family wanted more seated exercise options, suggesting that activity choices may not meet every resident’s mobility or preference needs.

    Management feedback is less consistent than feedback about direct caregivers. Some families praise current leaders and describe operations as running smoothly, while others raise concerns about leadership or caregiver turnover, unclear procedures, and communication or follow-through. Respite care has also been described as accommodating by one family, but another found repeat availability difficult to plan and the short-stay terms unclear. A small number of older accounts raised concerns about staffing changes, activity engagement, and medication oversight; these differ from the generally favorable accounts, but make it reasonable for prospective families to ask about current staffing levels, supervision, medication procedures, respite availability, and how concerns are handled. Overall, the reviews present a largely positive picture of compassionate care and a distinctive setting, alongside practical questions about consistency, dining preferences, respite access, and management stability.

    Reviews written on Mirador

    We have no reviews to show about Vacaville Memory Care.

    Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.

    Location

    Vacaville Memory Care is located at 431 Nut Tree Rd, Vacaville, CA, 95687.

    About Vacaville Memory Care

    Vacaville Memory Care specializes in helping seniors with memory problems like Alzheimer's and dementia, and they use the Daily 7 program every day, which means residents get support through things like physical activities, music, social time, cognitive exercises, reminiscing, spiritual activities, and outdoor time, and you'll notice people out in secure courtyards with hand rails for safety, the cottages themselves either being one or two bedrooms meant to help with independence while still keeping everyone supported, and the apartments come in different options such as studios or semi-private rooms, each one generally furnished with a twin bed, dresser, and a small sink or wash area. The setting feels familiar and homey, with plenty of natural gathering spots like cozy lounges, a fireplace, a library, inviting common rooms, and walking paths in a landscaped, safe courtyard, and you'll see the whole place is pet-friendly though there are specific rules about that. Staff at Vacaville Memory Care get ongoing training in how to support those with memory loss, there's always a licensed vocational nurse (LVN) on site, and specialized memory care workers called medication care managers and medication technicians who help with daily medication and health needs, and besides that, visiting therapists come regularly to offer speech, occupational, physical, or podiatry services.

    Vacaville Memory Care is licensed by the state-license number 486803645-and offers support for adults 55 and over, specifically those dealing with dementia or other kinds of cognitive issues, and they do things like complimentary weekly housekeeping and laundry, complimentary rides to doctors or local outings, and help with all basic daily activities. Dining is a big part of life, and meals are made by an experienced culinary team, with attention paid to special dietary needs, and the food's won awards for being both nutritious and tasty, so it gets a lot of positive feedback. Extra amenities include Wi-Fi, handicap accessibility, an onsite beauty salon and barber shop with a caring beautician, a library, monthly family events, and devotional services open to all faiths. The activities calendar includes wellness classes, gardening, animal-assisted therapy, outings, and both indoor and outdoor group events, with a few folks mentioning they'd like to see more exercise options like chair yoga or seated Zumba.

    The community's reviewed as helpful and understanding, especially during stressful move-ins or changes, and people mention the staff as friendly, compassionate, and focused on treating everyone like family, and that goes along with their philosophy of being a joyful, friendly, and safe community. The facility's received awards like Best of Senior Living, Best of Senior Living All Star, and Best Meals and Dining, plus it's a verified partner with its license checked twice a year. Safety's emphasized with secured buildings and monitored outdoor areas to reduce any wandering or confusion, while the environment itself aims to balance support, structure, and the feeling of being at home. Vacaville Memory Care also provides career opportunities for its team, offering benefits like paid time off, discounted meals, health insurance, and retirement planning, and there's room for professional growth.

    Family members are encouraged to visit often, and there are regular staff introduction events and monthly gatherings so everyone can feel connected. Vacaville Memory Care mainly focuses on memory care and respite care for residents and is careful about helping people keep some independence while staying safe, thanks to their specialized layouts and trained staff available 24/7.

    About Pacifica Senior Living

    Vacaville Memory Care is managed by Pacifica Senior Living.

    Pacifica Senior Living, a division of Pacifica Companies (family-owned since 1978), was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in San Diego, California. Operating over 90 communities across 13-14 states with concentrations in California, Florida, and Arizona, Pacifica has grown to become the 13th largest overall senior care provider in the United States. The company ranks as the 5th largest memory care provider, 10th largest assisted living provider, and 21st largest independent living provider nationally, serving thousands of residents from coast to coast through their comprehensive care offerings.

    Pacifica's mission centers on creating a lifestyle of independence, security, and peace of mind for each individual and their family. The company provides personalized, compassionate care services through their signature Heartland™ Assisted Living and Legacies™ Memory Care programs, which focus on the individual while offering customized care plans that respect each resident's needs, preferences, and privacy. Their philosophy emphasizes striking a balance between assistance and independence, providing dignified and compassionate retirement experiences in environments that feel like home. Each community is managed individually, allowing for tailored support of unique resident profiles and communal character, with everything from scheduling to dining menus designed around residents' preferences.

    The company's specialized memory care programs demonstrate their expertise in dementia care. Their Legacies™ Memory Care program helps patients with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of memory loss feel safe and secure while providing memory-boosting activities. The innovative Amara Memory Support program creates welcoming and empowering environments that celebrate the essence of people rather than focusing on their diagnosis. Programming encompasses nine Focus Elements of Life: Recreation, Service, Spirituality, Movement, Sensory, Household Connection, Community, Exploration, and Creative Arts, delivered through stimulating activities including gardening, culinary adventures, musical experiences, creative artistic outlets, and mindfulness practices.

    Pacifica offers a comprehensive continuum of care including independent living, assisted living, memory care, respite care, skilled nursing, and adult day care services. All communities focus on promoting well-being by meeting care needs while facilitating social interactions, activities, and wellness programs. Despite recent financial challenges leading to the bankruptcy of one management entity affecting approximately 20 California facilities, the majority of Pacifica's nearly 100 communities continue operating, maintaining their commitment to advancing senior living and providing peace of mind to residents and families through warm, family-like communities where each resident receives individualized attention while maintaining dignity and independence.

    People often ask...

    Vacaville Memory Care offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $6,850 per month.

    Vacaville Memory Care offers assisted living and memory care.

    There are 41 photos of Vacaville Memory Care on Mirador.

    The full address for this community is 431 Nut Tree Rd, Vacaville, CA 95687.

    No, Vacaville Memory Care does not offer respite care. Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.

    Safety & Compliance

    In California, the Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing Division licenses residential care facilities for the elderly, conducting inspections and investigating complaints.

    License number486803645
    StatusLicensed
    Facility typeResidential Care Elderly
    Capacity75 residents
    LicenseePACIFICA SR LVG VACAVILLE; NORTHSTAR SR LVG INC
    EffectiveDecember 7th, 2016
    View the official license record

    Inspection Reports

    92

    Reports

    29

    Type A Citations

    29

    Type B Citations

    52

    Complaints

    7

    Years

    30 Sept 2026Inspection
    Found no deficiencies.
    16 Jul 2026Complaint
    Investigated a complaint and found that staff mismanaged residents' medications; other allegations were unsubstantiated.
    • Type ACCR 87465(a)(4)Incidental Medical and Dental Care
    16 Jul 2026Complaint
    Investigated the allegations of staff leaving residents unattended and insufficient supervision leading to elopement, and concluded there was insufficient evidence to prove them.
    29 May 2026Inspection
    Found no deficiencies. An ongoing complaint about lack of staff supervision was noted and is under investigation.
    09 Apr 2026Inspection
    Identified neglect that led to unstageable pressure injuries requiring hospitalization and surgery, resulting in a $10,000 civil penalty.
    • Type A87466
    30 Mar 2026Complaint
    Found that a staff member used physical force against a resident, including tackling from behind and punching, and that residents were not adequately protected from abuse.
    • Type B87468.1(a)(3)
    30 Mar 2026Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that staff did not provide adequate supervision of a resident who attempted to exit the building. Findings showed staff maintained visual contact, followed established protocols, and promptly involved emergency responders when needed.
    19 Mar 2026Inspection
    Concluded that no licensing citations were issued during the visit.
    11 Mar 2026Complaint
    Investigated nine complaints about resident care, medications, records, belongings, cleanliness, odors, and activities; evidence did not support the claims.
    11 Feb 2026Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that residents and their families were not notified about a change in ownership and about financial distress. The review found that notices for the ownership change were not provided and that the financial distress issue was not proven at this time.
    • Type B87208(a)
    29 Jan 2026Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that a resident's special diet was not followed and the allegation that drinking containers were not kept clean and sanitary.
    • Type B87555(b)(29)
    14 Jan 2026Inspection
    Identified concerns about resident supervision, infection control, incontinence care, and changes in management; related investigations were ongoing.
    14 Jan 2026Inspection
    Investigated an allegation that a staff member sexually abused a resident during incontinence care; no deficiencies were cited.
    14 Jan 2026Complaint
    Investigated allegations that staff did not follow a resident's care plan when assisting with ADLs and violated a resident's personal rights.
    11 Dec 2025Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that infection control was not followed; found no evidence of improper isolation or ongoing outbreak and noted appropriate precautions were in place.
    12 Nov 2025Inspection
    Observed adequate staffing and safety measures with sufficient supplies; a technical violation was noted for missing health screenings and TB test results for some staff, and emergency planning documents were reviewed.
    12 Sept 2025Complaint
    Identified a problem with incontinence care for a resident, and noted staffing concerns that lacked sufficient evidence.
    • Type A87468.2(a)(4)
    12 Sept 2025Complaint
    Investigated allegations that resident incontinence care was not being met and staff did not follow care plans. Interviews indicated mixed findings with some concerns about task completion, but no clear evidence that residents were left unattended.
    12 Sept 2025Inspection
    Investigated an abuse allegation through a case-management visit and performed safety and wellness checks; no deficiencies were cited.
    12 Sept 2025Complaint
    Investigated allegations that staff neglected residents, groomed male residents' private areas, and left residents unattended; interviews did not provide evidence to support these claims.
    23 Jul 2025Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that staff did not maintain safe, sanitary and good repair conditions. Observed bathrooms clean on visits but several fixtures were in disrepair, including a missing paper towel dispenser, broken toilet paper holder, out-of-order toilet, broken soap dispenser, and a clogged utility sink.
    • Type B87303(a)
    23 Jul 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff were not mitigating the spread of infectious outbreaks. Investigators found gaps in infection control practices, including inconsistent PPE use and reliance on hospice teams for scabies management.
    • Type A87470(b)
    23 Jul 2025Inspection
    Identified ongoing concerns from prior complaints, including neglect causing pressure injuries, supervision gaps, infection control issues, reporting requirements, and changes to management without notification; observed that all emergency exits were unobstructed during the follow-up review.
    23 Jul 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that infection control was not followed; evidence showed infection control protocols, cleaning, and staff training were in place.
    11 Jul 2025Complaint
    Identified staff failures to supply residents with toiletries and to administer medications as prescribed.
    • Type A87465(a)(4)
    • Type B87307(a)(3)(D)
    11 Jul 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that there was insufficient staffing to intervene during a resident-on-resident assault, which resulted in an eye injury to one resident.
    04 Jun 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not maintain a comfortable temperature. Observed all five houses at comfortable temperatures and residents not in distress.
    31 May 2025Inspection
    Found one building's central air conditioning was not working, while other areas remained cool and residents appeared comfortable.
    06 May 2025Inspection
    Identified an incident in which a staff member reportedly made open-hand contact with a resident's cheek on 04/14/2025; the staff member involved was no longer employed, and no deficiencies were cited.
    23 Apr 2025Inspection
    Identified that revised admissions agreements were not submitted for review and approval.
    • Type B87208(a)
    • Type B87209(a)
    23 Apr 2025Complaint
    Found that a staff member posted resident photos online without consent, staffing levels were insufficient to meet residents’ needs, an exit door was obstructed, and some staff lacked training to meet residents’ care needs.
    • Type A87411(a)
    • Type A87468.2(a)(1)
    • Type A87202(a)
    23 Apr 2025Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that an admission agreement was unlawful; the allegation was found unfounded.
    23 Apr 2025Complaint
    Investigated a complaint alleging staff did not meet residents' hygiene needs. Observations and interviews showed residents were clean and presentable with no strong odors observed.
    14 Apr 2025Inspection
    Identified late incident/death reporting. Three reports were submitted after the seven-day deadline for incidents on 03/17/2025 and 03/24/2025.
    • Type B87211(a)(1)
    14 Apr 2025Inspection
    Investigated bankruptcy-related matters and management changes, noting lawsuits mentioned in media but no financial impact on residents or properties.
    20 Feb 2025Complaint
    Investigated a complaint about incontinence care and staff supervision, and found concerns about how health changes and wounds were observed and addressed, posing safety risks to residents.
    • Type A87466
    • Type A87468.6
    20 Feb 2025Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that an adult forced a resident to eat and found no preponderance of evidence to prove the allegation.
    04 Feb 2025Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that staff did not follow infection control protocols. Evidence showed PPE was not properly doffed, discarded, stored, or removed during an active Covid-19 case.
    • Type A87470(b)(2)
    03 Jan 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff handled residents in a rough manner. Found the allegation to be supported.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(1)
    03 Jan 2025Complaint
    Identified that staff did not ensure residents' incontinence care needs were met.
    • Type A87468.2(a)(4)
    03 Jan 2025Complaint
    Investigated neglect resulting in a pressure injury after a resident's wound went unobserved and under-documented, prompting medical escalation.
    • Type A87466
    03 Jan 2025Complaint
    Investigated allegation that the Activities Director spoke Spanish to residents who do not understand Spanish and made them uncomfortable; interviews showed staff speak both languages and use English for large groups.
    03 Jan 2025Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that staff posted residents on social media; interviews and documentation showed consent for photography and social media use, and posts were related to events. No evidence supported the allegation.
    05 Nov 2024Inspection
    Observed several compliance issues related to resident safety and care. Hot water temperatures at several sinks exceeded the required range; medications were not centrally stored for some residents; staff training was incomplete; and one resident did not have an updated physician's report.
    • Type A87411(c)(1)
    • Type A87705(c)(5)
    • Type B1569.625(b)(2)
    • Type B87465(h)
    • Type B87303(e)(2)
    17 Oct 2024Inspection
    Found that a staff member did not have the required fingerprint clearance or association to the site.
    • Type A1569.17(c)(1)(A)
    11 Sept 2024Inspection
    Found that locks kept toxins inaccessible to residents and staff training was in place; no deficiencies were cited.
    26 Aug 2024Inspection
    Identified that a resident ingested dish soap after accessing the kitchen because toxic substances were accessible to a person with dementia.
    • Type A87705(f)
    26 Apr 2024Complaint
    Found that an unwitnessed resident fall was not properly reported to licensing and other required parties, and that the resident did receive medical attention after the incident.
    • Type B87211(a)(1)
    26 Apr 2024Inspection
    Identified that a resident was left unsupervised in the courtyard, resulting in an unwitnessed fall with injuries. A civil penalty was issued for a repeat violation.
    • Type A1569.269(a)(6)
    13 Feb 2024Inspection
    Observed discussions about improving medication assistance and record keeping, updating laundry equipment, and a decision not to pursue Technical Support Services.
    24 Jan 2024Complaint
    Found concerns about staff sleeping on duty and residents' clothing being shared due to soiled items awaiting cleaning, compromising supervision and safeguarding of belongings.
    • Type B87411(a)
    • Type B87217(b)
    24 Jan 2024Complaint
    Identified neglect due to inadequate supervision of incontinence care that contributed to a pressure injury.
    • Type A1569.269
    • Type B1569.625(b)(2)
    09 Jan 2024Complaint
    Investigated and found lack of supervision allowed a resident to sustain an injury after falling from a wheelchair when only one staff member was present.
    • Type A1569.269
    09 Jan 2024Complaint
    Investigated allegation that staff did not follow infection control protocols. Found unsubstantiated.
    20 Dec 2023Complaint
    Found that staff improperly administered medications, residents were left in soiled clothing or urine, and living areas were not kept clean or sanitary.
    • Type A87465(a)(4)
    • Type A87464(f)
    • Type B87465(i)
    • Type B87393(a)
    • Type B87303(a)
    17 Nov 2023Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that staff did not ensure adequate lighting for residents; interviews and a tour found insufficient evidence to prove or disprove the allegation.
    17 Nov 2023Complaint
    Investigated allegations that staff did not provide timely care and that medications were not given as prescribed; findings could not prove or disprove these allegations.
    09 Nov 2023Inspection
    Observed a clean, well-maintained site with residents engaged in activities, safe kitchen and shower areas, and cheerful staff. No deficiencies were cited.
    07 Nov 2023Inspection
    Observed safety measures, medication storage, and resident records during an annual required inspection. Conditions appeared to meet applicable regulations.
    05 Jun 2023Inspection
    Found a medication error where a resident received the wrong medication, and a fall requiring hospitalization followed by transfer to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation; also noted a separate incident where a family member forcibly attempted to move a resident, with the resident later placed at a SNF for rehab.
    • Type A87465(a)(5)
    28 Apr 2023Inspection
    Verified that the excluded staff member was not present, employed, or residing at the site.
    10 Apr 2023Inspection
    Found no deficiencies during a case management incident review.
    06 Feb 2023Complaint
    Investigated multiple complaints about care and reporting; interviews and records could not prove or disprove the concerns, and no clear violations were established.
    19 Dec 2022Inspection
    Confirmed no deficiencies were observed during a case management-incident review.
    09 Dec 2022Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that a resident's personal rights were violated. Based on interviews and observations, no evidence supported the claim.
    08 Nov 2022Inspection
    Identified that a resident sustained a black eye from an unknown source and the incident wasn't reported to licensing.
    • Type B87211(a)(1)(D)
    08 Nov 2022Complaint
    Investigated a complaint alleging care deficiencies, including unmet resident needs, possible neglect leading to hospitalization, and issues with medication administration and personal rights.
    03 Nov 2022Complaint
    Identified insufficient staffing during shifts.
    • Type B87411(a)
    24 Oct 2022Inspection
    Found no deficiencies during a required one-year inspection.
    21 Oct 2022Inspection
    Identified that a resident's change of condition was not documented in the required physician's report and was not retained in the records.
    • Type B87458
    • Type B87506(b)(10)
    21 Oct 2022Complaint
    Found that the allegations about staff not assisting with incontinence and hygiene were unsubstantiated.
    05 Oct 2022Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that a resident's needs were not met; interviews and record reviews found insufficient evidence to support the allegation.
    01 Sept 2022Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that a resident was assaulted by other residents, causing injury, and that injuries occurred due to lack of staffing or supervision.
    11 Aug 2022Complaint
    Observed three allegations—mold, not maintained in good repair, and staff not providing bed linens—and found no evidence to support them.
    11 Aug 2022Complaint
    Found no evidence to support the four allegations: not enough staff to meet residents' needs, odor, lack of activities, and delays in responding to requests for communication. Investigators reviewed records, interviewed staff and residents, and observed the setting.
    06 Jul 2022Inspection
    Identified two incidents involving residents: staff separated them after an altercation and relocated them, and a resident left unassisted and was found nearby unharmed.
    • Type A1569.312(d)
    06 Jul 2022Complaint
    Identified that staff did not have the required dementia-specific in-service training; records showed insufficient documented training hours.
    • Type B87707(a)(2)
    06 Jul 2022Complaint
    Investigated a complaint alleging staff did not assist residents with incontinence, conditions were dirty and in disrepair, residents were left in the sun, staff did not follow physician orders, and medical care was not obtained. Found no evidence to support the allegations.
    06 Jul 2022Complaint
    Investigated a complaint alleging staff left residents unattended, left residents soiled, made inappropriate comments, and pest issues; found no credible evidence to support the allegations.
    06 Jul 2022Complaint
    Investigated allegations that staff handled a resident roughly, made inappropriate comments toward residents, and failed to provide privacy; investigators found no evidence to support or refute the allegations.
    23 Jun 2022Inspection
    Investigated self-reported incidents involving residents, including a urinary tract infection and a fall with injury; no deficiencies were cited.
    28 Apr 2022Inspection
    Investigated three resident-to-resident incidents with no injuries reported.
    09 Feb 2022Inspection
    Observed that SIRs were submitted timely and positive COVID-19 cases were reported to licensing and local public health authorities; staffing and PPE were sufficient; no deficiencies were cited.
    15 Oct 2021Inspection
    Found no deficiencies cited; infection control measures were in place and residents had access to activities and meals.
    14 Oct 2021Inspection
    Identified aggressive incidents where one resident hit another, raising safety concerns. Noted that an related incident was not reported to the licensing agency within the required seven days.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(2)
    • Type B87211(a)(1)(d)
    23 Sept 2021Inspection
    Identified that a resident left the premises without staff assistance by cutting a window screen and climbing out. Alarms did not alert staff, creating a potential risk to residents.
    • Type B1569.312(d)
    01 Sept 2021Inspection
    Identified two self-reported incidents involving residents: aggression between two residents with no injuries observed, and bruising observed on another resident; no deficiencies were cited.
    26 May 2021Complaint
    Identified a failure to maintain a clean and sanitary environment, with a resident’s clothing soiled with urine and feces in the room. Also found two staff not wearing face coverings while assisting residents.
    • Type A87468.1
    • Type B87303(a)
    31 Jan 2020Inspection
    Confirmed individuals were not employed or present at the facility during the visit. No deficiencies were found.
    17 Dec 2019Complaint
    Investigated allegations of inadequate staffing, poor food service, and staff misconduct. Found appropriate staffing, balanced menus, and no evidence of staff mistreatment. Allegations remained unsubstantiated.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(2)
    • Type B87211(a)(1)
    19 Nov 2019Inspection
    Confirmed deficiencies in the facility's water temperature, emergency drill frequency, and fire extinguisher inspection date during an inspection of the premises with 72 residents diagnosed with dementia.
    • Type B1569.312(d)
    08 Nov 2019Inspection
    Visited facility found in compliance with no deficiencies.
    • Type A87468.1
    • Type B87303(a)

    Disclaimer

    Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Vacaville Memory Care. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Vacaville Memory Care directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.

    Are you an owner or operator of Vacaville Memory Care?

    Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.

    Nearby Communities

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 59 facilities$5,881/mo
    2. 48 facilities$6,113/mo
    3. 33 facilities$6,199/mo
    4. 113 facilities$4,965/mo
    5. 111 facilities$4,700/mo
    6. 109 facilities$4,698/mo
    7. 9 facilities$5,956/mo
    8. 2 facilities
    9. 32 facilities$5,221/mo
    10. 19 facilities$5,537/mo
    11. 59 facilities$6,387/mo
    12. 19 facilities$5,537/mo
    © 2026 Mirador Living