I moved my dad here after a great same-day tour and have been very pleased overall - the staff (from sales and front desk to nursing and activities) are warm, attentive and family-like, and the executive director (Hannah Myers) is calm and supportive. The community is beautiful, clean and hotel-like with lovely patios/views, active daily programming, good food, and a secure memory-care floor - my dad is happy and even dancing. A few real drawbacks: occasional understaffing, slow dining service/declining meal quality at times, some staff attitude incidents, small rooms, road noise, and confusing med-policy wording. Despite that, I feel my dad is well cared for and I highly recommend it for a welcoming, active senior community.
patio/outdoor seating (fountain) and pleasant outdoor areas
apartment-style rooms with full bath and refrigerator
active social programming and daily activities
church visits and spiritual programming
regular entertainment, excursions and special events
secure memory-care unit with staff-only access
convenient location near shopping and services
perceived good value and affordability
willingness to accommodate move-in needs (held rooms)
quick medical response and good care coordination
named staff praised for excellence (e.g., Jorge, Samantha, Alma, Vanessa, Kevan)
strong family communication and responsiveness
Cons
understaffing and high turnover
inconsistent caregiver staffing during ownership/switchover
reported rude or unprofessional staff incidents
perceived decline in dining quality and service
small dining room and assigned seating complaints
insufficient evening activities and low evening attendance
administrative miscommunication and poor onboarding
confusion or misleading information on medication policy
noise from Ventura Blvd/freeway and limited quiet outdoor space
some rooms are small or have suboptimal layouts
ongoing construction causing disruption and unclear community feel
rate hikes and concerns about increasing fees
language barriers and staff appearance concerns cited
management not always visible or accessible
service inconsistency between floors/units
Summary review
Overall sentiment across reviews of Savant of Woodland Hills is predominantly positive with repeated praise for the staff, daily life and the physical environment, but tempered by recurring operational and consistency issues that affect some residents. The strongest and most consistent theme is appreciation for the caregivers, activities staff and nursing teams — many reviewers describe staff as friendly, caring, attentive, supportive and professional. Multiple family members highlighted individual employees by name and noted quick medical responses, compassionate day-to-day care, and staff who built real relationships with residents (dancing with residents, knowing them well, and treating them like family). The sales and admissions experience is frequently called out as smooth and helpful, with same-day tours available, staff willing to hold rooms even when full, and generally effective communication around move-in for many families.
Facility and amenities receive high marks. The community is often described as clean, well-maintained and hotel-like or luxury-feel, with attractive décor, a beautiful dining room, a patio with a fountain, and apartment-style units that include full baths and refrigerators. Reviewers appreciate the convenient location near shopping and services. Memory-care features are also noted positively: reviewers mention a secure second-floor memory unit with staff-only access and the facility’s ability to separate a lighter independent/assisted vibe on the first floor from a more secure memory-care environment upstairs.
Dining and activities are an important strength but show mixed feedback. Many residents and families praise the food as delicious and varied, and reviewers list numerous daily activities (spelling bees, bingo, social hours, excursions, church visitors Wednesday and Sunday, movies) that contribute to an active social life. Several reviewers report that the dining area doubles as a social/game area and that excursions and entertainment are well organized. At the same time, some recurring negatives concern the dining program: a number of reviews mention a perceived decline in food quality and slower service, complaints about a small dining room, assigned seating that forces repeated meal partners, and lack of half-portion options. Evening programming is frequently singled out for improvement — low attendance and limited options after dinner (often only movies) leave some residents disengaged.
Management, staffing and operational consistency are the most common pain points across reviews. Multiple reviewers report understaffing, high turnover and specific periods of staff loss during ownership or service transitions (a cited Savant switchover). Some families describe administrative frustration, poor onboarding experiences, and miscommunication around introductions and expectations. There are also specific allegations about unprofessional behavior (one cited incident involving a rude server), and comments about low wages, staff attitude, language barriers, and appearance concerns (tattoos) that some families found troubling. A notable procedural concern reported by more than one reviewer relates to medication administration policy: one review described the policy as misleading and discussed confusion over weekly pill organizers versus facility medication policy. These operational and personnel inconsistencies can materially affect experience; while many families say the staff are exceptional, others felt management was not sufficiently visible or responsive and that those staffing problems reduced the quality of care.
Noise, space and cost considerations appear intermittently in the reviews. A few reviewers note that location near Ventura Boulevard and the freeway makes outdoor quiet areas limited and that highway noise can be noticeable inside some units. Several mentions of small or awkward room layouts indicate that not all apartments meet everyone’s expectations for space. Construction activity at times made it difficult for prospective residents to assess the community and introduced short-term disruption. Cost is discussed in mixed terms: many reviewers describe Savant as good value or the least expensive of comparable options and praise flexibility in aid costs, while others are concerned about rate increases over time and feel pricing may be high relative to the care level needed.
In summary, Savant of Woodland Hills is generally seen as a warm, clean, and activity-rich community with a strong core of compassionate caregivers and useful amenities. Families commonly report peace of mind, quick responses to medical needs, and positive social engagement for residents. However, prospective residents and families should weigh these strengths against recurring issues including staffing stability, administrative communication, dining consistency, and evening programming. If considering this community, ask specific questions about current staffing levels and turnover, evening activity schedules, the medication administration policy, dining arrangements (portion sizes, seating policy and recent menu changes), noise in preferred units, and any ongoing construction or planned rate changes. Those areas are where reviews indicate the greatest variability in resident experience.
Location
People often ask...
Savant of Woodland Hills offers independent living, assisted living, and memory care.
There are 14 photos of Savant of Woodland Hills on Mirador.
Yes, Savant of Woodland Hills allows residents to age in place and adjust their level of care as needed.
The full address for this community is 21711 Ventura Blvd, Woodland Hills, CA, 91364.
Yes, Savant of Woodland Hills offers respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
State of California Inspection Reports
40
Inspections
18
Type A Citations
24
Type B Citations
5
Years of reports
01 Apr 2025
01 Apr 2025
Found insufficient evidence to prove the allegation that staff did not refund pro-rated days after the resident moved out. A refund check for five pro-rated days was issued and mailed, with delivery confirmed after delays due to holidays and evacuations.
28 Mar 2025
28 Mar 2025
Found hot water temperatures in several bathrooms exceeded the allowed range, even after adjustments, and no documentation of quarterly emergency drills was provided. Noted medications securely stored and labeled, detectors tested and functioning, and common areas observed in clean, safe condition.
§ 9058
§ 87303(e)(2)
15 Jan 2025
15 Jan 2025
Identified that a staff member began working and residing at the site without the required criminal record clearance, despite conflicting statements from administration about how long they had been on the job. A livescan was submitted during the visit, and a $300 civil penalty was issued for this deficiency.
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Identified deficiencies related to medication management: PRN medications were not logged with the prescription number, fill date, or expiry, and it could not be confirmed which packs were used; medications were prepped and stored in pill boxes three days in advance with no verification of the source. Two staff members lacked criminal record clearance, and civil penalties totaling $1,000 were issued.
§ 87355(e)
§ 87465(d)
§ 87465(h)(5)
30 Oct 2024
30 Oct 2024
Identified that staff did not dispense acetaminophen to a resident as prescribed, with dosing counts off and the label misinterpreted. Insufficient evidence to support that staff did not properly maintain resident medical records, did not ensure confidentiality, or did not properly secure residents’ medications.
§ 87465(h)(4)
10 Sept 2024
10 Sept 2024
Investigated the allegation of failure to address a scabies outbreak; not enough evidence to verify its occurrence.
30 May 2024
30 May 2024
Found deficiencies during an unannounced annual visit, including incomplete medication bottle information and improper storage of one medication, and a restroom hot-water temperature of 115.5°F. Records and safety measures were largely in order, and an exit interview was conducted.
31 May 2024
31 May 2024
Confirmed that staff did not follow proper reporting requirements for COVID-19 cases.
§ 87211(a)(2)
30 May 2024
30 May 2024
Identified deficiencies in areas such as kitchen storage, medication labeling, and record keeping during an annual visit to a facility. Staff were informed of the findings and guidance was provided on addressing the issues.
§ 1569.695(a)(1)
§ 87212(c)
§ 87465(a)(6)
15 Mar 2024
15 Mar 2024
Confirmed allegations of improper reporting requirements and a resident leaving unassisted, while other allegations regarding incontinence care, medication assistance, meal service, and forced activities were unsubstantiated.
§ 87468.2(a)(4)
§ 87211(a)(1)
31 Jan 2024
31 Jan 2024
Investigated the allegation that staff did not obtain appropriate assistance for a resident engaging in self-risk behaviors; determined insufficient evidence to support the claim.
24 Oct 2023
24 Oct 2023
Confirmed that staff were provided with sufficient PPE supplies for residents who tested positive for COVID-19.
24 May 2023
24 May 2023
Identified deficiencies in various areas of the facility, including expired food items, missing documentation in personnel files, and failure to submit required exception requests for residents with prohibited health conditions.
§ 87615(a)
§ 87555(b)(8)
§ 87412(a)
§ 87412(d)
10 May 2023
10 May 2023
Identified multiple deficiencies, including unsigned Needs and Services Plans and missing change-in-condition appraisals for several residents, missing bed rail orders for some residents, undocumented TB tests, no quarterly emergency drills, incomplete staff training (initial 40 hours and annual 20 hours) plus missing dementia training, TB documentation for staff, and missing PRN authorization forms for residents.
10 May 2023
10 May 2023
Identified deficiencies in resident care and staff training during the inspection.
§ 87608(a)(5)
§ 87705(c)(3)
§ 87411(f)
§ 1569.625(b)(2)
§ 87458(b)(1)
§ 87463(a)
§ 87465(d)
§ 1569.695(c)
14 Apr 2023
14 Apr 2023
Investigated the allegation of insufficient staff to meet residents' needs and found no evidence to support this claim.
07 Mar 2023
07 Mar 2023
Confirmed allegation regarding dietary needs was unsubstantiated. Found allegation of residents waiting up to 90 mins for food was also unsubstantiated.
20 Jan 2023
20 Jan 2023
Reviewed a complaint about quarantine requirements, canceled activities, and communal dining restrictions related to COVID-19, and found no violations. Investigated claims of inadequate food service, confirmed that sufficient food and options were available, and found no issues.
21 Oct 2022
21 Oct 2022
Reviewed an allegation that staff did not follow a resident's care plan, but insufficient evidence found to support this claim after examining records and interviews related to a hospital transfer during the COVID-19 pandemic.
13 Sept 2022
13 Sept 2022
Identified inaccuracies in medication documentation and mismatches between notes and the medications on hand for two residents, including prescription numbers, expiration dates, and issued dates. Found the Centrally Stored Medication Log to be not current and discussed updating it during the visit.
§ 87465(a)(4)
§ 87465(h)(6)
13 Sept 2022
13 Sept 2022
Investigated two allegations and found insufficient evidence for the allegation that staff failed to assist with self-administration of medication, due to an unavailable MAR and the resident reporting no concerns. Investigated the allegation that prescriptions were not refilled in a timely manner and found insufficient evidence, as the resident denied any interruption and records showed medications were maintained while the resident no longer resided here.
13 Sept 2022
13 Sept 2022
Investigated claims about staff assistance with medication self-administration and timely prescription refills; both allegations were unsubstantiated. Identified unrelated medication errors during a medication audit, noted for further review. Exit interview conducted.
12 Aug 2022
12 Aug 2022
Found no evidence to support the allegation that transportation was not arranged for residents; basic transportation within ten miles was included, and an optional personal escort service was offered but declined. Found no evidence to support the allegations about food quality/quantity or improper fee increases, since meals were varied and residents and families reported satisfaction, and notices about the $1,000 increase were issued with proper timing.
12 Aug 2022
12 Aug 2022
Reviewed allegations of transportation assistance, food quality, and fee increase at a facility; all allegations were deemed unsubstantiated.
03 Aug 2022
03 Aug 2022
Investigated four specific allegations: staff did not change a resident's clothes; staff did not reposition a resident; staff failed to provide comfortable accommodations; and staff slept in a resident's room. Found insufficient evidence to prove the first two, observed residents generally in clean clothes, temperatures comfortable, and noted staff sleeping in living areas during shifts.
03 Aug 2022
03 Aug 2022
Confirmed allegations of staff falling asleep in a resident's room. Other allegations of not changing clothes, not repositioning residents, and not providing comfortable accommodations were unsubstantiated.
§ 87307(a)(b)
19 Apr 2022
19 Apr 2022
Identified multiple health and safety deficiencies and gaps in infection control at the site, including missing hand hygiene signage, unsecured medications and cleaning supplies, unlocked cabinets and doors, expired food, and missing department notices. Observed infection control measures such as centralized symptom screening, available PPE, and the ability to designate an isolation room if needed.
19 Apr 2022
19 Apr 2022
Identified deficiencies in infection control practices, signage, and proper storage of food and supplies during a recent visit.
§ 87555(b)(8)
§ 87303(e)(2)
§ 87355(e)(1)
§ 87309(a)
§ 87307(d)(2)
§ 87465(h)(2)
14 Apr 2022
14 Apr 2022
Inspection found clean and properly equipped resident rooms and common areas, with adequate infection control measures in place. Staff demonstrated proper practices during observation.
24 Mar 2022
24 Mar 2022
Investigated an allegation that a resident sustained multiple pressure injuries while in care. Review of home health and hospital records showed no clear evidence that the new injuries were caused by staff neglect, so the allegation could not be confirmed.
24 Mar 2022
24 Mar 2022
Identified missing hospice care plan and hospice records for a resident, failed to report hospice enrollment to licensing, did not complete a reappraisal after hospital stays and a change in condition, and did not report two hospital admissions.
24 Mar 2022
24 Mar 2022
Identified deficiencies in the care of a resident, including failure to obtain a hospice care plan, report incidents to Licensing, and complete required reappraisal after hospital stays.
§ 87211
§ 87463
§ 87632
§ 87633
23 Mar 2022
23 Mar 2022
Determined that allegations of a resident not receiving medication on time were unfounded, as records and staff interviews showed medications were administered as prescribed.
18 Jan 2022
18 Jan 2022
Confirmed an allegation of Neglect/Lack of Supervision resulting in repeated falls and serious injuries to a resident, leading to a civil penalty.
§ 1569.312(a)
21 Dec 2021
21 Dec 2021
Confirmed neglect/lack of supervision allegation resulting in multiple bruises on a resident, leading to a substantiated finding and a civil penalty assessed.
§ 1569.312(a)
03 Sept 2021
03 Sept 2021
Investigated the allegation that staff took a call pendant away from a resident and found insufficient evidence to support the claim. Interviews with residents and staff revealed no incidents or concerns regarding this issue.
19 May 2021
19 May 2021
Identified deficiencies related to infection control, including visitors not being screened at entry, missing hand hygiene signage, and insufficient cleaning supplies and non-perishable food stock. Noted that medications were accessible in some resident rooms and some safety measures were not in use at the time of the visit.
19 May 2021
19 May 2021
Identified deficiencies in infection control practices and procedures during the annual visit by Licensing Program Analysts. Recommendations made for signage, education, and continued screening of visitors and staff.
§ 87309(a)
§ 87555(b)(26)
§ 87465(h)(2)
13 May 2021
13 May 2021
Identified deficiencies in promoting hand hygiene and respiratory illness reporting throughout the facility during an unannounced inspection.
07 Mar 2020
07 Mar 2020
Confirmed that the facility provided satisfactory food services and had no pests according to resident interviews and observations.