I toured and stayed briefly at Regency Park and was very pleased. The staff were exceptionally friendly, caring, and responsive; management was accessible and handled requests. The building is beautiful and clean with lovely gardens, hotel-style apartments, plentiful activities, strong memory-care programs, good dining, and an overall welcoming, at-home feel-I would recommend it to other families.
Current/former resident
Sep 2026
Pricing
Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Request a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Coordination with health care providers
Hospice waiver
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Healthcare staffing
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Restaurant-style dining
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Air-conditioning
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wifi
Memory care community services
Dementia waiver
Mild cognitive impairment
Specialized memory care programming
Transportation
Community operated transportation
Transportation arrangement
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Common areas
Beauty salon
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Gaming room
Garden
Outdoor space
Small library
Wellness center
Community services
Concierge services
Fitness programs
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Planned day trips
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
4.07·(132)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
3.8
Staff
4.0
Meals
3.3
Amenities
4.0
Value
2.4
Pros
newly renovated, airy common areas
apartment-style suites with personalization allowed
restaurant-style dining and varied menus
knowledgeable nursing leadership
long-tenured caregiving staff
dedicated and responsive maintenance team
robust social and entertainment program
regular outings and transportation services
fitness and wellness amenities
separate memory-care neighborhoods with focused layout
proximity to St. Vincent Medical Center
pet-friendly policies
on-site salon and ancillary services
secure memory-care environment
flexible meal options
supportive move-in and admissions assistance
clean, modern interior finishes
positive hospice and end-of-life support
active volunteer and community engagement
pleasant outdoor grounds and courtyards
Cons
inconsistent care quality across assisted living and memory-care units
chronic understaffing during peak care times
inconsistent personal-care routines (bathing and hygiene assistance)
gaps in medication-administration oversight and clinical monitoring
uneven meal quality and variable dietary-accommodation follow-through
irregular housekeeping and maintenance follow-through
weak inter-shift and family communication processes
limited and inconsistent activity programming in parts of memory care
high upfront fees and private-pay-only financial model
staff turnover and uneven staff training/competency
insufficient emergency-power resilience for extended outages
variable responsiveness to clinically urgent needs (wound care, pressure management)
Summary of reviews
Regency Park presents a strongly mixed profile: many families and visitors describe an attractive, recently renovated campus with airy common spaces, apartment-like suites, and a wide range of amenities (dining rooms, fitness areas, salon, gardens and regular outings). The campus design—including separate neighborhoods for memory care and assisted living—receives consistent praise for its layout, sense of normalcy, and proximity to a nearby medical center. Several staff members and departments (nursing leadership, maintenance, and some caregiving teams) are frequently singled out for positive responsiveness and individualized attention.
Care quality is uneven across the facility. Positive accounts describe knowledgeable nursing leadership, long-tenured caregivers, secure memory-care neighborhoods, and effective hospice coordination. Conversely, other families raised concerns about inconsistent personal-care routines, delayed attention to clinical issues such as wound/pressure management, and variability between assisted-living and memory-care standards. These divergences suggest that clinical oversight and care protocols may be reliable in some units or shifts but less consistent in others.
Staffing and operations are a recurring theme. Many reviews praise compassionate, attentive employees and particular staff who go above and beyond; at the same time, a pattern of understaffing, turnover, and uneven training emerges. Reviewers described observable behaviors that reflect these operational strains (for example, staff occupied with mobile devices, limited supervision on certain shifts, or forgotten tasks). Communication gaps between shifts and with families — including missed messages, delayed email responses, and inadequate orientation for new residents — are also noted as contributors to dissatisfaction.
Dining and nutrition receive polarized commentary. Some families describe restaurant-style dining, varied menus, and nutrition-aware meal planning; others describe bland or low-quality food, inconsistencies in meal service, and failures to accommodate dietary restrictions. These differences point to variability in food preparation and dietary accommodation processes rather than a uniformly poor or excellent dining program.
Activity programming and social engagement are strengths in many parts of the community: frequent music events, exercise classes, bus outings, and a broad calendar are commonly mentioned. However, memory-care programming is described as more limited or inconsistently delivered by some families, with occasional cancellations and fewer advertised activities in practice. This suggests the activity portfolio is robust overall but may be unevenly applied across neighborhoods.
Facility management and financial policies produce mixed impressions. Some families value responsive administrators and a recent management change that brought experienced clinical leadership. Others report organizational issues during admissions, high nonrefundable community fees and buy-in expectations, a private-pay-only financing model, and concerns about budget-driven staffing reductions. Emergency preparedness has been questioned in isolated instances (limited generator capacity during extended outages), indicating an operational area to verify during a tour.
Patterns to weigh when evaluating Regency Park: the facility offers strong physical assets, an extensive activities program, and notable staff who provide individualized, compassionate care in many cases. At the same time, reviewers describe operational inconsistencies—especially around staffing levels, personal-care routines, medication oversight, communication, and dietary accommodations—that affect residents’ experience unevenly. Prospective residents and families should tour with specific, practical questions: clarify staffing ratios by unit and shift, ask about medication administration and clinical oversight protocols, request examples of dietary accommodation processes, review housekeeping and maintenance schedules, and confirm emergency-power capabilities and financial policies (deposit/refund and private-pay rules). Observing the memory-care unit during an activity period and speaking with current families can help gauge whether the community’s operational strengths align with the needs of a particular resident.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Regency Park.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Regency Park is located at 8300 SW Barnes Rd, Portland, OR, 97225.
About Regency Park
Regency Park Assisted Living and Memory Care is nestled in Portland’s West Hills, offering a community that emphasizes both vibrant assisted living and specialized memory care. For decades, the long-tenured team at Regency Park has provided a comforting environment where residents can enjoy an active lifestyle, individualized support, and the distinct character of one of Portland’s most desirable neighborhoods. The community is ideally situated just minutes away from parks, entertainment venues, shopping, restaurants, places of worship, and local medical centers, ensuring convenience and enriching opportunities for its residents.
Designed with flexibility and comfort in mind, Regency Park provides a variety of apartment choices, including studios and one- or two-bedroom units in assisted living, as well as companion, companion deluxe, private studio, and private one-bedroom suites in memory care. Rentals are available on a monthly basis with no substantial buy-in required, making the transition to senior living more accessible. Thoughtful amenities and services are included, such as meals prepared by a passionate culinary team, a robust social calendar, housekeeping, maintenance, and personalized daily support. This allows residents to devote more time to enjoying life, whether they’re participating in community activities or relaxing in the beautiful, park-like setting that gives Regency Park its home-like ambiance.
Regency Park is particularly noted for its Mosaic Memory Care Program, an exclusive initiative that draws upon decades of best practices and research. This program acknowledges and celebrates the unique lives of every resident, supporting not only their present needs but honoring who they have always been. The focus is on meaningful engagement, encouraging socialization and the pursuit of favorite activities throughout the day. Personalized assistance is available around the clock, setting a standard for attentive and compassionate care within a safe and functional environment.
A sense of belonging and genuine community is at the heart of the Regency Park experience. Many members of the staff have been committed to the community for years, building warm relationships with residents and families. From the culinary staff—like Robert, who brings his love of cooking and tradition to the dining room and monthly Chef’s Chat—to the care partners and maintenance team, every staff member is empowered to contribute to a supportive and joyful atmosphere. Leadership values input from those who know the residents best, fostering a culture of respect and continuous improvement.
Regency Park accommodates a range of needs, from short-term respite stays offering a sample of the community, to long-term assisted living and memory care. Couples with different care requirements have the opportunity to stay close, supported by tailored services. The community’s approach champions independence, dignity, and the small daily moments that make a profound difference—whether it’s a friendly greeting, listening with sincere interest, or celebrating individual achievements. Life at Regency Park is truly about enriching the lives of seniors, empowering them to pursue each day with a renewed sense of purpose and comfort, amid familiar surroundings and a dedicated team.
Founded by four experienced partners, Cascade Living Group is a privately-owned senior living provider headquartered in Bothell, Washington. Operating 31 communities across Oregon, Nevada, California, Washington, and Arizona, they offer assisted living, independent living, and memory care services.
People often ask...
Regency Park offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $6,030 per month.
Regency Park offers assisted living and memory care.
There are 45 photos of Regency Park on Mirador.
The full address for this community is 8300 SW Barnes Rd, Portland, OR 97225.
No, Regency Park does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Identified a deficiency for failing to provide staffing documentation upon request. The records were not provided in a timely or adequate manner.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
20 May 2026Inspection
20 May 2026Inspection
Found failure to provide appropriate staffing documentation when requested. This constitutes a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
20 May 2026Inspection
20 May 2026Inspection
Investigated and found that appropriate staffing documentation was not provided when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
20 May 2026Inspection
20 May 2026Inspection
Found a staffing documentation violation. It involved failing to provide timely or adequate documentation when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
10 May 2026Inspection
10 May 2026Inspection
Investigated the staffing documentation allegation and found that records were not timely provided.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
28 Apr 2026Inspection
28 Apr 2026Inspection
Found a deficiency in implementing services in accordance with the rules; an incident occurred where a resident was pushed by another resident, resulting in a fall and a full hip replacement.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
28 Apr 2026Inspection
28 Apr 2026Inspection
Investigated and found a deficiency for not implementing an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
28 Apr 2026Inspection
28 Apr 2026Inspection
Found that behavioral symptoms impacting residents and others must be evaluated and included on the service or care plan.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
28 Apr 2026Inspection
28 Apr 2026Inspection
Investigated an allegation of failing to provide a safe environment. Found a failure to immediately report an abuse incident.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
31 Mar 2026Inspection
31 Mar 2026Inspection
Identified failure to implement and maintain an acuity-based staffing tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
21 Mar 2026Inspection
21 Mar 2026Inspection
Found deficiencies in implementing and maintaining an acuity-based staffing tool as required by the rule.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
20 Mar 2026Inspection
20 Mar 2026Inspection
Found that an acuity-based staffing tool was not implemented or maintained as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
15 Feb 2026Inspection
15 Feb 2026Inspection
Found a licensing violation for failing to implement and maintain an acuity-based staffing tool. This posed a potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
05 Feb 2026Inspection
05 Feb 2026Inspection
Identified failure to develop, maintain, and implement an acuity-based staffing tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
28 Jan 2026Inspection
28 Jan 2026Inspection
Investigated and found a deficiency related to not developing or implementing an acuity-based staffing tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
22 Jan 2026Inspection
22 Jan 2026Inspection
Identified a deficiency in implementing and maintaining an acuity-based staffing tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
28 Dec 2025Inspection
28 Dec 2025Inspection
Investigated the complaint and found that prescribed medications were not carried out as prescribed. Missed doses included Amiodarone and Levothyroxine.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
23 Dec 2025Inspection
23 Dec 2025Inspection
Found failure to develop, maintain, and implement an acuity-based staffing tool in accordance with the applicable rule. This constitutes a licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
19 Dec 2025Inspection
19 Dec 2025Inspection
Identified a monitoring deficiency for changes in condition; a resident's left elbow skin tear was not followed up.
Licensing—Failed to provide oversight and monitoring of change of condition
11 Nov 2025Inspection
11 Nov 2025Inspection
Found that the care plan was not followed, resulting in potential harm and violations related to resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
11 Nov 2025Inspection
11 Nov 2025Inspection
Found that an acuity-based staffing tool was not developed, maintained, or implemented as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
08 Sept 2025License Condition
08 Sept 2025License Condition
Determined that residents' scheduled and unscheduled needs were not met because an acuity-based staffing tool was not fully implemented or updated as required. Violations cited against staffing and acuity-related rules.
Regulatory Action—Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents
21 Aug 2025Kitchen
21 Aug 2025Kitchen
Identified sanitation and infection-control deficiencies: the kitchen was not maintained to food-safety standards, and there was no designated Infection Control Specialist with required training.
Investigated a failure to provide a safe environment and found a resident with known exit-seeking behavior unattended outside near a busy road, creating risk of harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
19 Jul 2025Inspection
19 Jul 2025Inspection
Identified a deficiency in developing, maintaining, and implementing an acuity-based staffing tool in accordance with required rule.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 Jun 2025Inspection
23 Jun 2025Inspection
Investigated an allegation and found a deficiency for not developing an Acuity Based Staffing Tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 Jun 2025Inspection
23 Jun 2025Inspection
Found failure to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
12 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
12 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
Identified neglect and abuse from not following the care plan, which led to a fall and injuries; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
01 Jun 2025Inspection
01 Jun 2025Inspection
Found a deficiency for failing to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool as required by rule.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 May 2025Inspection
23 May 2025Inspection
Identified a deficiency for not developing, maintaining, and implementing an acuity-based staffing tool as required by OAR 411-054-0037(1-7).
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
07 Apr 2025Inspection
07 Apr 2025Inspection
Identified a deficiency in acuity-based staffing tool development, maintenance, and implementation.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
28 Mar 2025Inspection
28 Mar 2025Inspection
Found that an acuity-based staffing tool was not developed, maintained, and implemented as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
13 Mar 2025Inspection
13 Mar 2025Inspection
Identified a deficiency in developing and implementing an acuity-based staffing tool. The issue related to failure to use an ABST result.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
26 Feb 2025Inspection
26 Feb 2025Inspection
Found that an acuity-based staffing tool was not developed, maintained, and implemented as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
23 Feb 2025Inspection
23 Feb 2025Inspection
Investigated an allegation of staffing noncompliance and identified a deficiency in acuity-based staffing. Concluded that a required Acuity Based Staffing Tool was not developed, maintained, or implemented per OAR 411-054-0037(1-7).
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
20 Feb 2025Inspection
20 Feb 2025Inspection
Found failure to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity-Based Staffing Tool as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
18 Feb 2025Complaint
18 Feb 2025Complaint
Investigated the complaint and identified deficiencies related to treatment orders and staffing with potential for moderate harm.
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Plan
16 Feb 2025Inspection
16 Feb 2025Inspection
Found failure to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
16 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
16 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a fall incident involving a known fall risk resident and found the care plan was not followed, resulting in neglect and abuse. The resident was found on the floor without socks or an assistive device, sustaining a skin tear; a $250 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
08 Feb 2025Inspection
08 Feb 2025Inspection
Identified a deficiency for failing to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
20 Jan 2025Inspection
20 Jan 2025Inspection
Found failure to develop, maintain, and implement an Acuity Based Staffing Tool per OAR 411-054-0037(1-7).
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
16 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
16 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment that led to an unwitnessed fall and bruise.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Jan 2025Inspection
11 Jan 2025Inspection
Investigated and found that an acuity-based staffing tool was not developed, maintained, and implemented as required.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
10 Nov 2024Abuse: Neglect
10 Nov 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a safety-related concern and found inadequate oversight left a known fall risk with repeated falls, indicating abuse/neglect and resulting in a fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Sept 2024Abuse: Neglect
20 Sept 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found that staff failed to follow the care plan and perform timely safety checks, resulting in falls and neglect; a $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Sept 2024Inspection
18 Sept 2024Inspection
Found that staffing documentation was not provided timely or adequately when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
18 Sept 2024Kitchen
18 Sept 2024Kitchen
Identified deficiencies in kitchen sanitation and administration compliance. Noted extensive cleaning needs and licensing rule noncompliance.
Investigated a staffing documentation allegation and found failure to provide timely or adequate documentation when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
10 Sept 2024Inspection
10 Sept 2024Inspection
Found failure to provide appropriate staffing documentation when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
10 Sept 2024Inspection
10 Sept 2024Inspection
Investigated the staffing documentation allegation and identified a deficiency for failure to provide documentation when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
04 Sept 2024Inspection
04 Sept 2024Inspection
Found failure to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
04 Sept 2024Inspection
04 Sept 2024Inspection
Found staffing documentation was not provided timely when requested.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
03 Aug 2024Abuse: Neglect
03 Aug 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found a safety environment deficiency when a resident exited through an open courtyard gate and sustained scratches; neglect and abuse cited.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
30 May 2024Inspection
30 May 2024Inspection
Investigated the abuse reporting allegation; found that the licensee failed to immediately notify the local Department office or the local AAA of any incident of abuse or suspected abuse, and failed to report falls.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
14 Mar 2024Inspection
14 Mar 2024Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found an outdated ABST that did not reflect residents’ care needs, with inconsistencies among the roster, care plans, and ABST.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
09 Mar 2024Inspection
09 Mar 2024Inspection
Investigated the complaint and found that medication orders weren't carried out, resulting in residents not receiving evening medications.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Mar 2024Inspection
01 Mar 2024Inspection
Determined that safe medication administration practices were not followed, compromising patient safety.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
28 Feb 2024Inspection
28 Feb 2024Inspection
Found violations for failing to administer medications as ordered.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the safety allegation and found that a resident was attacked by a known individual on multiple dates, constituting neglect and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found a violation for failing to provide a safe environment, constituting abuse and neglect. A $169 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
24 Feb 2024Inspection
24 Feb 2024Inspection
Investigated a complaint that potential or suspected abuse was not reported promptly and found a violation of reporting requirements.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
09 Feb 2024Inspection
09 Feb 2024Inspection
Investigated the allegation of non-cooperation and found that records were not provided. This resulted in a substantiated violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to cooperate with an investigation
22 Jan 2024Complaint
22 Jan 2024Complaint
Investigated a licensure complaint about treatment orders; noted a severity level of 2 and a scope of isolated/minimal harm or potential for moderate harm.
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
30 Nov 2023Inspection
30 Nov 2023Inspection
Investigated a medication administration allegation and found that medication orders were not carried out as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
29 Oct 2023Abuse: Neglect
29 Oct 2023Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint that a resident was transferred without the required two-person assistance, resulting in a facial bruise; found failure to follow the care plan and training documentation was lacking.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
03 Oct 2023Validation
03 Oct 2023Validation
Identified multiple deficiencies in service planning, nursing delegation, infection control, fire safety, building maintenance, and plumbing, with substantial compliance found after follow-up.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Rn Delegation and Teaching
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Found that the facility failed to implement and use an acuity-based staffing tool as required.
Regulatory Action—Failed to use an ABST
11 Sept 2023Validation
11 Sept 2023Validation
Identified multiple deficiencies in resident care, evaluations, service planning, infection control, staffing, and safety processes; later found to be in substantial compliance on a subsequent revisit.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Resident Services: Adls
Deficiency—Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors
Deficiency—Plumbing Systems
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance With Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Activities
01 May 2023Inspection
01 May 2023Inspection
Investigated and determined that a staff member did not follow the care plan during a transfer, causing a skin tear. The care plan mandated two-person assistance with a gait belt.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
30 Jan 2023Licensure
30 Jan 2023Licensure
Identified deficiencies in food sanitation and administration compliance, including unlabeled foods, temperature control problems, glove hygiene lapses, and damaged storage areas. Findings reflect violations of state food safety rules and licensing requirements.
Found sanitation issues in the kitchen and storage areas, including debris on equipment, unlabeled foods, and improper glove use. A follow-up visit concluded substantial compliance with applicable food sanitation rules.
Investigated and found a failure to submit timely or adequate weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff to the proper authority, ongoing for 30 days.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
29 Nov 2022Abuse: Neglect
29 Nov 2022Abuse: Neglect
Found violations for failing to follow the resident's care plan, leaving a dim room and the resident barefoot, which led to toe injuries.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
02 May 2022Inspection
02 May 2022Inspection
Found that weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents, and staff to the proper authority was not submitted timely.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
09 Mar 2022Abuse: Neglect
09 Mar 2022Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system, resulting in missed doses and a hospital transport. This was identified as abuse and neglect.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
29 Dec 2021Inspection
29 Dec 2021Inspection
Investigated the complaint and found that resident medications were not administered for four days.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
02 Apr 2021Inspection
02 Apr 2021Inspection
Investigated a medication safety violation and found that medication was placed on hold but later administered, risking harm; identified abuse and neglect and a failure to maintain a safe medication administration system.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
25 Mar 2021Inspection
25 Mar 2021Inspection
Investigated a medication administration error where a resident received another resident's medication and found a safety violation related to unsafe medication practices.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
01 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in seven unwitnessed falls and a knee abrasion.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
23 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment by not following the resident's care plan, resulting in a fall with minor injuries; a $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
22 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint and found a failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in neglect and abuse after an individual unsafely left the premises without assistance.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 Aug 2020Abuse: Neglect
02 Aug 2020Abuse: Neglect
Identified a violation for neglect due to failure to provide a safe environment when a resident left without staff assistance and was returned by law enforcement.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Feb 2020Abuse: Neglect
26 Feb 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found that the care plan was not followed, leading to unwitnessed falls and injuries. A fine of $375 was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
09 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
09 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the complaint and found that care plan requirements were not followed, resulting in neglect and potential harm; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
10 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
10 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect and abuse for failing to follow the care plan, leading to pressure ulcers on heels and redness near the coccyx.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
09 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
09 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care and abuse due to failure to follow a resident's care plan, leading to dehydration and hospitalization; a $500 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
12 Oct 2019Inspection
12 Oct 2019Inspection
Concluded that a staff member used profanity toward a resident and that a safe environment was not provided for the resident.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
12 Oct 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
12 Oct 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated an allegation of verbal/mental abuse and failure to provide a safe environment; findings indicated neglect and risk of serious harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
12 Oct 2019Inspection
12 Oct 2019Inspection
Found that a caregiver verbally abused a resident and failed to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
26 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care due to failing to follow the care plan and provide a safe environment. This resulted in a second injury fall within two months.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
03 Dec 2017Inspection
03 Dec 2017Inspection
Determined the allegation of failing to administer medication as ordered. Found deficiencies in medication management.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
14 Feb 2017Inspection
14 Feb 2017Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment and a failure to follow the care plan.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
29 Oct 2016Abuse: Neglect
29 Oct 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to provide a safe environment and assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Sept 2016Abuse: Neglect
18 Sept 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Aug 2016Inspection
26 Aug 2016Inspection
Found a deficiency in providing a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
21 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of abuse/neglect and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
03 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
03 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
15 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
15 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 Jul 2016Inspection
13 Jul 2016Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The allegation of failing to properly plan care was identified.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
05 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
05 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found violations of care planning and of providing a safe environment, and assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
25 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
25 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of failure to properly plan care and found a deficiency in providing a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
20 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
20 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
Identified violations for failing to provide a safe environment and assessed a $250 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
05 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect related to safety and found a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
19 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
19 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation of neglect and found a failure to properly plan care leading to an unsafe environment.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
13 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
13 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a safety deficiency in providing a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
12 May 2016Abuse: Physical Abuse
12 May 2016Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated abuse allegation; concluded there was a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
26 Apr 2016Abuse: Financial abuse
26 Apr 2016Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a safety deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Apr 2016Abuse: Neglect
22 Apr 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found substantiated neglect and failure to properly plan care, resulting in an unsafe environment, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
21 Mar 2016Abuse: Neglect
21 Mar 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care related to falls and assessed a $350 fine.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
19 Feb 2016Inspection
19 Feb 2016Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Feb 2016Abuse: Neglect
08 Feb 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found an inadequate medication system that could lead to harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
24 Nov 2015Inspection
24 Nov 2015Inspection
Found failure to provide a safe environment due to not assessing and intervening.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Oct 2015Abuse: Neglect
20 Oct 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Mar 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
23 Mar 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
Determined that the resident's financial exploitation allegation was substantiated and that the provider failed to protect the resident from theft.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
23 Jan 2015Inspection
23 Jan 2015Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The finding was substantiated.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
07 Jul 2014Abuse: Neglect
07 Jul 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The finding involved neglect with potential for minor to moderate harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
27 Jun 2014Abuse: Neglect
27 Jun 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect related to failing to address resident behavior and to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
29 May 2014Abuse: Neglect
29 May 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a failure to provide a safe environment, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
13 Jan 2014Abuse: Financial abuse
13 Jan 2014Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment. Also substantiated a financial abuse allegation.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 May 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
02 May 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated a safety complaint and found safeguards against theft were inadequate, leaving an RV unprotected.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 May 2013Abuse: Neglect
02 May 2013Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to provide a safe environment. This involved a neglect issue with potential for moderate harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
19 Feb 2013Inspection
19 Feb 2013Inspection
Investigated and found deficiencies related to failing to answer call lights promptly and to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
24 Jan 2013Inspection
24 Jan 2013Inspection
Found deficiencies for failing to follow the care plan, resulting in inadequate care and services.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
05 Feb 2012Inspection
05 Feb 2012Inspection
Identified a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Oct 2011Abuse: Neglect
11 Oct 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to follow the care plan.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
07 Apr 2011Abuse: Neglect
07 Apr 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found that the care plan was not followed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
08 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
08 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect due to failure to intervene when a resident's condition changed. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
04 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
04 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found evidence of neglect for failing to intervene when a resident's condition changed, and a $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
22 Feb 2011Abuse: Neglect
22 Feb 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
09 Jan 2010Inspection
09 Jan 2010Inspection
Found a deficiency in providing a secure environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Regency Park. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Regency Park directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of Regency Park?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
