Bentley House by SCH

    3449 Rosewood Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90066
    • Assisted Living
    • Memory Care

    Clean warm room, caring staff

    I toured the place and my large sunny private room was clean, warm and comfortable. The staff-two caregivers and the in-charge-were caring, knowledgeable and answered all my questions. The small, home-like setting and nice menu made it welcoming; I'd recommend it.

    Current/former resident
    Jul 2026

    Pricing

    Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.

    Schedule a Tour

    Date of Tour
    Time Window
    Tour Type

    You selected in-person tour on in the

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Housekeeping and linen services

    Memory care community services

    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Common areas

    • Dining room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library

    Community services

    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    Reviews

    3.83·(6)

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.0
    • Staff

      3.5
    • Meals

      3.5
    • Amenities

      3.0
    • Value

      3.0

    Pros

    • Small, home-like environment
    • Caring and knowledgeable staff
    • Helpful staff responsive to care questions
    • Clean, comfortable private rooms with abundant natural light
    • Pleasant menu and acceptable food quality
    • Warm and comfortable common areas in some units
    • Convenient location
    • Reasonable value for money

    Cons

    • Maintenance deficits affecting fixtures and accessibility
    • Odor concerns in some common areas
    • Limited one-on-one staff–resident engagement
    • Communication gaps due to staff language proficiency
    • Insufficient activity programming and low socialization
    • Dim or subdued interior lighting and atmosphere
    • Limited bed availability / capacity constraints

    Summary of reviews

    The reviews describe a small, home-like assisted living environment with clear strengths in individualized living spaces and some aspects of care. Reviewers commonly praised the facility’s staff as caring and knowledgeable, and families highlighted helpful front-line caregivers who answered questions about care. Private rooms are frequently described as large, sunny, clean, and comfortable; several comments specifically noted a warm feel in some units and that the menu and food quality were acceptable. Location and perceived value for money were additional positive points for prospective residents.

    At the same time, consistent patterns of operational concern emerge. Building maintenance and upkeep were cited as uneven: reviewers described doors and window coverings that needed repair and generally identified infrastructure maintenance deficits. Related to the physical environment, multiple comments pointed to odor concerns in common areas and, in at least a few accounts, issues suggestive of incontinence-care or sanitation shortcomings. Several reviewers also felt the interior atmosphere could be brighter and better maintained overall.

    Staffing and daily engagement present a mixed picture. While direct-care staff were often called caring and helpful, there are repeated observations of limited one-on-one interaction and low resident socialization—examples included residents spending long periods in front of televisions with little apparent engagement. Staffing levels and role coverage appear constrained in places, which may contribute to reduced activity programming and less frequent personal interaction. Some families also noted communication gaps attributable to staff language proficiency, which can complicate care discussions and family communication.

    Management and operational notes are similarly split. The on-site leadership was described positively by some reviewers, with managers responding to questions and displaying a helpful demeanor. However, the facility’s small size also translates into capacity constraints: limited bed availability was mentioned, which can affect admissions. Overall, the pattern suggests a facility that delivers personalized, comfortable accommodations and attentive caregiving in many cases, but that would benefit from improved maintenance, stronger environmental sanitation practices, enhanced activity and engagement programming, and clearer communication support to address language-related barriers.

    Reviews written on Mirador

    We have no reviews to show about Bentley House by SCH.

    Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.

    Location

    Map showing location of Bentley House by SCH

    Bentley House by SCH is located at 3449 Rosewood Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90066.

    About Bentley House by SCH

    Bentley House by SCH is a small senior living community in Los Angeles, California, licensed for up to six residents, and it's a place where people get different levels of care depending on what they need, including assisted living, memory care, nursing home care, independent living, home care, adult day services, and hospice care. You'll find trained staff like an RN, Medical Director, Activity Director, Nutrition Director, and Pharmacy Consultant available 24 hours every day, and residents can get help with things like medications, bathing, dressing, toileting, walking, and all the personal care tasks that come with daily living, plus there's always nursing support if medical attention's needed. Housekeeping and laundry services are standard, with dry cleaning included, and there's always someone to help organize transportation for doctor appointments, shopping trips, or spiritual services, which helps families and residents feel safe and looked after. Memory care services are set up for people living with Alzheimer's or other types of dementia, with a secure environment, clear walking paths, gardens, and comfortable gathering spaces, and the staff knows how to provide patient, compassionate support for memory loss.

    Rooms at Bentley House include private baths, and living areas are bright, with high ceilings, soft lighting, and a colorful, home-like interior design featuring tile arches and welcoming décor-it's family-owned and run, so there's a cozy feeling that spreads throughout the place. People living here enjoy meals made fresh several times a day, including snacks, and the dietary team can change meal plans if someone needs special foods for health reasons. The property's got a common living room, reading room, outdoor spaces like sunny patios, spacious balconies, and well-kept gardens for those who enjoy fresh air or gardening, plus there's a recreation room, wellness features like a hot tub or sauna, and a salon or barbershop with a mobile hairdresser.

    Residents have a full calendar of events, from art classes, animal therapy sessions, and live music to tabletop games, fitness activities, and regular outings around the local community-so there's always something going on, and the activity director plans programs that keep people active, engaged, and included, whether it's cognitive games for memory or just a fun movie night. Bentley House is close to places like the UCLA Medical Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and Marina Del Rey Hospital, so medical care is never far away if more help's needed, and the staff keeps in touch with residents' families through regular outreach and educational programs, making sure everyone knows what's happening. People at Bentley House can live as independently as possible with support for everything from simple daily tasks to higher levels of care as needs change, and because the community's small, there's often a family atmosphere that helps residents form close friendships and feel at home. The community's also close to art exhibits, shopping, restaurants, senior centers, and even Venice Beach, which gives everyone plenty of chances to get out and enjoy what Los Angeles has to offer. Bentley House by SCH keeps visiting hours from seven in the morning until seven at night, so family and friends can spend time with residents without hassle. The building is purpose-built for safety, comfort, and dignity, and residents benefit from round-the-clock attention from compassionate staff who focus on each person's social, spiritual, and health needs with patience and kindness.

    People often ask...

    Bentley House by SCH offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $6,000 per month.

    Bentley House by SCH offers assisted living, memory care, and board and care.

    There are 8 photos of Bentley House by SCH on Mirador.

    The full address for this community is 3449 Rosewood Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90066.

    No, Bentley House by SCH does not offer respite care. Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.

    Safety & Compliance

    In California, the Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing Division licenses residential care facilities for the elderly, conducting inspections and investigating complaints.

    License number198320303
    StatusLicensed
    Facility typeResidential Care Elderly
    Capacity6 residents
    LicenseeSPECIALIZED COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE COMPANY
    EffectiveAugust 2nd, 2022
    View the official license record

    Inspection Reports

    50

    Reports

    11

    Type A Citations

    38

    Type B Citations

    12

    Complaints

    7

    Years

    08 Sept 2025Inspection
    Observed all records in order and no deficiencies were found.
    16 Aug 2024Inspection
    Observed infection control measures and safety procedures were satisfactory; no deficiencies were cited.
    05 Jan 2024Complaint
    Found no sufficient evidence to support the allegation that there were no activities for residents and that staff were not properly trained.
    11 Aug 2023Inspection
    Noted that some staff CPR cards were not current, posing a potential safety risk; overall sanitation and safety measures appeared adequate.
    • Type B1569.618(c)(3)
    17 May 2023Complaint
    Identified that liability insurance coverage did not meet required limits and there was no current compliant policy covering residents.
    • Type AHSC1569.605
    13 Dec 2022Inspection
    Observed all areas clean and in good repair, safety systems tested, and no deficiencies identified.
    14 Nov 2022Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff stole a resident's belongings and withheld mail. Found no evidence to support the claim.
    04 Nov 2022Complaint
    Investigated the allegations that staff did not safeguard residents' personal property and that staff were not meeting residents' needs, and concluded there was not a preponderance of evidence to prove the violations.
    23 Aug 2022Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that staff failed to follow a physician's orders. Interviews indicated staff followed orders and one resident refused to take new medication; no deficiencies were cited.
    11 Aug 2022Inspection
    Observed no deficiencies during the unannounced case management visit after speaking with a resident.
    26 Jul 2022Inspection
    Observed that the outside activity area is properly enclosed with a self-closing gate and includes six chairs (four around a table and two under the awning).
    25 Jul 2022Inspection
    Identified hot water temperatures in bathrooms ranged from 123.2F to 143.2F, exceeding the required maximum.
    • Type A87303(e)(2)
    25 Jul 2022Inspection
    Identified readiness for change of ownership during a pre-licensing evaluation, with fire clearance approved and safety measures in place.
    22 Jul 2022Inspection
    Conducted a change-of-ownership pre-licensing evaluation at a single-story residential care home, with capacity for six residents and a dementia care plan in place. An ownership transfer application had been submitted earlier.
    18 Jul 2022Inspection
    Identified a licensing evaluation of a residential care facility conducted by the licensing office, with the applicant participating by telephone. It covered facility operation, staff qualifications, program policy, and required regulatory items.
    28 Jun 2022Inspection
    Identified noncompliance with liability insurance coverage requirements because two facilities shared the same liability policy and did not meet the required coverage levels. The issue remained unresolved at the time of the visit.
    • Type B1569.605
    10 Jun 2022Inspection
    Identified failure to maintain liability insurance coverage as required; additional citations were issued.
    • Type B1569.605
    06 Jun 2022Complaint
    Investigated two allegations: food quality concerns and a verbal transportation-cost agreement. Found insufficient evidence to support the allegations.
    27 May 2022Inspection
    Identified noncompliance with liability insurance requirements because the same policy covered two separate facilities and did not meet the required limits.
    • Type B1569.605
    17 May 2022Complaint
    Investigated an illegal eviction allegation involving eviction notices for residents. A 60-day notice to pay or vacate was issued, and a 30-day notice was not provided.
    • Type B87224(a)(1)
    • Type B87224(a)(2)
    • Type B87224(a)(3)
    • Type B87224(a)(4)
    • Type B87224(a)(5)
    12 May 2022Inspection
    Identified noncompliance with liability insurance coverage requirements; a single policy was used for two facilities, which is not permitted.
    • Type B1569.605
    29 Apr 2022Inspection
    Identified ongoing noncompliance with liability insurance coverage requirements following a follow-up visit; additional citations were issued.
    • Type B1569.605
    28 Apr 2022Complaint
    Investigated allegations about transportation to appointments, visitors' access, and meal service. Found no definitive proof of violations.
    15 Apr 2022Inspection
    Identified failure to maintain liability insurance meeting required limits for a licensed residential care setting.
    • Type B1569.605
    11 Apr 2022Complaint
    Investigated allegations of illegal eviction, lack of activities for residents, and transportation issues; the preponderance of evidence did not prove the violations.
    24 Mar 2022Inspection
    Identified noncompliance with liability insurance requirements as the coverage did not meet the required limits; additional citations were issued.
    • Type B1569.605
    24 Mar 2022Inspection
    Observed infection control measures in place, including screening protocols, PPE supply, and posted posters; no deficiencies were cited.
    23 Feb 2022Inspection
    Identified failure to maintain liability insurance as required by regulation; additional citations were issued.
    • Type B1569.605
    15 Feb 2022Inspection
    Identified noncompliance with eviction procedures and a reappraisal requirement, including failing to rescind an eviction notice by the due date.
    • Type B87224(a)(4)
    • Type B87463
    10 Feb 2022Inspection
    Identified noncompliance with liability insurance coverage requirements; the same policy number was used for two separate facilities.
    • Type B1569.605
    09 Feb 2022Inspection
    Identified ongoing safety concerns: power in multiple rooms could shut off when circuit breakers tripped due to use of space heaters, and heating devices were accessible to residents with dementia, creating potential risk.
    • Type B87303(a)
    • Type B87705(d)
    • Type B87457(a)(1)
    • Type B87405(d)(1)
    • Type B87405(d)(2)
    • Type B87616(a)
    • Type B87555(b)(5)
    09 Feb 2022Complaint
    Investigated the illegal eviction allegation and found the eviction did not follow required procedures.
    • Type B87224(a)(4)
    • Type B87463
    09 Dec 2021Inspection
    Identified that a resident with a prohibited health condition lacked an approved exception, and another resident did not receive meal alternatives after expressing dislike for menu items.
    • Type B87616(a)
    • Type B87555(b)(5)
    07 Dec 2021Complaint
    Investigated two complaints: disrepair and poor food quality. Found that circuit breakers tripped when multiple space heaters ran, causing power loss in rooms 2, 3, and 6.
    • Type A87303(a)
    07 Dec 2021Inspection
    Identified deficiencies showed that heaters were accessible to residents with dementia, a needs and services plan was not on record for a resident, and administrator qualifications did not meet requirements.
    • Type B87705(d)
    • Type B87457(a)(1-2)
    • Type B87405(d)(1)
    07 Dec 2021Inspection
    Obtained a copy of the liability insurance certificate; no deficiency was cited.
    29 Sept 2021Inspection
    Identified that liability insurance coverage was not in place and civil penalties were being assessed.
    • Type B1569.605
    22 Sept 2021Inspection
    Identified that several citations were cleared during the visit, and that the due date for a related citation was missed, with civil penalties being assessed.
    • Type A87468.2(a)(1)
    • Type B87219(a)(1)-(6)
    • Type B87506(a)
    14 Sept 2021Complaint
    Identified that staff did not treat residents with dignity and that daily activities were not provided.
    • Type B87219(a)(1)-(6)
    • Type B87468.2(a)(1)
    • Type B87506(a)
    07 Sept 2021Inspection
    Found that liability insurance meeting the required coverage was not documented, with the corporate office handling the matter. Found that admission agreement copies were being prepared, and an exit interview was conducted in which appeal rights were provided.
    30 Aug 2021Inspection
    Found noncompliance with liability insurance requirements because documentation of coverage was not provided and the corporate office was handling the issue. Additional citations were issued and civil penalties assessed, and an exit interview was conducted with appeal rights explained.
    30 Aug 2021Inspection
    Concluded a conference with licensee representatives about facility closures and resident relocation timelines. The discussion covered required eviction procedures and reporting requirements.
    • Type A87224
    • Type A1569.682
    • Type A87211
    20 Aug 2021Inspection
    Found that the plan of correction was not met and noncompliance continued; civil penalties are being assessed under health and safety rules related to liability insurance.
    18 Aug 2021Inspection
    Identified an allegation that proof of liability insurance coverage was not provided as required. Follow-up showed the coverage issue remained unresolved, with the corporate office still handling it.
    30 Jul 2021Inspection
    Found the accusation was not posted in a conspicuous location and written notification to residents, their responsible parties, and the local Long Term Care Ombudsman was not provided within the 10-day requirement. Staff were instructed to post the accusation and provide the required notices; civil penalties may be assessed for noncompliance.
    26 Feb 2020Inspection
    Confirmed civil penalties were issued for not having liability insurance and not meeting Title 22 Regulations. The physical plant and resident files were found to be in good condition.
    17 Jan 2020Inspection
    Found that required liability insurance coverage was not met following a visit to the facility.
    • Type A
    • Type A1569.50
    • Type A
    • Type B1569.605
    02 Jan 2020Inspection
    Confirmed deficiency regarding liability insurance was corrected. No deficiencies noted during the visit.
    13 Nov 2019Inspection
    Identified deficiency in liability insurance during visit. Civil penalty assessed.
    • Type A
    11 Oct 2019Inspection
    Identified deficiencies from a previous visit were found during a recent unannounced inspection. No proof of liability insurance or documentation of a designated substitute Administrator was observed.

    Disclaimer

    Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Bentley House by SCH. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Bentley House by SCH directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.

    Are you an owner or operator of this community?

    Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.

    Nearby Communities

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 174 facilities$6,090/mo
    2. 201 facilities$5,712/mo
    3. 185 facilities$5,968/mo
    4. 226 facilities$5,626/mo
    5. 348 facilities$5,750/mo
    6. 198 facilities$5,545/mo
    7. 323 facilities$5,678/mo
    8. 101 facilities$6,390/mo
    9. 331 facilities$5,788/mo
    10. 339 facilities$5,583/mo
    11. 176 facilities$5,540/mo
    12. 246 facilities$5,489/mo
    © 2026 Mirador Living