Pricing ranges from
    $7,263 – 9,441/month

    The Oaks at Nipomo

    177 Mary Ave, Nipomo, CA 93444
    • Independent Living
    • Assisted Living
    • Memory Care

    Pricing

    Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.

    Request a Tour

    Date of Tour
    Time Window
    Tour Type

    You selected in-person tour on in the

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    Reviews

    4.52·(73)

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.0
    • Staff

      4.5
    • Meals

      4.0
    • Amenities

      4.6
    • Value

      3.0

    Pros

    • Friendly, engaged caregiving staff
    • Strong memory-care leadership
    • Clean, modern, newly built facility
    • Pleasant outdoor courtyards and landscaped grounds
    • Active, varied activities program
    • On-site physical, occupational, and speech therapy
    • Bistro/café with snacks and extended access
    • Flexible and varied dining menu
    • Private, well-appointed apartment options
    • Accessible design (wide hallways, wheelchair access, large elevator)
    • Salon and wellness amenities onsite
    • Structured memory-care unit with supervised outings
    • Assigned housekeeping and laundry services
    • Good family communication and community events
    • Multiple common areas (theater, library, fitness/TV rooms)
    • Short, supported move-in and transition processes
    • Attentive administration and responsive community leadership
    • On-site physician and clinical therapy support (in some units)
    • Sociable, community-oriented atmosphere
    • Transportation assistance for appointments and church

    Cons

    • Inconsistent staffing levels and high staff turnover
    • Understaffing pressure on caregiving shifts
    • Gaps in clinical oversight and limited nurse availability
    • Medication-management and medication-safety vulnerabilities
    • Inconsistent dining service continuity and long wait times
    • Restricted meal access hours and occasional missed meals
    • Variable food quality across meals
    • Inconsistent housekeeping and sanitation practices
    • Inconsistent staff conduct and communication standards
    • Weaknesses in theft prevention and personal-property security
    • Variable management transparency around fees and concessions
    • Memory-care room configuration limitations and institutional feel

    Summary of reviews

    The reviews for The Oaks at Nipomo present a strongly mixed picture: many families and visitors praise the facility's new, well-maintained environment, robust activities and therapy programs, and numerous amenities, while others raise operational concerns that touch on staffing, clinical oversight, dining service, and security. The facility's physical plant and community spaces receive consistent positive notice — reviewers describe bright, modern interiors, accessible circulation, attractive gardens and courtyard spaces, multiple common areas (theater, library, fitness room), and a bistro/café amenity that contributes to a hotel-like atmosphere.

    Care quality and staffing are focal points of divergence. Positive accounts emphasize compassionate, knowledgeable caregivers, strong memory-care leadership, attentive administration, and effective on-site therapy that has supported mobility and social engagement. Conversely, reviews also indicate inconsistent staffing levels and frequent turnover that create pressure on caregivers and may delay routine attention. Several reviewers expressed concerns about clinical oversight in the absence of consistent nursing coverage; prospective families should clarify nurse availability and staff-to-resident ratios for higher-acuity needs.

    Medication administration and safety emerged as a notable pattern of concern. Some reviews describe vulnerabilities in medication controls and the potential for medication diversion or mishandling. Given the seriousness of medication-safety issues, it is advisable for families to ask for detailed policies on medication storage, administration protocols, controlled-substance handling, and incident reporting, as well as any recent regulatory inspections.

    Dining and housekeeping experiences are likewise mixed. Many reviewers praise an appealing, varied menu, on-demand cooking, and flexible meal options; others report long dining-room wait times, restricted dining hours, missed meals, and inconsistent food quality. Housekeeping and laundry arrangements receive praise when there is an assigned, consistent housekeeper, but some families reported variability in cleanliness and light housekeeping follow-through. Prospective residents should confirm meal schedules, sample menus, and the scope and frequency of housekeeping services.

    Activities, therapy, and community engagement are clear strengths. Multiple reports highlight an active calendar of social and physical activities, staff-led outings (including memory-care outings with extra staffing), therapy services on site, celebratory events, and a warm community atmosphere. Staff members, activity directors, and administrators are frequently identified as personable and invested in resident well-being, which contributes to socialization and an energetic community life.

    Management, sales, and policy transparency are areas to probe during a visit. A subset of reviews describe inconsistent responses from corporate representatives, questions about concessions or fee changes, and unclear transportation or ancillary-fee policies. There are also isolated but serious mentions of theft and medication-diversion incidents; these indicate the importance of asking about property-security measures, staff vetting/hiring practices, and how the community documents and responds to such events.

    Recommendation: The Oaks at Nipomo offers many desirable physical amenities, a lively activity program, therapy services, and caring staff in many accounts. However, the pattern of concerns around staffing consistency, clinical oversight, medication safety, dining continuity, and property security suggests that families should conduct a focused due-diligence visit. Specific questions to ask on tour include: current staffing ratios and turnover metrics, nurse coverage and clinical protocols, medication-administration controls, dining hours and average service times, housekeeping schedules, security and incident-reporting procedures, memory-care roommate configurations, and a clear written breakdown of fees and concessions. Also consider requesting recent inspection reports, speaking with current resident family members, and observing meal service and staff–resident interactions during a site visit.

    Reviews written on Mirador

    We have no reviews to show about The Oaks at Nipomo.

    Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.

    Location

    The Oaks at Nipomo is located at 177 Mary Ave, Nipomo, CA, 93444.

    About The Oaks at Nipomo

    The Oaks at Nipomo sits in a handy spot close to Arroyo Grande and Santa Maria and offers several types of care for seniors, whether someone's looking for independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, or even continuing care as needs change over time, and the whole place has a friendly, secure feel to it with 24-hour staff on-hand if you need anything day or night. People who choose independent living usually want a maintenance-free lifestyle with private apartments-studio, one-bedroom, or two-bedroom layouts-with housekeeping, laundry, in-unit washing machines, and included utilities, and many apartments come with kitchenettes or even a full kitchen if someone likes to cook, but they can also go to restaurant-style dining rooms or a wine bar to socialize, or join others in shared spaces like the library, activity rooms, indoor pool, or the fitness center. For those who need more support, assisted living services help with daily needs like bathing, dressing, and managing medicines but aim to let folks stay as independent as possible; assisted living is also set up to offer personalized support with personal care and daily living, and offers time to relax or join a busy schedule of social activities, music events, and outings using the transportation provided by The Oaks. Memory care here focuses on respect and safety for people with Alzheimer's or dementia, led by a dedicated Memory Care Program Director, and offers secure areas, plans tailored to each person, and regular wellness checks, plus activities set up to spark memories and keep minds active. The whole place feels like a real community, with outdoor patios, gardens, and indoor common rooms for people to meet and take part in everything from devotional services-both on and offsite-to games and educational sessions, and there's even a theater for movies or events, plus an on-site salon and barber shop. The facility lets residents decorate their suites with their own furniture so spaces feel more like home, welcomes pets, and encourages visitors. Services for families include help finding funding, figuring out care planning, and advice on paying for care with options like insurance, VA benefits, and Medicare. The staff at The Oaks support a routine full of activities and connections and also offer companion care through home care aides, and for those needing therapy, they provide physical, occupational, and speech therapies onsite. Wi-Fi, parking, and high-speed internet are available for all, and safety is a clear focus, especially for those in memory care who might be at risk for wandering. The Oaks at Nipomo sets up everyday life to be simple, comfortable, and interesting, so seniors have as much choice as possible while knowing support's close by.

    People often ask...

    The Oaks at Nipomo offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $7,263 per month.

    The Oaks at Nipomo offers independent living, assisted living, and memory care.

    There are 47 photos of The Oaks at Nipomo on Mirador.

    Yes, The Oaks at Nipomo allows residents to age in place and adjust their level of care as needed.

    The full address for this community is 177 Mary Ave, Nipomo, CA 93444.

    No, The Oaks at Nipomo does not offer respite care. Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.

    Safety & Compliance

    In California, the Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing Division licenses residential care facilities for the elderly, conducting inspections and investigating complaints.

    License number405809547
    StatusLicensed
    Facility typeResidential Care Elderly
    Capacity122 residents
    LicenseeNIPOMO OAKS,GP OF NIPOMO OAKS OPS LP;WESTMONT LVNG
    EffectiveJuly 16th, 2018
    View the official license record

    Inspection Reports

    45

    Reports

    16

    Type A Citations

    27

    Type B Citations

    29

    Complaints

    5

    Years

    17 Sept 2026Inspection
    Found no deficiencies.
    26 Aug 2026Complaint
    Investigated the allegation of insufficient cleanliness; found sanitation issues in the kitchen, walk-in coolers, and dining areas with spoiled items, debris, and insect activity, and a civil penalty was assessed.
    • Type BCCR 87555(b)(27)General Food Service Requirements (b)(27)
    26 Aug 2026Inspection
    Observed improper food storage with contaminated and exposed items and spoiled produce, and a repeat-violation civil penalty was assessed.
    • Type BCCR 87555(b)(28)General Food Service Requirements
    12 Aug 2026Inspection
    Investigated a case management incident and identified medication administration errors involving self-administered medications and cross-use of another resident's medications.
    • Type ACCR 87465(a)(4)Incidental Medical and Dental Care
    21 Jul 2026Complaint
    Investigated a complaint about dining service and found insufficient food service staffing to meet residents' needs, with turnover and scheduling gaps contributing to meal delays.
    • Type BCCR 87555(b)(18)General Food Service Requirements
    21 Jul 2026Complaint
    Investigated an illegal eviction where a resident was not allowed to return for several days without proper eviction procedures.
    • Type BCCR 87468.2(a)(20)Additional Personal Rights of Residents in Privately Operated Facilities (a) To be protected from involuntary transfers, discharges, and evictions.
    21 Jul 2026Complaint
    Investigated a complaint about overnight staff sleeping on duty and cited a deficiency related to staffing requirements.
    • Type ACCR 87411(a)1-6Personnel Requirements - General
    10 Jul 2026Inspection
    Identified deficiencies in PRN medication dose documentation and in food service practices, including expired/open foods and kitchen cleanliness issues.
    • Type ACCR87465(c)(3)Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services
    • Type BCCR87555(b)(8)All food shall be of good quality
    • Type BCCR87555(b)(27)All kitchen areas shall be kept clean and free of litter, rodents, vermin and insects
    09 Jul 2026Inspection
    Identified expired medications not properly removed or destroyed and improperly stored, creating immediate health and safety risks for residents.
    • Type ACCR 87465(i)Incidental Medical and Dental Care
    08 Jul 2026Inspection
    Found no deficiencies during the visit.
    22 Apr 2026Complaint
    Investigated allegations that laundry machines were dirty and moldy and that staff did not respond promptly to residents' concerns.
    • Type B87303(a)
    07 Apr 2026Complaint
    Investigated a resident elopement and related reporting issues. Found that the initial incident narratives were inaccurate and the reporting did not accurately reflect the event.
    • Type B87211(a)(1)(D)(a)
    26 Feb 2026Complaint
    Investigated allegation that staff failed to report suspected abuse as required. Evidence showed repeated psychological harassment toward residents and staff, and mandated reports were not submitted.
    • Type B87211(a)(1)(D)
    • Type B15630
    • Type B15610.07(a)(1)
    • Type B15610.53
    26 Feb 2026Complaint
    Investigated two allegations about reporting incidents and staffing adequacy. Interviews and records did not provide conclusive evidence that the described issues occurred.
    27 Jan 2026Complaint
    Investigated the infection control allegation and found evidence of bodily fluids in a resident's room after an emergency, with the room unoccupied at the time of review. A technical violation was issued for spills of blood and other potentially infectious materials that were not promptly cleaned.
    • Type B87470(a)(2)(C)
    25 Nov 2025Complaint
    Investigated complaints about food safety and service; found expired and improperly stored food, while other concerns about kitchen cleanliness, menu adherence, staffing, and meal timing did not rise to violations.
    • Type B87555(b)(28)
    01 Oct 2025Complaint
    Investigated two allegations: weekly housekeeping not provided due to staffing shortages, and dining area/patio doors unsafe for residents using wheelchairs or walkers.
    01 Oct 2025Inspection
    Observed that food service, storage, temperature logging, and cleaning practices met requirements during the annual review. Overall conditions indicated maintained safety standards.
    03 Sept 2025Complaint
    Investigated a Norovirus-related infection control complaint. Interviews and records indicated insufficient enhanced cleaning and adherence to infection-control procedures.
    • Type B87470(b)(1)
    02 Jul 2025Complaint
    Investigated two allegations about residents lacking an adequate supply of hygiene items and not being provided appropriate activities. The investigation included interviews and observations across memory care and other units.
    30 Jun 2025Complaint
    Investigated a complaint with multiple allegations about resident care and safety. Evidence did not establish the alleged violations.
    29 May 2025Inspection
    Observed that 99 residents were cared for by 67 staff, with clean common areas, safety features, and required postings in place.
    27 Feb 2025Complaint
    Investigated a complaint alleging staff rough handling, untimely changing residents, and inadequate meal portions.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(3)(3)
    27 Feb 2025Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not provide proper eviction notice to a resident; the eviction was determined lawful and consistent with policies, while interviews described the resident as disruptive to others.
    • Type B87468.1(a)
    22 Oct 2024Complaint
    Investigated allegations that staff handled a resident roughly, did not administer prescribed medication, and did not address a change in the resident's medical condition.
    28 Aug 2024Complaint
    Identified allegations that rooms were not clean and had odors, and that dining room staffing was insufficient to meet residents' needs.
    • Type B87303(a)(a)
    • Type B87555(b)(18)(b)
    27 Aug 2024Complaint
    Investigated complaints about staff rough handling causing skin tears, profanity toward residents, and not wearing gloves during food preparation. Findings indicated concerns about staff conduct and kitchen hygiene practices.
    • Type A87468.2(a)(8)
    • Type B87468.1(a)(a)
    • Type B87555(b)(15)(b)
    23 Aug 2024Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that transportation for a medical appointment was not provided. Records and interviews showed transportation options and scheduling procedures were in place, and the resident did not utilize those options.
    11 Jul 2024Inspection
    Verified staffing levels and recordkeeping, and reviewed resident and staff records and disaster preparedness.
    19 Jun 2024Complaint
    Investigated two allegations about showers and pendant response times; findings showed showers were delayed or missed due to staffing, and pendant calls were not answered promptly during understaffing.
    • Type B87464(f)(1)(f)
    • Type B87468.2(a)(4)(a)
    08 Feb 2024Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that contaminated food wasn’t discarded and a second claim about kitchen cleanliness and pest control. Observed improper storage of perishable foods in the refrigerator and concerns about rodent/ant control in the kitchen.
    • Type B87555(b)(23)
    15 Sept 2023Complaint
    Investigated the allegation that residents did not have adequate toilet paper; found no evidence to support this claim.
    26 Jul 2023Inspection
    Observed secure medication storage, MAR/CSMDR records, and destruction procedures, with staff files, training records, and resident records reviewed.
    20 Jul 2023Inspection
    Conducted a one-year case management visit, including tours of resident areas and interviews with residents. Planned to return to complete the annual review.
    14 Jul 2023Inspection
    Observed general compliance with most requirements; some items needed attention, including cleaning in the memory care kitchen, posting of a disaster preparedness form, and correct placement of posters.
    17 Nov 2022Complaint
    Identified staffing shortages contributing to long dining wait times and concerns about meal quality for residents.
    • Type B87555(b)(18)
    17 Nov 2022Complaint
    Investigated three kitchen-related allegations; found the kitchen clean and sanitary, food handled and stored properly, and no contaminated food was served.
    10 Nov 2022Complaint
    Identified failures to inform residents' responsible parties in a timely manner, incomplete documentation, and inadequate hygiene and incontinence care linked to staffing shortages.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(8)
    • Type A87468.2(a)(4)
    • Type A87625(b)(3)
    • Type B87506(b)(13)
    10 Nov 2022Complaint
    Investigated staffing shortages that affected resident care and caused delays in showers and other daily needs. On days with insufficient staff, showers were not completed as scheduled.
    • Type A87411(a)(a)
    • Type A87464(f)(4)(f)
    26 Jul 2022Inspection
    Observed a staff member transport a resident with a mask pulled down under the chin, raising safety concerns about infection control.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(2)
    20 May 2022Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that a staff member did not wear a mask properly, based on a witness report from the evening of 5/13/2022.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(2)
    16 Sept 2021Inspection
    Identified that an incident on 08/31/2021 was not reported to licensing within seven days.
    • Type B87211(a)(1)
    21 Jul 2021Complaint
    Investigated a complaint about supervision, alarm responsiveness, wandering, and showering services. The investigation described concerns related to supervision, response to pull cords, and shower scheduling.
    • Type A87464(f)(1)
    • Type A87101(c)(3)
    • Type A1569.2(c)
    09 Jul 2021Inspection
    Identified a failure to provide a required two-person assist during a resident transfer, which resulted in a resident fall and an emergency room visit.
    • Type B87411(d)(3)
    09 Jul 2021Inspection
    Observed infection control protocols followed with no deficiencies noted.

    Disclaimer

    Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of The Oaks at Nipomo. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact The Oaks at Nipomo directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.

    Are you an owner or operator of The Oaks at Nipomo?

    Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.

    Nearby Communities

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 37 facilities$6,642/mo
    2. 14 facilities$7,698/mo
    3. 45 facilities$6,648/mo
    4. 40 facilities$6,642/mo
    5. 1 facilities$4,912/mo
    6. 85 facilities$6,095/mo
    7. 35 facilities$5,262/mo
    8. 34 facilities$5,237/mo
    9. 36 facilities$5,262/mo
    10. 33 facilities$5,220/mo
    11. 50 facilities$5,966/mo
    12. 47 facilities$4,738/mo
    © 2026 Mirador Living