Pricing ranges from
    $5,692 – 6,830/month

    The Watermark at Westwood Village

    947 Tiverton Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90024
    • Independent living
    • Assisted living
    • Memory care
    AnonymousLoved one of resident
    4.0

    Modern, lively, pricey; small rooms

    I toured this senior living community and loved the hotel-like, modern facility-beautiful spaces, state-of-the-art amenities (salon, big patio/dog park, pizza night) and a lively, social calendar. Staff were consistently kind, professional, and engaging, dining felt restaurant-quality, and memory care/activities impressed me. Drawbacks: it's pricey, rooms are on the small side, and I noted occasional cleanliness, transportation, and communication issues. Overall I felt confident my loved one would be happy here if the budget allows.

    Pricing

    $5,692+/moSemi-privateAssisted Living
    $6,830+/mo1 BedroomAssisted Living

    Schedule a Tour

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Community services

    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    4.75 · 102 reviews

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      4.5
    • Staff

      4.8
    • Meals

      4.6
    • Amenities

      4.5
    • Value

      3.1

    Pros

    • Warm, attentive and compassionate staff
    • Dedicated and celebrated Memory Care leadership
    • Restaurant-quality, fresh and thoughtfully prepared dining
    • Boutique-hotel / five-star resort ambience and design
    • Beautiful, well-maintained grounds and garden areas
    • Extensive, varied and engaging activities and events
    • Strong social atmosphere and opportunities for friendships
    • High-quality move-in support and concierge-style service
    • Extensive amenities (outdoor patio, dog park, salon, pizza oven)
    • Convenient Westwood / UCLA location with nearby shopping
    • Aging-in-place readiness across care levels
    • Personalized, family-like resident care and advocacy
    • Seamless paperwork and professional sales/tour experiences
    • Positive leadership and regional directors praised
    • Clean, attractive interior common spaces
    • Multiple staff members singled out as exceptional
    • Private and boutique-style independent living units
    • Frequent live entertainment, lectures, fitness and special events

    Cons

    • Inconsistent staff responsiveness and communication gaps
    • Wellness/staff sometimes unreachable or unresponsive
    • Executive/management disengagement or disorganization reported
    • Late delivery of nighttime medication creating safety risks
    • Billing for wellness or care beyond what was expected/included
    • No/limited transportation for medical appointments (eye surgery/PT)
    • Reported cleanliness issues in some areas (laundry, tables)
    • Reports of bed bugs (isolated but serious)
    • Some residents report food quality is inconsistent
    • Paid washers/dryers and concerns about laundry room security/theft
    • Smaller apartment sizes and limited storage in some units
    • High pricing and refundable deposit concerns
    • Limited assisted-living availability or added cost for assistance
    • Exterior or building age/appearance concerns and planned remodeling
    • Occasional marketing-forward vibe rather than clinical focus
    • Inconsistent guest/host experiences during events or tours
    • Conflicting reports about transportation availability
    • Some residents find the community overwhelming or too large

    Summary review

    Overall sentiment: Reviews for The Watermark at Westwood Village are strongly weighted toward praise, especially for staff, dining, atmosphere, and programming, but a consistent minority of reviews raise important operational and safety concerns. The most frequently and enthusiastically mentioned themes are the high-touch, compassionate staff; restaurant-quality dining; polished, boutique-hotel style facilities; and a vibrant calendar of activities that fosters social connection. Multiple reviewers used words like "family," "home-like," and "five-star" to describe the environment, and several staff members and leaders (including Memory Care directors and regional leadership) were singled out by name for exemplary service.

    Care quality and staffing: Many reviews emphasize deeply caring, skilled, and attentive caregiving, particularly in Memory Care and in interactions with named team members. Staff are repeatedly described as going "above and beyond," being warm and welcoming, and providing strong advocacy for residents. That said, there is a clear and recurring counterpoint: some residents and family members reported poor responsiveness from wellness staff and management, with at least one account of the executive director being unresponsive. There are operational concerns around care delivery — most notably reports of nighttime medications being delivered late, which reviewers explicitly flagged as a safety risk. Several reviews call out billing practices that charged for wellness/care time beyond what families believed was included. These mixed signals suggest a generally high level of interpersonal caregiving but variable reliability in clinical coordination, scheduling, and billing practices.

    Facilities, cleanliness and apartments: The physical property attracts consistent praise: many reviewers describe the interiors and grounds as beautiful, modern, and well-maintained, with boutique-hotel finishes, elegant dining rooms, a lovely garden area, and generous common spaces. Amenities like outdoor patios, a pizza oven, dog-friendly spaces, and a full-service salon reinforce the upscale feel. However, some reviewers note problems: a few called specific areas "not very clean," pointed to an unclean laundry area, complained of dirty tables during events, and one brief mention reported bed bugs — a serious, if apparently isolated, claim. Apartment sizing also receives mixed notes: units are often described as smaller than expected (especially one-bedroom or studio layouts), with limited refrigeration/counter space in a few older units, and some reviewers pointed to high pricing relative to square footage.

    Dining and programming: Dining is one of the most consistently praised features across reviews. Many residents and families describe the food as fresh, thoughtfully prepared, and restaurant-quality; multiple reviewers highlighted special menus, themed nights (pizza, surf-and-turf), and strong attention to presentation. A few reviewers, however, felt the food quality was only average. Programming and activities are another major strength: frequent live entertainment, lectures, fitness classes, movie nights, and culturally rich events are commonly cited. These offerings contribute to a lively, social community where many residents form close friendships. Overall, programming appears broad and well-staffed, with positive notes about event execution and party planning support.

    Operations, management and communication: This area shows the greatest polarity. Positive reviews mention seamless paperwork, excellent tour and sales experiences, and proactive coordination by staff (names like Nicole and Lucy are cited for above-and-beyond service). Conversely, some reviewers reported disorganized management, disengaged leadership, and inconsistent guest experiences. Communication gaps are repeatedly called out — between families and wellness staff, and in expectations about what services and transportation are included. Transportation availability is inconsistent in reviews: some note free transportation and frequent local outings, while others report no transportation for critical medical trips (eye surgery, physical therapy). Billing transparency is another recurring concern; families described unexpected charges related to wellness care beyond included hours. These mixed operational reports indicate the community may deliver a high level of hospitality and personal attention but has weaknesses in consistent clinical operations, communication, and billing clarity.

    Safety and logistics: A few operational issues have safety implications — most notably late nighttime medications. Reviewers explicitly connected late meds to safety risks. The combination of medication timing problems, unreachable wellness staff at times, and billing disputes around wellness hours suggests prospective residents and families should probe medication administration protocols, on-call procedures, and fee structures during a tour. There are also reports of paid laundry facilities with theft concerns and a small number of cleanliness/pest incidents; these should be validated with management.

    Value, pricing and fit: Multiple reviewers feel the property is a high-value, luxury option that justifies its price with exceptional dining, staff, and amenities; others find it expensive for the unit size or note sizable deposits. Some prospective residents may find the social density (busy, vibrant, lots of people) a plus; others may find it overwhelming. Availability of assisted living spots appears variable, and some services (hands-on assistance, medical support) may come with extra charges. These financial and accommodation realities mean the community tends to fit best for residents seeking a high-end independent or assisted/memory care setting with robust hospitality, provided they understand fee structures and unit sizes in advance.

    Patterns and final assessment: The dominant themes are excellence in hospitality, dining, aesthetics, and personalized, compassionate staff — particularly in Memory Care and event programming — making The Watermark at Westwood Village stand out as an upscale, socially engaging community. The primary concerns are operational consistency: medication timing and safety, occasional cleanliness/pest reports, unclear billing for wellness services, variable transportation for medical appointments, and occasional management disengagement. These issues do not appear uniformly across reviews but occur often enough to warrant careful, specific questions during a tour.

    Suggested due diligence for prospects (based on review patterns): ask for written medication administration protocols and on-call coverage details; verify what wellness hours are included and request a billing example; confirm transportation policies for medical appointments and whether special trips (surgery/therapy) are supported; inspect laundry and public restroom cleanliness; tour the specific apartment models you are shown to confirm size and storage; and discuss recent pest-control measures and any reported incidents. Overall, if you prioritize a warm staff culture, exceptional dining, vibrant activities, and a boutique-hotel environment, Watermark Westwood frequently delivers — but verify operational reliability and fee transparency to ensure it meets clinical and logistical expectations.

    Location

    Map showing location of The Watermark at Westwood Village

    About The Watermark at Westwood Village

    The Watermark at Westwood Village sits in the heart of Westwood Village and offers several living choices including Independent Living, Assisted Living, Memory Care, and Nursing Homes all on one campus, and sometimes folks come for Short-Term Stays, too, since they offer furnished places for that, and there's a steady focus on supporting seniors with different needs, especially people with Alzheimer's or dementia, since their Memory Care programs like Thrive Memory Care and Luminescence Memory Care℠ have extra support. The place uses signature programs you don't really see everywhere, like Watermark University for activities and learning, BrainCafé™ to keep minds busy, EngageVR® for virtual experiences, and 360Well wellness programs that help both body and mind, and then you've also got The Neighborhood partnerships, which include groups like SAGE. Residents can use amenities like a salon and spa for a little pampering, fitness facilities to keep moving, and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet to stay in touch or entertained, and folks can pick from private suites or one- and two-bedroom residences or even short-term options. The outside is well kept, and there's a courtyard so people can get fresh air. For meals, there's a range from Savour Cuisine℠ to Gourmet Bites Cuisine for those needing a little help eating, and people can use a Flexible Spending Plan to budget for what they want and need. The Watermark at Westwood Village pays attention to each day's details and has support services like Technology Concierge, iN2L, LifeLoop, and Channel Insertion so folks can get help with tech or stay connected. The staff provide customized care for all levels, with programs and events through VivaLife Enrichment℠ and art or cultural happenings like opera, movies, and records, so days have variety. The focus is on making life easier, letting residents enjoy activities, good food, and tailored support in a community that works to include everyone and make each person feel like family, and if someone wants to see how the place looks, there are photos, floor plans, virtual tours, plus reviews and testimonials. The Watermark at Westwood Village is part of the Watermark Retirement Communities network and offers independent living for those wanting a maintenance-free lifestyle, assisted living for those needing help with daily tasks, specialized memory care for Alzheimer's and dementia, and skilled nursing services, all in one setting with care that matches each resident's needs.

    About Watermark Retirement

    The Watermark at Westwood Village is managed by Watermark Retirement.

    Watermark Retirement Communities is a premier senior living operator managing over 70 communities across 21 states with approximately 5,800 associates, ranked as the nation's 9th-leading senior housing operator by the American Seniors Housing Association. Founded in 1985 by David Freshwater and David Barnes as The Fountains in Tucson, Arizona, the company pioneered wellness-based senior living in collaboration with the University of Arizona Center on Aging before rebranding as Watermark in 2006. Headquartered in Tucson, Watermark became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Singapore-based Keppel Corporation in March 2024, following Keppel's initial 50% acquisition in 2019, with Paul Boethel succeeding the founders as CEO while Freshwater continues as Chairman Emeritus.

    The company's signature Watermark University is an award-winning intergenerational learning program where residents, associates, family members, and local experts—including museum curators, university professors, and world-renowned doctors—teach dozens of classes ranging from watercolor painting and ballroom dancing to language learning and sculpture workshops. Named among Fortune's Top 25 Best Workplaces for Aging Services™ by the Great Place to Work® Institute, Watermark provides comprehensive training through programs like GO (General Orientation) Ripples, Leadership by Design workshops, and specialized sales systems focused on understanding buyer motivations and customer service excellence.

    Watermark's innovative Prema Memory Support℠ program features Naya caregivers—named after the Sanskrit word for "guide" or "person of wisdom"—who are Certified Dementia Practitioners trained through the National Council of Certified Dementia Practitioners. The Thrive Memory Care experience includes secure courtyards, multi-sensory environments with fresh flowers, music therapy, and sensory gardens. Their groundbreaking Thrive Dining (Gourmet Bites) program transforms nutritious meals into attractive, bite-sized portions that residents can enjoy independently without utensils. The Dementia Awareness Experience uses virtual simulations including impairment gloves and vision-loss glasses to help associates develop deeper empathy and understanding.

    The company leads the industry in technology innovation with EngageVR, a virtual reality program using Oculus Quest headsets that enables residents to travel virtually to the pyramids of Egypt, swim with whales, or reconnect with veterans from their battalions in virtual living rooms. The 360Well wellness program integrates four key circles—mind, body, spirit, and community—to promote holistic health and independence. Through partnerships with the University of Arizona's Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute and Curana Health for value-based care delivery in Florida, Texas, and Pennsylvania, Watermark continues advancing senior care research and innovation.

    Following a "shrinking to grow" strategy under new leadership, Watermark focuses on operating premium communities while maintaining its founding philosophy that they are "a wellness company that happens to provide housing and services for seniors," committed to creating experiences where residents truly feel at home with purpose, possibility, and joy.

    People often ask...

    State of California Inspection Reports

    41

    Inspections

    3

    Type A Citations

    16

    Type B Citations

    5

    Years of reports

    09 Jul 2025
    Identified missing items from residents' rooms—a $2,900 check, six unauthorized credit-card charges, two missing credit cards, $300 in cash, and a wedding band—and conducted interviews with residents and a witness while gathering supporting documentation. Found no deficiencies per regulations; exit interview conducted.
    05 Jun 2025
    Investigated two allegations regarding a resident's death and oxygen care. Found no evidence to support that staff withheld lifesaving oxygen or failed to meet the resident's oxygen needs.
    15 May 2025
    Investigated an allegation that two staff members joked with a dementia resident and may have tapped toward the resident’s inner thigh while saying “no stop it”; found no deficiencies and no citations were issued.
    • § 9058
    15 May 2025
    Found no evidence to support the allegation that staff failed to provide lifesaving oxygen to the resident. Found no evidence to support the allegation that staff did not meet the resident's oxygen needs.
    15 May 2025
    Identified that theft and loss program requirements were not met, including incomplete resident property documentation and gaps in initial employee training. Found that staff did not safeguard a resident’s personal belongings, with missing jewelry and designer bags reported; however, most residents and staff felt safe and described security measures as in place.
    • § 87218(a)(2)
    10 Mar 2025
    Found the home generally clean, safe, and well maintained with functioning safety systems and proper records; identified two deficiencies: nine employees not associated on a guardian and three staff members lacking TB health screenings.
    • § 87355(e)(3)
    • § 87411(f)
    30 Dec 2024
    Investigated allegation that a staff member transported residents while under the influence of marijuana; interviews and records did not produce evidence to support that the incident occurred.
    17 Dec 2024
    Investigated a complaint alleging safety concerns at the care setting. Reviewed related documentation and held an exit discussion.
    07 Nov 2024
    Identified an open investigation into a specific complaint and gathered related documentation. Conducted an exit interview with the senior executive director.
    07 Nov 2024
    Identified that cameras in common areas had audio recording capability, infringing residents' privacy. A deficiency was cited for this privacy violation, and a Technical Advisory Note was issued.
    18 Sept 2024
    Identified that pendants and bedroom phones were down during the transition to a new management company, with multiple staff and some residents reporting outages, while a pendant test showed devices were operational with a 5–8 minute response. Identified concerns about meals being missed due to phone outages during the transition; however, residents reported receiving meals and the executive director stated there were no ongoing issues since the transition.
    • § 87303(i)(1)
    30 Aug 2024
    Identified that strong security measures and staff training were in place at the site; an individual dressed as a service worker entered through the main entrance at about 11:30 and was escorted out at 12:08. No deficiencies were observed and no citations were issued.
    30 Aug 2024
    Confirmed no deficiencies found during the visit.
    27 Mar 2024
    Found no deficiencies after an unannounced one-year visit; safety systems, living spaces, food service, and emergency equipment were functioning properly.
    27 Mar 2024
    Confirmed no deficiencies during the inspection of the facility.
    11 Apr 2023
    Identified multiple safety and record-keeping deficiencies, including exposed walls with holes and no posted signs in fire escape areas on all floors, a blocked emergency exit in the memory care stairwell, a non-operational van parked at the gate, unsecured knives and cleaning chemicals in the kitchen, three staff without CPR training, missing staff educational verification, expired and outdated food, and no medication dosage records.
    17 Jan 2024
    Found that the resident location and ambulatory status register exists and can be shared with first responders, and staff could explain their roles during emergencies. Found that the allegation of not following the emergency plan may have happened or is valid, but there wasn’t enough evidence to prove the violation, and no deficiencies were cited.
    17 Jan 2024
    Investigated a complaint regarding the implementation of emergency disaster plan protocols; found that staff knew their roles during emergencies, and the facility maintained an updated register of residents, but drills felt chaotic to some residents. Allegation regarding emergency plan compliance unsubstantiated due to lack of evidence.
    06 Oct 2023
    Identified concerns for multiple allegations. Found Covid-19 protocol issues, including unreported positive cases and questions about testing and reporting; disrepair issues including incomplete wiring in some apartments, loose lifters, leaks, and elevator problems; absence of a documented emergency disaster plan; safety concerns about security; questions about safe food handling; and questions about whether resident paperwork is complete.
    06 Oct 2023
    Confirmed that there were Covid-19 cases not reported and safety concerns regarding the physical condition of the premises.
    • § 87211(a)(2)
    • § 87303(a)
    05 Sept 2023
    Found that the two specific allegations—staff not safeguarding residents' personal property and residents being financially abused—were not supported by a preponderance of evidence.
    05 Sept 2023
    Investigated complaints of staff not safeguarding personal property and financial abuse, but evidence was insufficient to conclusively verify these allegations.
    28 Aug 2023
    Found that the allegation that staff did not assist residents with bathing could not be shown to have occurred. Interviews with residents and staff and shower schedule reviews indicated baths were provided as scheduled, with residents sometimes refusing baths and staff noting they repeatedly asked up to three times before rescheduling.
    28 Aug 2023
    Investigated the allegation that staff did not assist residents with bathing; found no evidence to support the claim, as residents and staff reported compliance with bathing schedules and procedures.
    29 Mar 2023
    Found no deficiencies noted during the visit, and a follow-up visit was required due to time constraints.
    28 Mar 2023
    Found no deficiencies cited during the visit on 03/28/2023. Confirmed current licensing details and census information for this program.
    11 Apr 2023
    Identified deficiencies in safety measures and staff training during a recent inspection at a multi-story facility.
    • § 1569.618(c)(3)
    • § 87307(d)(4)
    • § 87307(d)(6)
    • § 87309(a)
    • § 87412(a)(6)
    • § 87555(b)(8)
    • § 87465(a)(6)
    29 Mar 2023
    Inspection on 03/29/2023 found no deficiencies at the facility.
    28 Mar 2023
    Reviewed facilities census, medication records, and staff interviews during an inspection visit, with no deficiencies cited.
    18 Jan 2023
    Determined that the allegation that staff did not safeguard a resident's personal property could not be proven or disproven. Interviews and camera footage did not show anyone entering the resident's apartment, while some residents reported missing items and others left doors unlocked.
    18 Jan 2023
    Confirmed missing items allegation from one resident, but could not prove or disprove the claim. Resident believes staff may be taking items, but video footage and interviews do not provide enough evidence to support the allegation.
    10 Feb 2022
    Identified on 12/05/2021 staffing shortages that left caregivers unable to meet residents' needs, causing some residents not to receive needed care. Found that medications were not dispensed as prescribed and emergency pendants were not promptly responded to.
    10 Feb 2022
    Confirmed that staff struggled to meet residents' needs due to insufficient staffing, leading to issues with medication administration and response delays to emergency pendants on a specific day.
    • § 87464(f)(1)
    • § 87411(a)
    • § 87705(c)(4)
    09 Feb 2022
    Identified significant gaps in emergency preparedness, including no staff training on the disaster plan, no drills conducted, and residents not aware of evacuation procedures. Found that some staff with medical or religious exemptions were not being tested weekly for COVID-19.
    09 Feb 2022
    Confirmed inadequate emergency preparedness and lack of compliance with COVID-19 testing guidelines.
    • § 87468.1(a)(2)
    • § 87705(c)(2)
    16 Nov 2021
    Investigated the allegation that unqualified staff administered medications and found insufficient evidence to prove or disprove it; medications were administered by trained personnel and MAR initials matched, with no adverse effects linked to errors. Investigated the allegation that residents' belongings were not safeguarded and found insufficient evidence to prove or disprove it; staff denied taking items and residents reported their belongings were safeguarded or stored.
    16 Nov 2021
    Investigated allegations of unqualified staff administering medication and resident belongings not being safeguarded; determined that sufficient evidence was not found to support the claims.
    16 Mar 2021
    Found that an initial license request was submitted for a 237-capacity senior residence with memory care and non-ambulatory units, assessed via a virtual pre-licensing visit due to COVID-19. Found no items of noncompliance; fire clearance for the approved capacity was issued and safety, dietary, medication, and record-keeping measures were in place.
    16 Mar 2021
    Conducted pre-licensing evaluation virtually via FaceTime. All areas of the facility were found to be in compliance with regulations.
    01 Dec 2020
    Completed COMP II and confirmed understanding of Title 22, covering operation, staff and administrator qualifications, program policies, grievances and community resources, physical plant and food service, and the required licensing documents.
    01 Dec 2020
    Confirmed understanding of various areas related to facility operation, staff qualifications, program policies, physical plant, and application documents during the inspection.

    Nearby Communities

    • Exterior view of a multi-story senior living facility building with beige and white walls, surrounded by trees and landscaping under a clear blue sky.
      $10,000+4.6 (101)
      suite
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Belmont Village Senior Living Westwood

      10475 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90024
    • Four-story cream-colored residential building with palm trees at a street intersection under a clear blue sky.
      $6,500 – $8,450+4.7 (133)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom • Studio
      assisted living, memory care

      Sunrise of Beverly Hills

      201 N Crescent Dr, Beverly Hills, CA, 90210
    • Exterior front view of Encino Terrace Senior Living building with beige walls, multiple windows with brown awnings, a driveway entrance, and a pharmacy on the right side under a green sign.
      $2,750 – $4,680+4.5 (87)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom
      independent living, assisted living, board and care

      Encino Terrace Senior Living

      16025 Ventura Blvd, Encino, CA, 91436
    • Exterior view of The Village at Sherman Oaks building entrance at dusk with illuminated covered driveway, palm trees, and landscaped plants.
      $5,230 – $8,155+4.4 (104)
      Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      The Village at Sherman Oaks

      5450 Vesper Ave, Sherman Oaks, CA, 91411
    • Photo of Ivy Park At Burbank
      $4,375 – $9,895+4.1 (37)
      Semi-private • Studio • 1 Bedroom • 2 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      Ivy Park At Burbank

      2721 Willow Street, Burbank, CA, 91505
    • Entrance of The Gardens at Park Balboa facility with double glass doors, potted plants on either side, outdoor wall lanterns, and surrounding greenery including palm trees and bushes.
      $3,400 – $4,100+4.5 (200)
      Semi-private • 1 Bedroom
      independent, assisted living, memory care

      The Gardens at Park Balboa

      7046 Kester Ave, Van Nuys, CA, 91405

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 338 facilities$5,812/mo
    2. 190 facilities$6,005/mo
    3. 357 facilities$5,841/mo
    4. 353 facilities$5,720/mo
    5. 179 facilities$6,082/mo
    6. 103 facilities$6,480/mo
    7. 207 facilities$5,566/mo
    8. 327 facilities$5,778/mo
    9. 231 facilities$5,493/mo
    10. 401 facilities$5,568/mo
    11. 402 facilities$5,391/mo
    12. 345 facilities$5,641/mo
    © 2025 Mirador Living