I placed my mom at Callahan Court and am very pleased overall - the building is always clean and safe, rooms and common areas are comfortable, and the courtyard is lovely. The staff (administrator Kim and front desk Shannon included) are professional, compassionate, and quick to respond; care is individualized with good communication, engaging activities, tasty meals, and solid dementia/palliative support, which gives our family real peace of mind.
Loved one of resident
Jul 2026
Pricing
Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Schedule a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Coordination with health care providers
Hospice waiver
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Healthcare staffing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Spa
Telephone
Wifi
Memory care community services
Dementia waiver
Mild cognitive impairment
Specialized memory care programming
Transportation
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Common areas
Beauty salon
Dining room
Garden
Outdoor space
Community services
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
4.29·(48)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
4.3
Staff
4.3
Meals
4.0
Amenities
4.4
Value
1.6
Pros
compassionate direct-care staff
family-like, homey atmosphere
personalized dining and menu accommodations
robust hospice and palliative-care access
energetic and varied activity program
regular care-plan reviews
small single-floor, 48-bed community layout
clean and well-maintained common areas
accessible outdoor courtyard and gardens
spacious dining and communal spaces
prompt maintenance response
individualized personal-care attention
opportunities for social connection and friendships
calming, welcoming reception and front-desk staff
higher nighttime staffing ratio
Cons
inconsistent staffing levels and resource allocation
delays in call-response and assistance
gaps in care documentation and coordination
questionable billing and refund policies
variable management responsiveness and leadership
deficiencies in supervisory training and oversight
inadequate handling of personal belongings and laundry
high out-of-pocket costs relative to expectations
small resident rooms with some shared bathrooms
inconsistent meal quality and dining execution
Summary of reviews
Callahan Court Memory Care elicits strongly mixed impressions across reviewers. Many families emphasize consistently compassionate frontline caregivers who create a family-like, homey atmosphere and provide individualized attention. Reviewers frequently praised the facility's hospice and palliative-care access, regular care-plan reviews, and an activity program described as energetic and varied. Common positives include clean and well-maintained common areas, an accessible courtyard and gardens, spacious dining and communal spaces, prompt maintenance responses, and staff who facilitate social engagement and friendships among residents.
Care quality and staff interactions are a central strength for many families: direct-care staff are characterized as caring, attentive, and willing to sit with residents to provide companionship and assistance. Several accounts note helpful nurses, a higher nighttime staffing ratio, and effective hospice coordination during end-of-life transitions. That said, there are recurring concerns about operational consistency. Reviewers describe uneven staffing levels, delays in responding to call buttons or requests for assistance, and variable integration with outside medical providers. Some families reported gaps in charting and care coordination that contributed to frustration and anxiety about continuity of care.
Dining and activities receive largely positive feedback for menu variety, special accommodations, and engaging programming (including outings and seasonal events). Multiple reviewers appreciated personalized meal support for residents who need extra assistance. However, there are also comments about inconsistent meal quality and execution, suggesting that dining experience may fluctuate depending on staffing and shift. The activity program, courtyard, and communal areas are cited as important contributors to residents' social engagement and quality of life.
Facility features are generally described positively: a small, single-floor layout, cleaner common spaces, and adequate maintenance. Room size and configuration are mixed items — while common areas are spacious, some residents live in relatively small rooms and may share bathrooms, which could be a consideration for prospective families. Operational issues around personal property handling were raised, including concerns about laundry and damaged hearing aids.
Management, billing, and administrative practices are the area with the most consistent negative commentary. Reviewers noted confusing or nonrefundable fee structures, charges that families questioned after a resident's move or death, and slow or unresponsive resolution of billing disputes. Several reviewers also expressed concerns about supervisory engagement, training oversight, staff morale, and a corporate feel that can inhibit local problem-solving. These administrative and financial issues appear to drive much of the dissatisfaction among families who otherwise appreciated the caregiving staff and environment.
In summary, Callahan Court appears to offer many strengths valued by families—compassionate caregivers, robust activities, hospice access, and a small, home-like setting. Prospective residents and families should weigh those strengths against operational concerns: assess current staffing patterns, inquire specifically about response times and documentation practices, clarify all fees and refund policies in writing, and evaluate room/bathroom configurations. Visiting at different times of day and speaking directly with nursing leadership and the administrator about care coordination and billing procedures will help determine whether the facility aligns with a particular resident's needs and expectations.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Callahan Court Memory Care.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Callahan Court Memory Care is located at 1770 NW Valley View Dr, Roseburg, OR, 97471.
About Callahan Court Memory Care
Callahan Court Memory Care is located in the beautiful Umpqua Valley of southern Oregon, providing a welcoming and supportive environment for individuals experiencing Alzheimer’s, dementia, or other forms of memory loss. The community prides itself on a holistic, person-centered approach to care, with thoughtfully designed assessments and care plans developed in collaboration with residents, family members, and care partners. The goal at Callahan Court is to empower each resident, enhance their dignity, honor their choices, support their independence, and ultimately improve their quality of life.
At the heart of Callahan Court Memory Care lies a dedicated team of compassionate professionals who provide care and support around the clock. The atmosphere is warm and nurturing, specially designed for the unique needs of adults with memory challenges. The care partners prioritize empathy and kindness in every aspect of their work, guided by the core values of goodness, loyalty, faith, and fun. These guiding principles are woven into daily interactions and contribute to a community where residents feel secure and valued.
The True North Programs at Callahan Court are emblematic of its commitment to individualized care. These programs are structured to support the unique preferences, needs, and desires of each person, placing their interests at the center of daily life. Life enrichment opportunities and wellness services are key components, designed to maintain and, when possible, enhance the abilities and independence of residents. The community also emphasizes the importance of abilities over limitations, seeking to highlight what each individual can do while providing support where needed.
Residents at Callahan Court enjoy spacious, comfortable apartments that are both efficient and home-like. Throughout the community, inviting common rooms, cozy sitting areas, and wide, well-lit outdoor walking paths promote social engagement and relaxation. The beautifully landscaped courtyard with benches, outdoor patio tables with umbrellas, and entertainment spaces—such as the community kitchen with counter seating and the entertainment room with comfortable seating and a TV—provide plenty of opportunities for connection and enjoyment. Meals are enjoyed in a dining room with tables set for dinner, where fresh flowers and attention to detail contribute to a pleasant dining experience.
Central to the community’s philosophy is a belief in doing the right thing, striving for excellence, and always showing care to others. The team at Callahan Court Memory Care works not only to meet the needs of residents but also to provide families with peace of mind, knowing that their loved ones are surrounded by kindness, respect, and a genuine commitment to their well-being.
Frontier Management is a leading senior living provider in the United States, operating over 120 communities across 19 states. Headquartered in Durham, Oregon, Frontier offers a range of senior living options, including independent living, assisted living, and memory care. Founded in 2000, Frontier has grown significantly and has been recognized for its excellence in senior care, earning multiple prestigious industry awards.
One of Frontier's hallmark programs is the Spark program, rooted in Montessori-style practices, which promotes purpose and engagement among residents. Initially designed for memory care, this program has been expanded to other types of care within Frontier's communities. The Spark program empowers residents to have an active role in their community, enhancing their daily lives through meaningful activities.
Frontier is also known for its dedication to resident health and well-being. Their communities offer comprehensive services tailored to individual needs, including customized healthcare plans through the Frontier Advantage Network, which aims to extend residents' stay by keeping them healthier for longer periods.
The company has undergone significant changes and growth in recent years, including a rebranding effort to refresh its image and enhance its services. Frontier's communities are spread across various states including Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, Oregon, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Frontier Management's commitment to quality care, innovative programs, and extensive service options makes it a prominent name in senior living, continually striving to meet the evolving needs of its residents.
People often ask...
Callahan Court Memory Care offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $5,548 per month.
Callahan Court Memory Care offers assisted living and memory care.
There are 19 photos of Callahan Court Memory Care on Mirador.
The full address for this community is 1770 NW Valley View Dr, Roseburg, OR 97471.
No, Callahan Court Memory Care does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Determined that care planning and follow-through were not followed, resulting in a resident fall and hospital treatment.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
27 Dec 2025Abuse: Neglect
27 Dec 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a neglect allegation found failure to follow the care plan and provide required services, risking harm to a high fall-risk resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
01 Jul 2025Abuse: Neglect
01 Jul 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided, resulting in abuse and neglect observed during the investigation.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Feb 2025Change of Owner
26 Feb 2025Change of Owner
Found multiple deficiencies across resident rights, monitoring of condition, coordination of outside health services, medication orders, fire safety training, privacy and dignity, activities, and administration compliance.
Deficiency—Resident Rights and Protection - General
Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
Deficiency—Res Hlth Srvc: On- and Off-Site Health Srvc
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training for Residents
Deficiency—Individual Rights Settings: Privacy, Dignity
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Compliance with Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Activities
02 Dec 2024Inspection
02 Dec 2024Inspection
Investigated a staffing allegation and found inconsistencies between staffing schedules and ABST data, with staffing not aligned to resident needs. Violations cited under Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
18 Nov 2024Inspection
18 Nov 2024Inspection
Investigated and found staffing levels did not meet ABST guidance, with inconsistencies between the staffing schedule and ABST data.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
02 Nov 2024Inspection
02 Nov 2024Inspection
Identified staffing deficiencies where levels did not match ABST indications and determined noncompliance with Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
29 Oct 2024Inspection
29 Oct 2024Inspection
Investigated staffing adequacy and found inconsistencies between the ABST data and the staffing schedule, with levels not met to cover scheduled and unscheduled resident needs.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
22 Sept 2024Inspection
22 Sept 2024Inspection
Found staffing levels, intensity, and qualifications did not align with the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool, failing to meet scheduled and unscheduled resident needs.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
22 Sept 2024Inspection
22 Sept 2024Inspection
Found staffing did not meet ABST-indicated levels to meet residents' scheduled and unscheduled needs due to inconsistencies between ABST data and scheduling.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
11 Jul 2024Licensure
11 Jul 2024Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meals service requirements and sanitation rules. No deficiencies cited.
Deficiency—Comment
15 Aug 2023Licensure
15 Aug 2023Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meal service and food sanitation rules. No deficiencies were cited.
Deficiency—Comment
03 May 2023Abuse: Neglect
03 May 2023Abuse: Neglect
Investigated abuse and neglect found violations for failing to protect a resident from inappropriate contact when a person with known inappropriate behaviors entered memory care and touched the resident.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from inappropriate sexual contact
18 Dec 2022Abuse: Neglect
18 Dec 2022Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that failure to follow the care plan led to a fall with injury for a known fall risk resident, attributed to staffing shortages.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
04 Jun 2022Abuse: Neglect
04 Jun 2022Abuse: Neglect
Investigated found that an individual exposed genitalia and fondled the resident's chest in the room and later repeated the behavior, indicating a failure to provide a safe environment and abuse/neglect.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Feb 2022Validation
14 Feb 2022Validation
Determined substantial compliance with the applicable rules. Found no deficiencies.
Deficiency—General Comments
10 Dec 2020Inspection
10 Dec 2020Inspection
Investigated an emotional abuse allegation and concluded emotional abuse occurred and there was a failure to protect a resident from staff abuse. This constitutes a violation of residents' rights under state rules.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from mental or emotional abuse
04 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
04 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in an unwitnessed fall with an injury; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
27 Feb 2020Inspection
27 Feb 2020Inspection
Found insufficient staff to meet scheduled and unscheduled resident needs.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate staffing
17 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
17 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated allegations of neglect and abuse and found insufficient supervision and staff support that led to an incident among residents; the findings were substantiated.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Sept 2019Abuse: Neglect
14 Sept 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care with a substantiated finding and a $188 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 Aug 2019Abuse: Neglect
02 Aug 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found a failure to protect a resident from harm. A fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
14 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found failure to provide basic care necessary to maintain health and safety, potentially causing harm. A $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
14 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a neglect allegation and found that basic care or services necessary to maintain health and safety were not provided, which may result in serious harm; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
13 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a neglect of care due to failure to follow the care plan; a $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
09 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
09 Jul 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect in care by failing to provide basic care or services and a safe environment that could result in serious harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Apr 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
21 Apr 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Concluded abuse and neglect findings, including verbal/mental abuse and neglect of basic care that risked serious harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
21 Mar 2019Inspection
21 Mar 2019Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to provide service and found a lack of substantial compliance. The issue carried moderate harm potential.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
14 Mar 2019Abuse: Neglect
14 Mar 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a safety deficiency due to failure to protect a resident from harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
24 Feb 2019Abuse: Neglect
24 Feb 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care due to failure to provide oversight and monitoring of changes in condition, and assessed a $2,500 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide oversight and monitoring of change of condition
31 Jan 2019Inspection
31 Jan 2019Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to report suspected abuse and found that suspected abuse was not reported; a $750 fine was assessed.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
27 Jan 2019Abuse: Physical Abuse
27 Jan 2019Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated and found physical abuse; confirmed the allegation that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
21 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect by failing to provide basic care, resulting in harm to a resident; a $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Sept 2018Inspection
20 Sept 2018Inspection
Determined that a license violation involving failure to protect a resident from rape was substantiated. The findings describe unwanted sexual contact that was not consented to.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from rape
28 Jul 2018Abuse: Neglect
28 Jul 2018Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to follow the care plan.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
14 May 2018Inspection
14 May 2018Inspection
Concluded that the care plan was not followed and a resident was not protected from harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
06 Apr 2018Abuse: Neglect
06 Apr 2018Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect; found failure to follow the care plan, with minor-harm potential, and a $188 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
26 Feb 2018Inspection
26 Feb 2018Inspection
Investigated the allegation of an unsafe environment and identified deficiencies in assessing and intervening.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
09 May 2017Inspection
09 May 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation of an unsafe environment and found a deficiency for failing to protect RV2 from physical harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
24 Apr 2017Inspection
24 Apr 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found the interim service plan was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Mar 2017Inspection
11 Mar 2017Inspection
Found failure to follow the care plan.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
05 Mar 2017Abuse: Neglect
05 Mar 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found that the care plan wasn't followed and no assessment or intervention occurred.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
01 Mar 2017Abuse: Neglect
01 Mar 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found failures to assess and intervene in response to a resident's behavior.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
24 Dec 2016Abuse: Financial abuse
24 Dec 2016Abuse: Financial abuse
Found residents were not protected from theft.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
20 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found neglect involving failure to protect a resident from harm.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
27 Apr 2016Inspection
27 Apr 2016Inspection
Found that a resident was subjected to rough treatment, violating resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
23 Apr 2016Inspection
23 Apr 2016Inspection
Found a licensing violation for failing to provide a safe environment and for failing to assess and intervene.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Jan 2016Inspection
14 Jan 2016Inspection
Investigated and found that the care plan was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
19 Dec 2015Abuse: Neglect
19 Dec 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment resulting in physical harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
17 Nov 2015Abuse: Neglect
17 Nov 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to protect a resident from harm and assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
11 Oct 2015Abuse: Neglect
11 Oct 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found failures to assess and intervene regarding a resident's behavior, with abuse/neglect findings substantiated.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
01 Oct 2015Inspection
01 Oct 2015Inspection
Concluded that the care plan was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
26 Sept 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
26 Sept 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated an allegation of physical abuse and found a failure to protect residents from rough treatment.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
26 Sept 2015Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
26 Sept 2015Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated the verbal abuse allegation and found residents were not protected from inappropriate verbal comments.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
12 Sept 2015Abuse: Neglect
12 Sept 2015Abuse: Neglect
Identified a deficiency for failing to follow the care plan, resulting in harm to residents.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
31 Aug 2015Abuse: Neglect
31 Aug 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to assess and intervene regarding a resident's behavior in connection with an alleged neglect.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
31 Aug 2015Abuse: Neglect
31 Aug 2015Abuse: Neglect
Determined that staff failed to assess and intervene and protect residents from potential harm.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
28 Aug 2015Inspection
28 Aug 2015Inspection
Investigated an allegation that care plans were not followed, and found residents were not protected from harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
20 Aug 2015Abuse: Sexual abuse
20 Aug 2015Abuse: Sexual abuse
Found failure to protect residents from inappropriate sexual contact.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from inappropriate sexual contact
17 Aug 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
17 Aug 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
Found residents were not protected from rough treatment and intimidation.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
01 Aug 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
01 Aug 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
Found a failure to protect a resident from harm.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
01 Aug 2015Inspection
01 Aug 2015Inspection
Found violations related to protecting resident rights due to inappropriate verbal comments.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
12 Jul 2015Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
12 Jul 2015Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated a verbal/mental abuse allegation and identified failure to treat a resident with dignity.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from mental or emotional abuse
31 Mar 2015Inspection
31 Mar 2015Inspection
Investigated and determined that residents' rights were not protected from inappropriate comments.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
18 Oct 2014Inspection
18 Oct 2014Inspection
Found that the care plan was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
13 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
13 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint alleging neglect and found that call lights were not answered promptly, risking minor to moderate harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
01 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
01 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found failure to follow the care plan.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
17 Jun 2014Abuse: Neglect
17 Jun 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to follow the care plan that could cause harm.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
20 Apr 2014Inspection
20 Apr 2014Inspection
Found a failure to follow the care plan, resulting in a Level 1 licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
05 Apr 2014Abuse: Neglect
05 Apr 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a neglect allegation and found a failure to follow the care plan. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
07 Jan 2014Inspection
07 Jan 2014Inspection
Investigated and substantiated a violation involving failure to protect a resident from physical harm.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
04 Dec 2013Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
04 Dec 2013Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated an allegation of verbal abuse and found that the resident was exposed to inappropriate verbal comments.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
04 Sept 2013Inspection
04 Sept 2013Inspection
Identified failure to follow the care plan, with potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
19 Jul 2013Inspection
19 Jul 2013Inspection
Concluded that a licensing violation occurred by failing to address a resident's behavior and protect residents from harm.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
27 Apr 2013Inspection
27 Apr 2013Inspection
Found the care plan was not followed. This was a Level 2 licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
27 Apr 2013Inspection
27 Apr 2013Inspection
Investigated the allegation that a resident's behavior was not addressed and found a deficiency in protecting residents from harm.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
26 Apr 2013Inspection
26 Apr 2013Inspection
Investigated an allegation about addressing a resident's behavior and found a failure to protect from harm.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
15 Feb 2013Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
15 Feb 2013Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated an allegation of verbal abuse and found failure to protect a resident from inappropriate verbal comments and threats of punishment.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
26 Jan 2013Abuse: Neglect
26 Jan 2013Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that the falls-related care plan was not followed, resulting in a substantiated abuse/neglect finding and a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
30 Dec 2012Abuse: Neglect
30 Dec 2012Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an abuse/neglect allegation and found failure to properly plan and follow care, with a fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
29 Dec 2012Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
29 Dec 2012Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Concluded that a resident was exposed to inappropriate verbal comments and not adequately protected.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
01 May 2012Abuse: Neglect
01 May 2012Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a deficiency for failing to protect a resident from inappropriate sexual contact.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from inappropriate sexual contact
15 Mar 2012Inspection
15 Mar 2012Inspection
Found that the care plan was not followed, creating a risk of minor harm or potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
04 Feb 2012Abuse: Neglect
04 Feb 2012Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of abuse/neglect and found residents were not protected from inappropriate sexual contact.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
03 Feb 2012Inspection
03 Feb 2012Inspection
Found deficiencies for not following the care plan and for not addressing a resident's behavior.
Licensing—Failed to address resident's behavior
23 Jan 2012Inspection
23 Jan 2012Inspection
Investigated an allegation of an unsafe environment and found a violation for failing to protect from inappropriate interaction.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
07 Jun 2011Abuse: Neglect
07 Jun 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to follow the care plan.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
22 Feb 2011Inspection
22 Feb 2011Inspection
Found a failure to provide a secure environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
06 Jan 2011Abuse: Neglect
06 Jan 2011Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found a failure to intervene when a resident's condition changed, resulting in a substantiated finding and a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
19 Dec 2010Inspection
19 Dec 2010Inspection
Confirmed resident rights were not protected due to inappropriate verbal comments.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
06 Nov 2010Inspection
06 Nov 2010Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found a safety-related deficiency. The findings indicate failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
30 Sept 2010Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
30 Sept 2010Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Concluded that a resident was not protected from verbal/mental abuse, and a safety deficiency was identified.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from mental or emotional abuse
28 Jul 2010Abuse: Neglect
28 Jul 2010Abuse: Neglect
Concluded that there was a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Apr 2010Abuse: Neglect
08 Apr 2010Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that the care plan was not followed, resulting in a neglect finding.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Callahan Court Memory Care. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Callahan Court Memory Care directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of this community?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
