Pricing ranges from
    $3,250 – 4,495/month

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville

    930 Oak Ridge Dr, Roseville, CA 95661
    • Assisted Living
    • Memory Care

    Pricing

    Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.

    Request a Tour

    Date of Tour
    Time Window
    Tour Type

    You selected in-person tour on in the

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Hospice waiver
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Internet
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Memory care community services

    • Dementia waiver
    • Mild cognitive impairment
    • Specialized memory care programming

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor patio
    • Outdoor space
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    Reviews

    4.19·(109)

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      3.5
    • Staff

      4.0
    • Meals

      4.1
    • Amenities

      3.9
    • Value

      3.4

    Pros

    • Compassionate, attentive staff
    • Clean, well-maintained facility
    • High-quality, restaurant-style dining
    • Diabetic-friendly and individualized meal options
    • Robust activity and events program
    • On-site physical therapy and rehab services
    • Scheduled transportation and outing van
    • Pet-friendly policy
    • Housekeeping and laundry services
    • Secure memory-care unit
    • Medication-tracking and management systems
    • Courtyard and outdoor seating areas
    • Smaller, homey community atmosphere
    • Variety of apartment types (studios and one-bedrooms)
    • Responsive concierge and front-desk staff

    Cons

    • Inconsistent staffing levels and high turnover
    • Gaps in clinical oversight and nursing coverage
    • Inconsistent personal-care and bathing schedules
    • Incontinence-care delays and wound-care concerns
    • Transfer-safety and fall-prevention practice weaknesses
    • Sanitation concerns and inconsistent housekeeping in some instances
    • Allegations of medication and inventory control problems
    • Communication gaps with families and limited management visibility
    • Pricing transparency and unexpected fee increases
    • Variable activity engagement and program consistency
    • Small apartment sizes and limited space for high-acuity equipment
    • Limited outdoor amenities and walking-path options

    Summary of reviews

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville elicits strongly mixed responses. Many families describe a clean, well-kept campus with a smaller, home-like atmosphere, and they frequently cite the dining program and culinary staff as a distinctive strength. The community offers restaurant-style meals, diabetic-friendly options, individually plated service, and multiple dining areas; multiple comments praise the quality and presentation of food. The physical environment, including courtyards and common areas, is commonly described as attractive and well maintained. Apartment options include studios and one-bedrooms with some units offering patios; housekeeping and laundry services are part of the service package for many residents.

    Staff and direct care receive a large number of positive mentions: reviewers frequently describe staff as compassionate, attentive, personable, and engaged. Several families specifically note strong concierge/front-desk responsiveness, helpful housekeeping, and med-techs or nurses who know residents by name. On-site services such as physical therapy, rehab-style classes, transportation/van service, and a secure memory-care unit are available and appreciated by many residents and families. Pet-friendly policies and accessible social dining are additional points of value for prospective residents who prioritize continuity and quality of daily life.

    Despite those strengths, there are recurring operational concerns. Staffing levels and turnover are cited repeatedly and are associated with gaps in clinical oversight, inconsistent personal-care schedules (including bathing and incontinence care), and occasional delays in responding to resident needs. Several reviews raise transfer-safety and fall-prevention practice weaknesses and describe wound-care or infection-related care issues; these point to variability in clinical competence and supervision across shifts. Sanitation and housekeeping consistency are generally praised but appear uneven in some instances. There are also comments about limited unit size for residents requiring high-acuity equipment.

    Management, communication, and business-practice themes emerge as another pattern. Families report inconsistent communication, limited visible executive presence, and examples of admission- and billing-related confusion; pricing transparency and periodic unexpected fee increases were a noted concern. A small number of reviewers raised serious process issues, including allegations of medication and inventory control problems and concerns about staff conduct; these comments suggest the need for clear auditing and stronger oversight. Activity offerings are broad (exercise classes, games, outings, religious services, movie nights), but engagement and frequency vary by unit and by time, with some families finding programs robust and others describing fewer meaningful activities for particular residents.

    Bottom line: Meadow Oaks appears to offer many of the lifestyle and amenity elements families seek — strong dining, a clean environment, on-site therapy, pet-friendly policies, and an engaged team in many shifts. However, variability in staffing, clinical oversight, housekeeping consistency, activity engagement, and management communication have created uneven experiences. Prospective residents and families should prioritize an in-person, time-of-day visit to observe staffing levels, clinical presence, meal service, and activity engagement; request current staffing and nursing-coverage schedules; confirm pricing and refund policies in writing; and ask about documented infection-control, medication-inventory, and transfer-safety protocols before making a placement decision.

    Reviews written on Mirador

    We have no reviews to show about Meadow Oaks of Roseville.

    Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.

    Location

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville is located at 930 Oak Ridge Dr, Roseville, CA, 95661.

    About Meadow Oaks of Roseville

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville has a single-story layout with high ceilings and lots of natural light, and the design makes moving around easy for folks who use walkers or wheelchairs. The front entrance is accessible, and there's a back patio for sitting outdoors, plus walking trails where you can stretch your legs or walk your dog, since the place is pet-friendly, which is nice for those who want to keep their pets close. The campus has a stately look and plenty of spaces to relax, including a living room, a dining room, generous common areas, a library, and updated interiors that feel like home. There are housing choices ranging from studio-type standard units, which have private bathrooms, small living areas, and a reading or writing nook, to deluxe two-bedroom or companion units that share bathrooms, so people can pick what fits their needs. Each resident living space has a kitchen, so you can make your own snacks if you want, though meals and snacks are available around the clock with Elevate Dining if you don't want to cook, and there's always support if needed.

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville is a continuing care retirement community that offers independent living, assisted living, memory care, and respite care all in one place, which means you don't have to move if your needs change, and they have several care options for folks needing different types of help. The team there gets high praise for helping residents and their families, often noted for being both friendly and caring, and they provide around-the-clock care in memory care to folks who need it, covering things like assistance with daily tasks, bathing, and dressing. People living with Alzheimer's or dementia can take part in memory care programs that focus on safety, comfort, and support, with emergency alert systems and staff who know how to handle memory loss. Assisted living residents get help with daily things, but still have room to be independent, and there's always someone around if you need extra support.

    The community offers plenty of activities, from fitness and recreation amenities to social opportunities, with a focus on keeping folks as independent as possible, and there's a range of events to help residents stay connected, including through online platforms like Facebook and Instagram. Meadow Oaks of Roseville provides transportation for appointments and outings, so people can get around even if they don't drive anymore. The grounds have updated, homelike interiors, and the place aims to be as welcoming as possible, offering safety features, vibrant activities, family resources, and a setting where residents and their families tend to feel supported by the staff. Everything at Meadow Oaks of Roseville runs under the management of Integral Senior Living Management, LLC, and everything is set up to help seniors find comfort and companionship, whether for a short respite stay or for longer-term living.

    About Integral Senior Living

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville is managed by Integral Senior Living.

    Integral Senior Living (ISL), founded in 2002 and headquartered in Carlsbad, California, has emerged as a leading third-party management company specializing in senior independent living, assisted living, memory care, and new development properties. Managing 58 communities across 15 states including California, Oregon, Washington, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, Illinois, Tennessee, Alabama, Michigan, Missouri, and Florida, ISL ranks as the 20th largest senior living provider in the United States with annual revenues reaching $750 million.

    In 2023, ISL entered a transformative partnership with Discovery Senior Living through an investment by Lee Equity Partners and Coastwood Senior Housing Partners, creating the nation's fifth-largest senior housing operator. This strategic alliance positioned ISL as Discovery's largest vertically integrated senior living operator, managing over 113 communities within the Discovery family of companies. Together, Discovery Senior Living has become the largest privately held operator in the U.S., with a portfolio of nearly 35,000 units across 350 communities in almost 40 states, supported by more than 17,000 employees.

    ISL's care philosophy centers on fostering dignity and respect for residents while promoting their independence and individuality. Their person-centric approach is exemplified in programs like Generations Memory Care, where individuals are viewed as whole persons first rather than being defined by their conditions. The company delivers meaningful and vibrant life experiences through exceptional amenities, award-winning programs, chef-prepared meals, and expert care. This commitment extends to creating fulfilling work environments for associates, recognizing that employee satisfaction directly impacts resident care quality.

    The company's excellence has earned significant recognition, including 19 communities being named among the Best Senior Living Communities for 2024. Under the leadership of President and CEO Collette Gray, who received the 2025 McKnight's Senior Living Women of Distinction Lifetime Achievement Award and was inducted into the McKnight's Women of Distinction Hall of Honor in 2023, ISL has maintained its position as an industry leader. The partnership with Discovery has proven transformative for operations, enhancing support services, improving employee retention through enhanced benefits, and allowing both companies to leverage best practices while maintaining their unique cultures and programs.

    People often ask...

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $3,250 per month.

    Meadow Oaks of Roseville offers assisted living, memory care, and board and care.

    There are 45 photos of Meadow Oaks of Roseville on Mirador.

    The full address for this community is 930 Oak Ridge Dr, Roseville, CA 95661.

    No, Meadow Oaks of Roseville does not offer respite care. Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.

    Safety & Compliance

    In California, the Department of Social Services' Community Care Licensing Division licenses residential care facilities for the elderly, conducting inspections and investigating complaints.

    License number317005900
    StatusLicensed
    Facility typeResidential Care Elderly
    Capacity108 residents
    LicenseeROSEVILLE SH LLC; INTEGRAL SENIOR LIVING MGMT LLC
    EffectiveFebruary 29th, 2016
    View the official license record

    Inspection Reports

    74

    Reports

    17

    Type A Citations

    13

    Type B Citations

    27

    Complaints

    7

    Years

    30 Jun 2026Complaint
    Investigated a complaint about charges for services not provided and found no deficiencies.
    20 Mar 2026Complaint
    Found that the allegation of staff speaking inappropriately to residents was unfounded; call buttons were answered promptly, and the allegation that staff handled residents roughly was unfounded.
    26 Feb 2026Inspection
    Observed no deficiencies and found compliance with licensing requirements.
    15 Dec 2025Inspection
    Identified a lapse in arranging medical care after an unwitnessed fall, delaying treatment.
    • Type B87465(a)(1)
    25 Sept 2025Inspection
    Found no deficiencies were noted.
    19 Aug 2025Inspection
    Investigated a resident fall incident and found no deficiencies.
    22 May 2025Inspection
    Identified ongoing non-compliance issues related to medication errors and recordkeeping.
    10 Apr 2025Inspection
    Identified a medication error in which a resident received a discontinued hydrocodone and was later given tramadol, with lapses in communication and documentation noted.
    • Type A87456(a)(4)
    27 Mar 2025Inspection
    Identified a deficiency related to incidental medical and dental care, including assistance with self-administered medications.
    • Type B87465(a)(4)
    11 Mar 2025Inspection
    Identified that a resident with dementia exited through a patio area after the door alarm failed, resulting in an abrasion, and noted gaps in shift-to-shift communication and staffing to address safety needs.
    • Type A809-D
    13 Feb 2025Inspection
    Identified a deficiency about not immediately calling emergency services after an unwitnessed fall; it was amended and cleared. No new deficiencies were found.
    • Type A87469(c)(3)
    06 Feb 2025Inspection
    Identified significant deficiencies from May 2024 onward and discussed topics including administrator qualifications, personal rights, communications systems, staffing, and procedures.
    29 Jan 2025Inspection
    Identified that incidents and visits resulted in citations on 1/14/25 and 1/22/25, with no deficiencies noted.
    22 Jan 2025Inspection
    Found a deficiency where three of six resident appraisals were not signed as reviewed.
    • Type B87467(a)(3)
    22 Jan 2025Inspection
    Found that a resident's health changes were not regularly observed or reported to the physician, and prescribed medications were missed for three days, creating an immediate health risk.
    • Type A87468.2(a)
    14 Jan 2025Inspection
    Identified inadequate supervision and delayed medical response for a resident with ambulation needs, resulting in an unwitnessed fall and unreported incidents. Found gaps in policy and staff training contributing to ongoing safety risks.
    • Type A87468.2(a)(4)
    • Type A87405(h)(5)
    • Type B87211(a)(1)
    • Type B87303(a)
    30 Dec 2024Inspection
    Observed during a case management visit that no deficiencies were noted.
    14 Nov 2024Inspection
    Identified that a resident death notification was received and records were reviewed; no deficiencies were noted.
    06 Nov 2024Inspection
    Identified medication administration irregularities and a missing resident incident, and found there were not enough direct care staff to support residents’ safety needs. Civil penalties were applied.
    • Type A87705(c)(4)
    • Type A87465(a)(4)
    17 Sept 2024Inspection
    Identified that a resident left the property unsupervised, with monitoring gaps after 5 PM that created a safety risk due to staffing and supervision issues.
    • Type A87705(c)(4)
    13 Sept 2024Inspection
    Identified an immediate exclusion from all licensed facilities, barring the individual from work, living in, or contacting clients. The order directed removal of the individual from contact with clients and prohibited on-site presence.
    30 Aug 2024Complaint
    Investigated a complaint that staff did not ensure the resident's bathroom was clean and sanitary, but found insufficient evidence to prove the bathroom cleanliness issue.
    30 Aug 2024Inspection
    Observed follow-up on recent falls and a room-entry incident; no health or safety concerns were noted.
    12 Jun 2024Inspection
    Identified that a resident was forced to take medications by staff, with others restraining and covering the resident’s mouth to prevent refusal. The incident led to personnel actions and further investigation.
    • Type A87211(a)(5)(D)
    • Type A15630(b)(1)
    16 May 2024Inspection
    Investigated an incident involving a resident, interviewed six caregivers, and requested records; no deficiencies were noted.
    03 May 2024Inspection
    Identified an inadequate number of direct care staff to support residents with dementia, posing an immediate health and safety risk.
    • Type A87468.2(c)(4)
    21 Feb 2024Inspection
    Observed overall safety and medication practices were in order, and no deficiencies were cited.
    21 Feb 2024Inspection
    Investigated a narcotics-related incident involving a staff member signing off on a missing medication bubble pack; police were notified and an internal investigation plus narcotics-handling training were conducted.
    26 Oct 2023Complaint
    Investigated allegation that unlicensed staff administered Morphine to a hospice resident. Interviews and records indicated licensed hospice personnel and trained family members administered Morphine, with no evidence of improper administration by unlicensed staff.
    26 Oct 2023Inspection
    Investigated a missing narcotic bubble pack of 30 Tramadol 50mg not in the narcotic drawer on 09/10/2023; an internal investigation was conducted and the resident's doctor and the responsible party were notified.
    14 Sept 2023Complaint
    Investigated four allegations about care and access; findings indicated no violations.
    30 Aug 2023Complaint
    Investigated allegations of insufficient staffing and staff verbally abusing residents; found no preponderance of evidence to support either claim.
    29 Jun 2023Inspection
    Observed residents in the activity room participating in activities. No health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed, and the setting was found in substantial compliance.
    04 May 2023Inspection
    Investigated allegations that a staff member cussed and spoke rudely to residents; the staff member was suspended pending investigation.
    08 Mar 2023Inspection
    Found substantial compliance with health and safety standards during an unannounced visit; no deficiencies were cited.
    10 Feb 2023Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that staff did not adhere to the admission agreement; the allegation was unfounded.
    09 Feb 2023Inspection
    Observed no health, safety, or personal rights violations and found substantial compliance.
    28 Dec 2022Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that refunds were not issued as specified in the admission agreement and an allegation that staffing was inadequate to meet residents' needs.
    • Type B87507(f)
    08 Dec 2022Complaint
    Investigated allegations about a resident's room odor and related care. Odor control problems tied to incontinence were identified, resulting in a deficiency being issued.
    • Type B87625(b)(3)
    08 Dec 2022Inspection
    Found no immediate health, safety, or personal rights violations during a case-management health check and noted substantial compliance.
    01 Sept 2022Inspection
    Found residents engaged in activities; no health, safety, or personal rights violations were observed and the site was in substantial compliance.
    17 Aug 2022Complaint
    Investigated a complaint alleging issues with resident hygiene, incontinence care, staff supervision, food service, and pressure sores, and reviewed staff interviews and resident records.
    09 Jun 2022Inspection
    Observed no health, safety, or personal rights violations and found substantial compliance. No deficiencies were cited.
    07 Apr 2022Complaint
    Investigated staffing adequacy, adherence to COVID protocols, and rate notice. Findings showed no evidence to support the staffing allegation and the other two were unfounded.
    15 Feb 2022Inspection
    Found no health, safety, or personal rights violations and observed substantial compliance with infection-control protocols.
    21 Jan 2022Complaint
    Investigated allegations that a resident was physically abused and that staff did not treat residents with dignity and respect.
    • Type A87468.1(a)(3)
    • Type A87468.1(a)(1)
    02 Dec 2021Complaint
    Found lack of supervision that allowed a resident to wander away from the premises. Other allegations regarding notifying a responsible party and seeking timely medical attention were not supported.
    • Type A87466
    02 Dec 2021Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that a resident developed a pressure injury due to neglect; records and interviews did not establish neglect as the cause.
    20 Oct 2021Inspection
    Found no deficiencies; infection-control measures were in substantial compliance.
    27 Jul 2021Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that staff did not ensure a resident's colostomy bag was changed; records and interviews indicated the resident largely self-managed the bag with reminders, and there was no evidence of improper care.
    16 Jun 2021Complaint
    Investigated two complaints: one about staff not assisting a resident with hygiene and another about restricting a resident's visitors; findings indicated the allegations were unsubstantiated.
    28 May 2021Complaint
    Investigated allegations that staff failed to safeguard residents' personal belongings, caused an injury, and turned off a call button; found no credible evidence to support these claims.
    26 May 2021Inspection
    Observed that the administrator was holding the alleged perpetrator during an ongoing investigation. Licensing staff awaited more facts and the case required further investigation.
    08 May 2021Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that conditions were in despair and found that hallway and memory care unit lights were not working, creating safety concerns.
    • Type B87303(a)
    26 Apr 2021Complaint
    Identified issues in medication administration not aligned with physician orders and the lack of notification to the authorized representative about renewals.
    • Type A87465(a)(5)
    • Type A87468.1(a)(8)
    15 Feb 2021Complaint
    Investigated an allegation that a resident's room was malodorous and that basic services, including ADL assistance and routine cleaning, were not provided as required.
    • Type B87464(f)(1)
    01 Feb 2021Complaint
    Found that the allegation that a staff member was forced to work while COVID-19 positive or symptomatic after exposure was not supported by the information available.
    02 Dec 2020Complaint
    Found that a rate increase for a higher level of care was implemented without proper written notice to the resident's representative. Other billing-related allegations lacked supporting evidence.
    • Type B1569.657(a)
    26 Oct 2020Inspection
    Investigated an unusual incident in which a resident fell forward from a wheelchair in the courtyard, struck the head, and was sent to the emergency department, returning the same day with no new orders; resident is in memory care and on hospice, with monitoring in place, and no deficiencies cited.
    26 Oct 2020Inspection
    Found that a resident experienced chest pain, was evaluated in the ER, and returned the same day with the responsible party notified; an alert for 48 hours was established, and the resident was reported to be doing well. Requested physician records, needs and services plan, and discharge documents.
    26 Oct 2020Inspection
    Investigated an unusual incident in which a resident went to the ER with a broken right ankle after reportedly sitting on it; the resident had used an electric scooter prior to the incident, returned with a boot, a 48-hour alert was set, no surgery was required, and records including the physician report, needs and services plan, and discharge documents were requested; deficiencies were not cited.
    24 Jul 2020Complaint
    Investigated allegation of an uncleared adult present on 7/3/2020 and confirmed it was unfounded, with documentation showing the individual was suspended and terminated after failing to receive a criminal record clearance.
    09 Jul 2020Complaint
    Determined no issue with increased fees due to higher level of care for resident.
    03 Jul 2020Inspection
    Interview conducted regarding missing money from resident's wallet, no proof of theft at this time.
    01 Jul 2020Inspection
    Confirmed compliance with regulations and statutes governing the operation of an elderly care facility, with specific conditions and limitations outlined.
    13 May 2020Complaint
    Investigated allegations regarding staff falsifying medication records and mishandling resident medications; found both to be unfounded.
    25 Apr 2020Inspection
    Confirmed inappropriate behavior by a staff member towards a resident during continence care. Staff member has been terminated and will no longer have contact with residents.
    02 Apr 2020Inspection
    Investigated an alleged incident where a staff member potentially struck a memory care resident; the staff was suspended pending further inquiry with no deficiencies cited at the time.
    26 Feb 2020Inspection
    Reviewed a report of a case management visit conducted on February 26, 2020, regarding an earlier report about a resident's care; confirmed that the resident's needs were met, and no deficiencies were observed.
    • Type B87303(a)
    13 Feb 2020Inspection
    Confirmed compliance with health and safety regulations during inspection at the facility.
    29 Jan 2020Inspection
    Identified deficiencies in incident reporting and staff conduct during inspection.
    • Type B1569.657(a)
    09 Dec 2019Complaint
    Interviews and documentation found allegations of staff yelling at residents, forcing medication, and mishandling medication to be unsubstantiated.
    • Type B87464(f)(1)
    04 Nov 2019Complaint
    Reviewed a complaint alleging staff failed to administer a resident's medication; found inconclusive evidence to support the allegation after examining records and interviewing staff.
    22 Oct 2019Inspection
    Confirmed observation of inappropriate conduct by one resident in another resident's room, prompting increased monitoring by staff and notification to relevant parties.

    Disclaimer

    Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Meadow Oaks of Roseville. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Meadow Oaks of Roseville directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.

    Are you an owner or operator of Meadow Oaks of Roseville?

    Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.

    Nearby Communities

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 606 facilities$5,142/mo
    2. 469 facilities$5,165/mo
    3. 447 facilities$5,078/mo
    4. 287 facilities$5,299/mo
    5. 540 facilities$5,079/mo
    6. 256 facilities$5,167/mo
    7. 519 facilities$5,154/mo
    8. 175 facilities$5,274/mo
    9. 441 facilities$5,047/mo
    10. 450 facilities$5,112/mo
    11. 504 facilities$5,048/mo
    12. 218 facilities$5,164/mo
    © 2026 Mirador Living