Well-maintained, attractive grounds and courtyards
Bright, modern common spaces with abundant natural light
On-site movie theater and multiple libraries
Spacious apartments with full kitchens in many units
Memory-care design with secured unit and circular layout
Flexible month-to-month lease option
Three-level continuum of care (independent/assisted/memory)
Personalized medication knowledge among staff
Active gardening and outdoor-program opportunities
Hotel-like, country-club ambiance
Extensive transportation and scheduled excursions
Smooth move-in experience under some leadership
Clean, well-kept interiors and grounds
Concierge-style services and helpful front desk
Fitness classes and varied exercise programming
Cons
Inconsistent dining quality and meal-service execution
Chronic understaffing and high staff turnover
Communication and coordination gaps across leadership and care teams
Variability in housekeeping and service delivery
Inconsistent fulfillment of marketing and lease promises
Limited on-site clinical capacity for higher-acuity residents
Financial and billing transparency concerns, including ancillary/hidden fees
Large campus layout that can be overwhelming for some memory-care residents
Delays in responding to personal-care needs during staff shortages
Perceived operational emphasis on occupancy and revenue over individualized care
Summary of reviews
Overall impression: Courtyard at Mount Tabor consistently presents as a modern, attractive campus with many features that appeal to independent and socially active seniors. The facility's strengths include bright, well-maintained common areas, landscaped courtyards and gardening options, a movie theater and libraries, and a broad activity program with frequent outings. Many reviewers described the community as having a hotel- or country-club–like ambiance and praised cleanliness, spacious apartments (many with full kitchens), and proximity to Mt. Tabor Park.
Staff and care quality: Frontline caregivers, dining room servers, and activity staff receive frequent praise for kindness, personalized attention, and knowing residents by name. Several accounts describe smooth move-ins and individualized medication knowledge among staff. However, a persistent theme is staffing instability: high turnover, staffing shortages, and intermittent leadership changes have contributed to communication gaps, inconsistent follow-through on care plans, and occasional delays in personal-care response. For prospective residents with increasing clinical needs, multiple reviewers felt the community’s on-site clinical capacity and transfer-safety practices were not always sufficient, and some residents required higher-acuity care elsewhere.
Dining and housekeeping: Dining experiences vary across accounts. Many residents and visitors enjoyed restaurant-style options, ample portions, and specific strengths in menu variety and service. Conversely, a number of comments describe inconsistent meal quality, occasional cold or overprocessed entrées, limited specialized-menu options (for example, pescatarian or mechanical-soft adaptations), and variable execution during busy periods. Housekeeping and sanitation were generally described as good in many areas, but there are contradictory accounts indicating variability in laundry and housekeeping delivery, and at least one family indicated they paid for services they felt were not received. These mixed accounts suggest operational inconsistency in daily service delivery.
Activities and social life: The activity program is a clear asset for many residents: regular exercise classes (Tai Chi, morning exercise), scheduled excursions (shopping, beach trips, bowling, scenic tours), movie screenings, games, and social hours help sustain an active community life. At the same time, some residents—particularly those with dementia or limited mobility—found certain activities less engaging or encountered barriers to participation (quarantine limitations, transportation distances, or fewer updated unit options). Families considering memory care should assess how specific programming matches an individual’s cognitive and mobility profile.
Facilities and layout: The property is frequently described as bright, modern, and well-kept, with thoughtful design elements such as large windows, contained courtyards, garden boxes, and attractive hallways. That said, the community’s size and multi-building layout were noted as potential drawbacks for residents who prefer smaller, quieter settings or for those in memory care who may find larger campuses overwhelming. Parking and guest parking availability were mentioned as constrained at times.
Management and operations: Reviewers describe mixed experiences with leadership and administrative responsiveness. Positive accounts credit proactive new leadership and improvements in dining and communication; negative accounts cite inconsistent communication, billing and transparency issues, marketing or leasing promises that were not fully met, and a perceived emphasis on occupancy. These divergent experiences suggest operational variability tied to leadership transitions and staffing stability. Because financial considerations are significant—Medicaid is not accepted and some residents cited high ancillary fees—families should verify contract terms, fee schedules, and how the community handles transitions to higher levels of care.
Notable patterns and guidance for families: The dominant positive pattern is high-quality interpersonal care from direct-care staff and a robust activity and amenities package that supports an active lifestyle. The dominant concerns are operational: inconsistent dining and housekeeping, chronic staffing turnover, communication gaps, and occasional mismatch between advertised services and post-move realities. Prospective residents and families are advised to ask targeted questions about current staffing levels and turnover, sample the dining service, review the residency agreement for additional fees and billing practices, confirm clinical capabilities and transfer protocols for higher-acuity needs, and tour during multiple meal and activity times to gauge day-to-day consistency.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Courtyard at Mount Tabor.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Courtyard at Mount Tabor is located at 6125 SE Division St, Portland, OR, 97206.
About Courtyard at Mount Tabor
Courtyard At Mount Tabor sits in a quiet neighborhood in southeast Portland, Oregon, and has an average rating of 8.2 out of 10, which probably means most people feel good about the place but it's not perfect. The community is part of Integral Senior Living and offers a full range of care-independent living, assisted living, skilled nursing, memory care, adult day care, and even respite services-so folks can stay on the same campus as their needs change. The building offers studio, one-bedroom, and two-bedroom apartments, all with wood-style flooring, kitchens, laundry, generous closets, and either a patio or a balcony, plus bathrooms that have grab bars and an emergency alert system that helps with safety. Some apartments have private bathrooms, and there's weekly housekeeping and laundry for those who want it, so there's help with chores for folks who need it and help with activities of daily living when needed, especially in assisted living. Even the independent living folks can bring their pets if they want, with trails and parks nearby for walking.
The grounds stay well-kept with patios, wooden pergolas, plenty of plants, and a little water feature, so some folks like to sit out there, and there's a covered entrance with brick accents that makes the place feel calm and welcoming. They've got a dining room with comfortable seats and chandeliers where the staff serves daily meals, or smaller in-room dining if you want to eat in your apartment. There's a movie theater with soft chairs and popcorn, a fitness center with exercise equipment for keeping active, and places to gather like a piano room, communal lounge with a fireplace and chessboard, and a library for reading. Memory care offers special spaces focused on calm and comfort, and they use programs that try to match activities for people dealing with Alzheimer's or other dementias, so there's support and structure if needed.
A team of caregivers stays on site, tuning care plans to what each person really needs and keeping an eye on health and wellness. There's quick help for emergencies, and they offer home care services too for more support in the apartments. People living here find a mix of privacy and company, with both quiet corners and group activities like planned outings, exercise classes, games, and community committees. The staff seems to care about creating a good place to live and work, with an honest sense of support and warmth threading through the community. Residents and families can find resources about paying for care, help with insurance, veterans' benefits, and government programs like Medicare and Medicaid, as well as answers to common questions about moving into senior living. Families dealing with memory loss can join in on activities and get support, and there's a documentary, "Time to Get Ready," that shows real resident stories, which some find helpful.
With 199 beds and a variety of floor plans, Courtyard At Mount Tabor tries to match different needs without feeling too big or impersonal. Safety and social connections seem important here, with regular activities and events to help residents make new friends and stay engaged. Chef-prepared meals, transportation, housekeeping, maintenance, and concierge services take care of day-to-day needs, so folks can spend more time doing what they like, whether that's soaking in the hot tub, reading, working out, or joining in group outings. The community aims for a good mix of independence and support, so people can live as they wish but get extra help when health or memory needs change. No place is perfect, but Courtyard At Mount Tabor offers a steady choice for seniors looking for a welcoming, supportive, and adaptable place to live.
Founded in 1990 and headquartered in Irvine, California, MBK Senior Living operates 38 communities across six western states. As a subsidiary of Fortune 500 company Mitsui & Co., MBK offers independent living, assisted living, and memory care services. Their Japanese-inspired philosophy centers on three core values: Ageless Exploration, Better Together, and Reason for Being.
People often ask...
Courtyard at Mount Tabor offers independent living, assisted living, and memory care.
There are 74 photos of Courtyard at Mount Tabor on Mirador.
Yes, Courtyard at Mount Tabor allows residents to age in place and adjust their level of care as needed.
The full address for this community is 6125 SE Division St, Portland, OR 97206.
No, Courtyard at Mount Tabor does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Identified multiple deficiencies involving resident rights privacy, medication and treatment administration, staffing data accuracy, exterior safety, and restrictions on resident activities.
Deficiency—Resident Rights and Protection - General
Found insufficient qualified awake direct care staff to meet 24-hour needs.
Licensing—Failed to staff as indicated by ABST
06 Mar 2026Inspection
06 Mar 2026Inspection
Found that records were not provided to the Department upon request, violating Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
22 Dec 2025Abuse: Neglect
22 Dec 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated abuse by neglect alleging a failure to provide a safe environment and found safety wasn't maintained, leading to resident altercations. A fine was assessed as part of the sanction.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Dec 2025Kitchen
11 Dec 2025Kitchen
Identified deficiencies in kitchen sanitation practices and administration compliance; food sanitation rules and licensing requirements were not met.
Found that records were not provided upon request.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
21 Aug 2025Inspection
21 Aug 2025Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to provide service and found a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
19 Mar 2025Inspection
19 Mar 2025Inspection
Found that records were not accessible to the Department upon request.
Licensing—Failed to make facility or resident records accessible
17 Mar 2025Inspection
17 Mar 2025Inspection
Investigated the allegation that records were not provided in response to a department request; findings indicate a failure to provide records constitutes a violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to cooperate with an investigation
06 Mar 2025Inspection
06 Mar 2025Inspection
Investigated the allegation that records were not provided upon request and found a violation.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
27 Feb 2025Complaint
27 Feb 2025Complaint
Identified deficiencies in compliance with applicable state rules, with potential for moderate harm.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
27 Feb 2025Complaint
27 Feb 2025Complaint
Investigated a complaint and found that medication orders were not carried out for 1 resident, with MAR documentation showing a scheduled Olanzapine dose was mis-entered as and treated as PRN.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
26 Feb 2025Inspection
26 Feb 2025Inspection
Found that a caregiver failed to maintain a safe environment for a memory-care resident, resulting in neglect and abuse. The safety oversight in supervision failed.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Feb 2025Inspection
05 Feb 2025Inspection
Found that service was not provided to the alleged victim. This violated Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
05 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
05 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found violations for failing to properly plan care around a resident's fall history, leading to multiple unwitnessed falls and related injuries.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
04 Feb 2025Kitchen
04 Feb 2025Kitchen
Identified deficiencies in kitchen sanitation practices and administration compliance. Documented significant cleaning issues and cross-referenced rule violations.
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
26 Dec 2024Kitchen
26 Dec 2024Kitchen
Identified multiple sanitation and administration deficiencies, with ongoing concerns about relicensing and repeated violations related to food safety and facility maintenance across multiple visits.
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
23 Dec 2024Inspection
23 Dec 2024Inspection
Investigated an allegation and found failure to provide service to the Alleged Victim.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
28 Aug 2024Inspection
28 Aug 2024Inspection
Determined that nursing delegation and teaching requirements were not met.
Licensing—Failed to comply with nursing delegation requirement
13 Aug 2024Inspection
13 Aug 2024Inspection
Determined a violation for failing to administer medication as ordered. The finding indicated a medication administration issue occurred.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
27 Jul 2024Inspection
27 Jul 2024Inspection
Found that a resident did not receive a safe environment. An employee failed to secure the door, enabling the resident to exit and be intercepted outside, indicating neglect and abuse.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
16 Jul 2024Abuse: Neglect
16 Jul 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found that staff did not promptly respond to a resident's call light, resulting in abuse and neglect; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
07 Jun 2024License Condition
07 Jun 2024License Condition
Found deficiencies in care planning. The allegation concerned failure to provide service.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide service
24 May 2024Abuse: Neglect
24 May 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system, which led to a fall and injuries.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
24 May 2024Abuse: Neglect
24 May 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a care plan noncompliance that left a resident unattended in the shower, resulting in falls and injuries on two days; a $500 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
17 May 2024Inspection
17 May 2024Inspection
Determined that the alleged failure to provide service occurred, with potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
03 May 2024License Condition
03 May 2024License Condition
Investigated the allegation of failing to provide a safe environment and identified a deficiency for not providing needed/necessary services.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide safe environment
03 Apr 2024Abuse: Neglect
03 Apr 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment that led to bruising and a broken bed, with a $250 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
31 Jan 2024Licensure
31 Jan 2024Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meal service and food sanitation requirements; no deficiencies cited.
Deficiency—Comment
31 Jan 2024Licensure
31 Jan 2024Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meal service and food sanitation requirements. No deficiencies were cited.
Deficiency—Comment
31 Jan 2024Licensure
31 Jan 2024Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meal service and food sanitation rules; found no deficiencies.
Deficiency—Comment
30 Jan 2024Validation
30 Jan 2024Validation
Found multiple deficiencies related to service plans, infection control, medication administration, training, safety alarms, and outdoor area policies.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Systems: Medication Administration
Deficiency—Staffing Rqmt and Training: Training Rqmts
Deficiency—Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff
Deficiency—Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, Tv, Or Cable
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance With Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Secure Outdoor Recreation Area
13 Dec 2023Abuse: Neglect
13 Dec 2023Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found failures to complete medical assessments and obtain physician orders before admission, and to provide prescribed pain medications, resulting in pain and distress including suicidal ideation. The resident was sent to hospital for treatment before returning with proper orders and medications.
Abuse—Failed to provide appropriate pain control
12 Dec 2023Inspection
12 Dec 2023Inspection
Investigated and found neglect and abuse due to failing to assist with changing a soiled brief, causing the resident to wait about four hours and experience discomfort.
Licensing—Failed to provide peri care
09 Nov 2023Complaint
09 Nov 2023Complaint
Investigated deficiencies found: the staffing plan was not posted and quarterly service plans for residents were incomplete or missing key details.
Identified a failure to provide a safe medication administration system that caused pain and anxiety for a resident; found neglect and abuse with a $250 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to administer medication as ordered
07 Oct 2023Abuse: Neglect
07 Oct 2023Abuse: Neglect
Found abuse by neglect due to a resident exiting through a locked door and unresponsive staff; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
07 Sept 2023License Condition
07 Sept 2023License Condition
Identified that an acuity-based staffing tool was not used as required.
Regulatory Action—Failed to use an ABST
06 Sept 2023License Condition
06 Sept 2023License Condition
Found that the provider failed to implement an acuity-based staffing tool meeting the regulation.
Regulatory Action—Failed to use an ABST
08 Aug 2023Validation
08 Aug 2023Validation
Identified extensive deficiencies across abuse reporting, service planning, health services, medication management, staffing, and safety. Findings showed numerous regulatory noncompliances in multiple areas over several visits.
Deficiency—Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
Deficiency—Resident Health Services
Deficiency—Rn Delegation and Teaching
Deficiency—Res Hlth Srvc: On- and Off-Site Health Srvc
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
Deficiency—Systems: Resident Right to Refuse
Deficiency—Systems: Medication Administration
Deficiency—Systems: Self-Administration of Meds
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training – Pre-Serv
Deficiency—Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff
Deficiency—Annual and Biennial Inservice For All Staff
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—House Keeping and Sanitation
07 Aug 2023Validation
07 Aug 2023Validation
Determined the facility had numerous deficiencies across administration, health services, nutrition, behavior management, and safety; corrective actions followed, and final assessment showed substantial compliance.
Deficiency—Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
Deficiency—Resident Health Services
Deficiency—Rn Delegation and Teaching
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Systems: Medications and Treatments
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
Deficiency—Systems: Resident Right to Refuse
Deficiency—Systems: Medication Administration
Deficiency—Systems: Psychotropic Medication
Deficiency—Administrator Qualification and Requirements
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
Deficiency—Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—Housekeeping and Laundry
Deficiency—Administration Responsibilities
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance With Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Nutrition and Hydration
Deficiency—Activities
Deficiency—Behavior
07 Aug 2023Inspection
07 Aug 2023Inspection
Found failure to post and maintain daily staffing documentation.
Licensing—Failed to properly post and maintain daily staffing documentation
07 Aug 2023Inspection
07 Aug 2023Inspection
Found that quarterly service plans were not completed.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
21 Jul 2023Inspection
21 Jul 2023Inspection
Investigated and concluded that a staff member stole a resident's narcotic pain medication, resulting in unmanaged pain. The staff member's actions constitute neglect and abuse, and the provider failed to protect the resident from neglect.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Jul 2023Inspection
21 Jul 2023Inspection
Determined that a staff member stole a resident's alcohol, constituting financial exploitation and abuse, and that the resident was not protected from exploitation.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
21 Jul 2023Inspection
21 Jul 2023Inspection
Investigated allegations of theft and financial exploitation and found that a staff member admitted stealing alcohol from residents and protections failed to prevent theft.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
21 Jul 2023Inspection
21 Jul 2023Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found that a staff member stole alcohol from residents and drank during shifts, and protections against theft were inadequate, constituting financial exploitation.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
21 Jul 2023Inspection
21 Jul 2023Inspection
Investigated and found that a staff member stole alcohol from residents and drank on shift, constituting financial exploitation; residents were not protected from theft.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
21 Jul 2023Inspection
21 Jul 2023Inspection
Investigated and determined that a staff member stole a resident's alcohol and narcotic pain medication, constituting financial exploitation and a failure to protect the resident.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
01 Jun 2023Inspection
01 Jun 2023Inspection
Found violations for failing to submit timely staffing documentation and to report vaccination information to the proper authority.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
26 May 2023License Condition
26 May 2023License Condition
Investigated the allegation of not using an ABST and found failure to implement ABST as required.
Regulatory Action—Failed to use an ABST
23 May 2023Inspection
23 May 2023Inspection
Found failure to complete quarterly service plans. This reflects a deficiency in care planning.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
01 May 2023Inspection
01 May 2023Inspection
Identified a licensing violation for failing to submit timely weekly vaccination reporting for staff, residents, and vaccinated individuals for 30 days.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
28 Mar 2023Complaint
28 Mar 2023Complaint
Found deficiencies in implementing an acuity-based staffing tool and addressing all resident care tasks.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
26 Jan 2023Licensure
26 Jan 2023Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meals and food sanitation requirements.
Deficiency—Comment
26 Jan 2023Licensure
26 Jan 2023Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with state rules governing meals and food sanitation. No deficiencies cited.
Deficiency—Comment
26 Jan 2023Licensure
26 Jan 2023Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meal service and sanitation requirements.
Deficiency—Comment
01 Dec 2022Inspection
01 Dec 2022Inspection
Found that the licensee failed to submit timely weekly reporting of vaccination data for residents and staff to the proper authority. The finding covered November 1–30, 2022.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
01 Oct 2022Inspection
01 Oct 2022Inspection
Investigated and found failure to submit timely weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff to the proper authority for 30 days.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
17 Sept 2022Inspection
17 Sept 2022Inspection
Investigated found staff failed to assess pain and monitor a resident after changes in condition, contributing to an injury.
Licensing—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
24 Feb 2022Inspection
24 Feb 2022Inspection
Investigated the allegation that the service plan did not reflect residents' needs and was not updated at move-in, 30 days, and quarterly; the issue was verified.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
24 Feb 2022Inspection
24 Feb 2022Inspection
Found that required postings, including staffing plan and manager on duty, were not posted in a routinely accessible and conspicuous location for residents and visitors as required.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Sept 2021Abuse: Neglect
23 Sept 2021Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that care plan was not followed to keep residents safe, resulting in neglect and abuse due to an unwitnessed altercation.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
07 Sept 2021Inspection
07 Sept 2021Inspection
Investigated the complaint and found insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs, resulting in delayed responses to call lights.
Licensing—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
12 May 2021Abuse: Neglect
12 May 2021Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an abuse/neglect allegation and found failure to properly care plan for a resident's known behaviors, placing residents and staff at risk.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
13 Dec 2020Inspection
13 Dec 2020Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found that a staff member photographed a resident during a bed bath and sent the image to another staff member, and the provider failed to protect the resident from emotional abuse.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from mental or emotional abuse
03 Jun 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
03 Jun 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated an allegation of verbal/mental abuse and found neglect that caused significant emotional harm to the resident.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
12 Jul 2018Inspection
12 Jul 2018Inspection
Concluded that the allegation of physical abuse by a caregiver during care caused injury.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
07 Mar 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
07 Mar 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
Found that residents were not protected from theft.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
23 Feb 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
23 Feb 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
Determined that a resident was not protected from financial exploitation. The finding was substantiated.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
22 Oct 2015Inspection
22 Oct 2015Inspection
Investigated the resident rights allegation and found inadequate protection from inappropriate comments or actions.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
10 Oct 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
10 Oct 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
Determined that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
25 Sept 2015Inspection
25 Sept 2015Inspection
Found that a safe environment was not provided.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Dec 2014Abuse: Neglect
18 Dec 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint and found a failure to monitor resident falls. Assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Apr 2014Inspection
20 Apr 2014Inspection
Found a violation involving inappropriate verbal comments that failed to protect RV's rights.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
24 Mar 2014Abuse: Neglect
24 Mar 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found failure to provide appropriate care by not responding promptly to a call light.
Abuse—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
08 Mar 2014Inspection
08 Mar 2014Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found a deficiency in maintaining a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
05 Jan 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
05 Jan 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated the allegation of financial abuse and found the environment was not secure.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
10 Dec 2011Abuse: Neglect
10 Dec 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found a deficiency related to falls care planning and resident safety. The finding was substantiated.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
21 Nov 2011Abuse: Financial abuse
21 Nov 2011Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a failure to protect residents from theft.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 Jul 2011Abuse: Neglect
13 Jul 2011Abuse: Neglect
Cited a deficiency for failing to assess and intervene to keep the resident safe from falls, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
10 Jul 2011Abuse: Financial abuse
10 Jul 2011Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated and found a failure to protect a resident from financial exploitation and theft.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
22 Mar 2011Abuse: Physical Abuse
22 Mar 2011Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated the allegation of rough treatment and found that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
03 Mar 2011Inspection
03 Mar 2011Inspection
Investigated an allegation that medication was not administered as ordered and identified an inadequate medication system.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
30 Sept 2010Abuse: Neglect
30 Sept 2010Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an abuse/neglect allegation and found failure to provide appropriate care and to follow a clear care plan.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
27 Sept 2010Inspection
27 Sept 2010Inspection
Found that resident rights were not assured and safety for RV was not maintained.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
27 Sept 2010Inspection
27 Sept 2010Inspection
Found a deficiency in the medication administration process, specifically that a PRN dose was not given as ordered, posing potential harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Courtyard at Mount Tabor. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Courtyard at Mount Tabor directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of Courtyard at Mount Tabor?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
