I'm very pleased with my experience at Regency Park. The staff were warm, caring and responsive, management made move-in smooth (Levi was especially helpful), and the memory-care team was attentive. The building is beautiful and hotel-like with lovely gardens and a peaceful courtyard, rooms felt like apartments, dining was restaurant-style with good meals, and there are daily activities, live entertainment and outings that keep residents engaged. It's clean, comfortable, and I'd confidently recommend it to other families.
Loved one of resident
Jul 2026
Pricing
Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Schedule a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Coordination with health care providers
Hospice waiver
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Healthcare staffing
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Restaurant-style dining
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Air-conditioning
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wifi
Memory care community services
Dementia waiver
Mild cognitive impairment
Specialized memory care programming
Transportation
Community operated transportation
Transportation arrangement
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Common areas
Beauty salon
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Gaming room
Garden
Outdoor space
Small library
Wellness center
Community services
Concierge services
Fitness programs
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Planned day trips
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
4.09·(128)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
3.8
Staff
4.0
Meals
3.4
Amenities
4.0
Value
2.5
Pros
Modern, recently remodeled building
Spacious, airy apartments
Comfortable bistro and common seating areas
Restaurant-style dining room
Varied, nutrition-aware menus
Pet-friendly environment
Secure, two-level Memory Care unit
Engaging activity program (outings, live entertainment, exercise)
On-site fitness and gym amenities
Attractive outdoor spaces and gardens
Apartment-style layouts with decorating freedom
Helpful and compassionate caregiving staff
Responsive maintenance and operations personnel
Convenient location near hospital and freeway access
Separate laundry practices for Memory Care
Free Wi‑Fi and cable included
Flexible meal options and snack availability
Positive social atmosphere and opportunities to form friendships
On-site medical contracting and gerontology NP involvement
Smooth move-in and admissions experience (frequently noted)
Cons
Inconsistent staffing levels and elevated staff turnover
Gaps in personal-care scheduling (infrequent or irregular bathing)
Medication-administration controls and clinical oversight
Inconsistent meal quality and uneven dietary-accommodation practices
Limited or cancelled activities in some units, especially Memory Care
Communication and inter-shift message-relay gaps
Variable housekeeping and sanitation practices
Limited availability of therapy services (PT/OT) and clinical monitoring
Inadequate staff engagement time with residents during shifts
Emergency-power continuity limitations
High entrance fees and private-pay-only financing model
Mismatch between contracted care level and delivered services
Gaps in fall-prevention and safety-practice consistency
Perceived management disorganization and uneven responsiveness
Summary of reviews
Regency Park presents as a well-appointed, recently remodeled senior community with many physical and programmatic strengths. The building, common spaces and outdoor grounds are frequently described as clean, modern, and comfortable; apartments are noted as spacious and customizable, and dining areas are restaurant‑style. The community offers a wide activity slate—exercise classes, live entertainment, bus outings, bingo and social hours—and several reviews highlight a lively social environment and opportunities for new friendships. Proximity to a hospital and on-site medical contracting, plus occasional geriatric-NP involvement, are additional practical assets for families seeking accessible medical support.
Care quality and staffing generate mixed but consistent themes. Numerous accounts praise attentive, compassionate caregivers and long-tenured nursing staff who tailor care to resident preferences; maintenance and certain staff members are repeatedly singled out for responsiveness. Conversely, other accounts describe understaffing, high turnover and instances where staff availability and engagement were limited (for example, staff occupied with phones or not present in communal spaces). These patterns have been associated with gaps in personal-care scheduling (notably irregular bathing), uneven clinical oversight, and concerns about medication-administration controls. There are also mentions of inconsistent clinical services such as physical or occupational therapy availability and variable follow-through on individualized care plans.
Dining and nutrition are similarly inconsistent across experiences. Many reviewers describe appealing, varied, nutrition-aware menus and attentive dining service; others cite bland or low-quality meals, initial meal-preparation issues, and failures to accommodate specific dietary restrictions reliably. The facility has adapted in some cases (for example, modifying menu formats), but families should confirm allergy and special-diet protocols during tour and admission.
Activity offerings and social programming are a clear strength for much of the community, with an extensive calendar in Assisted Living and frequent outings, exercise and entertainment. However, activity frequency and cancellations—particularly in the Memory Care unit—are recurring concerns. Those evaluating Regency Park should assess the Memory Care schedule and daily programming in person, since engagement levels appear to vary by unit and by staffing on a given day.
Operational and management patterns warrant attention. Several reviewers cite communication issues: inter-shift handoffs, message relay, and family updates are described as inconsistent. Administrative experiences vary from smooth, responsive admissions to instances of unapproachable or disorganized management, and some families raise concerns about high entrance fees and a private-pay-only financing model. Emergency preparedness has been noted as limited in at least one account (generator capacity and meal modifications during power outages), suggesting prospective residents verify contingency plans.
Overall, Regency Park offers many attributes families seek—modern facilities, robust social programming, proximity to medical care, and frequently compassionate staff—but reviewer experiences indicate variability in operational consistency. The dominant patterns to evaluate during a visit are staffing stability and ratios (especially in Memory Care), medication and clinical oversight procedures, dietary-accommodation protocols, housekeeping and sanitation routines, activity continuity, and financial/contractual terms. Prospective residents and families should tour multiple units, observe daily routines, ask for recent staffing and activity schedules, and obtain written policies on dietary accommodations, medication administration, emergency power, and refundability of fees to align expectations with the facility’s variable performance profile.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Regency Park.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Regency Park is located at 8300 SW Barnes Rd, Portland, OR, 97225.
About Regency Park
Regency Park Assisted Living and Memory Care is nestled in Portland’s West Hills, offering a community that emphasizes both vibrant assisted living and specialized memory care. For decades, the long-tenured team at Regency Park has provided a comforting environment where residents can enjoy an active lifestyle, individualized support, and the distinct character of one of Portland’s most desirable neighborhoods. The community is ideally situated just minutes away from parks, entertainment venues, shopping, restaurants, places of worship, and local medical centers, ensuring convenience and enriching opportunities for its residents.
Designed with flexibility and comfort in mind, Regency Park provides a variety of apartment choices, including studios and one- or two-bedroom units in assisted living, as well as companion, companion deluxe, private studio, and private one-bedroom suites in memory care. Rentals are available on a monthly basis with no substantial buy-in required, making the transition to senior living more accessible. Thoughtful amenities and services are included, such as meals prepared by a passionate culinary team, a robust social calendar, housekeeping, maintenance, and personalized daily support. This allows residents to devote more time to enjoying life, whether they’re participating in community activities or relaxing in the beautiful, park-like setting that gives Regency Park its home-like ambiance.
Regency Park is particularly noted for its Mosaic Memory Care Program, an exclusive initiative that draws upon decades of best practices and research. This program acknowledges and celebrates the unique lives of every resident, supporting not only their present needs but honoring who they have always been. The focus is on meaningful engagement, encouraging socialization and the pursuit of favorite activities throughout the day. Personalized assistance is available around the clock, setting a standard for attentive and compassionate care within a safe and functional environment.
A sense of belonging and genuine community is at the heart of the Regency Park experience. Many members of the staff have been committed to the community for years, building warm relationships with residents and families. From the culinary staff—like Robert, who brings his love of cooking and tradition to the dining room and monthly Chef’s Chat—to the care partners and maintenance team, every staff member is empowered to contribute to a supportive and joyful atmosphere. Leadership values input from those who know the residents best, fostering a culture of respect and continuous improvement.
Regency Park accommodates a range of needs, from short-term respite stays offering a sample of the community, to long-term assisted living and memory care. Couples with different care requirements have the opportunity to stay close, supported by tailored services. The community’s approach champions independence, dignity, and the small daily moments that make a profound difference—whether it’s a friendly greeting, listening with sincere interest, or celebrating individual achievements. Life at Regency Park is truly about enriching the lives of seniors, empowering them to pursue each day with a renewed sense of purpose and comfort, amid familiar surroundings and a dedicated team.
Founded by four experienced partners, Cascade Living Group is a privately-owned senior living provider headquartered in Bothell, Washington. Operating 31 communities across Oregon, Nevada, California, Washington, and Arizona, they offer assisted living, independent living, and memory care services.
People often ask...
Regency Park offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $6,030 per month.
Regency Park offers assisted living and memory care.
There are 36 photos of Regency Park on Mirador.
The full address for this community is 8300 SW Barnes Rd, Portland, OR 97225.
No, Regency Park does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Investigated the complaint and found that prescribed medications were not carried out as prescribed. Missed doses included Amiodarone and Levothyroxine.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
19 Dec 2025Inspection
19 Dec 2025Inspection
Identified a monitoring deficiency for changes in condition; a resident's left elbow skin tear was not followed up.
Licensing—Failed to provide oversight and monitoring of change of condition
11 Nov 2025Inspection
11 Nov 2025Inspection
Found that the care plan was not followed, resulting in potential harm and violations related to resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
08 Sept 2025License Condition
08 Sept 2025License Condition
Determined that residents' scheduled and unscheduled needs were not met because an acuity-based staffing tool was not fully implemented or updated as required. Violations cited against staffing and acuity-related rules.
Regulatory Action—Failed to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents
21 Aug 2025Kitchen
21 Aug 2025Kitchen
Identified sanitation and infection-control deficiencies: the kitchen was not maintained to food-safety standards, and there was no designated Infection Control Specialist with required training.
Investigated a failure to provide a safe environment and found a resident with known exit-seeking behavior unattended outside near a busy road, creating risk of harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
12 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
12 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
Identified neglect and abuse from not following the care plan, which led to a fall and injuries; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
18 Feb 2025Complaint
18 Feb 2025Complaint
Investigated the complaint and identified deficiencies related to treatment orders and staffing with potential for moderate harm.
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Acuity Based Staffing Tool - Updates & Plan
16 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
16 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a fall incident involving a known fall risk resident and found the care plan was not followed, resulting in neglect and abuse. The resident was found on the floor without socks or an assistive device, sustaining a skin tear; a $250 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
16 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
16 Jan 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment that led to an unwitnessed fall and bruise.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
10 Nov 2024Abuse: Neglect
10 Nov 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a safety-related concern and found inadequate oversight left a known fall risk with repeated falls, indicating abuse/neglect and resulting in a fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Sept 2024Abuse: Neglect
20 Sept 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found that staff failed to follow the care plan and perform timely safety checks, resulting in falls and neglect; a $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Sept 2024Kitchen
18 Sept 2024Kitchen
Identified deficiencies in kitchen sanitation and administration compliance. Noted extensive cleaning needs and licensing rule noncompliance.
Found a safety environment deficiency when a resident exited through an open courtyard gate and sustained scratches; neglect and abuse cited.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
30 May 2024Inspection
30 May 2024Inspection
Investigated the abuse reporting allegation; found that the licensee failed to immediately notify the local Department office or the local AAA of any incident of abuse or suspected abuse, and failed to report falls.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
14 Mar 2024Inspection
14 Mar 2024Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found an outdated ABST that did not reflect residents’ care needs, with inconsistencies among the roster, care plans, and ABST.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
09 Mar 2024Inspection
09 Mar 2024Inspection
Investigated the complaint and found that medication orders weren't carried out, resulting in residents not receiving evening medications.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Mar 2024Inspection
01 Mar 2024Inspection
Determined that safe medication administration practices were not followed, compromising patient safety.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
28 Feb 2024Inspection
28 Feb 2024Inspection
Found violations for failing to administer medications as ordered.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found a violation for failing to provide a safe environment, constituting abuse and neglect. A $169 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
25 Feb 2024Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the safety allegation and found that a resident was attacked by a known individual on multiple dates, constituting neglect and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
24 Feb 2024Inspection
24 Feb 2024Inspection
Investigated a complaint that potential or suspected abuse was not reported promptly and found a violation of reporting requirements.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
09 Feb 2024Inspection
09 Feb 2024Inspection
Investigated the allegation of non-cooperation and found that records were not provided. This resulted in a substantiated violation of Oregon Administrative Rules.
Licensing—Failed to cooperate with an investigation
22 Jan 2024Complaint
22 Jan 2024Complaint
Investigated a licensure complaint about treatment orders; noted a severity level of 2 and a scope of isolated/minimal harm or potential for moderate harm.
Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
30 Nov 2023Inspection
30 Nov 2023Inspection
Investigated a medication administration allegation and found that medication orders were not carried out as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
29 Oct 2023Abuse: Neglect
29 Oct 2023Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint that a resident was transferred without the required two-person assistance, resulting in a facial bruise; found failure to follow the care plan and training documentation was lacking.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
03 Oct 2023Validation
03 Oct 2023Validation
Identified multiple deficiencies in service planning, nursing delegation, infection control, fire safety, building maintenance, and plumbing, with substantial compliance found after follow-up.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Rn Delegation and Teaching
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Found that the facility failed to implement and use an acuity-based staffing tool as required.
Regulatory Action—Failed to use an ABST
11 Sept 2023Validation
11 Sept 2023Validation
Identified multiple deficiencies in resident care, evaluations, service planning, infection control, staffing, and safety processes; later found to be in substantial compliance on a subsequent revisit.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Resident Services: Adls
Deficiency—Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
Deficiency—Doors, Walls, Elevators, Odors
Deficiency—Plumbing Systems
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
Deficiency—Compliance With Rules Health Care
Deficiency—Activities
01 May 2023Inspection
01 May 2023Inspection
Investigated and determined that a staff member did not follow the care plan during a transfer, causing a skin tear. The care plan mandated two-person assistance with a gait belt.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
30 Jan 2023Licensure
30 Jan 2023Licensure
Identified deficiencies in food sanitation and administration compliance, including unlabeled foods, temperature control problems, glove hygiene lapses, and damaged storage areas. Findings reflect violations of state food safety rules and licensing requirements.
Found sanitation issues in the kitchen and storage areas, including debris on equipment, unlabeled foods, and improper glove use. A follow-up visit concluded substantial compliance with applicable food sanitation rules.
Investigated and found a failure to submit timely or adequate weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents and staff to the proper authority, ongoing for 30 days.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
29 Nov 2022Abuse: Neglect
29 Nov 2022Abuse: Neglect
Found violations for failing to follow the resident's care plan, leaving a dim room and the resident barefoot, which led to toe injuries.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
02 May 2022Inspection
02 May 2022Inspection
Found that weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents, and staff to the proper authority was not submitted timely.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
09 Mar 2022Abuse: Neglect
09 Mar 2022Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system, resulting in missed doses and a hospital transport. This was identified as abuse and neglect.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
29 Dec 2021Inspection
29 Dec 2021Inspection
Investigated the complaint and found that resident medications were not administered for four days.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
02 Apr 2021Inspection
02 Apr 2021Inspection
Investigated a medication safety violation and found that medication was placed on hold but later administered, risking harm; identified abuse and neglect and a failure to maintain a safe medication administration system.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
25 Mar 2021Inspection
25 Mar 2021Inspection
Investigated a medication administration error where a resident received another resident's medication and found a safety violation related to unsafe medication practices.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
01 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in seven unwitnessed falls and a knee abrasion.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
23 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment by not following the resident's care plan, resulting in a fall with minor injuries; a $375 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
22 Oct 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint and found a failure to provide a safe environment, resulting in neglect and abuse after an individual unsafely left the premises without assistance.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 Aug 2020Abuse: Neglect
02 Aug 2020Abuse: Neglect
Identified a violation for neglect due to failure to provide a safe environment when a resident left without staff assistance and was returned by law enforcement.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Feb 2020Abuse: Neglect
26 Feb 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found that the care plan was not followed, leading to unwitnessed falls and injuries. A fine of $375 was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
09 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
09 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the complaint and found that care plan requirements were not followed, resulting in neglect and potential harm; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
10 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
10 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect and abuse for failing to follow the care plan, leading to pressure ulcers on heels and redness near the coccyx.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
09 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
09 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care and abuse due to failure to follow a resident's care plan, leading to dehydration and hospitalization; a $500 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
12 Oct 2019Inspection
12 Oct 2019Inspection
Concluded that a staff member used profanity toward a resident and that a safe environment was not provided for the resident.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
12 Oct 2019Inspection
12 Oct 2019Inspection
Found that a caregiver verbally abused a resident and failed to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
12 Oct 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
12 Oct 2019Abuse: Verbal/Mental abuse
Investigated an allegation of verbal/mental abuse and failure to provide a safe environment; findings indicated neglect and risk of serious harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
26 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care due to failing to follow the care plan and provide a safe environment. This resulted in a second injury fall within two months.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
03 Dec 2017Inspection
03 Dec 2017Inspection
Determined the allegation of failing to administer medication as ordered. Found deficiencies in medication management.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
14 Feb 2017Inspection
14 Feb 2017Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment and a failure to follow the care plan.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
29 Oct 2016Abuse: Neglect
29 Oct 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to provide a safe environment and assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Sept 2016Abuse: Neglect
18 Sept 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
26 Aug 2016Inspection
26 Aug 2016Inspection
Found a deficiency in providing a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
21 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
21 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of abuse/neglect and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
03 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
03 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
15 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
15 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 Jul 2016Inspection
13 Jul 2016Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The allegation of failing to properly plan care was identified.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
05 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
05 Jul 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found violations of care planning and of providing a safe environment, and assessed a $300 fine.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
25 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
25 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of failure to properly plan care and found a deficiency in providing a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
20 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
20 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
Identified violations for failing to provide a safe environment and assessed a $250 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
05 Jun 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect related to safety and found a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
19 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
19 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation of neglect and found a failure to properly plan care leading to an unsafe environment.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
13 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
13 May 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a safety deficiency in providing a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
12 May 2016Abuse: Physical Abuse
12 May 2016Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated abuse allegation; concluded there was a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from rough treatment
26 Apr 2016Abuse: Financial abuse
26 Apr 2016Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a safety deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Apr 2016Abuse: Neglect
22 Apr 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found substantiated neglect and failure to properly plan care, resulting in an unsafe environment, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
21 Mar 2016Abuse: Neglect
21 Mar 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of care related to falls and assessed a $350 fine.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
19 Feb 2016Inspection
19 Feb 2016Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Feb 2016Abuse: Neglect
08 Feb 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found an inadequate medication system that could lead to harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
24 Nov 2015Inspection
24 Nov 2015Inspection
Found failure to provide a safe environment due to not assessing and intervening.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Oct 2015Abuse: Neglect
20 Oct 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Mar 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
23 Mar 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
Determined that the resident's financial exploitation allegation was substantiated and that the provider failed to protect the resident from theft.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
23 Jan 2015Inspection
23 Jan 2015Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The finding was substantiated.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
07 Jul 2014Abuse: Neglect
07 Jul 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment. The finding involved neglect with potential for minor to moderate harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
27 Jun 2014Abuse: Neglect
27 Jun 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect related to failing to address resident behavior and to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
29 May 2014Abuse: Neglect
29 May 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found a failure to provide a safe environment, with a $300 fine assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
13 Jan 2014Abuse: Financial abuse
13 Jan 2014Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment. Also substantiated a financial abuse allegation.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 May 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
02 May 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated a safety complaint and found safeguards against theft were inadequate, leaving an RV unprotected.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 May 2013Abuse: Neglect
02 May 2013Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to provide a safe environment. This involved a neglect issue with potential for moderate harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
19 Feb 2013Inspection
19 Feb 2013Inspection
Investigated and found deficiencies related to failing to answer call lights promptly and to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to answer call light in a timely manner
24 Jan 2013Inspection
24 Jan 2013Inspection
Found deficiencies for failing to follow the care plan, resulting in inadequate care and services.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
05 Feb 2012Inspection
05 Feb 2012Inspection
Identified a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Oct 2011Abuse: Neglect
11 Oct 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to follow the care plan.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
07 Apr 2011Abuse: Neglect
07 Apr 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found that the care plan was not followed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
08 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
08 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect due to failure to intervene when a resident's condition changed. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
04 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
04 Mar 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found evidence of neglect for failing to intervene when a resident's condition changed, and a $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
22 Feb 2011Abuse: Neglect
22 Feb 2011Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
09 Jan 2010Inspection
09 Jan 2010Inspection
Found a deficiency in providing a secure environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Regency Park. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Regency Park directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of this community?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
