Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Request a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Coordination with health care providers
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Healthcare staffing
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Air-conditioning
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wifi
Memory care community services
Mild cognitive impairment
Specialized memory care programming
Transportation
Community operated transportation
Transportation arrangement
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Common areas
Beauty salon
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Gaming room
Garden
Outdoor space
Small library
Wellness center
Community services
Concierge services
Fitness programs
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Planned day trips
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
3.79·(118)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
3.4
Staff
3.8
Meals
3.6
Amenities
3.9
Value
2.0
Pros
Compassionate, attentive caregiving staff
Clean, modern, well-maintained facility
Bright apartments with large windows
Private rooms with in-room kitchenettes and refrigerators
On-site memory-care program (Clare Bridge)
Varied dining program with balanced menu options
Regular activities and scheduled outings with transportation
Pet-friendly accommodations
Accessible communal spaces and landscaped courtyard
Medicaid acceptance
Active social dining and resident engagement
Visible onsite managers and unit-level responsiveness
Cons
Inconsistent staffing levels and high turnover
Gaps in medication-administration processes and oversight
Irregular responsiveness to family communications and vendors
Billing-process inconsistencies and unclear pricing practices
Variable housekeeping and sanitation follow-through
Inconsistent food quality and portioning
Insufficient staffing in some memory-care shifts
Inconsistent activity frequency and programming variety
Care-coordination gaps during transitions and admissions
Front-office and corporate communication breakdowns
Summary of reviews
Brookdale Redmond is described by many reviewers as a bright, modern campus with strong social and amenity offerings. The facility's physical environment—large windows, clean common areas, landscaped courtyard, elevator access, and private-room options with small kitchenettes—receives consistent positive mention. Families and residents frequently praise warm, personalized interactions with direct-care staff and several named managers; the community offers regular group programming, onsite transportation for outings and appointments, and an on-site memory-care option (Clare Bridge) that some reviewers singled out positively.
Care quality evokes a mixed picture. Numerous accounts highlight compassionate caregiving, attentive aides, and clinical staff who help residents regain weight or mobility. However, there is a recurring pattern of operational weaknesses that affect clinical reliability: inconsistent staffing levels, high turnover, and specific gaps in medication-administration practices and oversight. Several reviewers described serious post-admission clinical failures and family interventions; these accounts raise concerns about timeliness of assistance, medication handling practices, and the need for stronger clinical safeguards. Memory-care staffing adequacy also surfaced as an area where perceptions vary—some reviewers praise specialized programming, while others cite periods of under-resourcing on the unit.
Dining and activities are prominent features. Many residents enjoy prepared-from-scratch meals, a varied menu, and social dining; lunchtime and certain menu items receive particular praise. At the same time, food quality and portion sizes are described as inconsistent across accounts. Programming includes regular outings, bingo, movie nights, and activity planning staff; reviewers note good transportation support for shopping and appointments. Counterpoints include limited activity variety at times, programs perceived as gender-skewed, and intermittent reductions in scheduled activities during staffing pinch points.
Facility maintenance and housekeeping are generally viewed positively—clean common spaces and an appealing layout contribute to a resort-like atmosphere. Nonetheless, there are recurring housekeeping and sanitation follow-through issues in some areas (for example, uneven housekeeping frequency or localized cleanliness concerns such as carpeting). Prospective residents should ask about housekeeping schedules and observable cleanliness standards during a visit.
Administrative and management themes are mixed. The sales and unit-level experience is often described as professional and welcoming; several staff members and managers receive commendations for hands-on support. At the same time, reviewers repeatedly cite problems with billing transparency, delayed or unexpected charges, and slow responses from corporate-level contacts. Communication lapses—unreturned calls, delayed email responses, and unpaid/invoice disputes—appear as operational pain points for families and vendors. A number of reviewers also raised serious allegations concerning theft and billing misconduct; such claims underscore the importance of checking financial documentation and references.
Bottom line: Brookdale Redmond offers many attributes families look for—modern, well-appointed spaces; an active social calendar; a visible memory-care program; and caregivers who, in many cases, deliver compassionate, individualized attention. However, the facility shows repeated operational vulnerabilities around staffing consistency, medication administration controls, housekeeping follow-through, and administrative transparency. Prospective residents and family members would be wise to tour multiple times, meet clinical leadership, request written medication and staffing protocols, review billing and contract terms in detail, and seek recent references from current families before making a placement decision.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Brookdale Redmond.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Brookdale Redmond is located at 1942 SW Canyon Dr, Redmond, OR, 97756.
About Brookdale Redmond
Brookdale Redmond sits in a spot where seniors can find support as they age, offering independent living, assisted living, and memory care services all in one place, so if someone's needs change they won't have to move to a new building, and the community itself is easy to get around, with two-story buildings, studio and one-bedroom apartments from 348 to 638 square feet, and plenty of indoor and outdoor common spaces for sitting, visiting, or strolling. The staff stay on-site all day and night-some are registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified caregivers-with a focus on both safety and kindness, and there's always someone around to help with daily tasks like bathing or medication, or to respond when help is needed in an emergency. Residents with memory loss, Alzheimer's disease, or dementia can have individual care plans, secure surroundings, and access to special programs aimed at helping reduce confusion and improve cognitive health, which is good for peace of mind, and everyone benefits from amenities like Wi-Fi, high-speed internet, wheelchair-accessible showers, a beautician on-site, and pet accommodations.
Meals focus on nutritious, fresh ingredients, and there are options every day in a friendly dining room, where people tend to linger and enjoy conversation. The activities list is long, including chair yoga, scenic rides, arts and crafts, wine socials, B-Fit fitness classes, educational events, and regular shopping trips. Transportation is set up for errands, appointments, or outings, and there's parking for those who drive. The staff have a reputation for being friendly and helpful, and the place is run in a way that encourages everyone to stay independent, make their own choices, and keep up an active, social life. Families can choose respite care or hospice support if needed, while a concierge doctor provides some medical services right on-site to make appointments easier.
Brookdale Redmond has 62 beds and offers several levels of care, so people who only want a low-maintenance, independent lifestyle will find what they need, as will folks needing help with personal care, or specialized support for memory issues. The aim is safe, simple living and a supportive, joyful environment, whether a person likes quiet time or lots of group activities, and there's a place for pets, communal worship, and personalized touches in each suite to help everyone feel at home. Signature programs and blog resources are available for residents and families, and the facility includes typical assisted living amenities alongside memory care, skilled nursing, continuing care retirement options, and at-home care services, all under the Brookdale Senior Living name.
Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (NYSE: BKD) is the largest senior living operator in the United States, managing over 640 communities with capacity for approximately 59,000 residents across 41 states and employing around 36,000 associates. Founded in 1978 and publicly traded since 2005, Brookdale solidified its market leadership through major acquisitions including American Retirement Corporation (2006) and Emeritus Senior Living (2014), making it the only national full-spectrum senior living company. Headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, Brookdale has topped the American Seniors Housing Association's ASHA 50 list and Argentum's largest providers list for multiple consecutive years.
The company's comprehensive care continuum includes independent living, assisted living, memory care, skilled nursing, and continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs). Brookdale's signature Clare Bridge program, developed over 30 years ago by dementia-care experts, provides specialized Alzheimer's and dementia care through two distinct levels: Clare Bridge communities for comprehensive memory support and the Clare Bridge Solace program for advanced-stage dementia residents. The program is recognized by the Alzheimer's Association® for incorporating evidence-based Dementia Care Practice Recommendations and features secure environments, enclosed courtyards, Daily Path programming with six structured activities daily, and the InTouch technology platform offering personalized brain-stimulating games and therapeutic content.
Brookdale's holistic Optimum Life® wellness approach balances six dimensions—Purposeful, Physical, Emotional, Social, Spiritual, and Intellectual—implemented through signature programs including B-Fit (eight exercise class options), Brain Fit (mental fitness workouts), My Life Story (resident storytelling), EngagementPlus (interest-based connections), Growing Together (collaborative learning), and The Ageless Spirit (kindness and gratitude practices). The Embrace Family Partnership provides caregiver education and support for families of memory care residents.
The company's Brookdale HealthPlus® care coordination model, winner of the 2024 Argentum Best of the Best Award placing it among the top 1% of operators, is a technology-enabled healthcare service featuring dedicated RN Care Managers who proactively manage residents' health, coordinate care transitions, and help prevent avoidable hospitalizations. Communities using HealthPlus report 78% fewer urgent care visits, 36% fewer hospitalizations, and 63% more completed annual wellness visits. The Personal Solutions program delivers hygiene products, medications, and daily necessities directly to residents' doors with discreet packaging and monthly billing convenience.
Following a strategic divestiture of its home health and hospice operations to HCA Healthcare (completed December 2023), Brookdale now focuses exclusively on senior living operations while maintaining its position as the industry's largest operator, committed to its mission of enriching lives with compassion, respect, excellence, and integrity.
People often ask...
Brookdale Redmond offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $3,565 per month.
Brookdale Redmond offers independent living, assisted living, and memory care.
There are 50 photos of Brookdale Redmond on Mirador.
Yes, Brookdale Redmond allows residents to age in place and adjust their level of care as needed.
The full address for this community is 1942 SW Canyon Dr, Redmond, OR 97756.
No, Brookdale Redmond does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Found multiple deficiencies across resident care planning, change-of-condition monitoring, coordination with outside providers, medication management, fire safety, and building upkeep.
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
Deficiency—Res Hlth Srvc: On- and Off-Site Health Srvc
Deficiencies identified in dining texture and fluid consistency, activity program, resident evaluations and plans, infection control, psychotropic use, staffing, ABST accuracy, fire safety, and administrative oversight.
Deficiency—Reasonable Precautions
Deficiency—Resident Services: Activities
Deficiency—Resident Move-in & Evaluation: Res Evaluation
Deficiency—Service Plan: General
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Systems: Psychotropic Medication
Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training: Staffing
Deficiency—Acuity Based Staffing Tool - ABST Time
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Administration Responsibilities
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Compliance with Rules Health Care
25 Jun 2026License Condition
25 Jun 2026License Condition
Investigated allegations stemming from a relicensure survey conducted in June 2026 based on preliminary evidence and interviews.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Jun 2026Kitchen
08 Jun 2026Kitchen
Identified multiple sanitation and equipment deficiencies in the kitchen areas that did not meet food sanitation rules. Observed issues included dirty surfaces, improper chemical use, uncovered foods, and malfunctioning equipment.
Observed multiple sanitation and cleanliness deficiencies in the kitchen, including inadequate chemical monitoring, open pantry items, and equipment buildup. Noted several sanitation rule violations during the visit.
Investigated and identified two violations related to safety and alarms, resulting in a resident's elopement, injury, and death.
Regulatory Action—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Dec 2025Inspection
22 Dec 2025Inspection
Found that an exit door alarm or equivalent security system was not provided to alert staff when residents exited, creating a safety risk.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Dec 2025Abuse: Neglect
22 Dec 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect and abuse for failing to provide a safe environment after an unlocked door allowed an individual to leave, resulting in injuries.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
18 Jun 2025Abuse: Neglect
Found that a resident was not protected from financial exploitation, constituting neglect and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
07 Jul 2024Abuse: Neglect
07 Jul 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found deficiencies in care planning for a resident's known fall history, resulting in post-fall pain management actions.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
23 Jan 2024Complaint
23 Jan 2024Complaint
Investigated the complaint and found no deficiencies.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
23 Jan 2024Complaint
23 Jan 2024Complaint
Found that the Acuity-Based Staffing Tool was not fully implemented for three sampled residents, with only 17 ADLs listed per resident in the ABST records.
Deficiency—Licensing Complaint Investigation
Deficiency—Acuity-Based Staffing Tool
19 Jan 2024Abuse: Neglect
19 Jan 2024Abuse: Neglect
Found violations for failing to protect a resident from verbal abuse and for inadequate care planning related to intoxication, resulting in a fine.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
27 Nov 2023Abuse: Neglect
27 Nov 2023Abuse: Neglect
Investigated found a failure to provide a safe environment, leading to a resident being pushed during a resident-to-resident altercation and resulting discomfort.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
20 Nov 2023Licensure
20 Nov 2023Licensure
Found deficiencies in kitchen sanitation and administration compliance, including improper storage, labeling, and sanitizer monitoring.
Deficiency—Inspections and Investigation: Insp Interval
25 Jul 2023Abuse: Neglect
25 Jul 2023Abuse: Neglect
Identified failure to implement interventions and care planning for a resident's fall history, leading to an unwitnessed fall and injury; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
09 Jun 2023Inspection
09 Jun 2023Inspection
Determined ABST was not fully implemented, with time and frequency for completing the care needs for all required ADLs undeterminable.
Licensing—Failed to use an ABST
24 Mar 2023Inspection
24 Mar 2023Inspection
Determined that a safe environment was not provided, and the licensing violation was substantiated.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
08 Mar 2023Abuse: Neglect
08 Mar 2023Abuse: Neglect
Found that a transfer was performed without the gait belt as required by the care plan, resulting in an abrasion and pain. A fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
21 Feb 2023Validation
21 Feb 2023Validation
Found multiple deficiencies in infection prevention, fire safety, door alarms, administration compliance, and staff training during the follow-up review.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
Deficiency—Call Sys, Exit Dr Alarm, Phones, Tv, Or Cable
Deficiency—Administration Compliance
Deficiency—Staff Training Requirements
06 Feb 2023Validation
06 Feb 2023Validation
Identified deficiencies in infection prevention leadership and in medication administration processes. These included lack of a designated Infection Control Specialist and missing resident-specific PRN medication instructions.
Deficiency—Comment
Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
Deficiency—Systems: Medication Administration
21 Nov 2022Licensure
21 Nov 2022Licensure
Found extensive deficiencies in food sanitation and kitchen operations during the initial review, with a follow-up showing substantial compliance with applicable rules.
Determined neglect occurred and a safe medication administration system was not provided, as a staff member did not sign out or initial a resident’s narcotic bubble pack, causing an off-count.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Mar 2022Inspection
01 Mar 2022Inspection
Found a licensing violation for failing to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation for a 27-day period.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
01 Mar 2022Inspection
01 Mar 2022Inspection
Found a violation for failing to submit timely weekly reporting of vaccinated individuals, residents, and staff to the proper authority.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
02 Apr 2021Inspection
02 Apr 2021Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system that placed a resident at risk of harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Mar 2021Abuse: Neglect
01 Mar 2021Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe medication administration system was not provided, placing a resident at risk of harm and constituting abuse and neglect. A $225 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to administer medication as ordered
06 Feb 2021Abuse: Neglect
06 Feb 2021Abuse: Neglect
Found deficiencies in care planning and fall-related interventions that led to an unwitnessed head injury from a fall.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
07 Jan 2021Inspection
07 Jan 2021Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe medication system.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
07 Jan 2021Inspection
07 Jan 2021Inspection
Found lack of policies and procedures to respond to incidents.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
02 Dec 2020Inspection
02 Dec 2020Inspection
Found that a medication administration violation occurred.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
24 Nov 2020Inspection
24 Nov 2020Inspection
Found a deficiency for failing to exercise reasonable precautions to protect residents' health, safety, or welfare.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident was safe
05 Nov 2020Inspection
05 Nov 2020Inspection
Found failure to administer medications as ordered and to carry out medication and treatment orders. It was classified as a Level 1 deficiency with no harm or potential for minor harm.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
03 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
03 Nov 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found that interventions and care planning for a resident's fall history were not properly implemented, leading to unwitnessed falls with injuries.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
26 Sept 2020Abuse: Neglect
26 Sept 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found deficiencies in care planning and interventions for a resident's fall risk, resulting in a fall and hospital treatment.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
25 Sept 2020Inspection
25 Sept 2020Inspection
Investigated and found a deficiency in safe medication administration practices.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident was safe
25 Sept 2020Inspection
25 Sept 2020Inspection
Found a deficiency in infection control procedures that violated administration requirements.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident was safe
22 Sept 2020Inspection
22 Sept 2020Inspection
Found noncompliance with safe medication administration practices due to failure to administer medication as ordered.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
19 Sept 2020Abuse: Neglect
19 Sept 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found that care planning and intervention failed, leading to an unwitnessed fall and serious injury. A fine of $1,125 was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
13 Aug 2020Abuse: Neglect
13 Aug 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found failure to properly plan care related to a resident's fall history, resulting in an unwitnessed fall and head injury.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
28 Jul 2020Abuse: Neglect
28 Jul 2020Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation that care planning failed, resulting in an unwitnessed fall with fracture and constituting neglect and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to properly plan care
28 Jul 2020Inspection
28 Jul 2020Inspection
Found PPE mask usage deficiencies that affected resident safety. Confirmed the safety-related allegation.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident was safe
09 Jun 2020Inspection
09 Jun 2020Inspection
Confirmed a failure to carry out medication orders as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
01 Jun 2020Inspection
01 Jun 2020Inspection
Found that medication orders were not carried out as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
01 Jun 2020Inspection
01 Jun 2020Inspection
Concluded that the care plan was not followed related to the general resident service plan. The allegation involved a licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
01 Jun 2020Inspection
01 Jun 2020Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system with adequate professional oversight.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
20 May 2020Inspection
20 May 2020Inspection
Investigated a complaint about medication administration; found a lack of a safe medication and treatment administration system and that doctor orders were not carried out on two occasions.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
23 Apr 2020Inspection
23 Apr 2020Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to administer medication as ordered and found the orders were not carried out.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
09 Mar 2020Inspection
09 Mar 2020Inspection
Found failure to administer medications and treatment orders as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
03 Mar 2020Inspection
03 Mar 2020Inspection
Found that medication orders were not carried out as prescribed.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
16 Feb 2020Inspection
16 Feb 2020Inspection
Found a violation related to a safe medication administration system, resulting in risk of harm to residents.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
27 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
27 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system, resulting in a double dosage for about 12 days and risk of serious harm to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
16 Jan 2020Inspection
16 Jan 2020Inspection
Found inadequate professional oversight of the medication administration system.
Licensing—Failed to administer ordered medication
01 Oct 2019Inspection
01 Oct 2019Inspection
Investigated the allegation that a safe environment was not provided and found a licensing violation.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
02 Aug 2019Abuse: Neglect
02 Aug 2019Abuse: Neglect
Investigated abuses found that medication safety was not ensured and medication was wrongfully taken; findings substantiated.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
03 Jul 2019Inspection
03 Jul 2019Inspection
Investigated the medication administration issue and found that it was not given as ordered.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
20 Jun 2019Abuse: Neglect
20 Jun 2019Abuse: Neglect
Identified abuse and neglect linked to a staff theft of medication and an unsafe medication administration system; a fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
31 May 2019Abuse: Neglect
31 May 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect due to failing to provide appropriate supervision, which resulted in elopement and risk of potential harm.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
05 Nov 2018Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint alleging failure to provide a safe environment and found neglect; a $500 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Nov 2018Inspection
05 Nov 2018Inspection
Investigated an allegation of failing to report suspected abuse and found a violation, resulting in a $750 fine.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
26 Aug 2018Abuse: Neglect
26 Aug 2018Abuse: Neglect
Found neglect of basic care resulting in risk of serious harm to a resident; a $250 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
19 May 2017Inspection
19 May 2017Inspection
Concluded that residents' right to refuse services or treatments was not assured.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
07 May 2017Inspection
07 May 2017Inspection
Investigated and found a failure to provide a safe environment for RV1, RV2, and RV3.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Apr 2017Inspection
11 Apr 2017Inspection
Investigated found that residents were not notified about changes in services and basic rates. There was no effective process to respond to or resolve complaints.
Licensing—Failed to provide service
10 Apr 2017Inspection
10 Apr 2017Inspection
Investigated and found a failure to provide three meals daily to residents.
Licensing—Failed to provide proper food/nutrition
16 Feb 2017Abuse: Neglect
16 Feb 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated a complaint of neglect and found a failure to follow the care plan and to provide a safe environment for a resident.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
27 Dec 2016Inspection
27 Dec 2016Inspection
Found a deficiency in tracking and recording resident belongings, indicating a failure to assure resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
27 Dec 2016Inspection
27 Dec 2016Inspection
Found a deficiency for not having a current assessment in place prior to a resident being discharged from hospital.
Licensing—Failed to perform adequate screening or assessment
30 Nov 2016Inspection
30 Nov 2016Inspection
Investigated and found failure to complete an evaluation after a return from hospital.
Licensing—Failed to perform adequate screening or assessment
30 Nov 2016Inspection
30 Nov 2016Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found a move-out notice deficiency, noting a resident did not receive a less-than-30-day move-out notice.
Licensing—Failed to comply with move-out, transfer or discharge requirements
29 Aug 2016Inspection
29 Aug 2016Inspection
Investigated an allegation of unsafe environment. Found a failure to protect a reported victim.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
11 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
11 Aug 2016Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect and found failures to intervene when a resident's condition changed and to provide administrative oversight.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
20 May 2016Inspection
20 May 2016Inspection
Found a violation for failing to provide a safe environment to a reported victim.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Apr 2016Inspection
22 Apr 2016Inspection
Found violations regarding involuntary move-out of residents.
Licensing—Failed to comply with move-out, transfer or discharge requirements
10 Feb 2016Abuse: Neglect
10 Feb 2016Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to intervene when a resident's condition changed; the neglect allegation was substantiated and a $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
13 Jan 2016Inspection
13 Jan 2016Inspection
Identified a deficiency in maintaining a secure environment. The issue was classified as Level 1 with no harm or potential for minor harm.
Licensing—Failed to maintain a safe physical environment
06 Jan 2016Inspection
06 Jan 2016Inspection
Found that a safe environment was not provided for two individuals.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
05 Jan 2016Inspection
05 Jan 2016Inspection
Found a failure to provide a safe environment that could cause harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
01 Jan 2016Inspection
01 Jan 2016Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to provide a secure environment and found a deficiency for not providing a secure environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
31 Dec 2015Inspection
31 Dec 2015Inspection
Investigated and concluded the allegation of failing to protect a resident from financial exploitation was supported by billing errors and a six-month delay with no resolution.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
30 Dec 2015Inspection
30 Dec 2015Inspection
Found a deficiency for failing to provide a 30-day notice before a rent increase.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
30 Dec 2015Inspection
30 Dec 2015Inspection
Identified a deficiency for lacking a tracking system for resident belongings. This deficiency affected resident rights.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
05 Dec 2015Inspection
05 Dec 2015Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found a failure to provide a safe environment, with potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
02 May 2015Abuse: Neglect
02 May 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided for two residents. A $250 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 May 2015Abuse: Neglect
02 May 2015Abuse: Neglect
Found a failure to provide a safe environment and assessed a $250 fine for neglect.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
19 Jan 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
19 Jan 2015Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated an allegation of physical abuse and found a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
18 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
18 Oct 2014Abuse: Neglect
Determined a failure to provide a secure environment. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
04 Apr 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
04 Apr 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated a financial abuse allegation and found a deficiency for failing to protect a resident from misappropriation of money.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Feb 2013Inspection
14 Feb 2013Inspection
Investigated an allegation of failing to administer medications as ordered. Found that medications were not provided as ordered to RV1 and RV21.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
14 Sept 2011Abuse: Physical Abuse
14 Sept 2011Abuse: Physical Abuse
Investigated a physical abuse allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment for residents.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
25 Apr 2011Abuse: Financial abuse
25 Apr 2011Abuse: Financial abuse
Found that two residents were not protected from money diversion.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
13 Apr 2011Inspection
13 Apr 2011Inspection
Investigated and substantiated a failure to provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
15 Mar 2011Abuse: Restraints
15 Mar 2011Abuse: Restraints
Investigated a restraint-related abuse allegation and found a violation affecting resident rights and safety.
Abuse—Failed to assure resident rights
07 Jan 2011Abuse: Neglect
07 Jan 2011Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the neglect allegation and found a failure to provide a safe environment for residents.
Abuse—Failed to address resident's behavior
17 Dec 2010Abuse: Financial abuse
17 Dec 2010Abuse: Financial abuse
Found a failure to protect a resident from diversion of medication after investigating a financial abuse allegation.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
23 Nov 2010Inspection
23 Nov 2010Inspection
Found that the care plan regarding transfers was not followed.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
13 Jun 2010Inspection
13 Jun 2010Inspection
Found an inadequate medication system that could harm residents.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
27 Mar 2010Inspection
27 Mar 2010Inspection
Investigated and found that medications were not provided as ordered, risking safe medication administration.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Brookdale Redmond. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Brookdale Redmond directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of Brookdale Redmond?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.
