Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.
Request a Tour
Amenities
Healthcare services
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Coordination with health care providers
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Respite program
Healthcare staffing
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
24-hour supervision
Meals and dining
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Restaurant-style dining
Special dietary restrictions
Room
Air-conditioning
Cable
Fully furnished
Housekeeping and linen services
Kitchenettes
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wifi
Transportation
Community operated transportation
Located close to restaurants
Located close to shopping centers
Transportation arrangement
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Common areas
Beauty salon
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Gaming room
Garden
Outdoor patio
Outdoor space
Pet friendly
Small library
Wellness center
Community services
Concierge services
Fitness programs
Move-in coordination
Activities
Community-sponsored activities
Planned day trips
Resident-run activities
Scheduled daily activities
Reviews
4.01·(67)
Overall rating
5
4
3
2
1
Care
3.8
Staff
4.0
Meals
3.0
Amenities
4.0
Value
2.1
Pros
Compassionate, personable caregiving staff
On-site nursing and clinical follow-up
Clean, recently renovated interiors
Private, refurbished apartment options
Large communal spaces and social lounges
Varied activity program (cards, crafts, outings)
Dining room and salon/barber amenities
Accessible grounds with outdoor and nature views
Responsive maintenance and move-in coordination
Small, family-like community atmosphere
Cons
Inconsistent medication-administration processes
Delays in staff responsiveness to call systems
Inconsistent incontinence and personal-care assistance
Variable food quality and meal-service reliability
Understaffing and low staff-to-resident ratio
Irregular housekeeping and laundry service
Management communication and billing transparency gaps
Variable staff performance and turnover
Food-safety and sanitation practice concerns
Inconsistent application of safety-equipment policies
Summary of reviews
Overall impression
Prestige Senior Living High Desert presents a mix of clear strengths and repeat operational weaknesses. Many reviewers praised the facility’s physical environment, communal spaces, and the interpersonal qualities of frontline staff. At the same time, a recurring pattern of service inconsistencies — particularly around clinical tasks, food service, housekeeping, and management responsiveness — emerged across multiple accounts.
Care quality and clinical issues
The community benefits from an on-site nurse and staff who, in many accounts, provide compassionate, respectful care and effective clinical follow-up. However, there are repeated concerns about medication management and basic assistance: reviewers described instances of medications not being administered, delayed responses to call systems, and inconsistent assistance with bathing, restroom needs, and incontinence care. There are also notes about inconsistent application of safety equipment (for example, bed-rail decisions), which suggests variability in operational protocols or their implementation. Taken together, these patterns indicate the facility may be a better fit for residents with lower, predictable care needs unless families verify staffing patterns and medication controls for higher-dependency residents.
Staffing, communication, and management
Many reviewers found individual caregivers warm, attentive, and helpful, and some accounts credit new or proactive managers with tangible improvements (added servers, housekeepers, and activity staff). At the same time, families reported uneven staff performance, turnover, and periods of understaffing that affected service delivery. Management responsiveness and communication are another recurring theme: reviewers described difficulties getting timely answers about care, delays in processing refunds or billing questions, and instances of upselling or unclear fee structures. Those patterns suggest gaps in consistent leadership communication, billing transparency, and staffing stability.
Dining, housekeeping, and operations
Dining receives mixed feedback: the facility has a pleasant dining room and some reviewers praised menu options and helpful servers, while others reported inconsistent meal temperature, occasional overcooked or bland items, and delays in meal service. Housekeeping and laundry show a similar split — when adequately staffed the cleaning and laundry service are described as thorough and timely, but when staffing is limited reviewers reported missed cleanings, mixed-up laundry, and declining consistency. A few reviewers also raised concerns about sanitation and food-safety practices, which should be clarified during a tour or follow-up with management.
Activities and amenities
The community offers a broad range of social and recreational options: cards, bingo, crafts, lectures, gardening, outings, and regular social gatherings. The facility’s salon/barber, large TV rooms, and outdoor access were frequently cited as positives. Activity offerings appear enthusiastic and meaningful for many residents, though a subset of reviewers found the programs limited relative to their expectations. The small, family-like atmosphere suits those who prefer a less institutional environment and closer staff–resident relationships.
Facilities and location
Physical plant feedback is largely positive: clean, recently remodeled interiors, private refurbished apartments, accessible layouts for mobility devices, and pleasant outdoor spaces with nature views. The community is near medical resources, which some families valued. A few comments noted that ongoing renovations can create temporary disruption.
Notable patterns and considerations for families
There is clear variability in the resident experience depending on staffing, shift coverage, and management engagement. Strong interpersonal care and a well-appointed physical environment coexist with operational gaps in medication administration, call-response times, meal consistency, and housekeeping. Prospective residents and families should verify current staffing levels, medication-administration protocols, food-safety practices, and billing policies during a tour; ask about recent corrective actions, turnover rates, and specific examples of how the facility handles missed medications or delayed response times. For residents with greater clinical needs, confirm the facility’s ability to reliably meet those needs before committing.
Bottom line
Prestige Senior Living High Desert offers many amenities, a renovated environment, and staff who can be genuinely caring and attentive, but the facility has documented patterns of operational inconsistency that can affect safety and quality of life. These issues appear to fluctuate with staffing and management changes; therefore, careful, up-to-date verification of clinical controls and service reliability is recommended for families considering placement.
Reviews written on Mirador
We have no reviews to show about Prestige Senior Living High Desert.
Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.
Location
Prestige Senior Living High Desert is located at 2660 NE Mary Rose Pl, Bend, OR, 97701.
About Prestige Senior Living High Desert
Prestige Senior Living High Desert sits in Bend, Oregon, right under Pilot Butte in the Mountain View neighborhood, and the place really looks like a home from the outside with a traditional style, while inside you'll find vintage decorations that feel nostalgic and calming, and with 68 beds, the community offers different living options like independent living for older adults who don't want extra chores, assisted living for those who need some help with daily things like bathing and taking medicine, and award-winning memory care for people with Alzheimer's or dementia who may need a secure area to live safely and with dignity. Folks can bring their pets, and there's a swimming pool, hot tub, lots of indoor and outdoor common spaces, and a resident council that helps keep the community active and involved, plus regular social events, happy hours, spiritual gatherings, and activities on or off site to foster connections and engagement. Meals come from chef and meal planners, served restaurant-style with vegetarian options, and there's a private dining room for families to gather and eat with loved ones, and people can also use beauty services without leaving the building. Residents get weekly housekeeping, laundry help, linen service, and home health or rehabilitative services can be coordinated as needed, so the staff will manage medicine and give support with hygiene in a secure, non-smoking environment, while volunteers, support groups, and scheduled transportation make daily life easier. The community uses the Celebrations program to focus on healthy and fulfilled living, offering activities that work the mind and body, and the place supports both short-term stays for folks needing respite and long-term options, all while keeping a home-like, family-run feel because the owners run things much like an extended family would, striving for a safe and comfortable place for seniors and their loved ones, always making sure everyone feels included and supported.
About Prestige Care
Prestige Senior Living High Desert is managed by Prestige Care.
Founded in 1985 but tracing its roots to 1946, Prestige Care began with Sarah Delamarter, a nursing pioneer who started caring for seniors in her Troutdale, Oregon home. What began as a compassionate effort to support her family evolved into a multi-generational legacy when her grandsons Harold and Dr. Rick Delamarter, along with business partner Greg Vislocky, expanded the business throughout the western United States. Today, this family-owned company remains headquartered in Vancouver, Washington, maintaining Sarah's original spirit of personalized, compassionate care. Prestige Care operates over 75 communities across seven western states including Oregon, Washington, California, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, and Montana.
People often ask...
Prestige Senior Living High Desert offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $5,078 per month.
Prestige Senior Living High Desert offers assisted living.
There are 41 photos of Prestige Senior Living High Desert on Mirador.
The full address for this community is 2660 NE Mary Rose Pl, Bend, OR 97701.
No, Prestige Senior Living High Desert does not offer respite care.
Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.
Safety & Compliance
In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.
Identified multiple deficiencies, including missing required postings, non-aligned service plans, infection control lapses, medication order inconsistencies, self-administration oversight gaps, and unassessed restraints.
Investigated allegations of neglect and abuse related to falls risk and care planning; found failures to prevent injuries, resulting in a $500 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
24 Dec 2024Inspection
24 Dec 2024Inspection
Investigated and found that the care plan was not followed, leaving the resident unattended in the restroom and at risk of harm.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
25 Jan 2024Licensure
25 Jan 2024Licensure
Determined substantial compliance with meals and food sanitation requirements.
Deficiency—Comment
01 Apr 2023Inspection
01 Apr 2023Inspection
Found failure to submit timely weekly vaccination reporting to the proper authority, resulting in a civil penalty. The issue covered reporting from March 2022 through March 2023.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
01 Mar 2023Inspection
01 Mar 2023Inspection
Concluded that the allegation of failing to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation occurred and assessed a $6,750 fine.
Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
26 Sept 2022Validation
26 Sept 2022Validation
Identified widespread deficiencies across multiple areas, including food sanitation, resident evaluations and service planning, change of condition monitoring, infection control, staff training, fire safety, and building maintenance.
Identified an infection control deficiency that could threaten residents' health.
Licensing—Failed to provide infection control
10 Aug 2020Inspection
10 Aug 2020Inspection
Investigated and found violations related to residents' rights, including failing to treat residents with dignity and to provide informed choice.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
23 Jul 2020Inspection
23 Jul 2020Inspection
Investigated and found violations for failing to protect a resident from verbal/emotional abuse by staff, which caused distress during discussions about COVID precautions.
Licensing—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
20 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
20 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
Found failure to follow the care plan for bathing, resulting in the resident not receiving planned showers and experiencing pain from a non-healing skin condition; deemed neglect and abuse.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
07 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
07 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
Found violations involving neglect and abuse, including incorrect medication administration and a long delay in repositioning that caused discomfort to a resident.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
23 May 2019Inspection
23 May 2019Inspection
Investigated the allegation and concluded that medication was not administered as ordered.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
13 Sept 2018Inspection
13 Sept 2018Inspection
Found a failure to follow doctor’s orders in providing medical treatment and timely submission of a urine sample.
Licensing—Failed to provide medical treatment as ordered
16 Jul 2018Inspection
16 Jul 2018Inspection
Found the resident record was not kept current or accurate.
Licensing—Failed to keep resident record current or accurate
22 Jun 2018Abuse: Neglect
22 Jun 2018Abuse: Neglect
Concluded that neglect occurred and assessed a $500 fine.
Abuse—Failed to provide service
22 Jun 2018Inspection
22 Jun 2018Inspection
Found that suspected abuse was not reported as required. A $1,000 fine was assessed.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
23 Apr 2018Inspection
23 Apr 2018Inspection
Found that suspected abuse was not reported and assessed a $750 fine.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
23 Apr 2018Abuse: Neglect
23 Apr 2018Abuse: Neglect
Investigated and found the provider failed to provide a safe medication administration system and appropriate care to a reported victim.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
14 Oct 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
14 Oct 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated and substantiated a financial exploitation allegation, finding a failure to protect a resident from financial exploitation and a failure to provide a safe environment for the Reported Victim.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
02 Oct 2017Inspection
02 Oct 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to assure food safety and found a violation.
Licensing—Failed to assure food safety
02 Oct 2017Inspection
02 Oct 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation and identified a deficiency for not following the care plan.
Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
02 Oct 2017Inspection
02 Oct 2017Inspection
Identified a deficiency for not providing proper food/nutrition.
Licensing—Failed to provide proper food/nutrition
02 Oct 2017Inspection
02 Oct 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found a deficiency in keeping resident records current or accurate.
Licensing—Failed to keep resident record current or accurate
02 Oct 2017Inspection
02 Oct 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to administer medication as ordered; found substantiated.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
04 Aug 2017Inspection
04 Aug 2017Inspection
Found insufficient staffing to meet residents' unscheduled needs.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate staffing
28 Jul 2017Inspection
28 Jul 2017Inspection
Investigated a complaint alleging failure to administer medication as ordered. The finding identified this as a rule violation.
Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
28 Jul 2017Inspection
28 Jul 2017Inspection
Found a deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment and not maintaining substantial compliance.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
14 Jul 2017Abuse: Neglect
14 Jul 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found that temporary agency staff were not properly trained in accordance with the applicable training requirements.
Licensing—Failed to hire according to administrative rules
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found that weekend activities were not provided as required by rule.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate activities
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Found that residents did not receive palatable meals.
Licensing—Failed to provide proper food/nutrition
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Determined that there were not enough caregivers to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate staffing
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Found failure to provide shower assistance as required.
Licensing—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Investigated a complaint and found a deficiency in food safety practices, as staff did not use hair nets or gloves during meal service.
Licensing—Failed to assure food safety
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Found background checks for temporary staff were not completed as required. The finding was substantiated.
Licensing—Failed to hire according to administrative rules
11 Jul 2017Inspection
11 Jul 2017Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failure to report potential or suspected abuse and concluded that reporting requirements were violated.
Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
27 Jun 2017Abuse: Neglect
27 Jun 2017Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation about a safe medication administration system and an unsafe environment for a reported victim, and found violations.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
28 Nov 2016Inspection
28 Nov 2016Inspection
Found a violation related to move-out, transfer or discharge requirements.
Licensing—Failed to comply with move-out, transfer or discharge requirements
09 Nov 2016Inspection
09 Nov 2016Inspection
Found a violation for failing to provide a safe environment; a $300 fine was assessed.
Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
22 Jun 2016Inspection
22 Jun 2016Inspection
Identified deficiencies in cleanliness due to inadequate housekeeping services.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services
22 Jun 2016Inspection
22 Jun 2016Inspection
Identified a deficiency related to building requirements and housekeeping, including unpleasant odors.
Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services
17 Sept 2015Inspection
17 Sept 2015Inspection
Investigated the allegation and found a deficient medication administration system.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
25 Mar 2015Inspection
25 Mar 2015Inspection
Found failure to provide a safe medication administration system. Involved potential for harm related to medication management.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
02 Feb 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
02 Feb 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated an allegation of financial exploitation and found the resident was not protected from theft.
Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
27 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
27 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
Found that a safe environment was not provided.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
15 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
15 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the neglect allegation and identified failures to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
15 Aug 2014Inspection
15 Aug 2014Inspection
Investigated and substantiated an allegation that hygiene care was not provided, indicating deficient care with minor harm or potential for moderate harm.
Licensing—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
15 Aug 2014Inspection
15 Aug 2014Inspection
Concluded that a safety deficiency existed due to an unsafe environment that could harm a resident.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident was safe
09 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
09 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the toileting assistance allegation and identified inadequate care.
Abuse—Failed to assist with toileting
08 Jul 2014Inspection
08 Jul 2014Inspection
Investigated a licensing allegation that care was not properly planned and found that appropriate care was not provided.
Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
01 Apr 2014Abuse: Neglect
01 Apr 2014Abuse: Neglect
Concluded that the allegation about inadequate care planning for falls was substantiated and that a safe environment was not provided for a resident.
Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
25 Dec 2013Abuse: Neglect
25 Dec 2013Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of neglect related to hygiene and found deficiencies in care.
Abuse—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
07 Nov 2013Abuse: Neglect
07 Nov 2013Abuse: Neglect
Concluded a failure to intervene when resident's condition changed. A $300 fine was assessed.
Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
21 Mar 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
21 Mar 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated and found a failure to protect a resident from misappropriation of monies.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
02 Sept 2012Abuse: Neglect
02 Sept 2012Abuse: Neglect
Investigated an allegation of unsafe medication administration and found failures in providing a safe system, resulting in a negative outcome.
Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
18 Aug 2012Abuse: Neglect
18 Aug 2012Abuse: Neglect
Found a safety violation due to failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
15 Aug 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
15 Aug 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
Investigated and found misappropriation of funds and a failure to provide a safe environment.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
09 Aug 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
09 Aug 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
Concluded financial abuse; found misappropriation of monies due to a failure to protect funds.
Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
16 Mar 2012Inspection
16 Mar 2012Inspection
Investigated an allegation of inadequate care planning related to falls and found deficiencies in providing care for a resident.
Licensing—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
16 Mar 2012Inspection
16 Mar 2012Inspection
Investigated the allegation of failing to provide peri care; found care was not provided to RV.
Licensing—Failed to provide peri care
17 Dec 2011Abuse: Neglect
17 Dec 2011Abuse: Neglect
Investigated the allegation of not following the care assessment and found a failure to follow the assessment for care.
Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
14 Nov 2011Inspection
14 Nov 2011Inspection
Investigated and found a licensing violation for failing to assure resident rights and provide a safe environment.
Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
29 Jan 2010Inspection
29 Jan 2010Inspection
Determined that the allegation of failing to provide a safe medication administration system was supported.
Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
Disclaimer
Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Prestige Senior Living High Desert. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Prestige Senior Living High Desert directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.
Are you an owner or operator of Prestige Senior Living High Desert?
Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.