Pricing ranges from
    $5,078 – 6,601/month

    Prestige Senior Living High Desert

    2660 NE Mary Rose Pl, Bend, OR 97701
    • Assisted Living

    Pricing

    Prices shown are estimates and subject to change. Contact your senior living advisor for current pricing.

    Request a Tour

    Date of Tour
    Time Window
    Tour Type

    You selected in-person tour on in the

    Amenities

    Healthcare services

    • Activities of daily living assistance
    • Assistance with bathing
    • Assistance with dressing
    • Assistance with transfers
    • Coordination with health care providers
    • Medication management
    • Mental wellness program
    • Respite program

    Healthcare staffing

    • 12-16 hour nursing
    • 24-hour call system
    • 24-hour supervision

    Meals and dining

    • Diabetes diet
    • Meal preparation and service
    • Restaurant-style dining
    • Special dietary restrictions

    Room

    • Air-conditioning
    • Cable
    • Fully furnished
    • Housekeeping and linen services
    • Kitchenettes
    • Private bathrooms
    • Telephone
    • Wifi

    Transportation

    • Community operated transportation
    • Located close to restaurants
    • Located close to shopping centers
    • Transportation arrangement
    • Transportation arrangement (medical)
    • Transportation arrangement (non-medical)
    • Transportation to doctors appointments

    Common areas

    • Beauty salon
    • Computer center
    • Dining room
    • Fitness room
    • Gaming room
    • Garden
    • Outdoor patio
    • Outdoor space
    • Pet friendly
    • Small library
    • Wellness center

    Community services

    • Concierge services
    • Fitness programs
    • Move-in coordination

    Activities

    • Community-sponsored activities
    • Planned day trips
    • Resident-run activities
    • Scheduled daily activities

    Reviews

    4.01·(67)

    Overall rating

    1. 5
    2. 4
    3. 3
    4. 2
    5. 1
    • Care

      3.8
    • Staff

      4.0
    • Meals

      3.0
    • Amenities

      4.0
    • Value

      2.1

    Pros

    • Compassionate, personable caregiving staff
    • On-site nursing and clinical follow-up
    • Clean, recently renovated interiors
    • Private, refurbished apartment options
    • Large communal spaces and social lounges
    • Varied activity program (cards, crafts, outings)
    • Dining room and salon/barber amenities
    • Accessible grounds with outdoor and nature views
    • Responsive maintenance and move-in coordination
    • Small, family-like community atmosphere

    Cons

    • Inconsistent medication-administration processes
    • Delays in staff responsiveness to call systems
    • Inconsistent incontinence and personal-care assistance
    • Variable food quality and meal-service reliability
    • Understaffing and low staff-to-resident ratio
    • Irregular housekeeping and laundry service
    • Management communication and billing transparency gaps
    • Variable staff performance and turnover
    • Food-safety and sanitation practice concerns
    • Inconsistent application of safety-equipment policies

    Summary of reviews

    Overall impression Prestige Senior Living High Desert presents a mix of clear strengths and repeat operational weaknesses. Many reviewers praised the facility’s physical environment, communal spaces, and the interpersonal qualities of frontline staff. At the same time, a recurring pattern of service inconsistencies — particularly around clinical tasks, food service, housekeeping, and management responsiveness — emerged across multiple accounts.

    Care quality and clinical issues The community benefits from an on-site nurse and staff who, in many accounts, provide compassionate, respectful care and effective clinical follow-up. However, there are repeated concerns about medication management and basic assistance: reviewers described instances of medications not being administered, delayed responses to call systems, and inconsistent assistance with bathing, restroom needs, and incontinence care. There are also notes about inconsistent application of safety equipment (for example, bed-rail decisions), which suggests variability in operational protocols or their implementation. Taken together, these patterns indicate the facility may be a better fit for residents with lower, predictable care needs unless families verify staffing patterns and medication controls for higher-dependency residents.

    Staffing, communication, and management Many reviewers found individual caregivers warm, attentive, and helpful, and some accounts credit new or proactive managers with tangible improvements (added servers, housekeepers, and activity staff). At the same time, families reported uneven staff performance, turnover, and periods of understaffing that affected service delivery. Management responsiveness and communication are another recurring theme: reviewers described difficulties getting timely answers about care, delays in processing refunds or billing questions, and instances of upselling or unclear fee structures. Those patterns suggest gaps in consistent leadership communication, billing transparency, and staffing stability.

    Dining, housekeeping, and operations Dining receives mixed feedback: the facility has a pleasant dining room and some reviewers praised menu options and helpful servers, while others reported inconsistent meal temperature, occasional overcooked or bland items, and delays in meal service. Housekeeping and laundry show a similar split — when adequately staffed the cleaning and laundry service are described as thorough and timely, but when staffing is limited reviewers reported missed cleanings, mixed-up laundry, and declining consistency. A few reviewers also raised concerns about sanitation and food-safety practices, which should be clarified during a tour or follow-up with management.

    Activities and amenities The community offers a broad range of social and recreational options: cards, bingo, crafts, lectures, gardening, outings, and regular social gatherings. The facility’s salon/barber, large TV rooms, and outdoor access were frequently cited as positives. Activity offerings appear enthusiastic and meaningful for many residents, though a subset of reviewers found the programs limited relative to their expectations. The small, family-like atmosphere suits those who prefer a less institutional environment and closer staff–resident relationships.

    Facilities and location Physical plant feedback is largely positive: clean, recently remodeled interiors, private refurbished apartments, accessible layouts for mobility devices, and pleasant outdoor spaces with nature views. The community is near medical resources, which some families valued. A few comments noted that ongoing renovations can create temporary disruption.

    Notable patterns and considerations for families There is clear variability in the resident experience depending on staffing, shift coverage, and management engagement. Strong interpersonal care and a well-appointed physical environment coexist with operational gaps in medication administration, call-response times, meal consistency, and housekeeping. Prospective residents and families should verify current staffing levels, medication-administration protocols, food-safety practices, and billing policies during a tour; ask about recent corrective actions, turnover rates, and specific examples of how the facility handles missed medications or delayed response times. For residents with greater clinical needs, confirm the facility’s ability to reliably meet those needs before committing.

    Bottom line Prestige Senior Living High Desert offers many amenities, a renovated environment, and staff who can be genuinely caring and attentive, but the facility has documented patterns of operational inconsistency that can affect safety and quality of life. These issues appear to fluctuate with staffing and management changes; therefore, careful, up-to-date verification of clinical controls and service reliability is recommended for families considering placement.

    Reviews written on Mirador

    We have no reviews to show about Prestige Senior Living High Desert.

    Help other families by writing a review about your experience with this community.

    Location

    Prestige Senior Living High Desert is located at 2660 NE Mary Rose Pl, Bend, OR, 97701.

    About Prestige Senior Living High Desert

    Prestige Senior Living High Desert sits in Bend, Oregon, right under Pilot Butte in the Mountain View neighborhood, and the place really looks like a home from the outside with a traditional style, while inside you'll find vintage decorations that feel nostalgic and calming, and with 68 beds, the community offers different living options like independent living for older adults who don't want extra chores, assisted living for those who need some help with daily things like bathing and taking medicine, and award-winning memory care for people with Alzheimer's or dementia who may need a secure area to live safely and with dignity. Folks can bring their pets, and there's a swimming pool, hot tub, lots of indoor and outdoor common spaces, and a resident council that helps keep the community active and involved, plus regular social events, happy hours, spiritual gatherings, and activities on or off site to foster connections and engagement. Meals come from chef and meal planners, served restaurant-style with vegetarian options, and there's a private dining room for families to gather and eat with loved ones, and people can also use beauty services without leaving the building. Residents get weekly housekeeping, laundry help, linen service, and home health or rehabilitative services can be coordinated as needed, so the staff will manage medicine and give support with hygiene in a secure, non-smoking environment, while volunteers, support groups, and scheduled transportation make daily life easier. The community uses the Celebrations program to focus on healthy and fulfilled living, offering activities that work the mind and body, and the place supports both short-term stays for folks needing respite and long-term options, all while keeping a home-like, family-run feel because the owners run things much like an extended family would, striving for a safe and comfortable place for seniors and their loved ones, always making sure everyone feels included and supported.

    About Prestige Care

    Prestige Senior Living High Desert is managed by Prestige Care.

    Founded in 1985 but tracing its roots to 1946, Prestige Care began with Sarah Delamarter, a nursing pioneer who started caring for seniors in her Troutdale, Oregon home. What began as a compassionate effort to support her family evolved into a multi-generational legacy when her grandsons Harold and Dr. Rick Delamarter, along with business partner Greg Vislocky, expanded the business throughout the western United States. Today, this family-owned company remains headquartered in Vancouver, Washington, maintaining Sarah's original spirit of personalized, compassionate care. Prestige Care operates over 75 communities across seven western states including Oregon, Washington, California, Arizona, Nevada, Idaho, and Montana.

    People often ask...

    Prestige Senior Living High Desert offers competitive pricing, with rates starting at a cost of $5,078 per month.

    Prestige Senior Living High Desert offers assisted living.

    There are 41 photos of Prestige Senior Living High Desert on Mirador.

    The full address for this community is 2660 NE Mary Rose Pl, Bend, OR 97701.

    No, Prestige Senior Living High Desert does not offer respite care. Respite care in assisted living communities provides temporary, short-term relief for primary caregivers by offering professional care for their loved ones. It allows individuals to stay in an assisted living community for a limited time, giving caregivers a break while ensuring residents receive necessary support and assistance with daily activities.

    Safety & Compliance

    In Oregon, the Department of Human Services' Aging & People with Disabilities program licenses assisted living and residential care facilities, conducting inspections, complaint investigations, and renewals.

    License number70A289
    StatusActive
    Facility typeAssisted Living Facility
    Capacity75 residents
    LicenseeCHP Bend-High Desert OR Tenant Corp
    EffectiveJuly 22nd, 2003
    View the official license record

    Inspection Reports

    65

    Reports

    0

    Type A Citations

    0

    Type B Citations

    0

    Complaints

    16

    Years

    24 Sept 2026Licensure
    Identified multiple deficiencies, including missing required postings, non-aligned service plans, infection control lapses, medication order inconsistencies, self-administration oversight gaps, and unassessed restraints.
    • Deficiency—Facility Administration: Required Postings
    • Deficiency—Service Plan: General
    • Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
    • Deficiency—Systems: Treatment Orders
    • Deficiency—Systems: Self-Administration of Meds
    • Deficiency—Restraints and Supportive Devices
    • Deficiency—Facility Administration: Required Postings
    09 Dec 2025Kitchen
    Found deficiencies in kitchen sanitation and maintenance, including extensive spills and needed repairs.
    • Deficiency—Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule
    12 Feb 2025Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated allegations of neglect and abuse related to falls risk and care planning; found failures to prevent injuries, resulting in a $500 fine.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
    24 Dec 2024Inspection
    Investigated and found that the care plan was not followed, leaving the resident unattended in the restroom and at risk of harm.
    • Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
    25 Jan 2024Licensure
    Determined substantial compliance with meals and food sanitation requirements.
    • Deficiency—Comment
    01 Apr 2023Inspection
    Found failure to submit timely weekly vaccination reporting to the proper authority, resulting in a civil penalty. The issue covered reporting from March 2022 through March 2023.
    • Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
    01 Mar 2023Inspection
    Concluded that the allegation of failing to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation occurred and assessed a $6,750 fine.
    • Licensing—Failed to submit timely or adequate staffing documentation
    26 Sept 2022Validation
    Identified widespread deficiencies across multiple areas, including food sanitation, resident evaluations and service planning, change of condition monitoring, infection control, staff training, fire safety, and building maintenance.
    • Deficiency—Comment
    • Deficiency—Resident Services Meals, Food Sanitation Rule
    • Deficiency—Resident Move-In and Eval: Res Evaluation
    • Deficiency—Service Plan: General
    • Deficiency—Change of Condition and Monitoring
    • Deficiency—Infection Prevention & Control
    • Deficiency—Staffing Requirements and Training – Pre-Serv
    • Deficiency—Training Within 30 Days: Direct Care Staff
    • Deficiency—Annual and Biennial Inservice For All Staff
    • Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Safety
    • Deficiency—Fire and Life Safety: Training For Residents
    • Deficiency—General Building Exterior
    • Deficiency—General Building: Doors-Walls, Cleanable
    • Deficiency—Heating and Ventilation
    25 Aug 2021Inspection
    Identified an infection control deficiency that could threaten residents' health.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide infection control
    10 Aug 2020Inspection
    Investigated and found violations related to residents' rights, including failing to treat residents with dignity and to provide informed choice.
    • Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
    23 Jul 2020Inspection
    Investigated and found violations for failing to protect a resident from verbal/emotional abuse by staff, which caused distress during discussions about COVID precautions.
    • Licensing—Failed to protect resident from verbal abuse
    20 Jan 2020Abuse: Neglect
    Found failure to follow the care plan for bathing, resulting in the resident not receiving planned showers and experiencing pain from a non-healing skin condition; deemed neglect and abuse.
    • Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
    07 Dec 2019Abuse: Neglect
    Found violations involving neglect and abuse, including incorrect medication administration and a long delay in repositioning that caused discomfort to a resident.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide service
    23 May 2019Inspection
    Investigated the allegation and concluded that medication was not administered as ordered.
    • Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
    13 Sept 2018Inspection
    Found a failure to follow doctor’s orders in providing medical treatment and timely submission of a urine sample.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide medical treatment as ordered
    16 Jul 2018Inspection
    Found the resident record was not kept current or accurate.
    • Licensing—Failed to keep resident record current or accurate
    22 Jun 2018Abuse: Neglect
    Concluded that neglect occurred and assessed a $500 fine.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide service
    22 Jun 2018Inspection
    Found that suspected abuse was not reported as required. A $1,000 fine was assessed.
    • Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
    23 Apr 2018Inspection
    Found that suspected abuse was not reported and assessed a $750 fine.
    • Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
    23 Apr 2018Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated and found the provider failed to provide a safe medication administration system and appropriate care to a reported victim.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
    14 Oct 2017Abuse: Financial abuse
    Investigated and substantiated a financial exploitation allegation, finding a failure to protect a resident from financial exploitation and a failure to provide a safe environment for the Reported Victim.
    • Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
    02 Oct 2017Inspection
    Investigated the allegation of failing to assure food safety and found a violation.
    • Licensing—Failed to assure food safety
    02 Oct 2017Inspection
    Investigated the allegation and identified a deficiency for not following the care plan.
    • Licensing—Failed to follow care plan
    02 Oct 2017Inspection
    Identified a deficiency for not providing proper food/nutrition.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide proper food/nutrition
    02 Oct 2017Inspection
    Investigated the allegation and found a deficiency in keeping resident records current or accurate.
    • Licensing—Failed to keep resident record current or accurate
    02 Oct 2017Inspection
    Investigated the allegation of failing to administer medication as ordered; found substantiated.
    • Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
    04 Aug 2017Inspection
    Found insufficient staffing to meet residents' unscheduled needs.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate staffing
    28 Jul 2017Inspection
    Investigated a complaint alleging failure to administer medication as ordered. The finding identified this as a rule violation.
    • Licensing—Failed to administer medication as ordered
    28 Jul 2017Inspection
    Found a deficiency for failing to provide a safe environment and not maintaining substantial compliance.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
    14 Jul 2017Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated the allegation and found a failure to provide a safe medication administration system.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Investigated the allegation and found that temporary agency staff were not properly trained in accordance with the applicable training requirements.
    • Licensing—Failed to hire according to administrative rules
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Investigated a complaint and found that weekend activities were not provided as required by rule.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate activities
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Found that residents did not receive palatable meals.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide proper food/nutrition
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Determined that there were not enough caregivers to meet the scheduled and unscheduled needs of residents.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate staffing
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Found failure to provide shower assistance as required.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Investigated a complaint and found a deficiency in food safety practices, as staff did not use hair nets or gloves during meal service.
    • Licensing—Failed to assure food safety
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Found background checks for temporary staff were not completed as required. The finding was substantiated.
    • Licensing—Failed to hire according to administrative rules
    11 Jul 2017Inspection
    Investigated the allegation of failure to report potential or suspected abuse and concluded that reporting requirements were violated.
    • Licensing—Failed to report potential or suspected abuse
    27 Jun 2017Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated an allegation about a safe medication administration system and an unsafe environment for a reported victim, and found violations.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
    28 Nov 2016Inspection
    Found a violation related to move-out, transfer or discharge requirements.
    • Licensing—Failed to comply with move-out, transfer or discharge requirements
    09 Nov 2016Inspection
    Found a violation for failing to provide a safe environment; a $300 fine was assessed.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide safe environment
    22 Jun 2016Inspection
    Identified deficiencies in cleanliness due to inadequate housekeeping services.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services
    22 Jun 2016Inspection
    Identified a deficiency related to building requirements and housekeeping, including unpleasant odors.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide appropriate housekeeping services
    17 Sept 2015Inspection
    Investigated the allegation and found a deficient medication administration system.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
    25 Mar 2015Inspection
    Found failure to provide a safe medication administration system. Involved potential for harm related to medication management.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
    02 Feb 2015Abuse: Financial abuse
    Investigated an allegation of financial exploitation and found the resident was not protected from theft.
    • Abuse—Failed to protect resident from financial exploitation
    27 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
    Found that a safe environment was not provided.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
    15 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated the neglect allegation and identified failures to provide a safe environment.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
    15 Aug 2014Inspection
    Investigated and substantiated an allegation that hygiene care was not provided, indicating deficient care with minor harm or potential for moderate harm.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
    15 Aug 2014Inspection
    Concluded that a safety deficiency existed due to an unsafe environment that could harm a resident.
    • Licensing—Failed to assure resident was safe
    09 Aug 2014Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated the toileting assistance allegation and identified inadequate care.
    • Abuse—Failed to assist with toileting
    08 Jul 2014Inspection
    Investigated a licensing allegation that care was not properly planned and found that appropriate care was not provided.
    • Licensing—Failed to properly plan care
    01 Apr 2014Abuse: Neglect
    Concluded that the allegation about inadequate care planning for falls was substantiated and that a safe environment was not provided for a resident.
    • Abuse—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
    25 Dec 2013Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated an allegation of neglect related to hygiene and found deficiencies in care.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide or assist with hygiene
    07 Nov 2013Abuse: Neglect
    Concluded a failure to intervene when resident's condition changed. A $300 fine was assessed.
    • Abuse—Failed to intervene when resident's condition changed
    21 Mar 2013Abuse: Financial abuse
    Investigated and found a failure to protect a resident from misappropriation of monies.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
    02 Sept 2012Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated an allegation of unsafe medication administration and found failures in providing a safe system, resulting in a negative outcome.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system
    18 Aug 2012Abuse: Neglect
    Found a safety violation due to failure to provide a safe environment.
    • Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
    15 Aug 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
    Investigated and found misappropriation of funds and a failure to provide a safe environment.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
    09 Aug 2012Abuse: Financial abuse
    Concluded financial abuse; found misappropriation of monies due to a failure to protect funds.
    • Abuse—Failed to provide safe environment
    16 Mar 2012Inspection
    Investigated an allegation of inadequate care planning related to falls and found deficiencies in providing care for a resident.
    • Licensing—Failed to adequately care plan related to falls
    16 Mar 2012Inspection
    Investigated the allegation of failing to provide peri care; found care was not provided to RV.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide peri care
    17 Dec 2011Abuse: Neglect
    Investigated the allegation of not following the care assessment and found a failure to follow the assessment for care.
    • Abuse—Failed to follow care plan
    14 Nov 2011Inspection
    Investigated and found a licensing violation for failing to assure resident rights and provide a safe environment.
    • Licensing—Failed to assure resident rights
    29 Jan 2010Inspection
    Determined that the allegation of failing to provide a safe medication administration system was supported.
    • Licensing—Failed to provide a safe medication administration system

    Disclaimer

    Mirador Living is not affiliated with the owner or operator(s) of Prestige Senior Living High Desert. The information above has not been verified or approved by the owner or operator. For exact information, please contact Prestige Senior Living High Desert directly. There is no cost for this service. We are compensated by the community you select.

    Are you an owner or operator of Prestige Senior Living High Desert?

    Claim this listing to receive messages from prospective customers and manage your community page.

    Nearby Communities

    Assisted Living in Nearby Cities

    1. 62 facilities$5,378/mo
    2. 26 facilities$6,470/mo
    3. 28 facilities$6,470/mo
    4. 8 facilities$5,358/mo
    5. 11 facilities$4,988/mo
    6. 15 facilities$5,232/mo
    7. 21 facilities$5,474/mo
    8. 13 facilities$5,747/mo
    9. 3 facilities$6,629/mo
    10. 1 facilities
    11. 5 facilities$5,758/mo
    12. 5 facilities$5,061/mo
    © 2026 Mirador Living